What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cleveland Browns (6 Viewers)

he seemed to make a lot of throws McCoy still couldn't after 2 years. let's give Weeden a few games to settle in.
This. No way Colt made half those throws with that kinda zip or touch on the ball. The guy across the field threw 4 INT's too and he's been around a while. If he's making the same mistakes in game 6 then I'll entertain a switch but come on, it's one game.
 
You don't want to push the panic button on a QB after his first start against a complicated defense, but I really didn't like that he threw the exact same interception twice. Also running the ball at the end of the half instead of throwing into the end zone showed a lack of awareness.
Tell me about it. I'm not going to bury Weeden after one bad game. I think he has a chance to be a great quarterback. But those two floaters down the sideline to guys that are NOT OPEN... christ. I was sitting right where he threw both of those picks. Those receivers were not open even for a second on those routes. Those were just terrible, terrible decisions.Pat Shurmur, you've had a full offseason to get this offense looking even just marginally better than what we saw last year. Grade of F- so far.

 
But those two floaters down the sideline to guys that are NOT OPEN... christ. I was sitting right where he threw both of those picks. Those receivers were not open even for a second on those routes. Those were just terrible, terrible decisions.
He might have gotten a little spoiled throwing to Blackmon against Big-12 corners.
 
Browns-Eagles Postgame Notes

Posted 1 hour ago

Here are the postgame notes from Sunday's Cleveland Browns-Philadelphia Eagles game.

POSTGAME NOTES

Cleveland’s defense forced five turnovers, including four interceptions. All 16 of the Browns points were scored off turnovers. The last time the team forced five or more turnovers in one game was at Jacksonville on November 21, 2010, when they totaled six. That game was also the last time the club had four interceptions in one contest.

Linebacker D’Qwell Jackson recovered a fumble and also returned an interception 27 yards for a touchdown. It marked the first time the Browns returned an interception for a score since linebacker David Bowens returned two for touchdowns at New Orleans on October 24, 2010. That game was also the last time an NFL team had three interceptions by linebackers in a single-game.

A pair of linebackers, each making their NFL debut, recorded interceptions. Rookie L.J. Fort and first-year player Craig Robertson each picked off Michael Vick. Since 1970, they are the only Browns linebackers to record an interception in their NFL debuts. In addition, Robertson co-led the team with eight tackles, while Fort added a sack. Fort became the first undrafted rookie to start at any position for the Browns on opening day in the Super Bowl era (since 1966).

The Browns became just the third NFL team since 1970 to start a rookie quarterback, running back and wide receiver on opening day.

Cleveland (2012)-Brandon Weeden (QB), Trent Richardson (RB), Josh Gordon (WR)

Houston (2002)-David Carr (QB), Jonathan Wells (RB), Jabar Gaffney (WR)

New Orleans (1971)-Archie Manning (QB), Bob Gresham (RB), Bob Newland (WR)

Kicker Phil Dawson became the fifth player in Browns history to appear in 200 or more regular season games. He joined Clay Matthews (232), Lou Groza (216), Doug Dieken (203) and Gene Hickerson (202) as the only Browns to reach that mark. Today, Dawson connected on all three of his field goal attempts (43, 42, 22) and one PAT. It marked the 34th time in his career that he has scored 10 or more points in a game.

BROWNS CAREER REGULAR SEASON GAMES PLAYED

1. Clay Matthews (1978-93)-232

2. Lou Groza (1950-59, 1961-67)-216

3. Doug Dieken (1971-84)-203

4. Gene Hickerson (1958-60, 1962-73)-202

5. Phil Dawson (1999-2011)-200

6. Ozzie Newsome (1978-90)-198

Defensive back T.J. Ward co-led the team with eight tackles, while adding one sack and one forced fumble. The sack was the second of his career, while the forced fumble was his third.

Wide receiver Travis Benjamin’s 35 yard rush in the second quarter was the third longest rush by a Browns receiver since 1999. His rush trailed only Joshua Cribbs’ 37 yard run against Pittsburgh on December 10, 2009 and Dennis Northcutt’s 36 yard touchdown run at New Orleans on November 24, 2002.

The Browns had six rookies start today (Brandon Weeden-QB, Trent Richardson-RB, Josh Gordon-WR, Mitchell Schwartz-RT, Billy Winn-DT and L.J. Fort-LB). It is the most rookies the Browns have started on opening day in the Super Bowl era (since 1966). Prior to today, the most rookies to start on opening day for the Browns was four in 1969 and 2011.

Brandon Weeden became the first rookie quarterback to start an NFL season opener for the Browns. He is the 17th quarterback to start for Cleveland since 1999 and 13th rookie quarterback in franchise history to start for the Browns.

At 28 years, 331 days Weeden is the second-oldest rookie quarterback to start a game since the merger (1970) behind Carolina’s Chris Weinke who was 29 years, 159 days old when he started the 2001 season finale on January 6, 2002.

The 15 rookies on the Browns active roster were the most that the team has had on opening day in the Super Bowl era. The previous high was 13 set in 1999. Prior to this year, the last NFL team to have 15 or more rookies on their active roster in season opener was Kansas City in 2008 (15). The Rams have 17 rookies on their roster this year.

Left tackle Joe Thomas has started and played in each of the first 81 games of his career, while center Alex Mack has started and played in each of the first 49 games of his career. Neither one of the two have missed an offensive snap during their career.

Defensive back Sheldon Brown has played in 161 consecutive regular season games, a figure which currently ranks sixth among all defensive players.

Running back Brandon Jackson recorded two receptions for 20 yards. He has recorded at least one reception in each of his last 22 regular season games, a figure which entered this weekend’s games as the sixth-longest active streak among all NFL running backs.

Defensive back Joe Haden recorded the seventh interception of his career and returned it 50 yards to set up a field goal. It was the second-longest interception return of his career, trailing only a 62-yard return at Pittsburgh on October 17, 2010. Today marked his first interception since he picked off Chad Henne in Miami on December 5, 2010.

Joshua Cribbs returned three kickoffs for a 30.3 average and six punts for a 13.0 average. It marked the seventh time in his career that he averaged 30.0 or better kickoff return yards and 10.0 or better punt return yards in the same game.
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/news/article-1/Browns-Eagles-Postgame-Notes/3af6852f-0e5d-4188-9272-9dcb718e1556I think the bolded puts the Browns team in rare company.

 
Weeden displayed the same problems yesterday he had in college - poor decisions/accuracy when pressured and trusts his arm too much when attacking coverage. I didn't expect yesterday to be that bad, but I also wasn't surprised either.

This year's Shurmur, same as last. I don't think the 2 pt decision was in the same conversation as his laundry list of gaffes from last year, given how the D had played making Philly score a TD instead of 2 FG's seemed like the right play to me. His decisions with Richardson and Weeden in the preseason were awful though. It was clear Richardson wasn't all the way there yesterday, no reason to give him 20 touches - Jackson should've been out there more in the 2nd half. Most of us questioned only playing Weeden 5 (bad) quarters in the preseason and yesterday showed why, he's not ready. That's on the coach more than Weeden imho. Shurmur and Heckert don't have much time to rectify this or else they're going to be shown the door, Holmgren's gone anyway but these guys have opportunities to save their jobs. I don't see how they can do it.

On the plus side, I under estimated this defense. I don't like the David Sims trade, but the free agent signings (Parker and Rucker) were solid, as was the entire DL play, Ward was back to 2010 form, our replacement level LB play made me didn't even realize we were missing 2/3 of our starting LB's, and once Sheldon Brown went out the play from the corners was very good too. Great gameplan Jauron, keep it up. We're going to miss Haden whenever he misses his 4 games, but there's a great foundation to work off of for the future.

 
On the plus side, I under estimated this defense. I don't like the David Sims trade, but the free agent signings (Parker and Rucker) were solid, as was the entire DL play, Ward was back to 2010 form, our replacement level LB play made me didn't even realize we were missing 2/3 of our starting LB's, and once Sheldon Brown went out the play from the corners was very good too. Great gameplan Jauron, keep it up. We're going to miss Haden whenever he misses his 4 games, but there's a great foundation to work off of for the future.
Not to mention no Phil Taylor. Was expecting to get blown out yesterday. Great day for the defense. :thumbup: :thumbup: Don't really need to say much about the offense. It'll just get me upset. :wall:
 
Weeden displayed the same problems yesterday he had in college - poor decisions/accuracy when pressured and trusts his arm too much when attacking coverage. I didn't expect yesterday to be that bad, but I also wasn't surprised either.This year's Shurmur, same as last. I don't think the 2 pt decision was in the same conversation as his laundry list of gaffes from last year, given how the D had played making Philly score a TD instead of 2 FG's seemed like the right play to me. His decisions with Richardson and Weeden in the preseason were awful though. It was clear Richardson wasn't all the way there yesterday, no reason to give him 20 touches - Jackson should've been out there more in the 2nd half. Most of us questioned only playing Weeden 5 (bad) quarters in the preseason and yesterday showed why, he's not ready. That's on the coach more than Weeden imho. Shurmur and Heckert don't have much time to rectify this or else they're going to be shown the door, Holmgren's gone anyway but these guys have opportunities to save their jobs. I don't see how they can do it. On the plus side, I under estimated this defense. I don't like the David Sims trade, but the free agent signings (Parker and Rucker) were solid, as was the entire DL play, Ward was back to 2010 form, our replacement level LB play made me didn't even realize we were missing 2/3 of our starting LB's, and once Sheldon Brown went out the play from the corners was very good too. Great gameplan Jauron, keep it up. We're going to miss Haden whenever he misses his 4 games, but there's a great foundation to work off of for the future.
Parker was always a good rotational DE. I thought the Eagles offensive gameplan was atrocious yesterday.
 
Weeden displayed the same problems yesterday he had in college - poor decisions/accuracy when pressured and trusts his arm too much when attacking coverage. I didn't expect yesterday to be that bad, but I also wasn't surprised either.This year's Shurmur, same as last. I don't think the 2 pt decision was in the same conversation as his laundry list of gaffes from last year, given how the D had played making Philly score a TD instead of 2 FG's seemed like the right play to me. His decisions with Richardson and Weeden in the preseason were awful though. It was clear Richardson wasn't all the way there yesterday, no reason to give him 20 touches - Jackson should've been out there more in the 2nd half. Most of us questioned only playing Weeden 5 (bad) quarters in the preseason and yesterday showed why, he's not ready. That's on the coach more than Weeden imho. Shurmur and Heckert don't have much time to rectify this or else they're going to be shown the door, Holmgren's gone anyway but these guys have opportunities to save their jobs. I don't see how they can do it. On the plus side, I under estimated this defense. I don't like the David Sims trade, but the free agent signings (Parker and Rucker) were solid, as was the entire DL play, Ward was back to 2010 form, our replacement level LB play made me didn't even realize we were missing 2/3 of our starting LB's, and once Sheldon Brown went out the play from the corners was very good too. Great gameplan Jauron, keep it up. We're going to miss Haden whenever he misses his 4 games, but there's a great foundation to work off of for the future.
Parker was always a good rotational DE. I thought the Eagles offensive gameplan was atrocious yesterday.
Agreed, going so pass heavy when Vick missed almost all of preseason and the Browns perceived weakness vs. the run made no sense. Make the Browns stop the run then go to the pass. I thought we played well regardless, but would be even more optimistic had we contained a good gameplan - we did not. The Eagles lose that game to just about anyone else in the NFL.
 
On the plus side for Weeden: He consistantly made the right reads and threw to the single-covered receiver. Unfortunately, that coverage was nearly 100% sufficient.

I'm still worried about the OL. Nine months off has apparently not transformed the OGs into top quality players.

Finally, 3-4 months ago, I asked how many games we would win this year, given the SOS. I was told to wait until after training camp. Anybody have a prediction now?

 
You don't want to push the panic button on a QB after his first start against a complicated defense, but I really didn't like that he threw the exact same interception twice. Also running the ball at the end of the half instead of throwing into the end zone showed a lack of awareness.
Tell me about it. I'm not going to bury Weeden after one bad game. I think he has a chance to be a great quarterback. But those two floaters down the sideline to guys that are NOT OPEN... christ. I was sitting right where he threw both of those picks. Those receivers were not open even for a second on those routes. Those were just terrible, terrible decisions.Pat Shurmur, you've had a full offseason to get this offense looking even just marginally better than what we saw last year. Grade of F- so far.
How about we don't call plays for for Benjamin down the sideline against a corner that's 4+ inches taller? Why wasn't he working the middle? Let Little and Gordon go up for the jump balls.Still bad decision to throw it there though.

 
On the plus side for Weeden: He consistantly made the right reads and threw to the single-covered receiver. Unfortunately, that coverage was nearly 100% sufficient.

I'm still worried about the OL. Nine months off has apparently not transformed the OGs into top quality players.

Finally, 3-4 months ago, I asked how many games we would win this year, given the SOS. I was told to wait until after training camp. Anybody have a prediction now?
Ugh. 4?Draft an old immobile QB who had all his success in the shotgun. Fail. Hope I'm wrong. Three cheers to the new ownership. Too bad he wasn't in there before they needlessly gave away the farm for Trent...who was going to be there anyways IMO.

 
On the plus side for Weeden: He consistantly made the right reads and threw to the single-covered receiver. Unfortunately, that coverage was nearly 100% sufficient.

I'm still worried about the OL. Nine months off has apparently not transformed the OGs into top quality players.

Finally, 3-4 months ago, I asked how many games we would win this year, given the SOS. I was told to wait until after training camp. Anybody have a prediction now?
If I didn't say 2 then I'll say it now.
 
I heard a reporter once say he knew a sports reporter from back in the old days who quit being a sports reporter to become a news reporter because he just couldn't take handing down all the same old bs and lies from the coach anymore, the lies and the bs from the politicians was actually more tolerable.

I was reminded of that reading this:

>>>In the opener with the Eagles, Cameron had no receptions and just one ball thrown his way. “There’s no conspiracy theory,” Shurmur said. “He was part of an offense that wasn’t very effective. I’m happy with him.”

Shurmur called Cameron the most improved player from a season ago.

“He’s one of those guys from a year ago, he’s improved the most, and I think there’s a huge upside for him,” he said. “The more you practice and play, the better you get.”<<<

http://www.foxsportsohio.com/09/13/12/Bengals-Say-Richardson-Nothing-Spectacul/landing_browns.html?blockID=789845&feedID=3689

- He was part of an offense that wasn't effective AND he's happy with him?

- He's the most improved player on the team, he's got HUGE upside, and the more he plays the better he will get, AND YET HE HAD ONLY ONE TARGET?

He was in for 7 plays total.

 
How about we don't call plays for for Benjamin down the sideline against a corner that's 4+ inches taller? Why wasn't he working the middle? Let Little and Gordon go up for the jump balls.Still bad decision to throw it there though.
We don't really have any idea where the coaches wanted Weeden to go with the ball. We just know where he threw it.
 
I honestly didn't think this season could be worse than last year. I hope they turn it around and prove me wrong. Because week one, they put the UGH in ugly, you know?

 
On the plus side for Weeden: He consistantly made the right reads and threw to the single-covered receiver. Unfortunately, that coverage was nearly 100% sufficient.

I'm still worried about the OL. Nine months off has apparently not transformed the OGs into top quality players.

Finally, 3-4 months ago, I asked how many games we would win this year, given the SOS. I was told to wait until after training camp. Anybody have a prediction now?
Ugh. 4?Draft an old immobile QB who had all his success in the shotgun. Fail. Hope I'm wrong. Three cheers to the new ownership. Too bad he wasn't in there before they needlessly gave away the farm for Trent...who was going to be there anyways IMO.
I hear ya. If they'd just made noise like they wanted Kalil, TRich would have been cheaper, at least.BTW, Weeden isn't old. "Old" implies worn out & ready to retire.

 
More than anything I'm tremendously disappointed with the HC. Year one mistakes I get and while there were a lot more than I would have liked I'll give him a chance. Pre-season and now one game in he's making the same bull#### mistakes and continues to have the deer-in-the-headlights look. He's not good and unless he figures it out quick, he will not make it past the bye week this year.

Interesting thought came up on ESPN today regarding RGIII. The opposition was looking at game film from last week on him and compared it to game film from the Tulane-Baylor game last year and guess what? Quite a few of the plays RGIII ran in that game were the exact same plays he had success with last Sunday. Not saying, just saying. . .Play to your players strengths when you can, as much as they try, square pegs still do not fit in round holes.

 
Way too many mental errors today with a Costly fumble and 87 penalties being the primary reasons for the loss. That said, I feel a lot better today than I did last Sunday. I know he faced a lesser defense, but Weeden kept his eyes downfield, hit receivers in stride, and checked down when needed. He had a few mistakes, but no QB is perfect. Richardson having room to operate made a huge difference. I can't remember the last time the Browns offense had a rhythm, but they had one today.

 
Way too many mental errors today with a Costly fumble and 87 penalties being the primary reasons for the loss. That said, I feel a lot better today than I did last Sunday. I know he faced a lesser defense, but Weeden kept his eyes downfield, hit receivers in stride, and checked down when needed. He had a few mistakes, but no QB is perfect. Richardson having room to operate made a huge difference. I can't remember the last time the Browns offense had a rhythm, but they had one today.
I think if Haden is there we win this game. Buster Skrine and Dmitri Patterson were simply outmuscled. I love Haden to death but I'm so disappointed in him. It's about time we saw some outside runs, some play action, and for the love of God Shanahan is playing to RGIII's strengths, why can't we run more shotgun to make Weeden more comfortable? It got better today but still. I was impressed with Richardson and Weeden (duh!). The main callout of Richardson is that it's evident that his sheer strength will wear defenses down and take over games when we have a lead. Now that Weeden established himself as a threat the box won't be as stacked. As for Weeden, I was really impressed at the way he stayed in the pocket under collapsing pressure, didn't get happy feet a la Colt, and stood tall and found his receiver. I also enjoyed his first game without fumbling the ball. He's like (gulp) an accurate Derek Anderson, #3 and all.I was cautiously optimistic but :unsure: when we took Cincy's John Hughes in the 3rd round. Billy Winn was a bargain in the 5th round. Although Winn got hurt today, it's an understatement when I say that I am much more than pleased with both of them. Phil Taylor isn't there and bloody hell, we have penetration at the line and a pass rush! D'Qwell is an absolute beast. I am anxious to see what James Michael Johnson can do when he comes back from his oblique strain. Pitt loses and we're only a game out of first :)
 
Word of caution from a fellow fan, Wheeden is not the guy we saw last week or the guy this week, but somewhere in between. He has a high ceiling and a low floor.

Give it more time to form an opinion.

Trich is God and after he was drafted, someone said "Let there be light!" though.

 
Can anyone remember the fan base being this positive after a loss? I can't.
We wanted a competent offense and watchable football, that's what we got. After a very bumpy start I was impressed with Weeden, but I was just as impressed in how awful Cincy is defensively. Still, have to take the positives from this week and spin it to a win next week because if we don't get a W against Buffalo we're staring 0-5 and a mid-October house cleaning right in the face. I'm all for moving on past these guys, but I also want to see growth and I don't see that happening if the ship is blown up in October, save that for January's Black Monday.
 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.

 
Patterson and Skrine are great depth, but starters? Oof.

Anxious to see if Wade develops. He looks like he has the tools to be a starter.

 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.

TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.

Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.

OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.

I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.

QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
:wall:
 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.

TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.

Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.

OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.

I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.

QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
:lmao: You should at least try to have an open mind about Weeden.

 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.

TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.

Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.

OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.

I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.

QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
:lmao: You should at least try to have an open mind about Weeden.
I am, pretending it's not an option would be foolish though. If he proves me wrong then it's not QB - it's just CB or DE. A bad season and the whole ship gets blown up, new guys come in that have zero ties to Weeden and if you took a consensus from the league they'd say the Browns probably have the worst QB in the league. They, and I, could all be wrong, but if that's the case then the Browns probably sratch and claw for enough wins that some people who wouldn't otherwise, that have ties to Weeden, keep their jobs.
 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.

TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.

Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.

OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.

I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.

QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
:lmao: You should at least try to have an open mind about Weeden.
I am, pretending it's not an option would be foolish though.
Can you tell me the last time that a team, under any circumstances, drafted a QB in the first round 2 years in a row?
 
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.

TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.

Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.

OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.

I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.

QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
Offering a differing opinion from the side of town where the sun shines occasionally... :boxing: Another top quality CB would make that unit complete. There are 6-7 very good D linemen on this team. The young LBs are kicking butt! DEFENSE is very close when healthy.

Disregard Mac's disparagement of Weeden. He wanted to draft a WR & needs to justify his opinion. TRich looks like an A+ choice. Could add another RB, though. TE is a solid, deep squad. WRs are young and improving. A Little better chemistry with Greg wouldn't hurt, though. OTs look good. C looks good. OGs ummmmmm... Depth = zero.

Gotta love the improvements everywhere! Just let the rookies play. :thumbup:

 
I'm shocked that Mac32 has a negative outlook; it's so unlike him.

As far as Skrine.... Jesus, it was his first start. IMO, he was just too agressive at times and lost his footing, overpursued, etc. That can be fixed. It seemed like he was "trying too hard" if that makes sense.

The Browns had 5 passing plays of over 20 yards. When is the last time that happened?

And I agree with DaveR, the defense is very close when healthy.

Every team needs to add depth, every year.

 
If they lose to Buffalo this week, I'm worried about going winless into the week Jimmy Haslam is ratified. Banner will come in and who knows if he has an itchy trigger finger to blow things up.

All I know is that I want to see **** Jauron function with all of his weapons at his disposal. Phil Taylor, Haden, Sheldon Brown, Billy Winn, and James Michael Johnson. This D has the potential to be outstanding.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
All-in-all it's nice to be thinking about adding pieces instead of units. Depth on the OL and depth at DB is what I'm contemplating.
A corner opposite Haden is a glaring issue.Parker and Rucker are surprisingly impressing me but they're stop gaps - we need to find another young pass rusher.

TE is developing into an issue since Moore didn't pan out, Watson's falling off the cliff, Smith is just depth, and Cameron isn't getting on the field.

Don't thnik WR is there either - Gordon has enormous potential and Benjamin looks like a nice role player, but Massaquoi and Little don't look like answers. Need someone else in there, especially with the problems at TE.

OG is still a problem too, but 5th in the priority list - a free agent solution should work.

I think we're good at S, LB, OT, and DT though.

QB, DE, or CB needs to be the round 1 pick next year with a passing game weapon mixed in day 2.
:lmao: You should at least try to have an open mind about Weeden.
I am, pretending it's not an option would be foolish though.
Can you tell me the last time that a team, under any circumstances, drafted a QB in the first round 2 years in a row?
Carolina basically did that with Clausen being their first pick of the draft in 2010, albeit 2nd round and Cam as the first overall in 2011. Considering the Browns reached for Weeden, the next QB didn't go until 2.25 to the Broncos (who would never have taken Weeden), and Wilson went at 3.12 to the Seahawks...you're looking at a potential Carolina type situation in Clevland.
 
I'll also add that with TRich being selected first and doing well, pulling the plug on Weeden if needed won't seem like a huge hit.

 
I'm shocked that Mac32 has a negative outlook; it's so unlike him.
I've actually been more positive since the ownership change, before if Weeden sucked we were stuck with him for 2+ years which would have given the front office that much time to make short sighted moves at the expense of the longevity of the franchise to try to save their jobs. Now if he sucks they all go and we'll get new guys in here with a good core to build around that a desperate front office didn't have time to ruin before heading out, I mean we did spend a #2 on Gordon and while a #3 seems more reasonable in hindsight and probably would've been the play had they not known a change was coming it's not the end of the world. Or Weeden can just end up being a good player and we can build from there.Much happier now than I was in April, hasn't changed my expectations for this year, but I can at least see a light at the end of the tunnel one way or the other.
 
I'll also add that with TRich being selected first and doing well, pulling the plug on Weeden if needed won't seem like a huge hit.
Correct, the Browns offense with Peyton Hillis comp's were incorrectly scoffed at by many but it absolutely holds water. I don't think Colt is the answer, but he can win games with Richardson behind him. If Weeden isn't the answer and one of Geno, Barkley, Bray, etc. is then he comes in here to a stud RB and developing WR corps with hopefully an added weapon - much better situation than any QB has come into here with since we came back.
 
big picture i think the team still has little depth.

they need to continue with taking the BPA. Heckert has done a solid job with his drafts. hopefully he will stay.

i think Weeden will probably become an average NFL QB. they will draft an eventual replacement in the next 2-3 years. the new QB will have time to learn under Weeden.

if all goes well, the Browns eventually become an above average franchise.

playoffs are still 1-2 years away.

 
actually probably 2-3 years.

which unfortunately sounds like a rebuild, but i really don't think they should blow up the team again.

 
In the week 1 game vs Philly when the Eagles tied it up 16-16 with a little over a minute left to play they didn't send D'Qwell to atleast attempt a block of the lead changing extra point, instead 0052 is spying the play. For what?

 
'amnesiac said:
well,here comes 0-5 and the next rebuild.####
What week does Shurmur get fired?
When's the bye week?Brutal game to watch. You can be optimistic all you want, there are some good things to take from each of these games but at the end of the day they have to start winning. The WR's drop balls that have to be caught, the Defense drop INT after INT that are potential game changers, the O-line pulls a stupid drive stopping penalty or gives up a sack at a critical point. And Shurmur is just lost, lost. Doesn't have a clue. There are 31 teams in the NFL playing football right now and then there are us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top