I think I’ve come to conclusion that backing into a parking spot is definitely more efficient for those people who know how to back into a spot competently. Everyone is ultimately better off with those people backing in. I fully support the competent backer-inners in this thread.
What convinced you? I mean, I’ve seen people back in first go, albeit far less than those pulling forward.
But they still have to drive past the spot, stop, and reverse to get there.* Multiple extra steps, and distance added to the parking equation. Not sure how that’s more efficient.
Regardless, I bet the guys seamlessly backing in would be equally adroit pulling in/backing out.
*I know you drive that distance backing out, but I find backing out far easier than in - no issue side-swiping other vehicles, or entering a lane wider than a parking space.
I think my initial position was based more on anecdotal experiences than logic. A competent backer-inner will have already seen that the parking space is clear and the chances of anything coming into that space in the couple of seconds they are backing in are infinitesimally small. So a competent backer-inner will in most situations be able to back into a space more quickly than backing out of a space when they commonly have to deal with traffic, pedestrians, and moving carts in the area into which the are backing out. So, for the competent backer inners, it is more efficient for them, which on balance results in an overall efficiency improvement (not to mention safety improvement).
The issue arises when you have a less than competent backer-inner. Those are the people who have to do five point turns and take an interminably long time backing into the space which then backs up traffic. Incompetent drivers lack the skill and the confidence to quickly back into the smaller space, and therefore are far less efficient than backing out of a space into a wider area.
So my conclusion is this: competent backer-inners improve overall efficiency while incompetent backer-inners decrease overall efficiency.
If where you live there are a material number of incompetent backer-inners, your perception will be that backing in is categorically less efficient for anyone who backs in. That’s where I’ve modified my view. Even if it is less efficient overall due to the high number of incompetent drivers I see trying to back into a space, the issue is with the incompetency of the drivers and not with the act of backing in. That is why I am now supportive of the competent backer-inners posting in this thread.