rockaction
Footballguy
Sam. He will be in my lineup for the league championship game next week.
Sam who?
Sam. He will be in my lineup for the league championship game next week.
*sameSam. He will be in my lineup for the league championship game next week.
Sam who?
*same
Sam the butcher?
Godspeed.Sam. He will be in my lineup for the league championship game next week.I don’t start him and he has his biggest game in 6 outings…although not a difference making effort. All year long with this guy though.
The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
His targets, receptions, yards, and fantasy points are all on pace to set new career highs by 40-50%. Anyone expecting a bigger jump than that was delusional IMO (or, more likely, overhyping the KC playoff game).
Perhaps you've heard the phrase "Lies, damned lies, and statistics". It's about manipulating statistics to bolster a weak argument. And your argument is definitely weak sauce. Really? Is part of your excuse that other players stepped up to produce where Davis couldn't?Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
His targets, receptions, yards, and fantasy points are all on pace to set new career highs by 40-50%. Anyone expecting a bigger jump than that was delusional IMO (or, more likely, overhyping the KC playoff game).
Not sure who peed in your cheerios but that doesn't excuse your nonsense.Perhaps you've heard the phrase "Lies, damned lies, and statistics". It's about manipulating statistics to bolster a weak argument. And your argument is definitely weak sauce. Really? Is part of your excuse that other players stepped up to produce where Davis couldn't?Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
His targets, receptions, yards, and fantasy points are all on pace to set new career highs by 40-50%. Anyone expecting a bigger jump than that was delusional IMO (or, more likely, overhyping the KC playoff game).
Davis is a 3rd year WR, who spent his first two seasons behind established veterans like Emmanuel Sanders and Cole Beasley, a PPR machine. Presenting the "jump" from 35 to ~50 receptions as a 50% improvement is lame given the opportunity and new role that Davis had in that offense.
The only irony is that the people who liked your post are among those who overhyped the play-off game and talked of Davis being worth multiple 1st round draft picks.
Considering he’s now tried to project a blatant lie multiple times despite being corrected multiple times, I’m not sure “being honest about the situation” is his MO here.if you actually want to be honest about the situation
You're bang on here. At least some people were able to say "I was wrong, he shouldn't have been taken that high". I took him in the 6th despite people screaming that he should be going round 4 at the latest, and I'll be the first to admit I took him too early. No matter how stubborn someone is, there's no way to spin it that he wasn't a bust this year. Let's call a spade a spade. People were shouting to take him WR15-20 and he's averaging the 36th most fantasy ppg for WR's in PPR, and 26th in standard.Perhaps you've heard the phrase "Lies, damned lies, and statistics". It's about manipulating statistics to bolster a weak argument. And your argument is definitely weak sauce. Really? Is part of your excuse that other players stepped up to produce where Davis couldn't?Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
His targets, receptions, yards, and fantasy points are all on pace to set new career highs by 40-50%. Anyone expecting a bigger jump than that was delusional IMO (or, more likely, overhyping the KC playoff game).
Davis is a 3rd year WR, who spent his first two seasons behind established veterans like Emmanuel Sanders and Cole Beasley, a PPR machine. Presenting the "jump" from 35 to ~50 receptions as a 50% improvement is lame given the opportunity and new role that Davis had in that offense.
The only irony is that the people who liked your post are among those who overhyped the play-off game and talked of Davis being worth multiple 1st round draft picks.
Nonsense? From someone who can't admit Davis' move to a full-time starter didn't come with more expectations?Not sure who peed in your cheerios but that doesn't excuse your nonsense.Perhaps you've heard the phrase "Lies, damned lies, and statistics". It's about manipulating statistics to bolster a weak argument. And your argument is definitely weak sauce. Really? Is part of your excuse that other players stepped up to produce where Davis couldn't?Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
His targets, receptions, yards, and fantasy points are all on pace to set new career highs by 40-50%. Anyone expecting a bigger jump than that was delusional IMO (or, more likely, overhyping the KC playoff game).
Davis is a 3rd year WR, who spent his first two seasons behind established veterans like Emmanuel Sanders and Cole Beasley, a PPR machine. Presenting the "jump" from 35 to ~50 receptions as a 50% improvement is lame given the opportunity and new role that Davis had in that offense.
The only irony is that the people who liked your post are among those who overhyped the play-off game and talked of Davis being worth multiple 1st round draft picks.
Speaking of weak sauce, Sanders wasn't even on the team for Davis' 1st year, and was on his 4th team in 4 seasons when he did join them and then promptly retired in the offseason. Beasley played an entirely different role in that offense, which apparently is where you're getting twisted. Why on earth would anyone expect Davis to pick up a ton of the targets that went to the slot?Yes, guys who play more of that role like McKenzie, Shakir, and even Cook helped fill that void.
Sorry if you erroneously thought Davis was a lot better than he was or that the Bills were going to change their offense to feature him for some reason but it isn't logical and obviously didn't happen. He is who he is and the numbers he had are pretty good increase if you actually want to be honest about the situation.
Another way to look at it is would you pay 3 firsts for a WR3. 2 firsts? Not saying this is his ceiling because there is upside, but there are multiple waiver wire picks each year that perform at WR3 or better each year.You're bang on here. At least some people were able to say "I was wrong, he shouldn't have been taken that high". I took him in the 6th despite people screaming that he should be going round 4 at the latest, and I'll be the first to admit I took him too early. No matter how stubborn someone is, there's no way to spin it that he wasn't a bust this year. Let's call a spade a spade. People were shouting to take him WR15-20 and he's averaging the 36th most fantasy ppg for WR's in PPR, and 26th in standard.Perhaps you've heard the phrase "Lies, damned lies, and statistics". It's about manipulating statistics to bolster a weak argument. And your argument is definitely weak sauce. Really? Is part of your excuse that other players stepped up to produce where Davis couldn't?Ironic given that your entire post is gross rationalization. The #2 role last year was a slot guy, other players arrived to absorb some of those vacated targets, and the fact that he's in one of the league's most prolific offenses was well known and factored into his expectations.The "his best year" take is gross rationalization given that he stepped into the #2 role, and there were a ton of vacated targets in one of the leagues most prolific offenses.It's obvious you disagree, but it's also obvious you desperately want to avoid admitting that you were too high on him for some reason. He's having his best year by a large margin, people who weren't too high on him have no reason to be disappointed with it. Also no reason to make stuff up like Allen is having a down year for passing when it's simply false.I could not disagree with this more. Most Davis boosters here went out of their way to *exclude* that 1 playoff game.Again, this is all about people overhyping the playoff game. If that never happened this thread would be ~5 pages long.
@barackdhouse & I went to great lengths to cover his entire young career up to that point.
This is a false narrative, and one that borders on insult in light of the absolute fact that those of us who were high on Davis explicitly did not do this.
At best, it shows you didn’t bother to read any of the posts from us.
His targets, receptions, yards, and fantasy points are all on pace to set new career highs by 40-50%. Anyone expecting a bigger jump than that was delusional IMO (or, more likely, overhyping the KC playoff game).
Davis is a 3rd year WR, who spent his first two seasons behind established veterans like Emmanuel Sanders and Cole Beasley, a PPR machine. Presenting the "jump" from 35 to ~50 receptions as a 50% improvement is lame given the opportunity and new role that Davis had in that offense.
The only irony is that the people who liked your post are among those who overhyped the play-off game and talked of Davis being worth multiple 1st round draft picks.
Gabe Davis caught 6-of-9 passes for 113 yards and a touchdown in the Bills' Wild Card Round win over the Dolphins.
Before this game, Davis hadn't topped 100 receiving yards since Week 5. With the stakes higher than ever, Davis exploded for a handful of long catches and a toe-tapping touchdown in the second half. He also tied Stefon Diggs for a team-high in targets. Though not the most consistent player, Davis can change the fortunes of his team at any moment. He will be a high-ceiling fantasy option for the Bills' Divisional Round game next week.
Jan 15, 2023, 5:22 PM ET
Gabe Davis caught 6-of-9 passes for 113 yards and a touchdown in the Bills' Wild Card Round win over the Dolphins.
Before this game, Davis hadn't topped 100 receiving yards since Week 5. With the stakes higher than ever, Davis exploded for a handful of long catches and a toe-tapping touchdown in the second half. He also tied Stefon Diggs for a team-high in targets. Though not the most consistent player, Davis can change the fortunes of his team at any moment. He will be a high-ceiling fantasy option for the Bills' Divisional Round game next week.
Jan 15, 2023, 5:22 PM ET
Correct. He can’t possibly get better. He’s over the hill at 23.WR 36 in my league. Totally back-end WR3.
Congrats if you continued to get in fights, take receipts, hang your hat upon, or otherwise cast aspersions on others' opinions about this mediocre mediocrity (from either side).
Correct. He can’t possibly get better. He’s over the hill at 23.
Wasn’t exactly a prediction. I was hoping for that. I believe I said that was his upside.Correct. He can’t possibly get better. He’s over the hill at 23.
WR56, WR60, WR36
He's had his three years. You predicted 80/1000/8 this year.
You were way off. Don't dredge this up again because it won't end well.
Calling this his 3rd year when it’s his first as a starter is disingenuous though.
I’m not rehashing anything, friend.Calling this his 3rd year when it’s his first as a starter is disingenuous though.
No, it's not. And I'll tell you why. Because if he was good enough, he would have been starting his first year. Like Drake London did this year. Like Chris Olave did this year. Like Garrett Wilson did. Like Jahan Dotson did. Like George Pickens. Like Christian Watson did the second half of the year.
All 2022 guys, including three late firsts. Each one of them scored approximately what Davis did this year, only they did it in their first year.
This is not good for my sanity. You want to re-hash this after the year he had and after you watched the rest of the league.
Update: Keeptradecut has his value as unfair if you offer a 2023 second round pick. It's unfair to the pick holder.
Good day about Davis.
His starting role seems solidified. 80/1000/8 seems pretty well within reach, and IMO one would be hard pressed to land a 2022 rookie that could deliver the same upside.
“Seems pretty well within reach” is not a prediction.His starting role seems solidified. 80/1000/8 seems pretty well within reach, and IMO one would be hard pressed to land a 2022 rookie that could deliver the same upside.
There you go. Page Nine. And you kept repeating this line throughout the thread.
By all means, pile on if it makes anyone feel better. He had a nice game today and I think he has a good future.
Anyone kicking in an open door can pound sand.
Really looking forward to folks telling us how much Davis sucks after a 6/113/1 game. Gonna be quality FF analysis.
“Seems well within reach” is not a prediction.
Obviously.
Thanks for quoting that to prove me right.
You can lie about my quote and call it a prediction so I can do whatever I like.
There’s an OBVIOUS difference between saying what a players UPSIDE is and a “prediction”
Classy.Eat a ****.
Nice edit. I reported your 1st one. Glad I quoted it.Go jump a rope.
Nice edit. I reported your 1st one. Glad I quoted it.
Super classy.
At the time I thought it was.Nice edit. I reported your 1st one. Glad I quoted it.
Super classy.
Nice FF analysis in this thread, bra.
Good work.
Sorry I’m not always right about everything.
But even I look at the numbers and think, “ok, that just not realistic” - except that’s what he’s been doing. The numbers are what they are.
So I try to keep my expectations a bit more modest at 80-ish, ~1000-ish, ~10-Ish.
And as you say - that’s rock solid for his ADP. And an excellent point about his potential Vs the players going around him.
I have both Davis & ARSB in my rebuild team, and in redraft I’d pick Davis 100 out of 100 times. And it’d be an easy call.
I know, and I feel the same way about him as your post a few posts up.
80/1000/10, but then you watch him and josh play and it's like, 17 games, a couple multi-touchdown games, a couple no-touchdown games, yeah 10-15 TD's seems 100% reasonable
I didn’t. I said I looked forward to people explaining why he was terrible after a good game. It wasn’t directed at you.So what I don't get is why you'd announce that somehow bad "fantasy analysis" would follow from people who don't agree with your position about Davis, followed by an eye-roll emoji.
I can’t control what others post; only myself.So 80/1000/10 kept getting repeated as expectation by at least three members of this board, including you.
Again, have a good night. I am done with this.
Do people think he sucks? Man, I’m a huge fan. Today was awesome — it’s what happens when the Bills freaking target the dude more than 5x per game.Gabe Davis caught 6-of-9 passes for 113 yards and a touchdown in the Bills' Wild Card Round win over the Dolphins.
Before this game, Davis hadn't topped 100 receiving yards since Week 5. With the stakes higher than ever, Davis exploded for a handful of long catches and a toe-tapping touchdown in the second half. He also tied Stefon Diggs for a team-high in targets. Though not the most consistent player, Davis can change the fortunes of his team at any moment. He will be a high-ceiling fantasy option for the Bills' Divisional Round game next week.
Jan 15, 2023, 5:22 PM ET
Really looking forward to folks telling us how much Davis sucks after a 6/113/1 game. Gonna be quality FF analysis.
ETA: this post was directed at no one in particular; but to the FF community at large who seems intent on trashing a player after they had a good game.
Very much so yes.Do people think he sucks? Man, I’m a huge fan. Today was awesome — it’s what happens when the Bills freaking target the dude more than 5x per game.
Respectfully HSG, the biggest debate I recall was about how high he could finish this year without greater target volume. Most people like his talent — there was concern about finishing in the WR2 range without sufficient volume. There may be a few naysayers, but IMO (based on recollection) that was a minority view.Very much so yes.Do people think he sucks? Man, I’m a huge fan. Today was awesome — it’s what happens when the Bills freaking target the dude more than 5x per game.
He was such a disappointment this year that his value has imploded & apparently has no future.
I agree completely. When targeted he performs. No disrespect taken.Respectfully HSG, the biggest debate I recall was about how high he could finish this year without greater target volume. Most people like his talent — there was concern about finishing in the WR2 range without sufficient volume. There may be a few naysayers, but IMO (based on recollection) that was a minority view.Very much so yes.Do people think he sucks? Man, I’m a huge fan. Today was awesome — it’s what happens when the Bills freaking target the dude more than 5x per game.
He was such a disappointment this year that his value has imploded & apparently has no future.
Would love to see Buffalo feed him the ball more…..especially on mid-range passes. Too often they just send him deep which contributes to his boom/bust performance.
Anyway. Big fan.
He actually had 93 targets this year. His TD % dropped, which is probably just regression to the mean or randomness. In an alternate universe, he probably still would have had 750-950 yards this year, but who knows, he could have had anywhere from say 4 to 12 TDs this year. Just a couple more random deep passes drop in right and he’s a beast.I agree completely. When targeted he performs. No disrespect taken.Respectfully HSG, the biggest debate I recall was about how high he could finish this year without greater target volume. Most people like his talent — there was concern about finishing in the WR2 range without sufficient volume. There may be a few naysayers, but IMO (based on recollection) that was a minority view.Very much so yes.Do people think he sucks? Man, I’m a huge fan. Today was awesome — it’s what happens when the Bills freaking target the dude more than 5x per game.
He was such a disappointment this year that his value has imploded & apparently has no future.
Would love to see Buffalo feed him the ball more…..especially on mid-range passes. Too often they just send him deep which contributes to his boom/bust performance.
Anyway. Big fan.
I had hoped for 100 targets, largely due to the ones vacated in BUF and his promotion to a full time role. I was wrong. He didn’t get as many targets or receptions. Obviously, I was wrong there. There’s no crystal ball.
I still think he has a bright future, and maybe I’m a fool for that.
and hey, lesson learned - I’ll never, ever say what I believe any player’s potential future upside is on this forum again. This topic is a perfect example of why.
It does look worse in PPR. Basically the difference between a back end WR2 & a back end WR3.He actually had 93 targets this year. His TD % dropped, which is probably just regression to the mean or randomness. In an alternate universe, he probably still would have had 750-950 yards this year, but who knows, he could have had anywhere from say 4 to 12 TDs this year. Just a couple more random deep passes drop in right and he’s a beast.I agree completely. When targeted he performs. No disrespect taken.Respectfully HSG, the biggest debate I recall was about how high he could finish this year without greater target volume. Most people like his talent — there was concern about finishing in the WR2 range without sufficient volume. There may be a few naysayers, but IMO (based on recollection) that was a minority view.Very much so yes.Do people think he sucks? Man, I’m a huge fan. Today was awesome — it’s what happens when the Bills freaking target the dude more than 5x per game.
He was such a disappointment this year that his value has imploded & apparently has no future.
Would love to see Buffalo feed him the ball more…..especially on mid-range passes. Too often they just send him deep which contributes to his boom/bust performance.
Anyway. Big fan.
I had hoped for 100 targets, largely due to the ones vacated in BUF and his promotion to a full time role. I was wrong. He didn’t get as many targets or receptions. Obviously, I was wrong there. There’s no crystal ball.
I still think he has a bright future, and maybe I’m a fool for that.
and hey, lesson learned - I’ll never, ever say what I believe any player’s potential future upside is on this forum again. This topic is a perfect example of why.
FWIW, in my non-PPR league he was #28 in PPG this year, and #24 in total points at WR. I hadn’t checked until today. I’m sure it looks much worse in PPR, but thankfully I don’t play in a league that rewards 3-yard dump off passes.
Edit to add: 93 targets, 48 catches, 836 yards, and 7 TDs in 15 games.