rustycolts
Footballguy
steelers live scoring app. try this link http://calcomatic.com/HomeDoing them individually? How do you get it for your whole team? firs ttime using the website
steelers live scoring app. try this link http://calcomatic.com/HomeDoing them individually? How do you get it for your whole team? firs ttime using the website
Right. I enter my team in under Live, then when I go to Home -> Overall Percent I get every entry, not just my own. When I go to Live-> My entry it only shows salaries and positions.steelers live scoring app. try this link http://calcomatic.com/Home
Yeah, you have to search for each player on your team at that link.Right. I enter my team in under Live, then when I go to Home -> Overall Percent I get every entry, not just my own. When I go to Live-> My entry it only shows salaries and positions.
I guess do I have to search my players individually for their % owned or is there a link on the site that does it for my team
Gotcha didn't understand your question. I did my individually of course I am tech impaired so there might be an easier way.Right. I enter my team in under Live, then when I go to Home -> Overall Percent I get every entry, not just my own. When I go to Live-> My entry it only shows salaries and positions.
I guess do I have to search my players individually for their % owned or is there a link on the site that does it for my team
I really like this team and this approach. You may kick yourself for no DJ or Elliott for Bell. Brown should pull you thru that though if he's back by the byes. You'll own everyone at K and D,I like to have large rosters in this contest, with a mix of studs & cheap value plays, and an emphasis on players who will produce late in the season (see: Allen, Winston, Bell). I try to fill some of the starting slots by throwing money at it and getting studs (who have the biggest weaks), and other slots by throwing numbers at it and letting best ball take care of the rest. Generally risk is good, and distinctiveness is good, though I didn't put a lot of effort into either of those.
My roster, with ownership percentages:
QB: 4 for $22
4.9% QB J Winston TB $10
19.6% QB A Dalton CIN $6
16.5% QB S Darnold NYJ $3
13.3% QB J Allen BUF $3
RB: 5 for $92
14.6% RB T Gurley LAR $37
2.2% RB L Bell PIT $37
41.1% RB P Barber TB $8
7.5% RB B Powell NYJ $7
2.9% RB C Edmonds ARI $3
WR: 8 for $77
9.4% WR A Brown PIT $37
36.5% WR K Cole JAX $7
8.2% WR A Miller CHI $7
21.0% WR Jo Brown BAL $6
15.1% WR M Gallup DAL $6
13.9% WR C Godwin TB $6
24.4% WR J Ross CIN $5
6.9% WR T Smith NO $3
TE: 4 for $40
15.4% TE R Gronkowski NE $26
4.6% TE J Cook OAK $8
3.5% TE R Griffin HOU $3
3.1% TE N Vannett SEA $3
PK: 4 for $8
18.3% PK K Fairbairn HOU $2
9.0% PK C Parkey CHI $2
5.3% PK Z Gonzalez CLE $2
2.3% PK J Sanders MIA $2
DT: 5 for $11
3.2% DT Redskins WAS $3
22.2% DT Browns CLE $2
7.1% DT Raiders OAK $2
5.6% DT Dolphins MIA $2
3.4% DT Colts IND $2
Breaking this down by price range:
Studs ($26+): 4 for $137. Todd Gurley ($37), Le'Veon Bell ($37), Antonio Brown ($37), Rob Gronkowski ($26). I was initially thinking "don't try to be clever here, just take the best guys who have the best shot at huge games & huge seasons." Then with Bell I tried to get clever; I figure that his holdout will depress his ownership but will probably blow over by week 5. That call could make or break me.
Solid starters ($11-$25): 0 for $0. None. Even with the ones who have relatively good prices, I'd rather pay up more for a stud or go with cheaper guys.
Undervalued midrange guys ($7-$10): 6 for $47. Jameis Winston ($10), Jared Cook ($8), Peyton Barber ($8), Bilal Powell ($7), Keelan Cole ($7), Anthony Miller ($7). At QB it seemed worth paying a little more for one guy with some upside, at TE Cook seemed really undervalued as the 2017 Raiders leading receiver, at RB I had to go up to this price range to get guys who have a reasonable shot at startable production each week, and at WR a couple of obvious value plays were slightly more expensive than the others.
Cheap value plays ($2-$6): 20 for $66. See most of my roster, above. Preseason good news + best ball scoring = lots of cheap fpts. Mostly pretty obvious value plays, though apparently the field didn't always agree. These guys give my roster a pretty high floor, and make the studs affordable, and have some upside themselves.
And by position:
RBs are generally overpriced for what they produced, so I wanted to get few of them. 4 potentially startable guys including 2 studs seems like it's about the minimum, and stud RBs are less overpriced than the rest because they do put up huge numbers. One shot at upside in Edmonds - it's not worth handcuffing your RBs because risk is good in this format, but it can be worth taking a shot at the handcuff to a RB that you don't own.
WR+TE is where most of the value plays are, and also some strong stud options.
QB: Normally I like to get a top QB plus 1-2 QB2s, but pricing was much kinder to the cheap options this year (e.g., Dalton+Tannehill+Darnold+Allen for $18) which favors throwing numbers at it. I considered my standard approach with Roethlisberger ($14) + Dalton ($6) + Darnold ($3), or that $18 foursome (though 3 have wk11 byes), before settling on Winston+Dalton+Darnold+Allen.
D+K: The case for getting 5 players at each position: we don't know who will get a pick 6 or kick 4 FGs any given weekend, so each one has basically the same weekly upside for just $2-3, plus a chance of hitting on this year's Zuerlein/Jags D. The case for only 4: 1) with 5, each one is only starting about 3 games for you on average, 2) once you've already picked your favorite 4, the 5th one is either more expensive or less good, 3) with the roster cap at 30 a 5th D/K limits your ability to take more value plays elsewhere. The last of these arguments swayed me down from 5+5 to 5+4, so I just have 9 players at D+K with fairly average spending.
Booo. what a crappy website.Yeah, you have to search for each player on your team at that link.
No Royce on my teams this year.Tennessee_ATO said:Am I going to be the one guy without Royce? I'm just not liking Denver this year. The whole thing looks kind of like it's a mess.
pluralityrustycolts said:Team breakdowns
18- 4051
19- 1741
20- 1390
21- 1189
22- 1104
23- 1008
24- 895
25- 785
26- 670
27- 562
28- 470
29- 440
30- 810
Once again 18 player teams are overwhelming majority.
I went with Olsen as one of my elites. 3.49%. Awesome to see that. I'll take it any day. Burton is my #2. Cook #3. Hollister is a flier at #4. Can't believe more people didn't grab Cook either. Bargain for him.Now, I get it that people are spending money on TEs because of the 1.5 PPR.
But Jimmy Graham? He might finish with 8 TDs on 40 catches this year.
I don't have Olsen on my team, but you have to think he'll still get enough targets to outperform his price.I went with Olsen as one of my elites. 3.49%. Awesome to see that. I'll take it any day. Burton is my #2. Cook #3. Hollister is a flier at #4. Can't believe more people didn't grab Cook either. Bargain for him.
I have three of those guys on my team - Everett, Benjamin and Boyd.Here are the lowest owned players (<2%), out of the ones who made my not-that-short list of guys worth considering:
0.62% WR T Smith CAR $3 - big play threat, possibly Ginn 2.0
0.67% WR C Williams ARI $3 - might be a starting WR
0.73% TE G Swaim DAL $3 - a starting TE
0.79% WR Z Jones BUF $3 - might be a starting WR
0.83% TE G Everett LAR $5 - a 2nd year breakout candidate
0.85% WR D Jackson TB $8 - not as sexy an option as Godwin
0.91% RB K Juszczyk SF $3 - could be the Niners' receiving back
0.97% WR J Nelson ARI $3 - big play threat
1.01% QB J Rosen ARI $5 - could be their starting QB soon
1.03% WR D Chark JAX $3 - big play threat, could be a rookie breakout
1.08% WR D Pettis SF $4 - could be a rookie breakout
1.17% TE T Higbee LAR $4 - a starting TE for now
1.20% WR T Benjamin LAC $3 - big play threat
1.22% WR T Gabriel CHI $3 - big play threat
1.32% WR T Williams DAL $4 - might be a starting WR
1.36% QB J Allen BUF $3 - could be their starting QB soon
1.48% WR T Boyd CIN $3 - might be a starting WR
1.73% WR K Coutee HOU $3 - big play threat
1.98% RB R Smith DAL $3 - Zeke's handcuff
Jared Cook?I went with Olsen as one of my elites. 3.49%. Awesome to see that. I'll take it any day. Burton is my #2. Cook #3. Hollister is a flier at #4. Can't believe more people didn't grab Cook either. Bargain for him.
I changed DEF1 from Houston to Baltimore after reading some less than complimentary content about Watt's presence since 2015 and about Houston's secondary.-OZ- said:What was your last move? Not the thousands of iterations but true last decision?
There are two Graham narratives:Now, I get it that people are spending money on TEs because of the 1.5 PPR.
But Jimmy Graham? He might finish with 8 TDs on 40 catches this year.
He was a TE1 last year. Had 80 targets. No one in his $ range saw anywhere close to that many targets last year, and his situation has only improved in Oakland.Jared Cook?
I've always been a big Graham fan. But apparently he looked pretty slow on tape last season.There are two Graham narratives:
A: He's slow and only a red zone target now, OR
B: Seattle's QB has never had a productive relationship with a receiver not named Doug Baldwin.
If the more popular narrative (A) turns out to be false, Graham is the only TE in the league other than Kelce who can outperform 16 game Gronk.
He averages roughly 125 targets in Carolina 2014-2016. Travis Kelce has cracked 120 once. He's younger but I'm just fine with status quo for Olsen to out perform his price.I don't have Olsen on my team, but you have to think he'll still get enough targets to outperform his price.
I don't fault you for seeing that way. I've watched the film. I think he has a shot at TE1.I've always been a big Graham fan. But apparently he looked pretty slow on tape last season.
Kelce is a beast. One has to wonder if his target share will shrink now that KC has more weapons.He averages roughly 125 targets in Carolina 2014-2016. Travis Kelce has cracked 120 once. He's younger but I'm just fine with status quo for Olsen to out perform his price.
And Alex Smith is gone. Alex Smith would often look to him not only because the offense catered to a TE. I really think Olsen is Kelce-light at his price. I have 4 TEs, and my TE2 and TE3 are many people's TE 1 and 2 so if he sucks then I at least have a backup plan. I am kind of hoping one of my other TEs does well enough to creep into flex territory some weeks, so striking out on Olsen would be a bummer. A lot of my bigger market guys were very low percentile owned (Barkley, Cook, Thielen, Olsen). I will be posting later, but I'm happy to see I have a lot of high % players and a lot of my higher $ players are low %. If I picked the right guys I could go far with that combo.Kelce is a beast. One has to wonder if his target share will shrink now that KC has more weapons.
I like my team, but now I'm already second-guessing how much I spent on TE and that I should have spent more.And Alex Smith is gone. Alex Smith would often look to him not only because the offense catered to a TE. I really think Olsen is Kelce-light at his price. I have 4 TEs, and my TE2 and TE3 are many people's TE 1 and 2 so if he sucks then I at least have a backup plan. I am kind of hoping one of my other TEs does well enough to creep into flex territory some weeks, so striking out on Olsen would be a bummer. A lot of my bigger market guys were very low percentile owned (Barkley, Cook, Thielen, Olsen). I will be posting later, but I'm happy to see I have a lot of high % players and a lot of my higher $ players are low %. If I picked the right guys I could go far with that combo.
Kicked in ten bucks. Hoping it breaks down to 60 cents/week (although if past years are any indication, it will be over a buck a week).Steeler said:Thanks Rusty! Appreciate it!
All the rosters were loaded into calcomatic.com this morning - let me know if you see any issues with your roster. Also, calcomatic.com is currently showing scores from pre-season but I'll get that fixed before the game tonight - I can't do it from work.
Blech. I couldn't possibly be less of a fan. I documented my incredulity about the hyping of the guy when he went to GB on some thread around here a couple of years ago. He wasn't actually a TE1 last year -- 54 catches for 688 yards and 2 TDs put him squarely in the top-half of TE2 range, which I guess if fine as far as that goes. But he's got no big-game upside. He drops the ball, runs horrible routes at (a lot of) times, and is remarkably unable to go up and get the ball in traffic given his body. And last year was his best year in his 9 year career. I got to watch him up close and personal for years at Tennessee. He is just not good. He looks like he should be awesome. But he isn't. He thinks he is (when he announced that he should be franchised by the Titans as a WR, it was one of the more absurd things I've ever seen in the NFL, and that's saying something). But he isn't. We have 9 years of data now that shows exactly what he is, IMO.He was a TE1 last year. Had 80 targets. No one in his $ range saw anywhere close to that many targets last year, and his situation has only improved in Oakland.
He finished TE12 in my PPR leagueBlech. I couldn't possibly be less of a fan. I documented my incredulity about the hyping of the guy when he went to GB on some thread around here a couple of years ago. He wasn't actually a TE1 last year -- 54 catches for 688 yards and 2 TDs put him squarely in the top-half of TE2 range, which I guess if fine as far as that goes. But he's got no big-game upside. He drops the ball, runs horrible routes at (a lot of) times, and is remarkably unable to go up and get the ball in traffic given his body. And last year was his best year in his 9 year career. I got to watch him up close and personal for years at Tennessee. He is just not good. He looks like he should be awesome. But he isn't. He thinks he is (when he announced that he should be franchised by the Titans as a WR, it was one of the more absurd things I've ever seen in the NFL, and that's saying something). But he isn't. We have 9 years of data now that shows exactly what he is, IMO.
Unto each his own, obviously, but I think he was overpriced at $8. For $2 or even $3 I could squint and see it. But that's why there are thousands of different rosters in this competition every year. Give me Hooper for that $8. He has the dropsies and can't run routes at (a lot of) times too. But he's on the right side of 30 and is still theoretically improving.
I'll take that bet. $20? Hooper may drop a ton, but he'll have space underneath to operate and he's still in his growth years. Cook is going to drop his fair share too, and is on the wrong side of 30 to suddenly be good. Plus, for all his issues last year and only starting 8 games, Hooper caught 49 -- a whopping 5 less than Cook.He finished TE12 in my PPR league![]()
ETA: Hooper will be lucky to have as many targets as Cook has receptions this year
So I've bookmarked this link, but how do you navigate to this? I don't see it in the menu path...?apalmer said:
Calcomatic.com under Home and Overall PercentageWhere are you guys getting %’s? Not liking what I’m seeing - I prob have the highest owned team imaginable!
Go to thr standings, and there's a link on there.So I've bookmarked this link, but how do you navigate to this? I don't see it in the menu path...?
That's actually a good thing IMO. Finished 6th or 7th one year with a team of all the highest owned guys. Thought I would get killed in the finals but my defense went off and I had most everyone else covered to an extent. With only 250 in the finals, you'll still have a pretty unique team even if all yours players are 80% owned. People compare this to dfs tournies, but you can win small tournies playing them like a cash game or chalk. You've got to get to the finals to have a shot and the process of narrowing it down from 15000 to 250 (1.6%) definitely favors not being unique.Where are you guys getting %’s? Not liking what I’m seeing - I prob have the highest owned team imaginable!
like your stylescoobus said:QB - Patrick Mahomes II - KC/12 - $11
QB - Jameis Winston - TB/5 - $10
QB - Andy Dalton - CIN/9 - $6
calcomatic.com is ready to go! It is no longer in preseason mode![]()
Couple reminders:
Thanks to everyone who already donated!! If you haven't donated yet, what are you waiting for
- This is not official - final results are posted at FBG usually on Tuesday morning.
- The scoring for the contest changed a bit from last year and I think I captured all of those changes but there may be some discrepancies early in the season until everything can be ironed out.
- There are still 10 players who I have not been able to setup to score points at calcomatic because they haven't accumulated any stats during the preseason. Not to get too technical, but I have to associate the FBG ID for each player with the NFL ID for each player and the easiest way for me to do that is after they accumulate stats and are in my database with the NFL ID. Anyway, this will resolve it self as these players play in the regular season.
![]()