Could go either way- if he can't sustain drives, it's going to mean fewer chances. In a PPR, I do think this probably helps- Bills RBs averaged over 80 receptions (combined) per season the last two years with him as QB.I wasnt too optimistic against the jets d because they are the best right now against the run. However does having fitz boost his value? This smart guy should be able to dump it off to cj and mske him look good right?
Everyone else has that thought, too. If you want to get him for the stretch run then you're going to have to get him 1-3 weeks earlier than that.I'm looking to make a trade for CJ2K after their bye. The schedule gets a little easier for them after that and I'd expect his production to go up.
I'm a CJ owner, and even if I needed WR help, I wouldn't trade him for all 4 of those guys together. Nobody is trading a RB2 for other peoples' roster trash.What would be a fair offer for him now? I'm looking to try and trade one of my WRs I have: Edelman, Roddy, Mike Williams, Givens?
Yes and no. In this league, a PPR league, Edelman is averaging 20/game. If the guy has other decent RB options and no WRs, it makes sense to make a play for CJ while he's down, no?I'm a CJ owner, and even if I needed WR help, I wouldn't trade him for all 4 of those guys together. Nobody is trading a RB2 for other peoples' roster trash.What would be a fair offer for him now? I'm looking to try and trade one of my WRs I have: Edelman, Roddy, Mike Williams, Givens?
News Flash: Starting RBs who get 20+ touches are worth a lot more than WR3s & WR4s.
Edelman is on borrowed time, any savvy owner knows that. It can't hurt to try though.MattFancy said:Yes and no. In this league, a PPR league, Edelman is averaging 20/game. If the guy has other decent RB options and no WRs, it makes sense to make a play for CJ while he's down, no?Resident A said:I'm a CJ owner, and even if I needed WR help, I wouldn't trade him for all 4 of those guys together. Nobody is trading a RB2 for other peoples' roster trash.MattFancy said:What would be a fair offer for him now? I'm looking to try and trade one of my WRs I have: Edelman, Roddy, Mike Williams, Givens?
News Flash: Starting RBs who get 20+ touches are worth a lot more than WR3s & WR4s.
Well, it really can't go much further down. He stinks this year. Again.MattFancy said:I'm looking to make a trade for CJ2K after their bye. The schedule gets a little easier for them after that and I'd expect his production to go up.
I agree. I know this guy didn't really like CJ to begin with and is even more frustrated now. If I could flip Edelman for him, I'd be pumped. Will it happen? No idea. But it certainly doesn't hurt to try.Edelman is on borrowed time, any savvy owner knows that. It can't hurt to try though.MattFancy said:Yes and no. In this league, a PPR league, Edelman is averaging 20/game. If the guy has other decent RB options and no WRs, it makes sense to make a play for CJ while he's down, no?Resident A said:I'm a CJ owner, and even if I needed WR help, I wouldn't trade him for all 4 of those guys together. Nobody is trading a RB2 for other peoples' roster trash.MattFancy said:What would be a fair offer for him now? I'm looking to try and trade one of my WRs I have: Edelman, Roddy, Mike Williams, Givens?
News Flash: Starting RBs who get 20+ touches are worth a lot more than WR3s & WR4s.
You may be able to find somebody who still highly values Roddy based on name.
I think you might flip Edelman or Roddy to an angry and shortsighted CJ owner. Not every fantasy footballer is savvy enough to fully consider the upcoming schedules and shifting team dynamics when considering an offer. Bottom line for some folks is that Edelman is a top ten WR through four games and CJ0K has been an utter bum.I agree. I know this guy didn't really like CJ to begin with and is even more frustrated now. If I could flip Edelman for him, I'd be pumped. Will it happen? No idea. But it certainly doesn't hurt to try.Edelman is on borrowed time, any savvy owner knows that. It can't hurt to try though.MattFancy said:Yes and no. In this league, a PPR league, Edelman is averaging 20/game. If the guy has other decent RB options and no WRs, it makes sense to make a play for CJ while he's down, no?Resident A said:I'm a CJ owner, and even if I needed WR help, I wouldn't trade him for all 4 of those guys together. Nobody is trading a RB2 for other peoples' roster trash.MattFancy said:What would be a fair offer for him now? I'm looking to try and trade one of my WRs I have: Edelman, Roddy, Mike Williams, Givens?
News Flash: Starting RBs who get 20+ touches are worth a lot more than WR3s & WR4s.
You may be able to find somebody who still highly values Roddy based on name.
Oh the ironyYou may be able to find somebody who still highly values Roddy based on name.MattFancy said:Yes and no. In this league, a PPR league, Edelman is averaging 20/game. If the guy has other decent RB options and no WRs, it makes sense to make a play for CJ while he's down, no?Resident A said:I'm a CJ owner, and even if I needed WR help, I wouldn't trade him for all 4 of those guys together. Nobody is trading a RB2 for other peoples' roster trash.News Flash: Starting RBs who get 20+ touches are worth a lot more than WR3s & WR4s.MattFancy said:What would be a fair offer for him now? I'm looking to try and trade one of my WRs I have: Edelman, Roddy, Mike Williams, Givens?
...how much less?Chris Johnson lashed out at fantasy owners via his Twitter page Monday.
Johnson rushed for 21 yards on 15 carries against the Jets in Week 3. So far this season, he's fantasy's No. 26 running back. "Public service announcement: I can care less about fantasy football. Key word fantasy. As long as we win I'm happy. I rush for 200 n lose y'all happy," wrote Johnson. He continued: "U r the head coach n the owner of ur fantasy team so u should be mad at urself I didn't ask any of u to draft me so if I'm so sorry y start me." Johnson no longer runs pass routes and doesn't play at the goal-line, so his upside is limited. The good news for owners is that the Titans have a really soft schedule (including at Jacksonville Week 16) in the second half of the season.
Not so fast. Jake Locker (not Jake the Snake Plummer) will be out 3 weeks only - againt KC, 49ers and SEA. Sound like good matchups to you?Jake the Snake is going to be out for 4-8 weeks... Time for Johnson to be the focus of the offense again.
Unless CJ starts catching a passes he's basically not someone you can start over the next few weeks. Depending on your options of course. So in that respect I think Fitz at QB during this horrendous schedule is CJ's only chance at success. I just can't see a guy who comes of the field inside the 5 yard line doing anything against these defenses unless Fitz starts dumping it off to him or due to his arm limitations and understanding these teams are not easy to run against the coaching staff starts finally calling designed screens to him.msommer said:Not so fast. Jake Locker (not Jake the Snake Plummer) will be out 3 weeks only - againt KC, 49ers and SEA. Sound like good matchups to you?Jake the Snake is going to be out for 4-8 weeks... Time for Johnson to be the focus of the offense again.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000254174/article/titans-jake-locker-has-sprained-hip-will-miss-3-weeks
he can't catch a pass if he isn't thrown a pass. Locker was always looking downfield and not the checkdown so with Locker out I think it's far more likely that CJ gets more receptions.Unless CJ starts catching a passes he's basically not someone you can start over the next few weeks. Depending on your options of course. So in that respect I think Fitz at QB during this horrendous schedule is CJ's only chance at success. I just can't see a guy who comes of the field inside the 5 yard line doing anything against these defenses unless Fitz starts dumping it off to him or due to his arm limitations and understanding these teams are not easy to run against the coaching staff starts finally calling designed screens to him.msommer said:Not so fast. Jake Locker (not Jake the Snake Plummer) will be out 3 weeks only - againt KC, 49ers and SEA. Sound like good matchups to you?Jake the Snake is going to be out for 4-8 weeks... Time for Johnson to be the focus of the offense again.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000254174/article/titans-jake-locker-has-sprained-hip-will-miss-3-weeks
I can't say I'm overly optimistic about any of it. I think his catches go up but I up from 1 a game is not saying much.
By all accounts he should have been on my bench after week 2 based on what I've seen but I'm sure a lot of you who own him go through the same thought process as I do. Which is that you are just certain as soon as you bench him is the week he breaks the long run.
I do think I can separate what I want to see happen in fantasy football from my opinion as a general fan for how I think a player should be used. So with that in mind let me say I'm not speaking as a frustrated fantasy owner but just a casual fan when I say his usage is dumb. I think they need to reduce his carries and do more to get him in space on the touches and stop trying to treat him like a 230 pound clock killing chain mover. Removing him from the field inside the 5 yard line, as frustrating as that is I think that's actually the right thing to do.
Jake "The Foot" LockerNot so fast. Jake Locker (not Jake the Snake Plummer) will be out 3 weeks only - againt KC, 49ers and SEA. Sound like good matchups to you?http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000254174/article/titans-jake-locker-has-sprained-hip-will-miss-3-weeksJake the Snake is going to be out for 4-8 weeks... Time for Johnson to be the focus of the offense again.
Totally agree Johnson hasn't been used well at all.Unless CJ starts catching a passes he's basically not someone you can start over the next few weeks. Depending on your options of course. So in that respect I think Fitz at QB during this horrendous schedule is CJ's only chance at success. I just can't see a guy who comes of the field inside the 5 yard line doing anything against these defenses unless Fitz starts dumping it off to him or due to his arm limitations and understanding these teams are not easy to run against the coaching staff starts finally calling designed screens to him.Not so fast. Jake Locker (not Jake the Snake Plummer) will be out 3 weeks only - againt KC, 49ers and SEA. Sound like good matchups to you?Jake the Snake is going to be out for 4-8 weeks... Time for Johnson to be the focus of the offense again.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000254174/article/titans-jake-locker-has-sprained-hip-will-miss-3-weeks
I can't say I'm overly optimistic about any of it. I think his catches go up but I up from 1 a game is not saying much.
By all accounts he should have been on my bench after week 2 based on what I've seen but I'm sure a lot of you who own him go through the same thought process as I do. Which is that you are just certain as soon as you bench him is the week he breaks the long run.
I do think I can separate what I want to see happen in fantasy football from my opinion as a general fan for how I think a player should be used. So with that in mind let me say I'm not speaking as a frustrated fantasy owner but just a casual fan when I say his usage is dumb. I think they need to reduce his carries and do more to get him in space on the touches and stop trying to treat him like a 230 pound clock killing chain mover. Removing him from the field inside the 5 yard line, as frustrating as that is I think that's actually the right thing to do.
Short, to the point, and deadly accurate. 3.1 YPC says it all.McGarnicle said:My wife just texted me: "Chris Johnson is a worthless piece of ####."![]()
Be patient. His schedule eases up quite a bit in the second half.I hope he gets it going. I was excited to have him as my RB2 in multiple leagues, but this is painful. Not sure why they aren't getting him more involved in the passing game. As someone previously mentioned, these up the middle runs just aren't working... use the guy's talents and get him some space to run! I'm holding him and hoping they adjust their game plan with him.
yea only makes sense? right?I hope he gets it going. I was excited to have him as my RB2 in multiple leagues, but this is painful. Not sure why they aren't getting him more involved in the passing game. As someone previously mentioned, these up the middle runs just aren't working... use the guy's talents and get him some space to run! I'm holding him and hoping they adjust their game plan with him.
Man, I hope so (in terms of his schedule). It's really the last thing I'm clinging to with him. Maybe having Shonn Greene back could even help... soften up the defenses a bit.Johnson has another tough assignment this week, then a bye week, then the schedule opens up a lot. I am disappointed he didn't juke as much in the early weeks, Locker going down has not helped, in fact I underestimated his impact on the offense.
Johnson has a very soft schedule down the stretch and I think owners are going to be shaking their heads who don't own him come playoff time.
I don't know why, but I'm feeling good about him this week.Man, I hope so (in terms of his schedule). It's really the last thing I'm clinging to with him. Maybe having Shonn Greene back could even help... soften up the defenses a bit.Johnson has another tough assignment this week, then a bye week, then the schedule opens up a lot. I am disappointed he didn't juke as much in the early weeks, Locker going down has not helped, in fact I underestimated his impact on the offense.
Johnson has a very soft schedule down the stretch and I think owners are going to be shaking their heads who don't own him come playoff time.
As of now I'm starting him over the likes of Lamar Miller and Stevan Ridley.Jake Locker looks like he'll be playing Sunday. Should be a plus for CJ. Is everyone starting CJ? I don't know if I should start him this week. He's been so bad lately, hard to justify starting him at the flex when I could start Decker or Wayne.
I am considering starting CJ over Ridley (obvious) and Lamar Miller in a PPR league. It's true, 49ers have not been great against the run, and at least CJ has been catching a couple passes per game.Jake Locker looks like he'll be playing Sunday. Should be a plus for CJ. Is everyone starting CJ? I don't know if I should start him this week. He's been so bad lately, hard to justify starting him at the flex when I could start Decker or Wayne.