I get it now. You travel around thread to thread in this forum antagonizing fans of other teams because you have no life.Clay is a hell of a player but not nearly as good off the roids.
he's taken. I've been talking him up in these forums for like 3 or 4 weeks now. he's great. he's better than Kuhn was at the same point in his career. same size as Mike Alstott was.I am developing a man crush on Ripkowski.
He missed Wentz badly too. I think he made one play all night and allowed probably 4 first downs on his weak ### tackles. He's needed as a body but he's still quite a liability.Love the missed tackle by Randall (vs Smallwood).
So, what, ... we cant share his hairy, husky, bulling his way straight forward virility? Damn dude, that's kinda selfish.he's taken. I've been talking him up in these forums for like 3 or 4 weeks now. he's great. he's better than Kuhn was at the same point in his career. same size as Mike Alstott was.
Ripkowski's gonna bring the FB back
Last night felt good. Even though I know a short winning streak that doesn't get them to the playoffs with a team ready to compete would be bad long term on both draft position and schedule I can't help myself, I want to win. I maintain hope that they can find themselves, sometimes against all reason. This is something I learned in the 70's and 80's. After th e60's I was spoiled. I may be again, but I always hope for the best.
Randall and Rollins missed some plays last night, but they made some as well. given that they are just back, and likely rusty, I give them a Mulligan. That said I want the learning curve to accelerate out of control.
We are going to need Ryan back at inside L.B. now, not in a week or two.
I was hoping to see a bit more out of Christian Michael. Maybe next week.
I still can't believe some of the decisions Starks is making. Several times a game he seems to completely miss the open lane with blockers for the closing lane overloaded with defenders. He needs to find his mojo, or better yet find Barry Sanders' mojo.
Aaron, Olivia on top this week. Let that hammy heal. No standing wheelbarrow into helicopter this week.
Tretter is the depth...not expendable at all imo.Zero sacks allowed on 40+ passing plays is impressive against the Philly defense. GB's offensive line has delivered some godly pass pro games this year and it's good to see Spriggs getting into the rotation. I think Tretter is officially expendable as he's about equal to Linsley.
I agree. With how they treated Sitton I could see Lang being next to go... that would be a mistake. If we do get Wolf next season I would imagine we would lock Lang up.I would love to keep Tretter (and banish Barclay forever) but I don't know if they have the luxury of keeping him and re-signing Lang as well.
The guy plays so reckless/hard he gets hurt so often (or is coming off of HGH so injuries are more common). Out of 8 seasons only 3 were a full 16 games. 2 were 15 game seasons so I am not sure what the deal was with those 1 games. But still. The guy can't stay healthy. I have no idea why his hamstrings are so fragile. If you watch a youtube of his work outs he can bring his knee to his face... plenty of flexibility.How good is Clay Matthews really? My brother mentioned while watching Denver/KC that if Houston and Vonn Miller are 99s, that makes Matthews about a 75 when healthy. I guess he's been the tallest midget on a mediocre D for a long time but is he really worth the 15MM cap hit next year?
Over the past 3.5 seasons (50 starts) he's gotten a grand total of 29 sacks. So averaging about a sack every other game plus change. Is a 9 sack guy really worth 15MM per season? I'm not so sure. Obviously he got stuck playing inside because Thompson hasn't properly stocked the shelves at LB so that hurts him some. But is he getting by on name recognition at this point?
I'm pretty sure Wentz would take offense to the comparison.Two huge plays against HWY23 while Philly was backed up deep. He is just not a good player at this point. Made Wentz look like Vick.
True...will be interesting to see how they treat Lang. Like Brew said about Sitton...will this injury now and him being out for whatever hurt that? He does not seem to have the injury history that Sitton had though.I would love to keep Tretter (and banish Barclay forever) but I don't know if they have the luxury of keeping him and re-signing Lang as well.
Half of those have probably been against the Bears. It's that beautiful head of hair that has taken him so far.How good is Clay Matthews really? My brother mentioned while watching Denver/KC that if Houston and Vonn Miller are 99s, that makes Matthews about a 75 when healthy. I guess he's been the tallest midget on a mediocre D for a long time but is he really worth the 15MM cap hit next year?
Over the past 3.5 seasons (50 starts) he's gotten a grand total of 29 sacks. So averaging about a sack every other game plus change. Is a 9 sack guy really worth 15MM per season? I'm not so sure. Obviously he got stuck playing inside because Thompson hasn't properly stocked the shelves at LB so that hurts him some. But is he getting by on name recognition at this point?
He was second on the team in tackles last night. Long way off from making just one play all night. But don't let the facts get in the way of your Randall-hate.He missed Wentz badly too. I think he made one play all night and allowed probably 4 first downs on his weak ### tackles. He's needed as a body but he's still quite a liability.
If the rumors are true about Sitton's release there was a lot more to his release than injuries, salary, etc. And his release was well-deserved. And how has Sitton been doing this year?I agree. With how they treated Sitton I could see Lang being next to go... that would be a mistake. If we do get Wolf next season I would imagine we would lock Lang up.
what were the Sitton rumors? I understood why and it obviously paid offIf the rumors are true about Sitton's release there was a lot more to his release than injuries, salary, etc. And his release was well-deserved. And how has Sitton been doing this year?
Speaking of, remember all the criticism when Sitton was released? Who was he replaced by? I can't remember his name now. Hmmmm. Must be playing so well you do['t even hear his name.
And remember the criticism of the Packers releasing Kuhn? Seems like they improved there.
And remember the criticism of the Packers taking Adams over Allen Robinson? Still would prefer Robinson but that gap has shrunk considerably.
And the criticism of the Packers dumping Masthay and signing Schum? And the criticism of Schum early on? He's been punting very well lately.
Yeah well it kind of pads your stats when you allow receivers to catch 20 yards passes on 2nd and 9 backed up on their own 2. Did you see him whiff on Wentz. It was laughable.He was second on the team in tackles last night. Long way off from making just one play all night. But don't let the facts get in the way of your Randall-hate.
If the rumors are true about Sitton's release there was a lot more to his release than injuries, salary, etc. And his release was well-deserved. And how has Sitton been doing this year?
Speaking of, remember all the criticism when Sitton was released? Who was he replaced by? I can't remember his name now. Hmmmm. Must be playing so well you don't even hear his name.
And remember the criticism of the Packers releasing Kuhn? Seems like they improved there.
And remember the criticism of the Packers taking Adams over Allen Robinson? Still would prefer Robinson but that gap has shrunk considerably.
And the criticism of the Packers dumping Masthay and signing Schum? And the criticism of Schum early on? He's been punting very well lately.
Cherry pick much?If the rumors are true about Sitton's release there was a lot more to his release than injuries, salary, etc. And his release was well-deserved. And how has Sitton been doing this year?
Speaking of, remember all the criticism when Sitton was released? Who was he replaced by? I can't remember his name now. Hmmmm. Must be playing so well you don't even hear his name.
And remember the criticism of the Packers releasing Kuhn? Seems like they improved there.
And remember the criticism of the Packers taking Adams over Allen Robinson? Still would prefer Robinson but that gap has shrunk considerably.
And the criticism of the Packers dumping Masthay and signing Schum? And the criticism of Schum early on? He's been punting very well lately.
.Agree on Starks...that one screen that went for 5 yards. He cut outside when the blocks had the inside sealed off likely for a much bigger gain and he ran right to where the waiting free man was. Just bad.
I'm in must win position also and am giving them a shot. Only had Rams on my roster and picked them up over Tampa and Carolina.Anyone have some perspective of how the defense might be shaping up with a juicy home MU vs. the Texans? Is this a defense worth the PU in must win FF games this week?
Early forecast is saying drizzle and 40s. This may help out.I'm in must win position also and am giving them a shot. Only had Rams on my roster and picked them up over Tampa and Carolina.
You think Sitton is why our rushing sucks?Cherry pick much?
Sitton's been injured.
His replacement has led GB to what in terms of rushing yards? tied for a league worst in rushing tds. Rodgers still gets pressured often.
When Adams gets 1400 yards then you can make this outrageous claim. I mean TY Montgomery is a better rb than Lacy...just look at their 2016 stats!!!
And Sitton's injury history was a part of the reason he was released.C'mon Nick. The Packers offensive line has been fantastic this year. The switch from Sitton to Taylor saved them a ton of $ and there has been no noticeable drop off. The line only started struggling when they had Don Barclay in there. He's awful. Now that they've given the job to Spriggs, they are back to playing great. Will be even better when Lang comes back.Cherry pick much?
Sitton's been injured.
His replacement has led GB to what in terms of rushing yards? tied for a league worst in rushing tds. Rodgers still gets pressured often.
When Adams gets 1400 yards then you can make this outrageous claim. I mean TY Montgomery is a better rb than Lacy...just look at their 2016 stats!!!
No. The defense will likely get housed by Miller's speed and having a functional level WR. They've gotten exactly one turnover since 2008.Anyone have some perspective of how the defense might be shaping up with a juicy home MU vs. the Texans? Is this a defense worth the PU in must win FF games this week?
I enjoyed the win, sure. Randall is young and inexperienced still. Not sure how long he gets a pass on poor play though. He's finishing out his second season and has shown no improvement at all. He's been tentative and afraid to hit his whole career thus far. He plays like a guy who doesn't want to hit anyone. Always has.I saw it. Looked like a still young and inexperienced guy who was rusty and tentative returning from injury. It was a very bad play. I also saw Wentz make Daniels, Peppers, and Mathews miss.
In a season like this one do you have even a few moments of joy after a win before you go negative and defeatist or is that constant, no matter what? Me, I have had an enjoyable week thus far. Sure the team is flawed, they nearly all are. The rules are set up to impede long-term success, and yet we have experienced quite a bit.
I hope you find a happy place. Let me help.
https://www.google.com/search?q=&tbm=isch&tbs=rimg:CTNfyUhPpFTGIjhiaJCLaE27IXxVnA-5AO59d38udbIew-sQA-6fgFkRpAdVOOqmFyk4DXzqfKH9rcZjBzlzLJJfnyoSCWJokItoTbshEcA3XxMt6HB5KhIJfFWcD7kA7n0R2IfLVmPQS0AqEgl3fy51sh7D6xFNdJmntUew4yoSCRAD7p-AWRGkEUX_1NZljLGpQKhIJB1U46qYXKTgRveoyYziuM0MqEgkNfOp8of2txhGlK4P-eXUFkyoSCWMHOXMskl-fETA0OIM57_1zK&tbo=u&gws_rd=ssl#gws_rd=ssl&imgrc=vBI0s7An0EXpwM%3A
You keep on being you.I enjoyed the win, sure. Randall is young and inexperienced still. Not sure how long he gets a pass on poor play though. He's finishing out his second season and has shown no improvement at all. He's been tentative and afraid to hit his whole career thus far. He plays like a guy who doesn't want to hit anyone. Always has.
One turnover since 2008? Wait? What?No. The defense will likely get housed by Miller's speed and having a functional level WR. They've gotten exactly one turnover since 2008.
You mean Miller with 1.5 good ankles? Their entire RB arsenal is questionable this week. Don't get me wrong, Miller will go and he will be a threat, but it's not like they are incredibly deep at RB that they can run their RB into the ground when he's limping into the game.No. The defense will likely get housed by Miller's speed and having a functional level WR. They've gotten exactly one turnover since 2008.
I wouldn't touch their defense in fantasy but maybe I have seen too much of it and not enough Texans offense. The defense is bad, add to that Clay may sit again this week and it gets worseAnyone have some perspective of how the defense might be shaping up with a juicy home MU vs. the Texans? Is this a defense worth the PU in must win FF games this week?
I haven't seen that at all. He's not even on their injury reportI wouldn't touch their defense in fantasy but maybe I have seen too much of it and not enough Texans offense. The defense is bad, add to that Clay may sit again this week and it gets worse
Going off memory here. Haven't looked it up.One turnover since 2008? Wait? What?
I think it's pretty much just a precautionary "He might not play" because he gets hurt a lot.I haven't seen that at all. He's not even on their injury report
http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/green-bay-packers-team-injuries
In that case, this should be the weekly norm for him. I'm shocked when I see him out thereI think it's pretty much just a precautionary "He might not play" because he gets hurt a lot.
Who is more hurt? Miller or the Packers Defense. Those stats may be true but has Brock faced anything close to the Packers D in terms of disorganization and lack of talent in the defensive backfield?You mean Miller with 1.5 good ankles? Their entire RB arsenal is questionable this week. Don't get me wrong, Miller will go and he will be a threat, but it's not like they are incredibly deep at RB that they can run their RB into the ground when he's limping into the game.
I think the GB defense could be a very sneaky play this week:
- Osweiler has thrown an INT every game except for 2 this season (averaging 1.2 per game)
- He's thrown for more than 1 TD only 3 times this season.
- Lamar Miller has averaged over 4.0 YPC only 5 games this season
- Special teams... I think GB's special teams are a big difference this week in starting the GB D/ST
Especially lately, I think teams are forcing Osweiler to beat them and closing in on Miller. Miller is still getting his to some degree but is not being given the ball as much:
First 4 games Miller averaged 23.25 rushes per game, 3.5 targets with 3.25 receptions
Last 4 games Miller is averaging 18.75, 2.5 targets, 1.75 receptions
Big drop off
Me... I'd probably find someone better to start, but I can definitely see how this would be a play worth considering
I started affectionately refering to him as "Street Clothes."In that case, this should be the weekly norm for him. I'm shocked when I see him out there