Doesn't look like the answer. None of the teams less than .5 above the cut had Cohen's score count for them.The difference between yahoo and nfl.com is 0.5 points for Cohen (5 yards). Definitely possible that is the entire difference in the cutline. If you look at the individual entries right around the cut it would tell the tale for sure.
-QG
There are still about 6 players who I am not capturing stats for because they haven't accumulated any stats yet this year. I know M. Wheaton is one of those players so he is currently counting as a zero in Calcomatic right now. If he got his first catch of the year last night, I'll be able to find the NFL ID associated with his stats and then his score will be available to count for the people who have him in the contest. I just checked and Wheaton only had 1 catch for 9 yards so his 1.9 points probably won't move the needle too much I'm guessing.Doesn't look like the answer. None of the teams less than .5 above the cut had Cohen's score count for them.
FWIW, Wheaton lateraled back to Cohen who essentially just fell on the ball where it hit him. He never made it back to where Wheaton was when he tossed it, so I think he has to be charged with lost yardage on the play.
so nfl.com is correct on that. Wonder if it is a similar play though. Those pass/lateral ones are always tricky.Doesn't look like the answer. None of the teams less than .5 above the cut had Cohen's score count for them.
FWIW, Wheaton lateraled back to Cohen who essentially just fell on the ball where it hit him. He never made it back to where Wheaton was when he tossed it, so I think he has to be charged with lost yardage on the play.
This is becoming quite the Scooby Doo mystery.There are still about 6 players who I am not capturing stats for because they haven't accumulated any stats yet this year. I know M. Wheaton is one of those players so he is currently counting as a zero in Calcomatic right now. If he got his first catch of the year last night, I'll be able to find the NFL ID associated with his stats and then his score will be available to count for the people who have him in the contest. I just checked and Wheaton only had 1 catch for 9 yards so his 1.9 points probably won't move the needle too much I'm guessing.
Can you double check Yahoo? I just checked these 4 sites and all of them have stats that work out to 10 points.Calcomatic has 10 points for Seattle Defense. FBG has 12. Boxscore on yahoo shows 2 sacks plus 2 intereceptions plus 3 fumbles lost by Rams to Seahawks.
-QG
NFL.com shows 5 turnovers in the box score.Steeler said:Can you double check Yahoo? I just checked these 4 sites and all of them have stats that work out to 10 points.
ESPN: 2 sacks, 2 INT, 2 DFR
CBS : 2 sacks, 2 INT, 2 DFR
NFL : 2 sacks, 2 INT, 2 DFR
MFL : 2 sacks, 2 INT, 2 DFR
Ertz alone is averinging 19.74 dont think your TE are rightQBs: Wilson (2), Wentz (3)
They have very nicely alternated good/bad weeks with each other - resulting in an average of 30.4 for the position. Need Wentz to have another good week this week with Wilson out.
RBs: Hunt (5), Hyde (4), McCaffrey (3), Cook (2), Smallwood (1)
This started out well, but with Cook's injury, Hyde's job security, McCaffrey's inconsistency, and Hunt's ownership stats - this is a dicey position for me right now. Averaging 44.8 for the 2 RBs combined - but that is skewed somewhat by Hunt's huge Week 1.
WRs: Hogan (4), Jordy Nelson (3), Cooks (2), Cooper (1), Richardson (1), Goodwin (1)
Hogan has been good, Cooper has been bad - hoping to see more consistency from Nelson and Cooks (though I had both Hogan and Cooks knowing the Patriots could feature different receivers each week). Averaging 38.2 combined from WRs.
TEs: Ertz (5), Engram (2), Graham (1)
Ertz has been great, but he is now on close to 50% of all remaining teams, Engram could show an uptick in value over the next several weeks, while Graham finally woke up this week. Averaging 16.5 points per week.
FLEX: RB (5), TE (3), WR (2) - average 32.3 per week
K: Walsh (4), Crosby (1)
This has been the Blair Walsh Project. Averaging 7.9 points per week.
D: Seahawks (4), Patriots (1)
Averaging 9.4 points. Patriots have been bad, but they have the Jets this week while Seattle in on Bye, so I hope that pays off....
Overall, a solid, if unspectacular, showing. In retrospect, I think I could have chosen a better WR than Cooper, but he may hold the key to my future with fewer than 500 owners remaining if he and Carr can get on the same page. I have used every player at least once, and Hunt and Ertz in all 5 weeks. Bye's won't be a significant issue until week 11, when I have 2 of my now 3 starting RBs out. Perhaps Smallwood will be contributing then...
QBs - 30.4
RBs - 44.8
WRs - 38.2
TEs - 16.5
Flex - 32.3
K - 7.9
D - 9.4
TOTAL - 179.5
I love this looks like a pain to figure out thoughI like @Sinn Fein format above. For me:
QB -- 28.11
RB -- 41.2
WR -- 36.9
TE -- 18.56
Flex -- 34.8
PK -- 12.4
DST -- 15.8
TOTAL -- 187.77
Yeah - rechecking with Spreadsheet:Ertz alone is averinging 19.74 dont think your TE are right
Not bad at all. FBG highlights the guys who counted for you each week. Took about 5 mins to do the adding and goesintos.halebop78 said:I love this looks like a pain to figure out though
The man!Calcomatic is all fixed up now and ready to go for tonight!
Lol you and me both this week sucks.Looks like I'll be missing DJ, Powell, Parker, Sturgis, and possibly Mariota due to injury, and Dalton, Paul Richardson, and Witten to BYE. Somehow managed to not be close to the cut so far, but it's not looking good this week.
Still giving Smallwood 0.2 points - snafu from the official scoring originally crediting Smallwood with a 2 yd run, before changing it to BarnerSteeler said:Calcomatic is all fixed up now and ready to go for tonight!
One of the few who didn't make if ?only Ertz can grab 2 catches for 16.5 pts lol. Best investment this year.
Oof. That's going to be tough to overcome.Cook
Smallwood
Parker
Boyd
Sturgis
Olsen
Kelley
Zay
Richardson
Witten
Hauschka
Dallas
All 0 this week
![]()
-QG
Most prolific Trio this season?
Hunt
Hogan
Ertz
Combined on 2125 teams that are still alive, with a 86.9% survival rate (compared to 46.4 overall survival rate).
I think you will be hard pressed to find another trio of players who are collectively owned by 2000+ teams, with such a high survival rate.
the good news is I still have 17 players and Ertz got me off to a good startOof. That's going to be tough to overcome.
Likely my exit.the good news is I still have 17 players and Ertz got me off to a good start![]()
assuming Kelley is out I am rolling:
Stafford/Winston
Ajayi/Hunt/Kerwynn
Evans/Wallace/Hogan/Anderson/Wright/Goodwin
Ertz/Gates/Gresham
Dawson
Washington/Detroit
![]()
-QG
Yep.Most prolific Trio this season?
Hunt
Hogan
Ertz
Combined on 2125 teams that are still alive, with a 86.9% survival rate (compared to 46.4 overall survival rate).
I think you will be hard pressed to find another trio of players who are collectively owned by 2000+ teams, with such a high survival rate.