matuski
Footballguy
I knew I should have kicked in for the super-premium version--I'd love to have some $2 QB options.
I think you werent following the convo.
I knew I should have kicked in for the super-premium version--I'd love to have some $2 QB options.
Super Mega Platinum version gives you $50 more in budget. Worth the $400 I paid to get into this elite tier of clientele.I paid for the super-premium-version as I consistently found myself coming up $12 short. I'm still coming up about $2 short on my ideal lineup so I'm tempted to pay up for the super-duper-premium-version
My bargain bin RB handcuff duo shot way up in value today.25 players rostered and I'm feeling pretty, pretty good.
QB: One QB is a no-brainer and I'm sure he will be on 90% of the rosters; swung for the fences on QB#2.
RB: Selected two studs and two handcuff tandems (one high-end pair and the other from the bargain bin).
WR: 8 rostered. Went bargain hunting and gambling that the ones I picked will rise to be clear-cut #1 WRs on their team.
TE: 3 rostered. Tier 1 TEs were too expensive for my tastes. Took the cheapest stud, a proven vet, and one cheap-o with a high ceiling.
K: $11 on three kickers
Def: $12 on three defenses.
Rookies on roster: 4
Health and WR picks will make or break me.
Pretty sure he’s on everyone’s team now.My bargain bin RB handcuff duo shot way up in value today.
My bargain bin RB handcuff duo shot way up in value today.
 
 Conner?Pretty sure he’s on everyone’s team now.
Was Kareem hunt the last really cheap rb to be on like everyone’s team? I might be misremembering.
I should have phrased better. I picked RBs #2 and #3 from a particular team from the bargain bin.Pretty sure he’s on everyone’s team now.
Was Kareem hunt the last really cheap rb to be on like everyone’s team? I might be misremembering.
In know, right? Matt Breida is gonna kill it.
I did like 7 times yesterday, only to end up back where I started.....for the love of all that is holy - lock this contest!Pretty stable run up to the deadline this year. My pace has slowed to a mere 2.5 roster iteration changes per day.
The deadline to submit/edit your contest entry is 11:59pm (ET) Wednesday, September 8thNew to this. What is the deadline for submission? I assume it's free and the guys talking about paying up for more players or something (didn't read too closely) are just joking?
Free for subscribers and yeah, the "pay for more" is joking (Just like the "Set your lineup for week 2" will be).New to this. What is the deadline for submission? I assume it's free and the guys talking about paying up for more players or something (didn't read too closely) are just joking?
I haven't done a roster churn in a good 29 hours.....I think I may be broken...My new morning routine - the 4's
####, shower, shave, survivor contest

Try a good laxativeI haven't done a roster churn in a good 29 hours.....I think I may be broken...
I have never understood paying up for one of the top defenses. I have never done that, and I have done well. Get 3 defenses with 3 different bye weeks that are cheap and you'll be fine. It likely won't be the reason why you get eliminated.3 for $6 for me. When I plug the scoring into Draft Dominator, it says any of the $4 defenses score less than 1 ppw more than the $2 defenses. Even the highest ranked and most expensive defenses only score 1.5 ppw more than the $2 choices.
Yeah, where's the Winz?? I'm only at 75 iterations so far. Definitely my low point in the past several years. Gonna have to step up my game to achieve my norm of 150 or so.This is the slowest year for chat. I remember two people in particular that posted constantly. I guess they are out this year.
you all need to share more information.
I didn’t check the scoring when I paid for the WFT defense. Now I’m spending either $8 or $6 for 3 defenses.I have never understood paying up for one of the top defenses. I have never done that, and I have done well. Get 3 defenses with 3 different bye weeks that are cheap and you'll be fine. It likely won't be the reason why you get eliminated.
I hear you. And just like that I'm contemplating a change to my surefire lock roster after viewing some recent news. Oh well, it will only affect 3 or 4 players. Of coure, bye weeks are screwed now. Damn itI have a core group which I haven’t changed and a plan which of course won’t be right. But there’s a group of 6 or so (depending on the iteration) which I keep swapping.
until the next injury hits I think I’m done.
It doesn’t even have to be that exotic to reward great defenses.It would probably make sense to add some more exotic scoring for defense to make it more of a viable roster slot of differentiation. Incorporating points allowed would likely reduce the 3 for $6 bias.
This is where I am at, I have 3 that really haven't changed but the other 3 seem to be back and forth. Yes there will be a few highly rostered players and that can go both ways when it matters down the stretch, but often would rather be zigging and hope for a good spate of luck...I'm at 22 right now but I keep fretting about depth and may cut a stud to a lesser to add that extra player elsewhere....It seems like the injuries/trades in the last week or so have created a lot of suddenly attractive bargain RBs. On one hand, it seems like grabbing two or three of those bargains is the smartest thing to do. On the other hand, I'm wondering if I'm better off keeping the lineup I had before those moves so that I'm zigging when everyone else is zagging.
It seems like the injuries/trades in the last week or so have created a lot of suddenly attractive bargain RBs. On one hand, it seems like grabbing two or three of those bargains is the smartest thing to do. On the other hand, I'm wondering if I'm better off keeping the lineup I had before those moves so that I'm zigging when everyone else is zagging.
Measured response is probably for the best. If 3 weeks ago I couldn't get away from roster size 20, I'm currently having difficulty getting away from roster size 27.It seems like the injuries/trades in the last week or so have created a lot of suddenly attractive bargain RBs. On one hand, it seems like grabbing two or three of those bargains is the smartest thing to do. On the other hand, I'm wondering if I'm better off keeping the lineup I had before those moves so that I'm zigging when everyone else is zagging.
 
 I don't think I've had a single lineup with a WR over $20 either. Lockett might be the biggest temptation. I can understand the argument for McLaurin, but it's tough for me imagining Fitz starting 17 games in a season.Completely rolling with stud backs, and 7 WRs under 20 bucks.
That's where I was before the Dobbins injury. I thought the table was set for Dobbins to have a huge season as a true three down back in a slightly more dynamic offense.I have a core group which I haven’t changed and a plan which of course won’t be right. But there’sa a group of 6 or so (depending on the iteration) which I keep swapping.
until the next injury hits I think I’m done.
He was one of the guys I was uncertain about. Now that’s easy but I’m not sure how I feel about GusThat's where I was before the Dobbins injury. I thought the table was set for Dobbins to have a huge season as a true three down back in a slightly more dynamic offense.
My current iteration has only five of these players and all of them are those that are likely obvious. My breakdown is as follows:Drunken Cowboy said:I am probably close to done:
QB - Jameis Winston - NO/6 - $10
QB - Ben Roethlisberger - PIT/7 - $9
QB - Cam Newton - NE/14 - $9
RB - Saquon Barkley - NYG/10 - $28
RB - Javonte Williams - DEN/11 - $18
RB - James Robinson - JAX/7 - $16
RB - Gus Edwards - BAL/8 - $11
RB - Sony Michel - LAR/11 - $5
RB - Carlos Hyde - JAX/7 - $4
RB - Rhamondre Stevenson - NE/14 - $3
WR - Diontae Johnson - PIT/7 - $18
WR - Corey Davis - NYJ/6 - $10
WR - Antonio Brown - TB/9 - $10
WR - DeVante Parker - MIA/14 - $9
WR - Sterling Shepard - NYG/10 - $9
WR - Jakobi Meyers - NE/14 - $6
WR - Marquez Callaway - NO/6 - $5
WR - Bryan Edwards - LV/8 - $4
TE - George Kittle - SF/6 - $22
TE - Mike Gesicki - MIA/14 - $12
TE - Cole Kmet - CHI/10 - $7
PK - Chris Boswell - PIT/7 - $4
PK - Younghoe Koo - ATL/6 - $4
PK - Matt Gay - LAR/11 - $4
TD - Pittsburgh Steelers - PIT/7 - $7
TD - Chicago Bears - CHI/10 - $3
TD - Denver Broncos - DEN/11 - $3
QB3 versus RB5 versus WR6 is irritating me.
So, if you are looking for a couple dollars to upgrade DST or PK and you had three QBs, would dropping the third QB be the first choice or would you slide down for two lesser costly QBs so that you could keep three in this Covid rule, likely missing games season of 2021?If you picked your other two QBs correctly, it's better to move that QB3 to another position.

Update?Barring any last min injury, I’m locked in.
good luck everyone.
If this was a total points on the year contest - yes. In a weekly elimination contest, take the easy money every time.It seems like the injuries/trades in the last week or so have created a lot of suddenly attractive bargain RBs. On one hand, it seems like grabbing two or three of those bargains is the smartest thing to do. On the other hand, I'm wondering if I'm better off keeping the lineup I had before those moves so that I'm zigging when everyone else is zagging.
Barring any last min injury, I’m locked in.
good luck everyone.
On the other other hand, everyone is targeting those same value picks.It seems like the injuries/trades in the last week or so have created a lot of suddenly attractive bargain RBs. On one hand, it seems like grabbing two or three of those bargains is the smartest thing to do. On the other hand, I'm wondering if I'm better off keeping the lineup I had before those moves so that I'm zigging when everyone else is zagging.
Quantify stud.On the other other hand, everyone is targeting those same value picks.
I feel like the winning recipe is a combination - gotta hit on a couple studs too. Since they cost so much, you can only have a few.
 
 Those are probably fair parameters.Quantify stud.
QB>15, RB>25, WR>20, TE>15
I have 1/2/0/1.
Currently
