What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cleveland Browns (11 Viewers)

Except last year in and out...Bortles, Keenum, Foles
Weird take.  Keenum and FOles played great.  Bortles did not, but did play well in the playoffs. 

Also, all three teams were rock solid everywhere on the roster.  And especially with Keenum and Foles, their level of play was much higher than the level of play of their RBs.

I really have no idea what you are getting at.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Weird take.  Keenum and FOles played great.  Bortles did not, but did play well in the playoffs. 

Also, all three teams were rock solid everywhere on the roster.  And especially with Keenum and Foles, their level of play was much higher than the level of play of their RBs.

I really have no idea what you are getting at.  
Fill the roster out with studs and there are plenty of options at QB that can take you to the playoffs.  Draft another bust at QB and sit in purgatory for another 3-4 years.

 
Fill the roster out with studs and there are plenty of options at QB that can take you to the playoffs.  Draft another bust at QB and sit in purgatory for another 3-4 years.
That seems to be the browns plan the last few years. Hasn't worked yet.

 
So which QB is the 1.1?  If there was a great QB that stood out, I would be all for the Browns making him their first pick.  I don't see that QB in this draft.  There is some really great talent in this draft at a few positions in this draft but QB does not seem to be one of those positions.  

The Browns have reached for their QB enough times that they should know that is a losing proposition.  The Browns need to draft BPA with a focus on QB.  If they like players measurably more than their first QB, then they need to draft those players.  They must reach some for a QB but overreaching will end in disaster. 

 
Can I float a theory/scenario?

#1 - Barkley

#4 - Chubb (I think if we go Saquon at 1, Chubb is 100% there at 4)

...... Keenum in FA, Allen Robinson in FA.

Offense now has Keenum (above average), Saquon, Gordon, AR15, Coleman, Njoku....

You can't honestly tell me that this offense won't put up points. And our defense, which I already rate quite highly, with Chubb..

Mamma mia...

 
Can I float a theory/scenario?

#1 - Barkley

#4 - Chubb (I think if we go Saquon at 1, Chubb is 100% there at 4)

...... Keenum in FA, Allen Robinson in FA.

Offense now has Keenum (above average), Saquon, Gordon, AR15, Coleman, Njoku....

You can't honestly tell me that this offense won't put up points. And our defense, which I already rate quite highly, with Chubb..

Mamma mia...
Decent team that Hue/Williams will drag down to double digit losses. 

 
Can I float a theory/scenario?

#1 - Barkley

#4 - Chubb (I think if we go Saquon at 1, Chubb is 100% there at 4)

...... Keenum in FA, Allen Robinson in FA.

Offense now has Keenum (above average), Saquon, Gordon, AR15, Coleman, Njoku....

You can't honestly tell me that this offense won't put up points. And our defense, which I already rate quite highly, with Chubb..

Mamma mia...
In this scenario, who are the colts drafting? Or did the Jets trade up? 

ETA: I just don't see it as 100% colts could really use Chubb.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
People also seem to be discounting some of the other RBs in the draft who will probably be available to us in a trade up from the 2nd round, or maybe just take in the 2nd without trading up.  

So do we take OUR QB at 1, a player like Chubb/Fitzpatrick (maybe even still Barkely) at 4, and a good RB prospect in the 2nd
People also seem to be forgetting we own the first pick in round 2. Yes Barkely is the lead dog in the RB house but are the 2nd and 3rd prospects that far away from him? I think you target Guise at 2.01 and be just as happy.

 
People also seem to be forgetting we own the first pick in round 2. Yes Barkely is the lead dog in the RB house but are the 2nd and 3rd prospects that far away from him? I think you target Guise at 2.01 and be just as happy.
Yes, Barkley and Gurley are generational talents, imo. 

They are far and few inbetween, to have guys w this much talent, and hype.

It'll be nice having the league's eyes on us, for a good reason, and not cuz we drafted Manziel.

 
If you want to settle for your #3 QB to draft a RB, cool.  I like your logic better
So you know, Dorsey's #1 and #2 QB choices will be gone by pick 4?

No you don't.

And you also don't know how he has them ranked or will have them ranked.

If the Browns have a clear cut we want this QB, they should take him at 1 though.

If they don't, then they have an option to take a non QB at 1 and maneuver differently. 

 
A first round pick is a high pick, especially when many people like me thought he was a third round pick at best.   As a Raider fan, that pick was a gift from the heavens.  

 
I don't think I'm alone but Quinn and Weeden certainly felt like reaches too.  

Weeden arriving with his AARP card to rookie camp was reason enough to call that pick a reach.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can I float a theory/scenario?

#1 - Barkley

#4 - Chubb (I think if we go Saquon at 1, Chubb is 100% there at 4)

...... Keenum in FA, Allen Robinson in FA.

Offense now has Keenum (above average), Saquon, Gordon, AR15, Coleman, Njoku....

You can't honestly tell me that this offense won't put up points. And our defense, which I already rate quite highly, with Chubb..

Mamma mia...
This is exactly what I would want to see happen if I were a Browns fan. 

 
I don't think I'm alone but Quinn and Weeden certainly felt like reaches too.  

Weeden arriving with his AARP card to rookie camp was reason enough to call that pick a reach.  
Pick 22 is forever cursed. The browns got cute then ended up with the leftovers. Which is exacrly what you and others are suggesting we do again. 

 
I think if you pick Barkley at 1 you would just be wasting his talent until you get a qb in place.  However I think if you get chubb at one to pair with Miles that is good enough alone for 6 wins.  That would help your entire defense.  Then at 4 you can still get a great player.

Chubb at 1 is just a no brainer

 
However I think if you get chubb at one to pair with Miles that is good enough alone for 6 wins.
Defense would be able to rush the passer, but it's not going to help the offense.  Defense may be able to get a few more turnovers, but unless they are returned for TDs at that time, it only gives the offense an extra opportunity to #### the bed.  Chubb is a good player, but I don't see how an extra 6 wins can be attributed just to him being on the team.

 
Quinn and Manziel weren't reaches, many people thought pre-draft that they would go much higher than where they fell to (both guys were there at the Draft on Day 1 after all.) Manziel was obviously a very polarizing prospect, but most people thought he would be drafted pretty early. Quinn in particular most people thought Cleveland would take him at 3 where they went with Joe Thomas instead. At worst, Quinn seemed like a lock to fall no further than the Dolphins at 9 who surprised everyone and took Ted Ginn instead (that didn't work out so well either.) Quinn famously was taken to another room so he wouldn't be on camera anymore as he continued to fall, that was back when every pick was 15 minutes. Most of the teams in the 'teens did not need a QB so it was obvious he was going to fall at that point, just like Rodgers did when SF went with Smith.

Old Man Weedon was definitely a reach.

 
MAC_32 said:
Pick 22 is forever cursed. The browns got cute then ended up with the leftovers. Which is exacrly what you and others are suggesting we do again. 
That is not what I am saying.   I'm saying that Cleceland needs to draft BPA and not go with a reach at QB.  Maybe Cleveland sees it differently than I and they have at least one QB ranked as at least the second best player in the draft.  I don't see that.  Which QB is worth the number 1 pick?  

 
DocHolliday said:
I don't think I'm alone but Quinn and Weeden certainly felt like reaches too.  

Weeden arriving with his AARP card to rookie camp was reason enough to call that pick a reach.  
They were.  They were all stupid picks.

What does that have to do with this year though?

 
voiceofunreason said:
You know Foles and Keenum are awful right? This thread is hillairious. They’ll both be backups soon enough.
Let's put on some Superbowl game film.  Foles might not be Rodgers or Brady, but his upside is very high...  Superbowl MVP, 7 TD a game high.

 
Let's put on some Superbowl game film.  Foles might not be Rodgers or Brady, but his upside is very high...  Superbowl MVP, 7 TD a game high.
I wonder how many other good QBs get tagged as bums because they never get a chance in a decent setting or get drafted by the Browns.

 
They were.  They were all stupid picks.

What does that have to do with this year though?
Seriously?   I was trying to point out that reaching for a QB hasn't worked for the Browns.  You said the Browns haven't reached for a QB in twenty years.   

I still don't know who you want as your QB.  

 
What Cleveland does this off-season should be fascinating. This possibilities are rich.

My arm-chair analysis. No QB in this draft is worth more than Barkley. Take Barkley #1. Just do it.

Promise Cousins an ARob signing, and get both. I don't think Cousins is a world beater, but he'd be extremely competent if surrounded by great talent

Trade down 1.4 to a QB hungry team and load up on defense/OL.

OR

Draft Barkley #1, draft Mayfield/LamarJ 1.4, and spend FA $$$$ on defense.

OR

The possibilities are limitless. Wish I could be reincarnated as Dorsey, circa today.

 
Hard to be too excited about Landy yet since we dont know what we gave.  Better not be a 2nd.  

I do very much like the addition though.  Will he be overpaid?  Sure.  That's free agency though.  If you never overpay anyone you will always be 50 million under the cap

Now sign Robinson and we just might look attractive to Cousins............though we might already with enough dollars shoved in his face.

 
Hard to be too excited about Landy yet since we dont know what we gave.  Better not be a 2nd.  
3rd at most. I’ll be disappointed if they actually gave up a 2nd.  If they can lure Cousins away, the possibilities with their first 2 picks would be incredible. 

 
Hard to be too excited about Landy yet since we dont know what we gave.  Better not be a 2nd.  
So you mean you don’t want to overpay for him while also monetarily overpaying him?

I suspect since we’re sending 2 picks, it won’t involve any 2nds. Will be surprised if it’s not 3.01 though. 

While I want to improve the team, not sure this was accomplished in the right way.

 
So you mean you don’t want to overpay for him while also monetarily overpaying him?

I suspect since we’re sending 2 picks, it won’t involve any 2nds. Will be surprised if it’s not 3.01 though. 

While I want to improve the team, not sure this was accomplished in the right way.
Sorry but if you think this team will ever get players at market value you need to wake up.  That is never happening until we have some winning seasons.  

Really no point in having all the picks and cap space if all we do is draft 15 rookies a year and never win, then lose our own FAs who would never DREAM of giving us a hometown discount to stay.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top