Ramsay Hunt Experience
Footballguy
Nobody loves three in the back more than me, but this isn't the staff I want tinkering with systems in the middle of a major tournament.
Or, you know, play soccer better..@J_Klinsmann's three areas of improvement for the#USMNT: defend set pieces, create more chances, and score.#USAvCRC
I get that and by no means expect Klinny to do it, mainly because it makes too much sense.Nobody loves three in the back more than me, but this isn't the staff I want tinkering with systems in the middle of a major tournament.
Really? I have a lot of confidence in Gator.Nobody loves three in the back more than me, but this isn't the staff I want tinkering with systems in the middle of a major tournament.
Or, you know, play soccer better..@J_Klinsmann's three areas of improvement for the#USMNT: defend set pieces, create more chances, and score.#USAvCRC
This came out dirtier than I expected it to.Nobody loves three in the back more than me,
That works on many levels....This came out dirtier than I expected it to.
I read a couple days ago that the lineup he used against Colombia was a first - had never started that 11 before. Understanding that a totally difference concept like a 3 - X - X lineup could never be implemented on the fly, its still kind of odd how unprepared the team is. I've got no eye for tactics, but even for me the shape was noticeably haphazard, especially when they tried to press. I saw individuals charging in and out with no relationship to their teammates.Nobody loves three in the back more than me, but this isn't the staff I want tinkering with systems in the middle of a major tournament.
I think they prepared the 4-3-3 for the last two games of the group. I think they intended to do something different for Columbia and the decent friendly results probably convinced JK to stay with the 4-3-3 and not use Beckerman as he had hinted. But Jones' comments suggest that he did so while still changing the way they had prepared it so that Jones could cover Johnson.I read a couple days ago that the lineup he used against Colombia was a first - had never started that 11 before. Understanding that a totally difference concept like a 3 - X - X lineup could never be implemented on the fly, its still kind of odd how unprepared the team is. I've got no eye for tactics, but even for me the shape was noticeably haphazard, especially when they tried to press. I saw individuals charging in and out with no relationship to their teammates.
Univision averaged 3.9 million viewers across its networks.The USA-Colombia game averaged 1,536,000 viewers, making it the second most-watched men's national team game on Fox Sports 1. Only the USA-Mexico game for the Concacaf Cup in October 2015 drew more viewers on FS1 (1,561,000).
By comparison, the USA-Honduras game on FS1 to open the 2015 Gold Cup averaged 986,000 viewers.
National viewing figures for USA-Colombia on Univision, UniMas and UDN were not yet available. Univision did report that the USA-Colombia was the most-watched network program during its time frame in eight key markets, including New York and Los Angeles.
2016 U.S. Men's English-Language Viewers:
AVERAGE GAME (NETWORK)
1,536,000 USA-Colombia (FS1, June 2016)
954,000 USA-Guatemala (ESPN2, March 2016)
531,000 USA-Iceland (ESPN2, January 2016)
454,000 USA-Bolivia (FS1, May 2016)
429,000 USA-Ecuador (ESPN2, May 2016)
304,000 Puerto Rico-USA (FS1, May 2016)
294,000 USA-Canada (FS1, February 2016)
162,000 Guatemala-USA (BeIN Sports, March 2016)
How are they historically against Costa Rica?I am strangely not worried about tonight.
I don't know if that is due to confidence or numbness though.
The team recently had its back up against the wall against Guat on qualifying and they responded well so I am hoping/expecting the same tonight.
13-5-14 (w-d-l)Ned said:How are they historically against Costa Rica?
My biggest problem with the team's play was because they were down early and yet there was nothing on the offensive end. There was so little urgency or imagination. It was a fairly competent defensive performance, but its not like Colombia was pressing. Just a completely uninspired effort.I wasn't willing to put my Pollyanna hat on in public, but this is almost exactly what I thought after the game as well.
If they play like that minus the especially egregious unforced errors (which they were punished harshly for) they'll be fine. Especially if there's a bit more spark from the two forward mids.
Colombia really did not play well at all IMO. Both goals came off of bad mistakes the US made and they rarely bothered the US after that outside of the last break away where they hit the cross bar on the counter.My biggest problem with the team's play was because they were down early and yet there was nothing on the offensive end. There was so little urgency or imagination. It was a fairly competent defensive performance, but its not like Colombia was pressing. Just a completely uninspired effort.
I'm calling for Nagbe and Pulisic, but I suspect we'll only see Nagbe..
I would not be surprised to see 1-2 changes in the line up tonight.
wow, Gulati typically says nothing. This is an odd time to say something......Gulati with some pretty pointed comments re: Klinsmann today. Said that performances in competitive tournaments have not been good enough and that while Klinsmann has implemented some good reforms as technical director, "we need to win games." Also said that JK's performance would be evaluated after the Copa.
Sounds like he's a goner if performance doesn't improve quickly.Gulati with some pretty pointed comments re: Klinsmann today. Said that performances in competitive tournaments have not been good enough and that while Klinsmann has implemented some good reforms as technical director, "we need to win games." Also said that JK's performance would be evaluated after the Copa.
So lets play this out to one possible conclusion (and a likely one imo).Yea those comments are pretty to the point have to think Jurgen is on his last legs here.
Somebody somewhere is his boss or paying the bills. And they're tired of it.So lets play this out to one possible conclusion (and a likely one imo).
Lets assume the US goes 1-1-1, makes the quarters and then loses a close game where the score does not indicate how badly they have been outplayed. Does JK keep his job with path?
I still am scratching my head why the normal turtle like Gulati has come out to the press now....Why play any cards before you have to? Does he have sponsorship backing to financially pull it off or does he already have an exact target in mind that would fit financially as the next coach?
Unless there is a ton of money hidden some where (or significant sponsor support), I don't think you are going to see an enormous name come, especially in the middle of a cycle.I'm ready for new blood...really hoping Gulati has a ringer in the waiting...Pep anyone??
TabI'm ready for new blood...really hoping Gulati has a ringer in the waiting...Pep anyone??
meh, Bradley was limited...great tactician but JK certainly brought something to the table that Bradley didn't have...I wish we could morph the two of them.Gulati's the one who chased out the perfectly fine Bradley and hired a German. To pop up now with that is strike two. Leaning towards show pony at this point.
No changes in the line up#USMNT lineup: Guzan; Yedlin, Cameron, Brooks, Johnson; Jones, Bradley, Bedoya; Zardes, Dempsey, Wood.Line up out yet?
I like that JK thinks this is his best lineup and he's rolling with it, but man does he open himself up to some hollerin' if they fall flat again.No changes in the line up#USMNT lineup: Guzan; Yedlin, Cameron, Brooks, Johnson; Jones, Bradley, Bedoya; Zardes, Dempsey, Wood.