I have said throughout this thread that it's the breed, not just the owners. I do believe owners do have some environmental responsibility but at the end of the day, that loving pit who turned on the youngest child ... it's the breed, it's genetic.
My question is to you, to the folks that claim that it's the owners ... I have a situation where my new neighbors are not fully equipped to handle this dog. Any time we go over, the dog is hyper. Jumps on people including me, and my daughter. They eventually put him in the dog cage and that's when I've heard him growl. They are gone - a lot. As two parents who work full time with 2 kids in sports ... This dog needs exercise and structure, and they are not providing it. The 10yo said the dog was crazy. They never have anything nice to say about the dog ... And were told the dog is much older than he was when he was adopted. They think the dog is younger than what it was claimed to be. Why would the previous owners lie about it?
Our distant friends have 3 small yapping PITA dogs. Each dog sucks with kids. We visited and mentioned the aggression that the dogs have displayed toward young children. Their response was that as long as my daughter doesn't get aggravate the dog, then all should be fine. She didn't but the one dog still ended up biting her on the lip. Their reasoning? It was past 8pm and the dog was exhausted.
Surely, those are examples of bad dogs. They suck actually. It angered me that my daugther got snipped at for doing nothing except, the dog was tired. The difference is ... my daughter is not disfigured and she's alive. A bad small toy dog is WAY DIFFERENT than a bad dog pit bull.