Depends on whether it is a name, a number, cryptic code. Could also be disinformation. Remember the Deep State reads these also.Like what?
Last edited by a moderator:
Depends on whether it is a name, a number, cryptic code. Could also be disinformation. Remember the Deep State reads these also.Like what?
Ok here's a third one:Glad to see that you are reading the posts.
I would have to go back and look at videos that cover that particular post. As of right now I have not clue. I do not have that good a memory.
[WARNING TO DECODERS: Original bolding original to the three guys creating the Q posts].700
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f81874 No.320057
Feb 9 2018 21:17:44 (EST)
[Next week]
[Next week]
[Next week]
Suicide weekend?
Q
It really sounds like you posted something having no reason for it or having any clue what it meant. Seem fair?Depends on whether I is a name, a number, cryptic code. Could also be disinformation. Remember the Deep State reads these also.
Again I bolded what I thought was the important part of the post, for you guys.lIt really sounds like you posted something having no reason for it or having any clue what it meant. Seem fair?
To me Furber, Diaz and Rogers (aka Q) were obviously talking about McCain - just like Henry said.
There are three times Diaz, Rogers and Furber referred to "suicide weekend". It just sounds like they yank the term out whenever they need to explain something out of the blue air.Seems like everyone is making an assumption that "suicide weekend' is a reference to "no name". We all know that neither Q nor Trump think "no name" was what he portrayed himself to be.
But again YOU are making the assumption of what that means, not me.
Don’t do that. This isn’t a cult meeting. The man just died. You should really use his name.Seems like everyone is making an assumption that "suicide weekend' is a reference to "no name". We all know that neither Q nor Trump think "no name" was what he portrayed himself to be.
But again YOU are making the assumption of what that means, not me.
Again I boded what I thought was the important part of the post.
Who are Furber, Diaz and Rogers?
Never heard of them.
.Qanon was just another unremarkable part of the “anon” genre until November 2017, when two moderators of the 4chan board where Q posted predictions, who went by the usernames Pamphlet Anon and BaruchtheScribe, reached out to Tracy Diaz, according to Diaz’s blogs and YouTube videos. BaruchtheScribe, in reality a self-identified web programmer from South Africa named Paul Furber, confirmed that account to NBC News.
“A bunch of us decided that the message needed to go wider so we contacted Youtubers who had been commenting on the Q drops,” Furber said in an email.
Diaz, a small-time YouTube star who once hosted a talk show on the fringe right-wing network Liberty Movement Radio, had found moderate popularity with a couple of thousand views for her YouTube videos analyzing WikiLeaks releases and discussing the "pizzagate" conspiracy, a baseless theory that alleged a child sex ring was being run out of a Washington pizza shop.
As Diaz tells it in a blog post detailing her role in the early days of Qanon, she banded together with the two moderators. Their goal, according to Diaz, was to build a following for Qanon — which would mean bigger followings for them as well.
On Nov. 3, 2017, just six days after the first 4chan post from “Q,” Diaz posted a video entitled “/POL/- Q Clearance Anon - Is it #happening???” in which she introduced the conspiracy theory to her audience.
“I do not typically do videos like this,” she said, but citing Q’s “very specific and kind of eerie” posts, Diaz explained that she would be covering the 4chan posts, “just in case this stuff turns out to be legit because honestly it kind of seems legit.”
That video, which has been viewed nearly 250,000 times, made Diaz one of the earliest people to seize on “Q” posts and decipher them for a conspiracy-hungry audience. Diaz followed with dozens more Q-themed videos, each containing a call for viewers to donate through links to her Patreon and PayPal accounts
Diaz’s YouTube channel now boasts more than 90,000 subscribers and her videos have been watched over 8 million times. More than 97,000 people follow her on Twitter. Diaz, who emerged from bankruptcy in 2009, says in her YouTube videos that she now relies on donations from patrons funding her YouTube “research” as her sole source of income.
Diaz declined to comment on this story.
“Because I cover Q, I got an audience,” Diaz acknowledged in a video that NBC News reviewed last week before she deleted it.
To reach a more mainstream audience (older people and “normies,” who on their own would have trouble navigating the fringe message boards), Diaz said in a blog post she recommended they move to the more user-friendly Reddit. Archives listing the three as the original posters and moderators show they created a new Reddit community called CBTS_Stream, short for Calm Before The Storm, where subscribers soon gathered to talk all things Q.
Their move to Reddit was key to Qanon’s eventual spread. There, they were able to tap into a larger audience of conspiracy theorists, and drive discussion with their analysis of each Q post. From there, Qanon crept to Facebook where it found a new, older audience via dozens of public and private groups.
That audience then started to head to 8chan to check out the original source and interact directly with the posts. (Q posts moved from 4chan to its more toxic offshoot 8chan in November after a post claiming the original board had been “infiltrated.” 8chan became notorious for having no rules, and even hosting child pornography.)
...
In March, their Reddit board, which boasted some 20,000 subscribers, was shut down by Reddit for “encouraging or inciting violence and posting personal and confidential information,” and the moderators — Diaz and the rest — were banned from the site. Furber had already been booted from the site for allegedly threatening to reveal the personal details of another user, and was pushed out of the private Q discussion groups he had helped form.
“I was very definitely banished,” Furber said, noting that he believes Q’s board has been taken over by imposters.
By then, Pamphlet Anon, whose real name is Coleman Rogers, had developed grander plans. (NBC was able to determine Rogers’ identity through property records that link the address where his business is registered to his parent’s home and to photos from his personal social media account. Those photos show him to be the same person who appears on YouTube as Pamphlet Anon.)
Rogers did not respond to calls seeking comment, but acknowledged his receipt of messages from NBC News via his website’s Twitter, writing in part, “WE DO NOT TALK TO FAKE NEWS.” ..
Sounds like a good policy frankly.In part because of the mounting claims against Patriots’ Soapbox, the web’s largest pro-Trump community has banned all mentions of Qanon. Reddit’s 640,000-member community r/The_Donald set up an autodelete function for mentions of Qanon’s claims, two moderators confirmed to NBC News, believing the group of YouTubers is making posts as Q.
A decode should be available in a day or so.None of your experts have decoded this? You get to refer to sources, any one of the ones you've recommended will do.
That’s what Betty Crocker, the ghost of Napoleon Bonaparte, and Michelle Obama want you to think.Sounds like a good policy frankly.
His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson.A decode should be available in a day or so.
You think this is so easy, it is not.
Just like when even the decoders "thought" that the MS13 in the Seth Rich post absolutely meant that MS13 was involved. The decoders were wrong, Q had to let them know way later.
Or that the Tarmac meeting between Lynch and Clinton meant that Lynch was going to get Scalia's seat, the decoders were wrong on that one also. Q had to straighten that out also .
Up is down. left is right, check here, there and behind you.
Trust In The Plan
WWG1WGA
I have "on occasion" listened to Patriot's Soapbox, at the beginning of my quest to learn. I really like Daddy Dragon. but I don't listen to them often at all anymore.Sounds like a good policy frankly.
Yup.Regarding McCain. Watch this video starting at the 7:20 mark. (This guy is a popular YouTube Q supporter.) This is from before McCain’s death but it’s obviously what Q is suggesting to me.
Sorry Henry I have no cue what you are talking about?His name is Robert Paulson. His name is Robert Paulson.
MeatloafSorry Henry I have no cue what you are talking about?
I will google his name to see if that helps.
Okay on itYup.
I do like Destroying the Illusion" but again no one is perfect, going to listen now. Will edit when done.Yup.
First thing I notice:Regarding McCain. Watch this video starting at the 7:20 mark. (This guy is a popular YouTube Q supporter.) This is from before McCain’s death but it’s obviously what Q is suggesting to me.
DTI Apparel - ...
Donate via
Crypto:
BitCoin:...
Ethereum: ...
LiteCoin:
BitcCoin Cash:
Thanks. Disgusting.Regarding McCain. Watch this video starting at the 7:20 mark. (This guy is a popular YouTube Q supporter.) This is from before McCain’s death but it’s obviously what Q is suggesting to me.
Is as does.I do like Destroying the Illusion
Meat Loaf was a contestant on Celebrity Apprentice. Now we’re getting somewhere.Meatloaf
Soap
Brennifer?
Brangelina?
To the Moon, Norton!
Remember The First Rule.
Yup.
Sorry Henry but Q does not suggest anything to you. You suggest, what Q posts, to yourself.Yup.
LOL, the real Q map is just about as confusing.Seems right.
Trust me, I understand. I’ve known people who were in cults.Sorry Henry but Q does not suggest anything to you. You suggest, what Q posts, to yourself.
The reason I DO NOT believe that is what Q meant is because "Future proves the Past" this was posted after no name died. This does not follow Q posts at all. So in my eyes it is misinformation for people that do not understand Q, what he posts or how he posts.
That is WHY I did not bold it, I considered it NOT important or relevant
Do you understand?
Actually he is pretty spot on in most of his posts. While I don't agree on his thinking no name hiding or NASA.Thanks. Disgusting.
Is as does.
This would be one heck of a large cult Henry and no you don't understand or have a clue.Trust me, I understand. I’ve known people who were in cults.
Thank you.You will notice I have stayed out of the thread on his death.
Yeah, I’m pretty sure someone my family knew said almost this exact thing before moving to Jonestown.This would be one heck of a large cult Henry and no you don't understand or have a clue.
You will though.
Citizens investigate Report, this guy and praying medic.Which are these again?
Okay Henry you are going off the rails again.Yeah, I’m pretty sure someone my family knew said almost this exact thing before moving to Jonestown.
Have fun. Stay away from the Kool-Aid.Okay Henry you are going off the rails again.
I need a break.
Well not you, you constantly misstate what Q posts. You didn't even understand what a kill box is. Pretty basic.Between the three you can get a good idea of the decodes. None are perfect, but then who is besides you?
I do not know why you say this. He is totally in line with Q and Q is not as coy as you about McCain. There is no ambiguity (for example post 732 which I am not quoting here because it is disgusting). Again you don't seem to know very much about Q, or really anything at all.Actually he is pretty spot on in most of his posts. While I don't agree on his thinking no name hiding or NASA.
I do believe no name was up into hips in this saga.
Destroying the IllusionThese need links if you don't mind.
Wait a tic, so this one is one of the magic three youtube sources, but when he merely reiterates what Q says about McCain our qanon simply brushes it off? Doesn’t sound like much of a source.
He’s a cafeteria conspiracist.Wait a tic, so this one is one of the magic three youtube sources, but when he merely reiterates what Q says about McCain our qanon simply brushes it off? Doesn’t sound like much of a source.
You seem quite good at this.I could only make uninformed assumptions.
It amazes me that you cannot seem to make a substantive post in any thread you post in.You seem quite good at this.
Where did I EVER say these three YT people were magic, in fact I have pointed out flaws in all three. You are making me think that you do not read any posts, because I have answered pretty much all your questions at least once if not more times.sWait a tic, so this one is one of the magic three youtube sources, but when he merely reiterates what Q says about McCain our qanon simply brushes it off? Doesn’t sound like much of a source.
ThankQ
I am not going to get into "no name", I know exactly what Q thinks of him. He has videos of him with he head of ISIS and other unsavory characters. Post 732 is but 1 example.I do not know why you say this. He is totally in line with Q and Q is not as coy as you about McCain. There is no ambiguity (for example post 732 which I am not quoting here because it is disgusting). Again you don't seem to know very much about Q, or really anything at all.
Not really, although I don't know what a "cafeteria conspiracist" is. I assume it is not a good thing. I actually answer a lot in this thread with substance and honesty. If some people don't read my answers, that is not on me.He’s a cafeteria conspiracist.
Oh, awesome. Please link to the video of McCain with the “head of ISIS.”I am not going to get into "no name", I know exactly what Q thinks of him. He has videos of him with he head of ISIS and other unsavory characters. Post 732 is but 1 example.
The guy just died, he is no longer an issue, so is of little consequence.
I know plenty, if you have something useful to ask then feel free. If you are just going to continue ranting about nothing then go to another thread, you wanted me out of there anyway.
In my opinion you are just showing ignorance, on the subject, \ when you say I don't know very much about Q.
Seriously you cannot type in 12 letters in a YT box. In my opinion it show you have no desire to learn or understand.These need links if you don't mind.
Your definition of the word “substantive” may be a little different from mine.It amazes me that you cannot seem to make a substantive post in any thread you post in.