Where'd you learn that Fatsquirreli - by reading this board? Nice scoop!ESPN.com has learned
I think all English teachers are currently jumping off bridges after reading that "grammar".You dont' NOT pay Coles and then trade away 2 1st round picks and wind up paying some unknown almost as much as you didn't give Coles.... Otherwise you can lose fans like myself off bridges.
Ahh. Nice, so the Pats actually stuck it to the Jets? YES!! hahaha. Either way, I hope they get the guy they want. Two #1s are a huge price to pay for one guy...IMHOHey! Maybe they want McGahee!!!!!Here's another take on the stick it to the division rival scenario.The sticking point in the negotiations with the Pats and the Bears was that the Pats wanted to include a swap of second round picks in addition to the two for one with the first rounders. The Bears would not go for it. Is is possible that not only was this deal purposely meant to fail, but to set the bar at two first round picks, knowing that the Jets coveted Robertson as well? I would not put this past Belichick. You can't believe a word that comes out of his mouth.Just some food for thought.
I agree that Sullivan will be gone at 17. That's why I stated that the Pats might trade the #17 and keep their #14.I think you're kidding yourself if you think Sullivan is going to be around at #17, even with the Jets taking Robertson.Seattle, Chicago, San Diego and even KC and New Orleans all pick before 17 and have strong interest in DTs.I don't think this will hamper the Pats at all. If anything it allows them to keep both 1st round picks. I would not be surprised at all to see the Patriots deal the #17 and their second rounder to move up in the top 10. That way they would be ensured of getting the DL that they want, and possible Newman or Truffant.The Pats have picks to burn and I would consider it a coup if they could get Sullivan and Truffant.
That's what I'm saying....why would they risk this and who do they take if Johnson is gone???If Rogers & Johnson are gone, which is a distinct possibility, this was sure a terrible trade for the Jets!
Guys...read my previous post, they didn't move up to get Andre, Texans are going to take him. They moved up to get D. Robertson who they, and the Pats (and Parcells for that matter) view as the standout defensive player in this draft. This is a ballsy move for Bradway because they could've gotten one of the top five tackles at the 13 spot BUT if his scouts feel Robertson is a difference maker, it's a move that could work out.CheersThat's what I'm saying....why would they risk this and who do they take if Johnson is gone???
I don't get that at all. Angelo is dealing one pick that should get you a very good player for two chances at less certain guys. It takes a lot more self-confidence to go with multiple chancy picks vs one safe choice.It's funny, most of the guys on Chicago radio think that from the link below "Angelo has no stones".
People are saying that him and his scouts can't make a decision on #4. They said that there won't be as much of a backlash on him if #13 fails compared to if #4 is a bust.I think it was a great move for the Bears, unless you hear Chicage radio a lot-it's hard to understand their fanbase....I don't get that at all. Angelo is dealing one pick that should get you a very good player for two chances at less certain guys. It takes a lot more self-confidence to go with multiple chancy picks vs one safe choice.It's funny, most of the guys on Chicago radio think that from the link below "Angelo has no stones".
Totally agree with you.My Opinion is that the conditional pick is for Andre Johnson - if the Jets get him, they owe more to Da Bears. I don't think he will be there, although the Texans are foolish if they take Andre Johnson.
How many times must we go over this? The Jets did this to get Robertson. As a Jet fan I do not want a WR in the first. I do not want to watch another season of mediocre backs running for 150 yards over this defense.If Rogers & Johnson are gone, which is a distinct possibility, this was sure a terrible trade for the Jets!
Ditto. It's Herm Edwards, remember?The Jets take....Dewayne Robertson, DT Kentucky.
I know it's herm edwards, but there was going to be a good dt at #13 where they could still get WR3/4 at pick 22. They have to love either A.Johnson more than any other WR they could get (and I understand this), or think that Robertson is going to be the man. I think they should have went dt/wr with their first rounders. I don't think the trade up from the dt at 13 to Robertson and the loss of #22 is worth it....I still think that they might go WR if Johnson is there. I think Johnson could have a huge impact as a nfl player and is loaded with more potential that Coles had/has.Ditto. It's Herm Edwards, remember?
Off topic a bit but your avatar is brutal.09Off topic a bit but I don't think this needs to be pinned.
I'll change it.Off topic a bit but your avatar is brutal.
09
They have to love either A.Johnson more than any other WR they could get (and I understand this), or think that Robertson is going to be the man. They do think Robertson is the man. Hence the move. Andre Johnson is the insurance. If NE or DAL or anyone moves into the #3 slot to take Robertson, AJ is there at #4.Now, I absolutely detest Johnson. He's a liar and a cheat. Had his girlfriend write his papers @ UM and also got caught cheating on exams. It's a blight on academic history that he even got to play this past year. BUT, he and Rogers ARE head and shoulders over every other WR out there. Jacobs & Washington included.Now before anyone flames me about the AJ opinion, read this link first, then if you feel its still necessary, flame awayJohnson's End Run at UMI know it's herm edwards, but there was going to be a good dt at #13 where they could still get WR3/4 at pick 22. They have to love either A.Johnson more than any other WR they could get (and I understand this), or think that Robertson is going to be the man.
Staying off topic in that:a) We've been unpinnedandB) I agreed wholeheartedly...go here for Ken's response... http://footballguys.net/forum/index.php?ac...t=ST&f=4&t=2312Off topic a bit but I don't think this needs to be pinned.
IMHO this is what the Bears will do. Angelo loves defense and the Bears need it. Watch 'em take Simms at #35.Sullivan DT @13Haynes DE @22Grossman/Simms/Ragone QB @ 35
originally published: March 7, 2002Nothing more current? The source is questionable.They have to love either A.Johnson more than any other WR they could get (and I understand this), or think that Robertson is going to be the man. They do think Robertson is the man. Hence the move. Andre Johnson is the insurance. If NE or DAL or anyone moves into the #3 slot to take Robertson, AJ is there at #4.Now, I absolutely detest Johnson. He's a liar and a cheat. Had his girlfriend write his papers @ UM and also got caught cheating on exams. It's a blight on academic history that he even got to play this past year. BUT, he and Rogers ARE head and shoulders over every other WR out there. Jacobs & Washington included.Now before anyone flames me about the AJ opinion, read this link first, then if you feel its still necessary, flame awayJohnson's End Run at UMI know it's herm edwards, but there was going to be a good dt at #13 where they could still get WR3/4 at pick 22. They have to love either A.Johnson more than any other WR they could get (and I understand this), or think that Robertson is going to be the man.
Unless the guy they want is Newman, Dallas knows it, Cinci trades down to 5, and Dallas takes Newman ahead of them.For a Jet fan the only way this backfires is if the first three selections tomorrow are Palmer, Newman and Robertson. :( Once I hear a WR mentioned in the top three, the first beer will be cracked open.