What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023-24 NBA (Playoffs!) Thread: Message board poster furiously types out one more horrible post before thread closes (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
but there's other intangibles he brings in the locker room that should help Sengun get tougher mentally.
Oh come on
Sengun is a sweet kid. He needs some of that dog in him. Brooks and Udoka have helped but I think Adams will a key piece in their championship run circa 26/27.

So a 34 year old Adams will be a key piece to a championship run in 26/27, when 25 year old Steven Adams wasn't a key piece to a championship run? You didn't even make that post with a straight face.
Yeah, he might be ok next year, but can’t imagine he is really part of any “plan” beyond that.
 

Coolest part of the story:

After each of Jordan's six titles and Finals MVPs, he was photographed with only one shoe on; Jordan had granted Bulls PR executive Tim Hallam his wish of having one of MJ's shoes if they won that first championship. Jordan, ever superstitious, honored what became a tradition five more times.
That's really cool. I found in another article that Hallam apparently had sold and/or given them to someone else who put them up for auction. Figured I'd have to die before my estate sold something this awesome.
 
Trae Young doing Trae things. His nickname should be Flop.
It’s amazing how a guy that is averaging 27 points a game, is the leader in total assists this season, is tied for 9th in total steals this season, tied for 3rd in 3pt field goals made this season is somehow thought of as being nothing but a flopper. Trae doing Trae things is literally almost going for 30 and 10 almost every game. Yeah—he might flop a couple/few times a game—but let’s not overlook the fact that he’s single handedly accounting for 50 or more points a game for his team. It’s a shame that he didn’t make the all star team.
 
Trae Young doing Trae things. His nickname should be Flop.
It’s amazing how a guy that is averaging 27 points a game, is the leader in total assists this season, is tied for 9th in total steals this season, tied for 3rd in 3pt field goals made this season is somehow thought of as being nothing but a flopper. Trae doing Trae things is literally almost going for 30 and 10 almost every game. Yeah—he might flop a couple/few times a game—but let’s not overlook the fact that he’s single handedly accounting for 50 or more points a game for his team. It’s a shame that he didn’t make the all star team.
Phenomenal player. And most players flop now. I just don’t like watching the flopping. He’s a talent, and some of his moves are insane.
 
Trae Young doing Trae things. His nickname should be Flop.
It’s amazing how a guy that is averaging 27 points a game, is the leader in total assists this season, is tied for 9th in total steals this season, tied for 3rd in 3pt field goals made this season is somehow thought of as being nothing but a flopper. Trae doing Trae things is literally almost going for 30 and 10 almost every game. Yeah—he might flop a couple/few times a game—but let’s not overlook the fact that he’s single handedly accounting for 50 or more points a game for his team. It’s a shame that he didn’t make the all star team.
Phenomenal player. And most players flop now. I just don’t like watching the flopping. He’s a talent, and some of his moves are insane.

He is a little fella so the flopping is more understandable. It's when the bigger guys like Draymond and Embiid do it that really bothers me.
 
Trae Young doing Trae things. His nickname should be Flop.
It’s amazing how a guy that is averaging 27 points a game, is the leader in total assists this season, is tied for 9th in total steals this season, tied for 3rd in 3pt field goals made this season is somehow thought of as being nothing but a flopper. Trae doing Trae things is literally almost going for 30 and 10 almost every game. Yeah—he might flop a couple/few times a game—but let’s not overlook the fact that he’s single handedly accounting for 50 or more points a game for his team. It’s a shame that he didn’t make the all star team.
Phenomenal player. And most players flop now. I just don’t like watching the flopping. He’s a talent, and some of his moves are insane.

He is a little fella so the flopping is more understandable. It's when the bigger guys like Draymond and Embiid do it that really bothers me.

This is a great way to put it. When I see Lebron flop I am like WTF, when Pat Beverley does it, I think I see what he is doing there.
 
Trae Young doing Trae things. His nickname should be Flop.
It’s amazing how a guy that is averaging 27 points a game, is the leader in total assists this season, is tied for 9th in total steals this season, tied for 3rd in 3pt field goals made this season is somehow thought of as being nothing but a flopper. Trae doing Trae things is literally almost going for 30 and 10 almost every game. Yeah—he might flop a couple/few times a game—but let’s not overlook the fact that he’s single handedly accounting for 50 or more points a game for his team. It’s a shame that he didn’t make the all star team.
Phenomenal player. And most players flop now. I just don’t like watching the flopping. He’s a talent, and some of his moves are insane.

He is a little fella so the flopping is more understandable. It's when the bigger guys like Draymond and Embiid do it that really bothers me.

This is a great way to put it. When I see Lebron flop I am like WTF, when Pat Beverley does it, I think I see what he is doing there.
When I see Beverly flop after hacking everyone on the court I think “screw this guy, it’s absurd that he’s in the NBA”
 
The Trae Young hatred is entirely reasonable IMO. If you want to understand why, peruse the PG statistical rankings for last season.

There are five PGs who shot 8+ free throws a game: SGA, Luka, Lillard, Ja, and our friend Trae. Nobody else took more than 6 a game.

Can you guess where Trae ranks among his peers in the FT Frequent Flyers Club in field goal attempts and in every single shooting efficiency statistic? I bet you can!
And can you guess where he ranks among those peers in the turnover/game category? I bet you can guess that one too!
 
What is the Bucks plan to get out of this mess? They are not title contenders.

The Bucks bench is a weakness but I’m not sure they can do anything about it. Giannis and Dame are 50% of their salary and if you add Lopez and Middleton those 4 players are 80%. Only one of them is playing up to their contract. They are in something called the double tax apron which means their options are somewhat restricted. We‘ll see what happens this week.
 
The East is suddenly looking like Boston's to lose. Will be a huge disappointment if they don't make it to the Finals.

Easily the most talented just hope Porzingis stays healthy. I'd be weary of NY and Indy. They look prime to make a run and upset some folks.
 
The Trae Young hatred is entirely reasonable IMO. If you want to understand why, peruse the PG statistical rankings for last season.

There are five PGs who shot 8+ free throws a game: SGA, Luka, Lillard, Ja, and our friend Trae. Nobody else took more than 6 a game.

Can you guess where Trae ranks among his peers in the FT Frequent Flyers Club in field goal attempts and in every single shooting efficiency statistic? I bet you can!
And can you guess where he ranks among those peers in the turnover/game category? I bet you can guess that one too!

He is a poor man's version of Allen Iverson.
 
The East is suddenly looking like Boston's to lose. Will be a huge disappointment if they don't make it to the Finals.

Easily the most talented just hope Porzingis stays healthy. I'd be weary of NY and Indy. They look prime to make a run and upset some folks.
The geeky analytics sites have the regular season projected win totals in the East as:

Basketball Reference:
BOS 62.4, CLE 52.5, NYK 52.1, PHI 51.1, MIL 50.7, ORL 45.5, IND 44.9, MIA 41.0

ESPN:
BOS 62.6, CLE 55.9, NYK 51.8, MIL 51.0, PHI 49.0, IND 45.2, ORL 44.2, MIA 40.6

Power Rankings Guru:
BOS 62.4, CLE 54.1, NYK 52.1, MIL 51.5, PHI 50.5, ORL 44.9, IND 44.4, MIA 41.2

If things play out that way, the Celtics would win the top seed by 7-10 games. If that were the case, I would hope they start resting the main guys down the stretch so they don't wilt in the post season like the past few years. At this point, no one really cares about how they do in the regular season . . . it's how far they advance in the post season.
 
Really? Thought he could be back right before the playoffs.
I don't think they will know until after the surgery. From what I saw, it's possible he could return late in the season if the issue is on the less severe side. As it is, I believe Embiid is opting for a less invasive surgery to get him on the court quicker. He could have had season ending surgery that stood a better chance of correcting the problem longer term (but declined). IIRC, this is the same injury and decision that Robert Williams had last year with Boston. He opted for the clean up procedure to be able to return in the playoffs. He was able to do that, but he was very limited, couldn't play many minutes, and was not the same guy when he came back. All injuries and all players are different, but if Embiid comes back, I doubt he would be 100% this year.
 
Last edited:
Sixers (overdue) panic button
🔴🔴
?

They have 4 starters out.
Well Embiid is likely done for the year, sooooooo there's that.

Really? Thought he could be back right before the playoffs.
as of now, the word is still that he may still return this year. maybe just posturing.

the only silver lining is that this happened before the trade deadline. the ongoing debate all year was whether to push in their assets at the deadline for a player to help this year. on the one side, they were going to be in a much better position to do something in the summer, with the cap space and additional draft picks available to trade, and there really isn't a player on the market right now that will swing their championship equity much. on the other hand, when you have embiid playing at an mvp level, can you afford to punt on a season or do you have to try to wring everything out of it? now that embiid playing at an mvp level is essentially out of the mix, the calculus for whether to do something at the deadline has become much simpler. the worst thing would have been to trade all the assets for someone like Dejounte Murray and then Embiid has this happen a week later.
 
The East is suddenly looking like Boston's to lose. Will be a huge disappointment if they don't make it to the Finals.

Easily the most talented just hope Porzingis stays healthy. I'd be weary of NY and Indy. They look prime to make a run and upset some folks.
The geeky analytics sites have the regular season projected win totals in the East as:

Basketball Reference:
BOS 62.4, CLE 52.5, NYK 52.1, PHI 51.1, MIL 50.7, ORL 45.5, IND 44.9, MIA 41.0

ESPN:
BOS 62.6, CLE 55.9, NYK 51.8, MIL 51.0, PHI 49.0, IND 45.2, ORL 44.2, MIA 40.6

Power Rankings Guru:
BOS 62.4, CLE 54.1, NYK 52.1, MIL 51.5, PHI 50.5, ORL 44.9, IND 44.4, MIA 41.2

If things play out that way, the Celtics would win the top seed by 7-10 games. If that were the case, I would hope they start resting the main guys down the stretch so they don't wilt in the post season like the past few years. At this point, no one really cares about how they do in the regular season . . . it's how far they advance in the post season.
I kind of think they will keep an eye on the West standings to try and secure home court in the Finals as well.

Denver/LAC/OKC/Minnesota is going to be fun.
 
I kind of think they will keep an eye on the West standings to try and secure home court in the Finals as well.

Denver/LAC/OKC/Minnesota is going to be fun.
Those same sites have BOS +5 wins over OKC, +4.6 wins over LAC, and +5.5 over OKC for best overall record. The C's should end up with the best record, but they are at the stage where they either win the title or the season would be classified as a disappointment.
 
I kind of think they will keep an eye on the West standings to try and secure home court in the Finals as well.

Denver/LAC/OKC/Minnesota is going to be fun.
Those same sites have BOS +5 wins over OKC, +4.6 wins over LAC, and +5.5 over OKC for best overall record. The C's should end up with the best record, but they are at the stage where they either win the title or the season would be classified as a disappointment.
Personally, I think while not making it to the Finals would be a disappointment, losing in the Finals wouldn't necessarily be...depending on who they played and how it played out.

I think the Clippers or Nuggets are good enough to win a 7-game series over Boston. If Denver gets rolling like they did last year, I'm not sure Mazzulla is a good enough coach to get Boston to beat them. I also believe the Clippers are deeper and a healthy Kawhi/PG13 combo is better than Tatum/Brown. Losing to either of those teams in 6 or 7 games wouldn't devastate me as this is the Celtics first run together with this group.

Now if they got swept or lost in 5 games to those teams or if they lose to a newcomer like Minnesota or OKC, then I'd be really disappointed.
 
I wonder what the odds would be that each of the teams that Doc Rivers played or coached for that make the playoffs this year (ATL, NYK, LAC, ORL, BOS, PHI) all do better this postseason than the Bucks do. Obviously, 5 Eastern teams can't advance. Would have to be a total postseason wins wager.
 
If things play out that way, the Celtics would win the top seed by 7-10 games. If that were the case, I would hope they start resting the main guys down the stretch so they don't wilt in the post season like the past few years. At this point, no one really cares about how they do in the regular season . . . it's how far they advance in the post season.
I don't think it is regular season minutes that cause these guys to wilt. It is/was the intense 6 games against Atlanta, 7 games against PHI, and 7 games against Miami.
Whereas Denver coasted to the finals (4-1, 4-2, 4-0)
 
If what happened? The Celtics add either Drummond, Wright or Olynyk? Seems like an odd thing to be super upset about.
I think it all depends on who they have to give up on the current roster to bring in a depth piece. IMO, I would rather hold onto the Top 8 . . . JT, JB, KP, JH, DW and Horford, Hauser, and Pritchard. I happen to think that Queta and Kornet are solid pieces and would be fine if those 10 guys were left alone. If they needed to move either of those two (or any of the other younger players not mentioned) to get another bruiser that could make a couple shots, snag some tough boards, put a body on someone, and use some fouls on one of the other elite bigs in the playoffs, so be it. But I wouldn't want to disrupt the Top 8. Maybe that's just me.
 
The Trae Young hatred is entirely reasonable IMO. If you want to understand why, peruse the PG statistical rankings for last season.

There are five PGs who shot 8+ free throws a game: SGA, Luka, Lillard, Ja, and our friend Trae. Nobody else took more than 6 a game.

Can you guess where Trae ranks among his peers in the FT Frequent Flyers Club in field goal attempts and in every single shooting efficiency statistic? I bet you can!
And can you guess where he ranks among those peers in the turnover/game category? I bet you can guess that one too!
About a year ago I briefly got interested in advanced defensive metrics. They all seemed flawed and didn't agree on much, but I was fascinated at how they were all in lockstep on Trae Young being historically bad defensively.
 
If what happened? The Celtics add either Drummond, Wright or Olynyk? Seems like an odd thing to be super upset about.
I think it all depends on who they have to give up on the current roster to bring in a depth piece. IMO, I would rather hold onto the Top 8 . . . JT, JB, KP, JH, DW and Horford, Hauser, and Pritchard. I happen to think that Queta and Kornet are solid pieces and would be fine if those 10 guys were left alone. If they needed to move either of those two (or any of the other younger players not mentioned) to get another bruiser that could make a couple shots, snag some tough boards, put a body on someone, and use some fouls on one of the other elite bigs in the playoffs, so be it. But I wouldn't want to disrupt the Top 8. Maybe that's just me.
Olynyk would be tough from a salary matching perspective, but Drummond could fit within their Grant Williams TPA.
 
The Trae Young hatred is entirely reasonable IMO. If you want to understand why, peruse the PG statistical rankings for last season.

There are five PGs who shot 8+ free throws a game: SGA, Luka, Lillard, Ja, and our friend Trae. Nobody else took more than 6 a game.

Can you guess where Trae ranks among his peers in the FT Frequent Flyers Club in field goal attempts and in every single shooting efficiency statistic? I bet you can!
And can you guess where he ranks among those peers in the turnover/game category? I bet you can guess that one too!
About a year ago I briefly got interested in advanced defensive metrics. They all seemed flawed and didn't agree on much, but I was fascinated at how they were all in lockstep on Trae Young being historically bad defensively.
Yeah, people keep waiting for some sort of leap but the guy is 25 now and has some support around him now. I think maybe he's just not that good. Time to move on and start putting the "next Steph Curry" tag on Caitlin Clark, I guess.
 
If what happened? The Celtics add either Drummond, Wright or Olynyk? Seems like an odd thing to be super upset about.
I think it all depends on who they have to give up on the current roster to bring in a depth piece. IMO, I would rather hold onto the Top 8 . . . JT, JB, KP, JH, DW and Horford, Hauser, and Pritchard. I happen to think that Queta and Kornet are solid pieces and would be fine if those 10 guys were left alone. If they needed to move either of those two (or any of the other younger players not mentioned) to get another bruiser that could make a couple shots, snag some tough boards, put a body on someone, and use some fouls on one of the other elite bigs in the playoffs, so be it. But I wouldn't want to disrupt the Top 8. Maybe that's just me.
They aren’t giving up anything of value for Drummond
 
If what happened? The Celtics add either Drummond, Wright or Olynyk? Seems like an odd thing to be super upset about.
I think it all depends on who they have to give up on the current roster to bring in a depth piece. IMO, I would rather hold onto the Top 8 . . . JT, JB, KP, JH, DW and Horford, Hauser, and Pritchard. I happen to think that Queta and Kornet are solid pieces and would be fine if those 10 guys were left alone. If they needed to move either of those two (or any of the other younger players not mentioned) to get another bruiser that could make a couple shots, snag some tough boards, put a body on someone, and use some fouls on one of the other elite bigs in the playoffs, so be it. But I wouldn't want to disrupt the Top 8. Maybe that's just me.
They aren’t giving up anything of value for Drummond
I'm not sure what Drummond is at this point that is better than Kornet. Olynyk I get as he has a different game. Just looked up Delon Wright's info and he's really not having a good year. Playing a bench big role for Boston would probably be a bit simpler than whatever his role is in Washington, but his efficiency and shooting % this season is atrocious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top