What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2014 ACC Basketball [Closed - use 2015 thread instead] (1 Viewer)

But enough about me. How about you guys?

And since we got that out of the ways, MSU and UM in a barn burner. 3-3 at the under 16 timeout. :eek:

 
Well I appreciate it. That was going to be my next question is what team he was a fan of previously? And my fandom of Philly goes beyond my profile as I've posted in the Eagles thread on Shark Pool.
ripleys aka grapeape, pantherpower, eastwood, and most recently Buck Stop is a Duke fan. He still has been signing in under Buck Stop, but I assume his posting privileges have been taken away for now. He will post again as either Buck Stop, some other alias, or he could be you. No matter what he'll be posting again in here. Why are you in the ACC thread? Do you root for an ACC team or another conference team?
Well I guess some more condemning information but b/c I am a Duke fan.
Key questions for you...1. Have you ever attended Duke? Yes (proceed to #2) or No (proceed to #3) or My dad did but I couldn't get in (proceed to #2)2. In what capacity did you attend Duke? Student that graduated (proceed to #3) or Cleaned the toilets (proceed to #4) or Dad took me to a game (proceed to #4)3. Welcome aboard, you are not Ripley's.4. Hi there Ripleys. That new GED has helped your posting.
I am #4 but not Ripleys. Became a Duke fan as a child, after Wojo hit a half court shot (I know but I was young). Didn't get into Duke engineering, who knew that was harder to get into than Trinity. Struggled with being a Duke fan who had no ties for it awhile but then I figured there are plenty of Alabama fans who didn't go there so I'm not too ashamed of being a non-alumni fan. If you don't believe me then I guess you can just ignore me now or just wait for me to slip up (or see that I'm not Ripley).
Based on what you wrote you would be #3 (never attended Duke). I'm guessing the reading comprehension thingy might have played a factor in Trinty/Duke. That said, being an engineering grad too, I realize that our SATs were weighted on one side.
 
Well I appreciate it. That was going to be my next question is what team he was a fan of previously? And my fandom of Philly goes beyond my profile as I've posted in the Eagles thread on Shark Pool.
ripleys aka grapeape, pantherpower, eastwood, and most recently Buck Stop is a Duke fan. He still has been signing in under Buck Stop, but I assume his posting privileges have been taken away for now. He will post again as either Buck Stop, some other alias, or he could be you. No matter what he'll be posting again in here. Why are you in the ACC thread? Do you root for an ACC team or another conference team?
Well I guess some more condemning information but b/c I am a Duke fan.
Key questions for you...1. Have you ever attended Duke? Yes (proceed to #2) or No (proceed to #3) or My dad did but I couldn't get in (proceed to #2)2. In what capacity did you attend Duke? Student that graduated (proceed to #3) or Cleaned the toilets (proceed to #4) or Dad took me to a game (proceed to #4)3. Welcome aboard, you are not Ripley's.4. Hi there Ripleys. That new GED has helped your posting.
I am #4 but not Ripleys. Became a Duke fan as a child, after Wojo hit a half court shot (I know but I was young). Didn't get into Duke engineering, who knew that was harder to get into than Trinity. Struggled with being a Duke fan who had no ties for it awhile but then I figured there are plenty of Alabama fans who didn't go there so I'm not too ashamed of being a non-alumni fan. If you don't believe me then I guess you can just ignore me now or just wait for me to slip up (or see that I'm not Ripley).
Based on what you wrote you would be #3 (never attended Duke). I'm guessing the reading comprehension thingy might have played a factor in Trinty/Duke. That said, being an engineering grad too, I realize that our SATs were weighted on one side.
I guess I misread the first question, just assumed that he meant jump to #4 if you never attended Duke but I guess that would have helped on the SATs. Yeah, I think Pratt's averages SAT Math was 750 or 760 the year I applied. Math was my strong suit but didn't do too well on the SATs. Regardless, I went to an engineering school that had a pretty bad bball program while I was there and no football program so Duke kinda stuck and like I said, many of the people there remained fans of the OSUs and Alabamas so I figured it could be worse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'sporthenry said:
I have no idea who Ripley is. But I guess that is what Ripley would say. For those interested, I haven't posted under a new UN, just found this site for football this year and found the off topic more recently. But for some of you, I suggest this will be fun to watch your conspiracy theories.
That's exactly what Ripleys would say.
I'm open to the possibility that there's more that one dbag Duke fan on the Internet.
What if there isn't. What if it's just been one guy the whole time.
:shock:
 
Getting somewhat confident about the OSU game tonight. Duke by 7 IMO.

Cook vs Craft is the key matchup. That kid made some huge plays in the first 5 or 6 minutes last year (including a couple of 3's) and the whole thing just snowballed. I have a feeling that Duke shoots very well tonight.

Thomas is elite, and duke doesn't really have a 3 or 4 man to guard him, but if they play good team defense, i think they'll be ok.

 
'sporthenry said:
I have no idea who Ripley is. But I guess that is what Ripley would say. For those interested, I haven't posted under a new UN, just found this site for football this year and found the off topic more recently. But for some of you, I suggest this will be fun to watch your conspiracy theories.
That's exactly what Ripleys would say.
I'm open to the possibility that there's more that one dbag Duke fan on the Internet.
What if there isn't. What if it's just been one guy the whole time.
:shock:
Not gonna lie...the thought of that did kinda rock me for a moment.
 
Duke getting absolutely killed on the boards. Looks a lot like last year but lucky for Duke, OSU has no Sullinger or Buford. Thomas getting what he wants but he has 2 fouls.

 
Great d by Osu. Cook is very passive so far.
Agreed. Took a few open 3's but since then he isn't looking for his shot. He is going to have to get to the rim and either finish or dish. But pounding it into the deck 30 feet out by all our guards isn't good enough.
 
Wow...amazing toughness in this team. You could tell how absolutely dog tired Curry was...falling down from tired legs and missing that free throw on the front end.

Plumlee impressed me at times...this was the kind of game I wanted to see out of him...battling some bodies but still finding a way.

Cook is an absolute beast...I'm in love with the kid.

Sheed has some amazing footwork...the kid can definitely make you miss and create his own shot.

I loved again how Plumlee was able to work defensively in the second half...that really impressed me most.

We still can't buy a rebound...Duke commits so much defensively to stop that initial shot but leaves them out of position for the rebound.

I never would've thought Duke would've won this game without Curry showing up...Sheed became the man.

Thornton just does what he always does...lock down defense and finds a way to pester the shooter and dig out the ball.

Kelly showed why we missed him so much last year...the guy has so many intangibles on offense and defense.

Great team effort to pull together and find a way...they deserve some serious rest and hopefully a good lull in their schedule.

I'll take a tie in this challenge...wow...can't believe the ACC found a way to tie it, especially after the first day.

 
Wow...amazing toughness in this team. You could tell how absolutely dog tired Curry was...falling down from tired legs and missing that free throw on the front end.Plumlee impressed me at times...this was the kind of game I wanted to see out of him...battling some bodies but still finding a way.Cook is an absolute beast...I'm in love with the kid.Sheed has some amazing footwork...the kid can definitely make you miss and create his own shot.I loved again how Plumlee was able to work defensively in the second half...that really impressed me most.We still can't buy a rebound...Duke commits so much defensively to stop that initial shot but leaves them out of position for the rebound.I never would've thought Duke would've won this game without Curry showing up...Sheed became the man.Thornton just does what he always does...lock down defense and finds a way to pester the shooter and dig out the ball.Kelly showed why we missed him so much last year...the guy has so many intangibles on offense and defense.Great team effort to pull together and find a way...they deserve some serious rest and hopefully a good lull in their schedule.I'll take a tie in this challenge...wow...can't believe the ACC found a way to tie it, especially after the first day.
:goodposting:Can't believe the ACC tied it. I think Sheed and Cook learned something tonight so going forward, they shouldn't be hesitant to attack. Hopefully Seth is healthy or he gets some time off. Ryan is starting to get his offense in gear. Hopefully getting Marshall back will help with some rebounding but Ryan/Mason are going to have to work better together on the glass and it seemed Sheed/Cook realized they needed to help with the rebounding.
 
Duke now gets a bunch of relatively meaningless games in a row (although Temple and Davidson could both be tough) until ACC play starts (and the first game is against lowly wake).

Hopefully K takes this time to rest Curry and give more minutes to Jefferson and Murphy. Gotta see what they have in those 2 before league play really gets going.

 
Duke now gets a bunch of relatively meaningless games in a row (although Temple and Davidson could both be tough) until ACC play starts (and the first game is against lowly wake). Hopefully K takes this time to rest Curry and give more minutes to Jefferson and Murphy. Gotta see what they have in those 2 before league play really gets going.
I agree...we need some help off that bench. I was thinking that Duke had OSU primed for the comeback if they kept banging them and cutting to the basket to pick up those fouls because OSU would have no bench...but as Kelly picked up fouls, I looked at the Duke bench and thought, "Who do we have that can really come in right now and give us a spark?"Thornton does his thing defensively...but where's the offense off the bench? Curry was running on gas and there weren't many options to go to...thankfully Sheed found his stroke and confidence. Kelly doesn't care where it is...if he feels it...he's shooting it. I liked how K had them just shooting in the second half. Everyone seemed to throw it at the basket more instead of looking for "their shot"...just put it up.I really can't express how much I really loved Cook's fire...even when everyone was looking exhausted and not ready for OSU's early and continued energy, Cook had a look of desire and passion that I like to see. No quit in the kid.
 
Duke now gets a bunch of relatively meaningless games in a row (although Temple and Davidson could both be tough) until ACC play starts (and the first game is against lowly wake). Hopefully K takes this time to rest Curry and give more minutes to Jefferson and Murphy. Gotta see what they have in those 2 before league play really gets going.
Yes. Temple will be fairly tough especially since they haven't lost too much from last year. But with Mason's emergence, I think they'll be able to take care of Temple.Assuming they can get through the rest of OOC play. They get two cupcakes to start ACC play before a tough game @NC State. Good thing for them is that it will still be fairly early for NC State and hopefully they are still figuring things out. But if they can get to NC State undefeated and win the ACC, they should have a 1 seed awaiting them.
 
Duke now gets a bunch of relatively meaningless games in a row (although Temple and Davidson could both be tough) until ACC play starts (and the first game is against lowly wake). Hopefully K takes this time to rest Curry and give more minutes to Jefferson and Murphy. Gotta see what they have in those 2 before league play really gets going.
I agree...we need some help off that bench. I was thinking that Duke had OSU primed for the comeback if they kept banging them and cutting to the basket to pick up those fouls because OSU would have no bench...but as Kelly picked up fouls, I looked at the Duke bench and thought, "Who do we have that can really come in right now and give us a spark?"Thornton does his thing defensively...but where's the offense off the bench? Curry was running on gas and there weren't many options to go to...thankfully Sheed found his stroke and confidence. Kelly doesn't care where it is...if he feels it...he's shooting it. I liked how K had them just shooting in the second half. Everyone seemed to throw it at the basket more instead of looking for "their shot"...just put it up.I really can't express how much I really loved Cook's fire...even when everyone was looking exhausted and not ready for OSU's early and continued energy, Cook had a look of desire and passion that I like to see. No quit in the kid.
I agree our bench is pretty bleak especially offensively but our starting 5 is pretty potent. Hopefully we use the next month to see what Amile/Alex can do. But while we might not have instant offense on the bench, Josh/TT do provide a bit of a spark with their hustle plays. Josh had a big basket tonight to keep the lead within reach and quell some momentum.
 
Thornton's defense is a TAD overrated. Don't get me wrong, he'll make 1 or 2 great hustle type plays every game (like the play at the end to cut off scott and force the TO) but he is usually not consistent over the course of the game. He lets guys with mediocre quickness turn the corner on him way too much. He's also usually good for 2 stupid fouls away from the basket per game.

He's good for what he is (the occasional spot up 3 is a nice bonus) but Duke NEEDED Quinn Cook to become what he appears to be turning into in order to generate any sort of consistent offense this year. Thornton is 99% useless on that end of the court.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thornton's defense is a TAD overrated. Don't get me wrong, he'll make 1 or 2 great hustle type plays every game (like the play at the end to cut off scott and force the TO) but he is usually not consistent over the course of the game. He lets guys with mediocre quickness turn the corner on him way too much. He's also usually got for 2 stupid fouls away from the basket per game. He's good for what he is (the occasional spot up 3 is a nice bonus) but Duke NEEDED Quinn Cook to become what he appears to be turning into in order to generate any sort of consistent offense this year. Thornton is 99% useless on that end of the court.
Agreed...Thornton ain't providing much else...but he does pick his spots. Relying on him all game would be a hindrance but he definitely can catch a guy in the second half with more effort and tenacity...but you're right, he does let someone get that step on him too often and he ends up fouling at times. But in this game, he provided much more than he detracted.
 
'sporthenry said:
I have no idea who Ripley is. But I guess that is what Ripley would say. For those interested, I haven't posted under a new UN, just found this site for football this year and found the off topic more recently. But for some of you, I suggest this will be fun to watch your conspiracy theories.
That's exactly what Ripleys would say.
I'm open to the possibility that there's more that one dbag Duke fan on the Internet.
:lmao: If that is being a d-bag, then I'm sure plenty in here were guilty when Duke got spanked by OSU last year or when Duke lost to Lehigh. When your rival loses by 24 points on national TV, I would expect some ribbing. As far as my criticisms, I don't think they were that over the top and I'm sure people in here have given K crap about not producing NBA players or the oft used not producing post players. As far as adapting, I don't think I'm the only one who thinks Roy doesn't know how to use timeouts. I believe that many UNC fans feel that way too. But hey, if you guys don't care, maybe he can send some timeouts to Andy Reid for his last few games. As far as his adaptation with different teams, Roy has never really been able to succeed without that dominant PG. Paige looks like a freshmen and certainly he could develop but right now he doesn't seem to be the guy to push their fast break offense. When Roy has the pieces, there may not be anyone better with his offense but I would say that Coach K has shown an ability to win with different teams.
Yeah, this is pretty much nonsense in my opinion. He's had overachieving teams on a number of occasions, including two of the last three times UNC wasn't very highly regarded in preseason, 2005-2006 and 2010-2011. Even if this year's team underwhelms he'll still be batting .500 in low expectation seasons at UNC. And the "dominant point guard" thing is sort of a chicken and egg question. Nobody thought Kendall Marshall or Kirk Hinrich were all-world PGs until Roy got a hold of them. And I'm still not sure who the "dominant PG" was on some of those late 90s Kansas teams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Became a Duke fan as a child, after Wojo hit a half court shot (I know but I was young).
i can't remember this shot. do you remember any of the details (opponent, home/road, etc)?welcome aboard, fellow Duke fan! this is a pretty good group overall. mostly congenial. mostly astute. mostly fair-minded.
 
'TobiasFunke said:
Yeah, this is pretty much nonsense in my opinion. He's had overachieving teams on a number of occasions, including two of the last three times UNC wasn't very highly regarded in preseason, 2005-2006 and 2010-2011. Even if this year's team underwhelms he'll still be batting .500 in low expectation seasons at UNC. And the "dominant point guard" thing is sort of a chicken and egg question. Nobody thought Kendall Marshall or Kirk Hinrich were all-world PGs until Roy got a hold of them. And I'm still not sure who the "dominant PG" was on some of those late 90s Kansas teams.
Kendall Marshall was #25 in the RSCI his senior year. That's fairly highly regarded. He had offers from other nationally-competitive schools. Hinrich wasn't quite on the national radar, but that's largely because the national radar wasn't calibrated to find white combo guards from Iowa back in 1999. KU fell backwards into Hinrich (and Nick Collison) because Tim Floyd left Iowa State to take the Bulls job, and landing both players was considered a big deal at the time.

I'm surprised you haven't heard of Jacque Vaughn. He was a McD's AA in high school and was four-year starter and two-time NCAA All-American at Kansas in the mid-late 90s. He played on some great teams with great teammates who went on to better pro careers, but he was a stud college player and is an NBA head coach now.

The year after Vaughn left, KU got knocked out in the second round of the NCAAs by Rhode Island. Even though the Jayhawks had Raef Lafrentz at C and Paul Pierce at SF, they had Ryan Robertson at PG. The next two seasons were Roy's least-successful ones with his own recruits at KU. By the time Hinrich was ready to run the team, KU was a national factor again.
Ah, my favorite Roy Williams hater!"Highly regarded" and "on the national radar" is not the same as "dominant." Not even close. That was the word the poster used that I responded to. That is clearly wrong. Nobody in their right mind would say that Kendall Marshall and Kirk Hinrich were considered "dominant" when they arrived on campus. Posters here- including the one who follows recruiting and high school ball the most- were questioning whether he could even be an effective starter in the ACC. Roy succeeded with them. Therefore, saying "Roy can't succeed without a dominant PG" is wrong.

Also, enough with the "they lost in the NCAA tournament, so they didn't succeed" nonsense. A stat guy like you should know better than to draw ridiculous conclusions from small sample sizes like 40 minutes of basketball. The 97-98 Jayhawks went 36-4 and won the 1998 Big XII regular season and tournament going away. Their only losses after Jan 1 were the tournament loss and a one point road loss to Missouri. That is a successful season, without a dominant PG Sure, he's more successful on average when he has a superstar PG. You know who else is generally more successful with a superstar PG than without one? Every coach in the history of basketball.

I have heard of Jacque Vaughn. Always considered him more of a combo guard than a true PG, but you watched a lot more late 90s Kansas basketball than I did, so I defer to you on that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's just be honest- there's always gonna be Roy Williams haters out there, just like there's always gonna be Coach K or Calipari or Jim Calhoun haters. And haters need something they can cling to in order to argue that the guy isn't all he's cracked up to be. For Roy it used to be "he can't win the big one." That ended in 2005, so the haters looked at that team, saw that it was recruited by Matt Doherty in large part, and said "he can't win with his own players." Then THAT ended in 2009, so "he can't win without a dominant PG" became the new meme.

I know this silly stuff is never gonna end- if he wins a title with an average PG, the haters will just look at all three teams and find some new common ground with the three teams, and criticize him for not being able to win unless he has whatever that is. But posters around these parts usually are better than that.

 
Let's just be honest- there's always gonna be Roy Williams haters out there, just like there's always gonna be Coach K or Calipari or Jim Calhoun haters. And haters need something they can cling to in order to argue that the guy isn't all he's cracked up to be. For Roy it used to be "he can't win the big one." That ended in 2005, so the haters looked at that team, saw that it was recruited by Matt Doherty in large part, and said "he can't win with his own players." Then THAT ended in 2009, so "he can't win without a dominant PG" became the new meme. I know this silly stuff is never gonna end- if he wins a title with an average PG, the haters will just look at all three teams and find some new common ground with the three teams, and criticize him for not being able to win unless he has whatever that is. But posters around these parts usually are better than that.
Well you would know better than me about UNC. I was just trying to get into some dialogue about why UNC wasn't doing well and figured I'd get in some good ribbing. I don't buy this whole UNC inexperience thing. Perhaps it is just a few whiffs on recruits but they have a Senior, 2 Juniors, and 2 Sophomores (1 of which is supposed to be top 5 good) who haven't done much. I know Hairston picked up an injury but they have enough experience and on paper it appears they have enough talent. I don't really hate Roy Williams. I hate UNC, I'm more indifferent to Roy and if anything, Roy provides me so comic relief with his mismanagement of timeouts and his dressing up on Midnight Madness or all his "dadgum" pressers. As far as KM, he was highly regarded coming out like many recruits. There are few recruits who are considered elite as many do have questions but that doesn't mean he wasn't elite from the minute he stepped on the court. Certainly he still had/has a lot to learn but he fit right in with Roy's system which it seems Paige is struggling with.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'TobiasFunke said:
Yeah, this is pretty much nonsense in my opinion. He's had overachieving teams on a number of occasions, including two of the last three times UNC wasn't very highly regarded in preseason, 2005-2006 and 2010-2011. Even if this year's team underwhelms he'll still be batting .500 in low expectation seasons at UNC. And the "dominant point guard" thing is sort of a chicken and egg question. Nobody thought Kendall Marshall or Kirk Hinrich were all-world PGs until Roy got a hold of them. And I'm still not sure who the "dominant PG" was on some of those late 90s Kansas teams.
Kendall Marshall was #25 in the RSCI his senior year. That's fairly highly regarded. He had offers from other nationally-competitive schools. Hinrich wasn't quite on the national radar, but that's largely because the national radar wasn't calibrated to find white combo guards from Iowa back in 1999. KU fell backwards into Hinrich (and Nick Collison) because Tim Floyd left Iowa State to take the Bulls job, and landing both players was considered a big deal at the time.

I'm surprised you haven't heard of Jacque Vaughn. He was a McD's AA in high school and was four-year starter and two-time NCAA All-American at Kansas in the mid-late 90s. He played on some great teams with great teammates who went on to better pro careers, but he was a stud college player and is an NBA head coach now.

The year after Vaughn left, KU got knocked out in the second round of the NCAAs by Rhode Island. Even though the Jayhawks had Raef Lafrentz at C and Paul Pierce at SF, they had Ryan Robertson at PG. The next two seasons were Roy's least-successful ones with his own recruits at KU. By the time Hinrich was ready to run the team, KU was a national factor again.
Also, enough with the "they lost in the NCAA tournament, so they didn't succeed" nonsense.
Perhaps we should just pin this comment and as long as we all get to use this.
 
Interesting opinions from Chad Ford chat

---------------

Joseph (Provo, UT. )

Does Roy Williams not get the most out of his players? It appears that Macadoo is doing teh same thing that Barnes did. A big recruit that isn't playing up to the potential.

Chad Ford (1:41 PM)

It's a question I was discussing with a number of GMs yesterday. Obviously UNC gets a lot of blue chip talent which means they're going to be good no matter what. But how many of those players actually develop or get better while they are at UNC? I can name a bunch of players at Kentucky who improve their games with Cal. Much harder to come up with examples among the elite UNC recruits. Not sure how much development they get there.

--------------

Johnny (Detoit)

Do GM's really put so much value on 1 game? McAdoo had a stinker last night...how much will that effect him?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

No. But there have been concerns for a while and when you're the only elite player in a tournament, you get a lot of intense focus. McAdoo just doesn't seem to have added much of anything to his game. His body looks good. That's about it. He's not very skilled and the turnovers are a real problem. He'll get better as the season goes on ... and his stock will rise if he does. But he just has not been impressive here in either game.
Can blame it on haters here but Chad Ford wasn't talking to posters here. He in discussion with GMs of the NBA wonder how much Williams develops the kids. GMs, not posters at FBGs. Guess GMs are William haters too.
 
Let's just be honest- there's always gonna be Roy Williams haters out there, just like there's always gonna be Coach K or Calipari or Jim Calhoun haters. And haters need something they can cling to in order to argue that the guy isn't all he's cracked up to be. For Roy it used to be "he can't win the big one." That ended in 2005, so the haters looked at that team, saw that it was recruited by Matt Doherty in large part, and said "he can't win with his own players." Then THAT ended in 2009, so "he can't win without a dominant PG" became the new meme.

I know this silly stuff is never gonna end- if he wins a title with an average PG, the haters will just look at all three teams and find some new common ground with the three teams, and criticize him for not being able to win unless he has whatever that is. But posters around these parts usually are better than that.
Well you would know better than me about UNC. I was just trying to get into some dialogue about why UNC wasn't doing well and figured I'd get in some good ribbing. I don't buy this whole UNC inexperience thing. Perhaps it is just a few whiffs on recruits but they have a Senior, 2 Juniors, and 2 Sophomores (1 of which is supposed to be top 5 good) who haven't done much. I know Hairston picked up an injury but they have enough experience and on paper it appears they have enough talent. I don't really hate Roy Williams. I hate UNC, I'm more indifferent to Roy and if anything, Roy provides me so comic relief with his mismanagement of timeouts and his dressing up on Midnight Madness or all his "dadgum" pressers.

As far as KM, he was highly regarded coming out like many recruits. There are few recruits who are considered elite as many do have questions but that doesn't mean he wasn't elite from the minute he stepped on the court. Certainly he still had/has a lot to learn but he fit right in with Roy's system which it seems Paige is struggling with.
If you don't buy it, I don't know what to tell you, because it's true. They don't have a lot of experience, that's just a fact. They have literally one player who played more than 50% of the team's total minutes last year (Bullock). Second place is McAdoo at 39%. Look through the KenPom Top 25, my guess is you won't find another team with so few returning minutes other than Kentucky. For sake of comparison, Duke returned 5 players who played more than 50% of the minutes in 2012. NC State returned 4.

That's a big part of why they're struggling. You can see it when you watch them. Their spacing in the half court is terrible. They panic at the drop of a hat. Now I also don't think they are all that talented, so I think the ceiling on this team isn't all that high, but they can certainly improve as they gain experience.

 
Interesting opinions from Chad Ford chat

---------------

Joseph (Provo, UT. )

Does Roy Williams not get the most out of his players? It appears that Macadoo is doing teh same thing that Barnes did. A big recruit that isn't playing up to the potential.

Chad Ford (1:41 PM)

It's a question I was discussing with a number of GMs yesterday. Obviously UNC gets a lot of blue chip talent which means they're going to be good no matter what. But how many of those players actually develop or get better while they are at UNC? I can name a bunch of players at Kentucky who improve their games with Cal. Much harder to come up with examples among the elite UNC recruits. Not sure how much development they get there.

--------------

Johnny (Detoit)

Do GM's really put so much value on 1 game? McAdoo had a stinker last night...how much will that effect him?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

No. But there have been concerns for a while and when you're the only elite player in a tournament, you get a lot of intense focus. McAdoo just doesn't seem to have added much of anything to his game. His body looks good. That's about it. He's not very skilled and the turnovers are a real problem. He'll get better as the season goes on ... and his stock will rise if he does. But he just has not been impressive here in either game.
Can blame it on haters here but Chad Ford wasn't talking to posters here. He in discussion with GMs of the NBA wonder how much Williams develops the kids. GMs, not posters at FBGs. Guess GMs are William haters too.
Nope, can't blame that on the haters. Of course there's no actual opinion there from GMs, only that Ford discussed the subject with them, so I'm not sure what there is to blame on anyone. Any ACC fan can come up with a long list of talent that has developed or improved under Roy at UNC. We can start with three guys from just last year's draft. Or maybe everyone thought Kendall Marshall and Tyler Zeller would be drafted in the first 17 picks of an NBA draft when they got to UNC, and that Henson would eventually overcome his hands of stone and horrific offensive game to become a lottery guy and an NBA starter within his first month as a pro?Also, I would never call Ford a hater, but I might call you a hater for posting the same thing twice just because you didn't get the desired reaction from UNC fans the first time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting opinions from Chad Ford chat

---------------

Joseph (Provo, UT. )

Does Roy Williams not get the most out of his players? It appears that Macadoo is doing teh same thing that Barnes did. A big recruit that isn't playing up to the potential.

Chad Ford (1:41 PM)

It's a question I was discussing with a number of GMs yesterday. Obviously UNC gets a lot of blue chip talent which means they're going to be good no matter what. But how many of those players actually develop or get better while they are at UNC? I can name a bunch of players at Kentucky who improve their games with Cal. Much harder to come up with examples among the elite UNC recruits. Not sure how much development they get there.

--------------

Johnny (Detoit)

Do GM's really put so much value on 1 game? McAdoo had a stinker last night...how much will that effect him?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

No. But there have been concerns for a while and when you're the only elite player in a tournament, you get a lot of intense focus. McAdoo just doesn't seem to have added much of anything to his game. His body looks good. That's about it. He's not very skilled and the turnovers are a real problem. He'll get better as the season goes on ... and his stock will rise if he does. But he just has not been impressive here in either game.
Can blame it on haters here but Chad Ford wasn't talking to posters here. He in discussion with GMs of the NBA wonder how much Williams develops the kids. GMs, not posters at FBGs. Guess GMs are William haters too.
Nope, can't blame that on the haters. Of course there's no actual opinion there from GMs, only that Ford discussed the subject with them, so I'm not sure what there is to blame on anyone. Any ACC fan can come up with a long list of talent that has developed or improved under Roy at UNC. We can start with three guys from just last year's draft. Or maybe everyone thought Kendall Marshall and Tyler Zeller would be drafted in the first 17 picks of an NBA draft when they got to UNC, and that Henson would eventually overcome his hands of stone and horrific offensive game to become a lottery guy and an NBA starter within his first month as a pro?Also, I would never call Ford a hater, but I might call you a hater for posting the same thing twice just because you didn't get the desired reaction from UNC fans the first time.
The senses, they are a tinglin'
 
Interesting opinions from Chad Ford chat

---------------

Joseph (Provo, UT. )

Does Roy Williams not get the most out of his players? It appears that Macadoo is doing teh same thing that Barnes did. A big recruit that isn't playing up to the potential.

Chad Ford (1:41 PM)

It's a question I was discussing with a number of GMs yesterday. Obviously UNC gets a lot of blue chip talent which means they're going to be good no matter what. But how many of those players actually develop or get better while they are at UNC? I can name a bunch of players at Kentucky who improve their games with Cal. Much harder to come up with examples among the elite UNC recruits. Not sure how much development they get there.

--------------

Johnny (Detoit)

Do GM's really put so much value on 1 game? McAdoo had a stinker last night...how much will that effect him?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

No. But there have been concerns for a while and when you're the only elite player in a tournament, you get a lot of intense focus. McAdoo just doesn't seem to have added much of anything to his game. His body looks good. That's about it. He's not very skilled and the turnovers are a real problem. He'll get better as the season goes on ... and his stock will rise if he does. But he just has not been impressive here in either game.
Can blame it on haters here but Chad Ford wasn't talking to posters here. He in discussion with GMs of the NBA wonder how much Williams develops the kids. GMs, not posters at FBGs. Guess GMs are William haters too.
Nope, can't blame that on the haters. Of course there's no actual opinion there from GMs, only that Ford discussed the subject with them, so I'm not sure what there is to blame on anyone. Any ACC fan can come up with a long list of talent that has developed or improved under Roy at UNC. We can start with three guys from just last year's draft. Or maybe everyone thought Kendall Marshall and Tyler Zeller would be drafted in the first 17 picks of an NBA draft when they got to UNC, and that Henson would eventually overcome his hands of stone and horrific offensive game to become a lottery guy and an NBA starter within his first month as a pro?Also, I would never call Ford a hater, but I might call you a hater for posting the same thing twice just because you didn't get the desired reaction from UNC fans the first time.
Well Marshall and Zeller probably aren't the two best examples considering they got drafted pretty much in line with their high school recruiting numbers ( which for guys in their range is no small feet since a whole bunch of.guys below the top 15 never get a sniff of the NBA). Having said that, K gets accused of the same thing on occasion, but the hit rate on non-top 10 recruits for NBA purposes is exceedingly low. Pull up some of these past rankings and it's littered with guys you've never heard of (Duke and UNC calls these "failures" transfers), but the past 12-15 years has shown is that besides for some technical skills most of these kids are who they are by the time they are freshman.

 
Interesting opinions from Chad Ford chat

---------------

Joseph (Provo, UT. )

Does Roy Williams not get the most out of his players? It appears that Macadoo is doing teh same thing that Barnes did. A big recruit that isn't playing up to the potential.

Chad Ford (1:41 PM)

It's a question I was discussing with a number of GMs yesterday. Obviously UNC gets a lot of blue chip talent which means they're going to be good no matter what. But how many of those players actually develop or get better while they are at UNC? I can name a bunch of players at Kentucky who improve their games with Cal. Much harder to come up with examples among the elite UNC recruits. Not sure how much development they get there.

--------------

Johnny (Detoit)

Do GM's really put so much value on 1 game? McAdoo had a stinker last night...how much will that effect him?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

No. But there have been concerns for a while and when you're the only elite player in a tournament, you get a lot of intense focus. McAdoo just doesn't seem to have added much of anything to his game. His body looks good. That's about it. He's not very skilled and the turnovers are a real problem. He'll get better as the season goes on ... and his stock will rise if he does. But he just has not been impressive here in either game.
Can blame it on haters here but Chad Ford wasn't talking to posters here. He in discussion with GMs of the NBA wonder how much Williams develops the kids. GMs, not posters at FBGs. Guess GMs are William haters too.
Nope, can't blame that on the haters. Of course there's no actual opinion there from GMs, only that Ford discussed the subject with them, so I'm not sure what there is to blame on anyone. Any ACC fan can come up with a long list of talent that has developed or improved under Roy at UNC. We can start with three guys from just last year's draft. Or maybe everyone thought Kendall Marshall and Tyler Zeller would be drafted in the first 17 picks of an NBA draft when they got to UNC, and that Henson would eventually overcome his hands of stone and horrific offensive game to become a lottery guy and an NBA starter within his first month as a pro?Also, I would never call Ford a hater, but I might call you a hater for posting the same thing twice just because you didn't get the desired reaction from UNC fans the first time.
Well Marshall and Zeller probably aren't the two best examples considering they got drafted pretty much in line with their high school recruiting numbers ( which for guys in their range is no small feet since a whole bunch of.guys below the top 15 never get a sniff of the NBA). Having said that, K gets accused of the same thing on occasion, but the hit rate on non-top 10 recruits for NBA purposes is exceedingly low. Pull up some of these past rankings and it's littered with guys you've never heard of (Duke and UNC calls these "failures" transfers), but the past 12-15 years has shown is that besides for some technical skills most of these kids are who they are by the time they are freshman.
Yeah. The whole line of reasoning is silly. The vast majority of draft picks over the last 10+ years are high school guys, one and dones and foreigners. The college coach's role is pretty limited. If you look only at guys who stay two or more years, Roy and K guys are probably just as successful in the NBA as anyone, if not more successful.
 
[lots of stuff]
The "dominant" thing was a response to a point, not my point to make. The more basic, semantics-free point is that he doesn't need Ty Lawson (or Jacque Vaughn) to succeed.As far as Vaughn goes, I was in school during his Kansas years and not much of an NBA fan during most of his career. I'm pretty much useless when it comes to basketball around the turn of the millennium, unless it's the ACC. If it wasn't for the NBA thread discussions and other internet resources I'd know next to nothing about the Malone/Stockton Jazz or the Shaq/Kobe Lakers :bag:
 
Kendall Marshall obviously ended up much better than I thought he would be. He benefited from being on a loaded team (just like when he played AAU ball with Boo williams, which is why his stock jumped so much) but he's a great PG regardless.

Still have questions about him in the NBA (and clearly the Suns feel the same way, as he's off to the D-league) but I was dead wrong about him as a college PG. When i saw him play with his HS team, he looked like he couldn't even start in my rec league. He looked slow, couldn't shoot, didn't defend anyone and his team got their doors blown off. Kyrie Irving absolutely humiliated him during McDonald's AA week (made him fall down at least twice) and Tyler Thornton had outplayed him pretty much every time they met up in HS games. (actual HS season, not AAU)

I guess I was just of the opinion that any top 50 (let alone a top 25, UNC bound PG) recruit should be able to drop 20 points every night and lead his high school team to victories. Now its clear to me that certain players just need other great players around them. Nothing wrong with that.

 
was thinking about how Duke's opening run was akin to an NCAAT run as a #2 seed (though games not in this order):

Round of 64 - #15 seed Florida Gulf Coast

Round of 32 - #7 VCU

Sweet Sixteen - #3 Minnesota

Regional Final - #1 Kentucky (they were ranked #4 at the time)

Final Four - #1 Ohio State

Championship - #1 Louisville

 
was thinking about how Duke's opening run was akin to an NCAAT run as a #2 seed (though games not in this order):Round of 64 - #15 seed Florida Gulf CoastRound of 32 - #7 VCUSweet Sixteen - #3 MinnesotaRegional Final - #1 Kentucky (they were ranked #4 at the time)Final Four - #1 Ohio StateChampionship - #1 Louisville
Great run...last two are out if order but point is the same.I love Duke's mix of talent and experience this year. We just gotta develop some of that bench more and hope those teams we beat don't find a way to get their young rosters to gel too much when we see them again.
 
I don't think I've ever seen freshly-cut-down-nets as uniform trim before. That's fantastic.At the top of the hour, ESPN2 has something called "Jimmy V's ESPY Speech" scheduled to air. I'm going to run a stopwatch and see how I long I last until Valvano's courage and authenticity these three pounds of onions I'm going to chop make me :cry: .
Love that speech. No matter how many times I watch it I cry like a baby. Anyone that has had a friend/loved one/anybody they know die from cancer should see this speech.
 
I fell asleep in the second half last night, and woke up with around 21 seconds left in the game, and State fouled a guy on a 3 point shot. :o State managed to pull out the win so I was happy, and it being the Jimmy V classic made the win even better. :wolf:

 
Good win, needed that one badly. Hopefully we are 13-2 going into the showdown with Duke at home.

 
I don't think I've ever seen freshly-cut-down-nets as uniform trim before. That's fantastic.At the top of the hour, ESPN2 has something called "Jimmy V's ESPY Speech" scheduled to air. I'm going to run a stopwatch and see how I long I last until Valvano's courage and authenticity these three pounds of onions I'm going to chop make me :cry: .
According to the official timepiece.. 1:46. Sometime during "If you laugh, you think, and you cry... that's a full day. That's a heck of a day. You do that seven days a week, you're gonna have something special."ETA: Those onions must have had a ton of Propanethiol S-oxide.
Just an amazing speech all around. Valvano has such amazing energy throughout the whole speech... and then he finishes and you watch K and Vitale basically almost carry the guy back to his seat. Inspiring every time I see it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top