What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

#QAnon (3 Viewers)

Glad to see that you are reading the posts. 

I would have to go back and look at videos that cover that particular post. As of right now I have not clue. I do not have that good a memory. 
Ok here's a third one:

700

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f81874 No.320057  
Feb 9 2018 21:17:44 (EST)

[Next week]
[Next week]
[Next week]

Suicide weekend? 
Q
[WARNING TO DECODERS: Original bolding original to the three guys creating the Q posts].

Ok this was a Friday, February 9th. No [muffle] "kill box" again. What did suicide weekend mean that weekend?

eta - That's three uses of "suicide weekend" - only one of which uses a kill box - which you will have to explain. Good luck.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Depends on whether I is a name, a number, cryptic code. Could also be disinformation. Remember the Deep State reads these also. 
It really sounds like you posted something having no reason for it or having any clue what it meant. Seem fair?

To me Furber, Diaz and Rogers (aka Q) were obviously talking about McCain - just like Henry said.

 
Seems like everyone is making an assumption that "suicide weekend' is a reference to "no name". We all know that neither Q nor Trump think "no name" was what he portrayed himself to be. 

But again YOU are making the assumption of what that means, not me.

 
lIt really sounds like you posted something having no reason for it or having any clue what it meant. Seem fair?

To me Furber, Diaz and Rogers (aka Q) were obviously talking about McCain - just like Henry said.
Again I bolded what I thought was the important part of the post, for you guys.

Who are Furber, Diaz and Rogers?

Never heard of them. Are they posters here?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seems like everyone is making an assumption that "suicide weekend' is a reference to "no name". We all know that neither Q nor Trump think "no name" was what he portrayed himself to be. 

But again YOU are making the assumption of what that means, not me.
There are three times Diaz, Rogers and Furber referred to "suicide weekend". It just sounds like they yank the term out whenever they need to explain something out of the blue air.

- eta - And Henry is right, show respect, the name is John McCain.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seems like everyone is making an assumption that "suicide weekend' is a reference to "no name". We all know that neither Q nor Trump think "no name" was what he portrayed himself to be. 

But again YOU are making the assumption of what that means, not me.
Don’t do that.  This isn’t a cult meeting.  The man just died.  You should really use his name. 

 
Again  I boded what I thought was the important part of the post.

Who are Furber, Diaz and Rogers?

Never heard of them.
Qanon was just another unremarkable part of the “anon” genre until November 2017, when two moderators of the 4chan board where Q posted predictions, who went by the usernames Pamphlet Anon and BaruchtheScribe, reached out to Tracy Diaz, according to Diaz’s blogs and YouTube videos. BaruchtheScribe, in reality a self-identified web programmer from South Africa named Paul Furber, confirmed that account to NBC News.

“A bunch of us decided that the message needed to go wider so we contacted Youtubers who had been commenting on the Q drops,” Furber said in an email.

Diaz, a small-time YouTube star who once hosted a talk show on the fringe right-wing network Liberty Movement Radio, had found moderate popularity with a couple of thousand views for her YouTube videos analyzing WikiLeaks releases and discussing the "pizzagate" conspiracy, a baseless theory that alleged a child sex ring was being run out of a Washington pizza shop.

As Diaz tells it in a blog post detailing her role in the early days of Qanon, she banded together with the two moderators. Their goal, according to Diaz, was to build a following for Qanon — which would mean bigger followings for them as well.

On Nov. 3, 2017, just six days after the first 4chan post from “Q,” Diaz posted a video entitled “/POL/- Q Clearance Anon - Is it #happening???” in which she introduced the conspiracy theory to her audience.

“I do not typically do videos like this,” she said, but citing Q’s “very specific and kind of eerie” posts, Diaz explained that she would be covering the 4chan posts, “just in case this stuff turns out to be legit because honestly it kind of seems legit.”

That video, which has been viewed nearly 250,000 times, made Diaz one of the earliest people to seize on “Q” posts and decipher them for a conspiracy-hungry audience. Diaz followed with dozens more Q-themed videos, each containing a call for viewers to donate through links to her Patreon and PayPal accounts

Diaz’s YouTube channel now boasts more than 90,000 subscribers and her videos have been watched over 8 million times. More than 97,000 people follow her on Twitter. Diaz, who emerged from bankruptcy in 2009, says in her YouTube videos that she now relies on donations from patrons funding her YouTube “research” as her sole source of income.

Diaz declined to comment on this story.

“Because I cover Q, I got an audience,” Diaz acknowledged in a video that NBC News reviewed last week before she deleted it.

To reach a more mainstream audience (older people and “normies,” who on their own would have trouble navigating the fringe message boards), Diaz said in a blog post she recommended they move to the more user-friendly Reddit. Archives listing the three as the original posters and moderators show they created a new Reddit community called CBTS_Stream, short for Calm Before The Storm, where subscribers soon gathered to talk all things Q.

Their move to Reddit was key to Qanon’s eventual spread. There, they were able to tap into a larger audience of conspiracy theorists, and drive discussion with their analysis of each Q post. From there, Qanon crept to Facebook where it found a new, older audience via dozens of public and private groups.

That audience then started to head to 8chan to check out the original source and interact directly with the posts. (Q posts moved from 4chan to its more toxic offshoot 8chan in November after a post claiming the original board had been “infiltrated.” 8chan became notorious for having no rules, and even hosting child pornography.)

...

In March, their Reddit board, which boasted some 20,000 subscribers, was shut down by Reddit for “encouraging or inciting violence and posting personal and confidential information,” and the moderators — Diaz and the rest — were banned from the site. Furber had already been booted from the site for allegedly threatening to reveal the personal details of another user, and was pushed out of the private Q discussion groups he had helped form.

“I was very definitely banished,” Furber said, noting that he believes Q’s board has been taken over by imposters.

By then, Pamphlet Anon, whose real name is Coleman Rogers, had developed grander plans. (NBC was able to determine Rogers’ identity through property records that link the address where his business is registered to his parent’s home and to photos from his personal social media account. Those photos show him to be the same person who appears on YouTube as Pamphlet Anon.)

Rogers did not respond to calls seeking comment, but acknowledged his receipt of messages from NBC News via his website’s Twitter, writing in part, “WE DO NOT TALK TO FAKE NEWS.” ..
.

 
In part because of the mounting claims against Patriots’ Soapbox, the web’s largest pro-Trump community has banned all mentions of Qanon. Reddit’s 640,000-member community r/The_Donald set up an autodelete function for mentions of Qanon’s claims, two moderators confirmed to NBC News, believing the group of YouTubers is making posts as Q.
Sounds like a good policy frankly.

 
None of your experts have decoded this? You get to refer to sources, any one of the ones you've recommended will do.
A decode should be available in a day or so.

You think this is so easy, it is not.

Just like when even the decoders "thought" that the MS13 in the Seth Rich post absolutely meant that MS13 was involved. The decoders were wrong, Q had to let them know way later. 

Or that the Tarmac meeting between Lynch and Clinton meant that Lynch was going to get Scalia's seat, the decoders were wrong on that one also. Q had to straighten that out also .

Up is down. left is right, check here, there and behind you. 

Trust In The Plan

WWG1WGA

 
A decode should be available in a day or so.

You think this is so easy, it is not.

Just like when even the decoders "thought" that the MS13 in the Seth Rich post absolutely meant that MS13 was involved. The decoders were wrong, Q had to let them know way later. 

Or that the Tarmac meeting between Lynch and Clinton meant that Lynch was going to get Scalia's seat, the decoders were wrong on that one also. Q had to straighten that out also .

Up is down. left is right, check here, there and behind you. 

Trust In The Plan

WWG1WGA
His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson. 

 
His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson. 
Sorry Henry I have no cue what you are talking about?

I will google his name to see if that helps.

Okay google says Robert Paulson is the name of the character in that Meatloaf plays in the movie "Fight Club?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay on it

I do like Destroying the Illusion" but again no one is perfect, going to listen now. Will edit when done.

A lot of people believe what he said about no name, I do not agree with him on this nor about NASA because I worked in the Space program, Lockheed. 

Sounded kind of wacky on those two parts.

I have said before I listen to 3 YTber's, I do not agree with all of what hey say but taken as a whole together they are pretty good.

I do believe no name is dead. But based on pictures of meeting he has had with the leader of ISIS and others, do believe he would have been indicted down the line.

Had to watch most of the video. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:


Sorry Henry but Q does not suggest anything to you. You suggest, what Q posts, to yourself. 

The reason I DO NOT believe that is what Q meant is because "Future proves the Past" this was posted after no name died. This does not follow Q posts at all. So in my eyes it is misinformation for people that do not understand Q, what he posts or how he posts.

That is WHY I did not bold it, I considered it NOT important or relevant

Do you understand? 

 
Sorry Henry but Q does not suggest anything to you. You suggest, what Q posts, to yourself. 

The reason I DO NOT believe that is what Q meant is because "Future proves the Past" this was posted after no name died. This does not follow Q posts at all. So in my eyes it is misinformation for people that do not understand Q, what he posts or how he posts.

That is WHY I did not bold it, I considered it NOT important or relevant

Do you understand? 
Trust me, I understand.  I’ve known people who were in cults. 

 
Which are these again?
Citizens investigate Report, this guy and praying medic. 

The first one wanders to much at times or digs too deep, this guy in usually pretty good but is into conspiracies far too much and the las guy is religious and ends hi videos with that crap. 

Between the three you can get a good idea of the decodes. None are perfect, but then who is besides you?

 
Actually he is pretty spot on in most of his posts. While I don't agree on his thinking no name hiding or NASA.

I do believe no name was up into hips in this saga. 
I do not know why you say this. He is totally in line with Q and Q is not as coy as you about McCain. There is no ambiguity (for example post 732 which I am not quoting here because it is disgusting). Again you don't seem to know very much about Q, or really anything at all.

 
sWait a tic, so this one is one of the magic three youtube sources, but when he merely reiterates what Q says about McCain our qanon simply brushes it off? Doesn’t sound like much of a source.
Where did I EVER say these three YT people were magic, in fact I have pointed out flaws in all three. You are making me think that you do not read any posts, because I have answered pretty much all your questions at least once if not more times.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not know why you say this. He is totally in line with Q and Q is not as coy as you about McCain. There is no ambiguity (for example post 732 which I am not quoting here because it is disgusting). Again you don't seem to know very much about Q, or really anything at all.
I am not going to get into "no name", I know exactly what Q thinks of him. He has videos of him with he head of ISIS and other unsavory characters. Post 732 is but 1 example.

The guy just died, he is no longer an issue, so is of little consequence.

I know plenty, if you have something useful to ask then feel free. If you are just going to continue ranting about nothing then go to another thread, you wanted me out of there anyway. 

In my opinion you are just showing ignorance, on the subject, \ when you say I don't know very much about Q. 

 
He’s a cafeteria conspiracist.
Not really, although I don't know what a "cafeteria conspiracist" is. I assume it is not a good thing. I actually answer a lot in this thread with substance and honesty. If some people don't read my answers, that is not on me.

 
I am not going to get into "no name", I know exactly what Q thinks of him. He has videos of him with he head of ISIS and other unsavory characters. Post 732 is but 1 example.

The guy just died, he is no longer an issue, so is of little consequence.

I know plenty, if you have something useful to ask then feel free. If you are just going to continue ranting about nothing then go to another thread, you wanted me out of there anyway. 

In my opinion you are just showing ignorance, on the subject, \ when you say I don't know very much about Q. 
Oh, awesome.  Please link to the video of McCain with the “head of ISIS.”

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top