Excellent points. To that, I'd add that I wonder how much of us exist in a bit of a FBG point projections "echo chamber" when it comes to looking for value in this contest. When prices are set, I'm assuming it's based on a combination of the FBG point projections at the date of release, along with some small adjustment for how late/early their bye weeks fall (I think I read this at some point).Most of the players with the highest ownership are the ones who had moderate or low cap numbers, and then had a strong
pre-season, or saw competing players get cut, and therefore had high stat projections on Footballguys as a result.
As we go through multiple iterations of our lineup before live date, trying to assemble the magic team that can survive to the
playoffs, we always look for value. A high stat projection without a corresponding high cap number is the very definition of
value for the purposes of this contest. The degree to which a particular owner believes the stat projection for each of those
individual players determines to a large degree which of them end up on his roster. Obviously there are also constraints
related to bye weeks, and constraints related to available cap space after settling on other players that are more expensive,
but desirable to the individual owner.
As we have seen this season, even if you assemble the perfect team, your fate will likely be determined more by injuries than
any other single factor.
If you are lucky enough avoid injuries, your fate might also be affected by players being traded, or players who were previously
starters being relegated to time shares (Fournette, Edwards-Helaire).
There was nothing above that you just read that you didn’t already know. Truth be told, you love the challenge as much as I do,
and that’s why we all come back here every year to play again, in spite of our disappointments.
That said, by the time we finalize our picks, some players have immediately increased value on their price due to Puppies' point about preseason/injuries, and the latest FBG projections would likely call those out. But if the majority of us are using those FBG projections, we're all "finding" the same values.
Some are more obvious than others, like Pierce. You can't NOT pick him up, right? No matter what rankings you use, that's extreme value.
I like and rely quite a bit on FBG projections, esp "rest of season" in the Dominator tool. But I do wonder if there is some advantage to being a bit contrarian in this particular contest. What if you used a combination of other site's rankings to define value in this contest and not FBG... You might exclude some value suggested by FBG, but it could even out with other values that surface using a different set of projections. But your advantage could fall with having a more differentiated bucket of "value" players than the rest of the field.
I'm very likely overanalyzing, but that's how my brain works. And yes, I LOVE this contest and the depth of thinking that could go into it.