Is there any shred of evidence that Dominion changed votes?
Hand recount in GA appears that it didn’t...why would anywhere else be different?
Dominion doesn’t have a thing to prove...those claiming fraud do.
There is a difference between voter fraud and election fraud. The Dominion issue deals with election fraud. There is a process and there is the legal system. The narrative here by many, mostly the hardened liberals here, is that since Sydney Powell did not release every last piece of evidence she had to the public and did not do it immediately that this is definitive proof that no election fraud happened. There are just way too many attorneys on this site, and I even think a few are on the current FBG Staff, for that narrative to actually hold any weight. Some will cite that Powell is receiving criticisms from pundits like Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro for not answering their requests for the data/evidence. Given their own personal incentive for ratings and their individual public brand, I understand their strategy, but again, that's not some kind of evidence that Powell is incorrect here.
Powell has immunity in the court room but NOT when she gives a press conference. Powell is risking her established reputation and legal action if this entire case was baseless. But again, to be fair about it, that's not proof that she is right, there is something and that the case will prevail. Her strategy is a good one so far - In order to make her case she needs someone who currently works at Dominion to flip. She might already have someone or several at this time. That Dominion is bunkering up is a positive sign for her ( Shutting down their offices, employees scrubbing their digital footprint, refusing to appear before the PA legislature, immediately lawyering up) Powell knows someone at DVS suing her for libel/slander is expensive and difficult to prove. Also in order to proceed with a lawsuit of such nature, Dominion is now open to discovery and cross examination. Do you think every single internal email, chat string, memo, meeting minutes, etc, etc are going to be flawless?
Your quarry cannot go to ground if you taken away all ground to go to except you.
Short term - If there is corruption and fraud and it can be linked to the DNC, what the options for Dominion, which is now hosed as a business forever? The DNC power brokers will either clean house aka "Let's take you jogging with Seth Rich" or get slammed as working alone and that this fraud was compartmentalized to a single company and a few civilians. This means pure survival leaves going to Powell as the only option.
Long term - This entire case becomes a foothold to push for federal voter ID and more restrictions on use of mail in ballots, which benefits the GOP directly. That Pelosi has financial ties to DVS means it's a leverage point to neutralize Gavin Newsom in 2024. It would be four LONG years with Trump in the daily media cycle ( He doesn't need Fox anymore, he can align with Newsmax, OAN, Parler, DailyWire, etc, etc. That would be four years of wiping out his political opponents, for a 2024 run, as a civilian and without the restrictions ( but also without the power) of office.
A hand recount operates with ballots that are there, it doesn't automatically make some of those ballots immune from fraud. Esp mail in ballots. I'm not here to say there was widespread fraud or not, I am saying investigating this is due process for the American people, even if unsavory in nature. One thing a hand count does do immediately is found "lost votes"
****
https://www.ajc.com/politics/recount-finds-thousands-of-georgia-votes-missing-from-initial-counts/ERDRNXPH3REQTM4SOINPSEP72M/
"Election workers in three counties discovered a total of more than 3,300 new votes stored on memory cards that hadn’t been loaded into election computers. A different issue in Floyd County led to another 2,600 ballots going unscanned.
Those votes are now being counted, reducing Joe Biden’s lead over Donald Trump to 12,781 votes. Trump gained about 1,400 votes that county election officials hadn’t tallied before the recount."
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/recount-or-audit-whats-happening-on-the-ground-in-georgia/
"Recounts and audits are distinct processes. A recount occurs after an election when the margin between candidates is narrow, or if a candidate asks for a recount. Recounts are a literal counting of ballots, sometimes by hand, to confirm the result. Some states have automatically triggered recounts for contests decided within a small margin; other states offer an option for a recount when a candidate requests it. Georgia does not have automatic recounts, but a candidate can request a recount after certification.
Contrary to recounts, an audit seeks to verify that the primary counting method is accurate. In Georgia, Risk Limiting Audits, or RLAs, are required by state statute. In an RLA, a certain number of ballots are audited based on the margin of victory between candidates in the race selected for auditing. Closer margins require more ballots to be reviewed in order to achieve a high standard of statistical confidence in the overall result. The process involves taking a small batch of ballots from precincts based on a unique identifier. Even pulling a few hundred ballots can be labor intensive. For contests with very small margins of victory, manually auditing all ballots is more efficient.
Audits are important. BPC recommends that states use audits to instill confidence in the reported outcome. While an RLA cannot confirm a 100% accurate count of the initial results—since it is not a full recount and therefore can only provide confidence within a specific interval—it offers a sound statistical check on the voting process that is sufficient in most cases.
So, what is happening in Georgia right now? Raffensperger ordered a hand-tally of all ballots across the state. One may think that this is a recount, but there are two reasons it is not. First, recounts in Georgia are not done by hand. Second, in Georgia, the results must be certified before a recount can be requested while an audit—per BPC’s recommendation—occurs before certification.
So, the Georgia maneuverings must be an RLA, right? Not quite. What Raffensperger has essentially ordered is a hybrid of an audit and a recount. This means that while they will be assessing every ballot, which is not normal in an ordinary RLA, they will be doing it by hand, which is not normal of a typical recount. After the completion of this process, which is set to happen on or before November 18, Raffensperger will the assess the results and then continue to the certification process on November 20. After certification, a recount can be requested which would see all the ballots scanned by machine again across the state."