What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Fact - Brandon Marshall is not at Bronco's practice today (1 Viewer)

Trap Play said:
steelcityman said:
49ers? And they pull offers for Crabtree?
Why trade one ##### bag for another?
when you start paying Marshall you know what you get. Or you can pay some idiotic bonus to Craby and HOPE he can be something like Marshall.And since both are jerks, it doesnt really matter, that cancels itself out.But lets face it, if Cutler was traded, and you now have Orton and then lets assume Colt McCoy, the OU QB or even Tim Tedbow, or someone who needs to "grow" into a pro, you are talking 3 years of crap at QB, not nice if you are a star potential WR. And since Cutler demanded and got traded, why wouldnt I want that too, get out of Denver ASAP. they cut ties with Shanahan, cutler and winning IMO.
 
urbanhack said:
JMJ said:
urbanhack said:
JMJ said:
David Yudkin said:
So where is the rumor coming from exactly?
Twitter
XWho on Twitter?
http://twitter.com/#search?q=brandon%20marshall
:confused: All that does is search for the words "Brandon Marshall."

Try again.
Right. And it had numerous reports of people confirming he is not at practice, saying McDaniels wouldn't confirm where he is, and speculating trade.The Denver Post also confirmed he was not at practice today and that they did not know his where abouts.

Also, I put the word RUMOR in all capital letters in the title of the thread. What do you want? A text message from Brandon himself? That is what a freaking rumor is.

 
urbanhack said:
JMJ said:
:confused: All that does is search for the words "Brandon Marshall."

Try again.
Right. And it had numerous reports of people confirming he is not at practice, saying McDaniels wouldn't confirm where he is, and speculating trade.The Denver Post also confirmed he was not at practice today and that they did not know his where abouts.

Also, I put the word RUMOR in all capital letters in the title of the thread. What do you want? A text message from Brandon himself? That is what a freaking rumor is.
Do you have anyone else with this rumor other than yourself?Post the link to the Denver post.

 
Couch Potato said:
eoMMan said:
Assuming he does go to the Jets or the Ravens....you have to downgrade him, right?
Anybody who hasn't already downgraded him SIGNIFICANTLY with the loss of Cutler, the attitude, the immaturity, the lack of effort, the off field issues (the next one meaining a big suspension), the not bothering to learn the playbook, the hip, the hammy... anyone not already dropping him out of the top 20 WRs has been burying his head in the sand. The guy is radioactive, and I wouldn't touch him in any league anywhere near his current ADP.
This is an overreaction in my humble opinion. T.O. is the living, breathing definition of a petulant WR with off-field issues ... and the dude went for 1200 yards and 13 TDs in a season in which he overdosed in what many thought was a suicide attempt. I'm not saying that Marshall is at TO-level talent, but if you can ball, then you can ball. He's not a top ten guy, but late teens sounds about right. Again, just my opinion, but I think you're better off giving Marshall a go than playing it safe with the type of guys ranked in the 20s- your Hines Ward, Jerrico Cotchery, Santana Moss types. Those guys won't lose a title for you, but they won't win one either. His ADP of 39 is obviously way too high, but if you're in a league full of FBGs taking their cues from Dodds and company, and he slips to the fifth or sixth round as a result, he's worth a roll of the dice.

 
Right. And it had numerous reports of people confirming he is not at practice, saying McDaniels wouldn't confirm where he is, and speculating trade.The Denver Post also confirmed he was not at practice today and that they did not know his where abouts.Also, I put the word RUMOR in all capital letters in the title of the thread. What do you want? A text message from Brandon himself? That is what a freaking rumor is.
You did good. With all that's been going on with the big BM, not showing up at practice AND THE TEAM BEING UNWILLING TO COMMENT is newsworthy. If it was just resting an injury they would have said so. They are either about to suspend him or deal him. So it's a big deal. Good for you for starting the thread.
 
There is nothing on the Denverpost website that I can find that speculates this is due to a trade.

Maybe McDaniels just has him running some errands during practice. It's not like he's been practicing anyway. Probably just went to the grocery store to get orange slices for after practice.

 
Do you have anyone else with this rumor other than yourself?

Post the link to the Denver post.
Yeah, FBG news speculates about a trade too.
Our view: All is quiet on the Brandon Marshall front. The team is not commenting, and the local media is basically in the dark right now. Could be nothing, could be a trade in the works, we'll just have to wait and see. Right now we'd say the Jets would be the team most likely to be cooking up a deal for Marshall.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you have anyone else with this rumor other than yourself?

Post the link to the Denver post.
It is not MY rumor. People on Twitter were speculating it when the Denver Post confirmed that Marshall was not at practice and that McDaniels would not comment on where he was.I just posted it here.

 
Max Power said:
I would upgrade him on the Ravens. He should get a lot of one of one coverage and Flacco has a cannon
Cutler also has a cannon, yet Marshall only scored 13 TDs in the last two seasons. I am not sure even sure his yardage and catches would be that high simply because the Ravens love to run the ball and play defense. Sure, adding a playmaker at WR would make them take more chances, but I don't see them changing their entire team or offensive philosophy because of one player, and a player who I might add who could do something stupid tomorrow resulting in a lengthy suspension.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
eoMMan said:
shader said:
eoMMan said:
Assuming he does go to the Jets or the Ravens....you have to downgrade him, right?
From Kyle Orton to Joe Flacco would be a downgrade?
I was thinking more along the lines of the offense. The Ravens are more of a run the ball, pass control offense and the Broncos like to air it out (assuming it doesn't change much with the new coach).
Plenty of teams have run first mindset but have a WR put up top numbers. Last year Steve smith, Roddy White and Antonio Bryant were top 10 receivers on teams that ran first.
 
I cant seem to find a link anywhere confirming he is not at practice.
From right here in this thread:http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13216251
As well as here, which actually preceded the Denver Post article:http://www.gazette.com/sports/-60905--.html

Marshall missing at beginning of Broncos practice

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

August 27, 2009 1:29 PM

FRANK SCHWAB

THE GAZETTE

ENGLEWOOD - Broncos receiver Brandon Marshall was not present at the start of the team's practice on Thursday afternoon. No reason has been given by the team for his absence.

Marshall has expressed on many occasions he is not happy with the team. He did practice Wednesday, presumably making it through the entire session. He walked off the field with the rest of the team Wednesday and declined an interview request.

Marshall said last week he doesn't know the playbook, and was held out of the second preseason game. Broncos coach Josh McDaniels wouldn't commit to Marshall playing in Sunday's preseason game against Chicago. Marshall also missed time during training camp with a hamstring injury. He has not played in the preseason.
 
Max Power said:
I would upgrade him on the Ravens. He should get a lot of one of one coverage and Flacco has a cannon
Cutler also has a cannon, yet Marshall only scored 13 TDs in the last two seasons. I am not sure even sure his yardage and catches would be that high simply because the Ravens love to run the ball and play defense. Sure, adding a playmaker at WR would make them take more chances, but I don't see them changing their entire team or offensive philosophy because of one player, and a player who I might add who could do something stupid tomorrow resulting in a lengthy suspension.
Derrick Mason had 80 receptions last year and that's a lot for a guy his age. The potential exists for Marshall in that offense. Mason is a glorified possession receiver at this stage of his career.
 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.

I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.

 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
:goodposting: Now that would be an ugly fantasy matchETA: why trade for McCown when there is a very good chance the guy will be cut?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
Huh? Did you hear that on 620?
 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.

I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
:goodposting: Awesome. So we could potentially be talking about Orton, Simms, McCown throwing to Royal, Stokely and Gaffney. This better be a helluva system McDaniels has brought over.

 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
:goodposting: Now that would be an ugly fantasy match
Would be a big shock to me. Bryant, Marshall and Winslow are too many lunatics for one locker room. I'm sure the Bucs made a call, but I wouldn't consider them even likely to pull this off.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
with simms injured, this could make some sense. either way, this team is going nowhere.
 
saintfool said:
twistd said:
eoMMan said:
Assuming he does go to the Jets or the Ravens....you have to downgrade him, right?
It is so hard to say. He is definitely a top 10 talent. He has injury problems. I thought his ADP was lower than it is. He is being drafted as WR #14 and overall pick 39, so he is early fourth round in a 12 team league. That is according to the consensus ADP on FBG. I think even that is too high. If he goes to another team he has to start over learning the playbook. If he goes to the Jets he will have a rookie throwing to him. IF he goes to the Ravens they are primarily a running team. So all things considered I think you are right, you have to downgrade him. But I think his current ADP is far too high considering the issues.
you don't make a play for a #1 WR like Marshall to remain a "primarily running team". the cost for this kind of deal - to the Broncos and the new contract to Marshall - would seem to support a shift in philosophy.
They have Mason, who is a solid possession receiver, and just about nothing else, which is why you want to make this trade. But you don't completely change your offensive philosophy two weeks before the season starts. Having Marshall could open up the passing game, but they don't suddenly turn in to the Saints, chucking the ball down the field 600 times. The Bears gave up two firsts for Cutler. That doesn't mean they are a passing team now. They are probably going to be more balanced, which is what I would guess would happen to the Ravens. I think Marshall has the chance for more targets with the Broncos. The Broncos have a hideous defense, which means they will be playing from behind a lot. The Ravens have one of the best. They will be much more conservative than the Broncos, IMO.
 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
:goodposting: Now that would be an ugly fantasy matchETA: why trade for McCown when there is a very good chance the guy will be cut?
I doubt McCown gets cut. He seems to have some trade value (as in 5th-rd pick trade value). Apparently the Jags called about him as well.
 
Damien Woody, RT of the Jets just posted this on his Twitter:

@damienwoody: To Jet Nation, i got one word, BELIEVE!! There's a quiet storm brewing...

Would be f'n sweat if Marshall landed in NY! Just keep him out of the nightclubs. :goodposting:

 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
:goodposting: Now that would be an ugly fantasy matchETA: why trade for McCown when there is a very good chance the guy will be cut?
I doubt McCown gets cut. He seems to have some trade value (as in 5th-rd pick trade value). Apparently the Jags called about him as well.
i think leftwich has the contract that makes moving and/or cutting him the most likely.
 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
Broncos GM: We want a 1st and a 4th for Marshall.Bucs GM: How about a 1st and Luke McCown.Broncos GM: You're kidding right?Bucs GM: Uh, how about a 1st and a 5th and McCown?Broncos GM: You'd have to upgrade the 4th to a 3rd just to get us to take the bum and his contract.Bucs GM: It's a deal! Woo hoo!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damien Woody, RT of the Jets just posted this on his Twitter:@damienwoody: To Jet Nation, i got one word, BELIEVE!! There's a quiet storm brewing...Would be f'n sweat if Marshall landed in NY! Just keep him out of the nightclubs. :goodposting:
That would make for one heck of a young corps of players on the Jets O. Marshall, Washington, Greene, Keller, Cotchery Sanchez, DBrick, and Mangold.
 
F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5

 
Frank Schwab @fs3142 just tweeted McD wouldn't say if it was health related but was agitated having to talk abt Marshall again

 
Fan Poll:

What should the Broncos do with Brandon Marshall?

Total Votes = 15010

Trade him now: Dump him as quickly as possible, even if the price is low. He's nothing but a liability and another off-the-field problem waiting to happen.

18.87 %

Wait for right offer: Hold out for at least first- and fourth-round picks.

29.38 %

Status quo: The Broncos need him, and Marshall needs to have a good season to get the contract he wants.

33.86 %

Extend him: Give him what he wants already. He's ready to turn over new leaf, on and off the field.

17.88 %

 
Buffaloes said:
LHUCKS said:
Statcruncher said:
Please let him wind up in Chicago.
Man, that makes sense on so many levels.
It does if you believe Denver would openly invite a PR nightmare by reuniting Marshall with his buddy Cutler in Chicago. Especially considering Denver holds Chicago's 1st round pick next year. Why not get the Bears that missing piece to their offense for this season and reunite a couple of Broncos who could have very productive years for a decade?
There are two major problems with this. The Bears aren't going to pay Marshall what he wants considering the off the field issues. And the Bears have nothing to give up. The Broncos aren't going to accept a first round pick in 2011. As a Bear fan I don't want him. He is a head case. He reports, but then dogs it, and disrupts the training camp. If you don't want to be there then stay away. I think he is too expensive, both in compensation that you would have to give the Broncos, and the guaranteed money you would have to give him in a contract.
 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
Huh? Did you hear that on 620?
Yup. Dbag Sileo.No Stern this week, so I'm forced to listen to that crap. :goodposting:
Nice. It would be interesting to see him in Tampa, but considering THAT rumor source... Oh yeah, regarding your question about when Bronco fans consider killing themselves, check back Sunday just after kickoff.
 
Buffaloes said:
LHUCKS said:
Statcruncher said:
Please let him wind up in Chicago.
Man, that makes sense on so many levels.
It does if you believe Denver would openly invite a PR nightmare by reuniting Marshall with his buddy Cutler in Chicago. Especially considering Denver holds Chicago's 1st round pick next year. Why not get the Bears that missing piece to their offense for this season and reunite a couple of Broncos who could have very productive years for a decade?
There are two major problems with this. The Bears aren't going to pay Marshall what he wants considering the off the field issues. And the Bears have nothing to give up. The Broncos aren't going to accept a first round pick in 2011. As a Bear fan I don't want him. He is a head case. He reports, but then dogs it, and disrupts the training camp. If you don't want to be there then stay away. I think he is too expensive, both in compensation that you would have to give the Broncos, and the guaranteed money you would have to give him in a contract.
Sorry, I thought it was obvious but my post was fraught with :sarcasm:
 
@fs3142 No specifics from McD on Marshall. He was in the building today. McD said he wasn't ready to practice.

 
The local sports radio hack said at about 6:15 this morning that the Bucs were involved in Marshall trade offers, and it included a "high draft pick" and most likely McCown.

I blew it off, but hearing this makes it interesting.
:hot: Now that would be an ugly fantasy matchETA: why trade for McCown when there is a very good chance the guy will be cut?
I doubt McCown gets cut. He seems to have some trade value (as in 5th-rd pick trade value). Apparently the Jags called about him as well.
Also the Packers.http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/08/27/desperate-...-look-to-tampa/

 
If Marshall is really hurt and McDaniels' style is to play games with the injury report, I'll bet he's regretting his decision with the avalanche of trade inquiries.

 
So...."if" Marshall is out of the picture, and Denver doesn't get a WR in return...is there any value in Gaffney, Stokley, Lloyd?

Looks like Marshall would leave behind 80-90 receptions. How would they be divided?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top