What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hurricane Sandy (2 Viewers)

Is fema doing a crappy job?
I think there's some grumbling at the local level, and that will always happen, but the overall reviews have been good. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/01/us/sandy-fema/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Well minus the giant generators sitting around doing nothing waiting for the marathon - when they could roll them out to maybe some gas stations or homes.
Were those provided by FEMA or the city? Either way I'd think FEMA just provides the device and the locality decides what to do with it. :shrug:
This is not how it used to work. IIRC, during the Katrina era, FEMA had to be invited in by the actual State to set up relief efforts, then they took over operations but many things have changed since then.
 
Just saw about 20 large power trucks and a semi from "Southern Electric" that apparently overnighted in my town leaving and heading north this morning.

 
Is fema doing a crappy job?
I think there's some grumbling at the local level, and that will always happen, but the overall reviews have been good. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/01/us/sandy-fema/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Well minus the giant generators sitting around doing nothing waiting for the marathon - when they could roll them out to maybe some gas stations or homes.
Were those provided by FEMA or the city? Either way I'd think FEMA just provides the device and the locality decides what to do with it. :shrug:
This is not how it used to work. IIRC, during the Katrina era, FEMA had to be invited in by the actual State to set up relief efforts, then they took over operations but many things have changed since then.
Sorry I didn't mean to imply FEMA only - it may well be the city - it's just wrong on so many levels.I understand the want and need to move forward - but when some people get get food and are still in need for rescuing, you are going to close down a bridge for a race. Have huge tents with power, etc etc. How about using those tents for the workers that need a break and some hot food, etc etc.

Just can't believe they are doing this on schedule when people are still digging out.

Hell the Steelers decided to fly in on game day instead of having people scurry to try and find them somewhere else to stay, since their hotel they were supposed to stay is still a mess. Not sure how I feel about the Ginats playing, although there area is "not as bad" in Jersey...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whoever turned these guys away should be burned at the stake.

m.waff.com/autojuice?targetUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.waff.com%2fstory%2f19981857%2fsome-nonunion-ala-crews-turned-away-from-sandy-recovery

(since my link is so crappy: basically non-union electric crews from out of state are being told that NJ doesn't want them to come and help)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whoever turned these guys away should be burned at the stake.

m.waff.com/autojuice?targetUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.waff.com%2fstory%2f19981857%2fsome-nonunion-ala-crews-turned-away-from-sandy-recovery
####### BS #### in times of need, crap like that really infuriates me, oh nice link hipple....GD's link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is fema doing a crappy job?
I think there's some grumbling at the local level, and that will always happen, but the overall reviews have been good. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/01/us/sandy-fema/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Well minus the giant generators sitting around doing nothing waiting for the marathon - when they could roll them out to maybe some gas stations or homes.
Were those provided by FEMA or the city? Either way I'd think FEMA just provides the device and the locality decides what to do with it. :shrug:
This is not how it used to work. IIRC, during the Katrina era, FEMA had to be invited in by the actual State to set up relief efforts, then they took over operations but many things have changed since then.
Sorry I didn't mean to imply FEMA only - it may well be the city - it's just wrong on so many levels.I understand the want and need to move forward - but when some people get get food and are still in need for rescuing, you are going to close down a bridge for a race. Have huge tents with power, etc etc. How about using those tents for the workers that need a break and some hot food, etc etc.

Just can't believe they are doing this on schedule when people are still digging out.

Hell the Steelers decided to fly in on game day instead of having people scurry to try and find them somewhere else to stay, since their hotel they were supposed to stay is still a mess. Not sure how I feel about the Ginats playing, although there area is "not as bad" in Jersey...
Yeah, I see both sides of the marathon coin. On the one side, you have the keep it going because it could help lift the spirits and it will bring in good revenue to help the city. They could even set up donation booths. On the other hand, it's way too soon. People are still trying to dig out. There's some unaccounted for. Getting around is still a mess. Mass power outages (though it sounds like a lot will be restored over the next 36 hours).They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?

 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
 
Is fema doing a crappy job?
I think there's some grumbling at the local level, and that will always happen, but the overall reviews have been good. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/01/us/sandy-fema/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Well minus the giant generators sitting around doing nothing waiting for the marathon - when they could roll them out to maybe some gas stations or homes.
Were those provided by FEMA or the city? Either way I'd think FEMA just provides the device and the locality decides what to do with it. :shrug:
This is not how it used to work. IIRC, during the Katrina era, FEMA had to be invited in by the actual State to set up relief efforts, then they took over operations but many things have changed since then.
Sorry I didn't mean to imply FEMA only - it may well be the city - it's just wrong on so many levels.I understand the want and need to move forward - but when some people get get food and are still in need for rescuing, you are going to close down a bridge for a race. Have huge tents with power, etc etc. How about using those tents for the workers that need a break and some hot food, etc etc.

Just can't believe they are doing this on schedule when people are still digging out.

Hell the Steelers decided to fly in on game day instead of having people scurry to try and find them somewhere else to stay, since their hotel they were supposed to stay is still a mess. Not sure how I feel about the Ginats playing, although there area is "not as bad" in Jersey...
Yeah, I see both sides of the marathon coin. On the one side, you have the keep it going because it could help lift the spirits and it will bring in good revenue to help the city. They could even set up donation booths. On the other hand, it's way too soon. People are still trying to dig out. There's some unaccounted for. Getting around is still a mess. Mass power outages (though it sounds like a lot will be restored over the next 36 hours).They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Move it a couple weeks. I understand there are issues but guess what everyone up there has issues that are not a minor inconveinence.... I heard somebody on the radio argue "well a lot of money collected from the race goes to charity", the host reply was " YOU can still donate the same money without running it". I think the big thing is you have all the extra police and emts/medical staff on duty for this race, when people are currently in need of their services.This turned out way worse than people thought. I was lucky to be in an area that was minimally affected but that doesn't mean I'm blind to the tragedy that has happened, like many people seem to be.

Not directed to people in this thread, meant many general public and politicians

 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
I don't believe this to be true. Sure it's "tough" to postpone it, but not impossible.
 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
I don't believe this to be true. Sure it's "tough" to postpone it, but not impossible.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not.
 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
I don't believe this to be true. Sure it's "tough" to postpone it, but not impossible.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not.
Well I guess you're right. It is impossible. I mean I read it on the internet and everything.
 
Whoever turned these guys away should be burned at the stake.

m.waff.com/autojuice?targetUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.waff.com%2fstory%2f19981857%2fsome-nonunion-ala-crews-turned-away-from-sandy-recovery
####### BS #### in times of need, crap like that really infuriates me, oh nice link hipple....GD's link
I'm as strong a union. Guy as anyone but it's stuff like this that shoots them in the foot. Guess what union boys, YOU AREN'T GETTING THE JOB DONE. Bottom line.

Disgrace.

So much for "cutting though the red tape"

 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
I don't believe this to be true. Sure it's "tough" to postpone it, but not impossible.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not.
Well I guess you're right. It is impossible. I mean I read it on the internet and everything.
:lmao: at "impossible"NYC is under a form of martial law right now. I'm sure this wide swath of power could encompass taking a Sunday in a few weeks or April and close down the roads to pull this off. Will the travel be more complicated and hotel bookings more of a burden? Certainly and all the runners couldn't race. But the major ones and local ones could. My office is underwater and I'm working out of the Marriott marquis right now. Full of euro runners. Nearly all oblivious to the situation they're in. But if Bloomberg and the state can unilaterally make all crossings HOV lanes, taxis can be put on a multi passenger Zone system, then surely this race can be staged. And outside of your point IK, a few other personal thoughts on thisThe ship has sailed as far as public sentiment. You run across literally NO ONE in town who supports this. The brain trust of this event are juiced in wine and cheeseheads that probably aren't even aware that chelsea is part if the city, never mind staten island. This event COULD have been what they are shouting from the hilltops it will be with a delay. A rebound from a bend but don't break moment. Now it feels like a unilateral slap in the face that no one supports. Hell I wouldn't WANT To run in This. People are mad and they don't know at what at this has become the lightening rod. Not saying its productive energy but it wouldn't shock me to see these runners pelted with fruit or eggs or what have you. I mean, to start in staten island is just so staggeringly stupid, it's crazy. It's a pure war zone on the south shore and to fire a starting gun and have this "celebration" while bodies are being plucked a mile away is appalling.
 
A lot of runners don't want to run in it. You think postponing is a logistical nightmare? How about running it when streets are littered with debris, power is out, getting around the city is difficult at best, hotels are closed or full? Can they do it? Of course they can. Should they? No. Can it be postponed? Of course it can, it's not unprecedented to postpone a marathon.

 
This is not how it used to work. IIRC, during the Katrina era, FEMA had to be invited in by the actual State to set up relief efforts, then they took over operations but many things have changed since then.
This was correct then, and is still correct. FEMA never serves as a first-response unit. FEMA will come in later and provide support if a city's or state's resources become overwhelmed. FEMA also has a significant role in post-disaster recovery funding.
 
lmao at impossible. sounds like someone whos never stepped foot in NYC.

anyway, ive seen numerous people on facebook dropping out of the marathon because even they cant support running it.

 
This is not how it used to work. IIRC, during the Katrina era, FEMA had to be invited in by the actual State to set up relief efforts, then they took over operations but many things have changed since then.
This was correct then, and is still correct. FEMA never serves as a first-response unit. FEMA will come in later and provide support if a city's or state's resources become overwhelmed. FEMA also has a significant role in post-disaster recovery funding.
100% correct. FEMA has no physical resources. It relies on the fact that a municipality has done its homework before a disaster strikes in identifying the community's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis) and has identified the resources necessary to INITIALLY handle the recovery efforts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
However from what I am reading and people here can confirm (if they even have electricity/internet) in places like Staten Island, it took 3+ days to start getting supplies (yesterday I believe was the first day). National Guard showed up in Hoboken, NJ on Wednesday (not sure who is in charge of mobilizing them) but with the storm hitting on Monday every day counts, people were trapped in their apartments.
That's about as fast as it will ever be. Local resources are the first line of assistance (in cases like Sandy, municipal shelters). After a major storm passes, another 36 hours or so is spent "triaging" damaged areas, identifying areas of especial need, and ensuring that routes of ingress/egress are available to deliver supplies.There is likely some more efficiency yet to be gained in the process, but not on the order of shaving 12-24 hours off. Nevertheless, your point about "every day counting" is well taken.

 
There's got to be a race track somewhere near New York that the joggers could just run around until they've ran a marathon.
Seeing 50,000 people crammed onto a race track and running around it for several hours would be cool to see. Maybe a taxi driver with instincts for avoiding traffic would win the race.
 
Whoever turned these guys away should be burned at the stake.

m.waff.com/autojuice?targetUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.waff.com%2fstory%2f19981857%2fsome-nonunion-ala-crews-turned-away-from-sandy-recovery
####### BS #### in times of need, crap like that really infuriates me, oh nice link hipple....GD's link
This might have been a rumor, or a misunderstanding of some sort.http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15654094&postcount=4

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15654094&postcount=4Could also be a case of an individual or small group mouthing off without authorization.

 
A lot of runners don't want to run in it. You think postponing is a logistical nightmare? How about running it when streets are littered with debris, power is out, getting around the city is difficult at best, hotels are closed or full? Can they do it? Of course they can. Should they? No. Can it be postponed? Of course it can, it's not unprecedented to postpone a marathon.
You can keep saying that if you want to, but the fact is that no, they can't postpone it for the reasons that I explained. In addition, since you seem to need more convincing, a postponment pretty much destroys the travel plans for tens of thousands of people who suddenly need to scramble for flights and hotel rooms that may or may not be available, to say nothing of the fact that if you've trained for a marathon, you don't just put it off a month (marathon training doesn't work that way). The logistics of staging an event like this mean postponment isn't an option, but runners who are registered for the event would probably just as soon see the event cancelled than postponed too. Like I mentioned earlier, cancellation would have been a perfectly reasonable choice. Everybody who registers for a race does so knowing that there is a non-zero probability that it may be cancelled. Every once in a while a marthon is cancelled a couple of days before the race. Sometimes they get cancelled mid-race (this happened with the Green Bay marathon earlier this spring). I can't imagine that any runners would have seriously objected to a cancellation.The only reason why I'm posting about this at all is so those of you who are wondering "Why didn't they just postpone it a few weeks" understand now why that wasn't seriously considered.
 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
I don't believe this to be true. Sure it's "tough" to postpone it, but not impossible.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not.
Well I guess you're right. It is impossible. I mean I read it on the internet and everything.
:lmao: at "impossible"NYC is under a form of martial law right now.

I'm sure this wide swath of power could encompass taking a Sunday in a few weeks or April and close down the roads to pull this off.



Will the travel be more complicated and hotel bookings more of a burden? Certainly and all the runners couldn't race. But the major ones and local ones could.

My office is underwater and I'm working out of the Marriott marquis right now. Full of euro runners. Nearly all oblivious to the situation they're in.

But if Bloomberg and the state can unilaterally make all crossings HOV lanes, taxis can be put on a multi passenger Zone system, then surely this race can be staged.

And outside of your point IK, a few other personal thoughts on this

The ship has sailed as far as public sentiment. You run across literally NO ONE in town who supports this. The brain trust of this event are juiced in wine and cheeseheads that probably aren't even aware that chelsea is part if the city, never mind staten island.

This event COULD have been what they are shouting from the hilltops it will be with a delay. A rebound from a bend but don't break moment. Now it feels like a unilateral slap in the face that no one supports. Hell I wouldn't WANT To run in This. People are mad and they don't know at what at this has become the lightening rod.

Not saying its productive energy but it wouldn't shock me to see these runners pelted with fruit or eggs or what have you.

I mean, to start in staten island is just so staggeringly stupid, it's crazy. It's a pure war zone on the south shore and to fire a starting gun and have this "celebration" while bodies are being plucked a mile away is appalling.
When your "solution" involves the imposition of martial law, you've answered the question of why postponment isn't a realistic option.
 
There's got to be a race track somewhere near New York that the joggers could just run around until they've ran a marathon.
Seeing 50,000 people crammed onto a race track and running around it for several hours would be cool to see. Maybe a taxi driver with instincts for avoiding traffic would win the race.
The track could even take bets, with proceeds going to charity. :thumbup:
 
They really should put it off. Either a few weeks or months. Why not have it in the spring if later in the month is too cold?
Just for clarification, it is essentially impossible to postpone a major marathon. Handling the logistics of street closings, transportation to the start/finish, etc. is a full-time for somebody every year. You can't just move it around on a few week's notice. The only realistic options are to run it as scheduled or to cancel it altogether. That's especially true for the NY marathon, which is probably the single most complicated marathon in the world, even in a normal year. I doubt that anybody who signed up for New York would have been surprised if it had been cancelled.
I don't believe this to be true. Sure it's "tough" to postpone it, but not impossible.
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not.
Well I guess you're right. It is impossible. I mean I read it on the internet and everything.
:lmao: at "impossible"NYC is under a form of martial law right now.

I'm sure this wide swath of power could encompass taking a Sunday in a few weeks or April and close down the roads to pull this off.



Will the travel be more complicated and hotel bookings more of a burden? Certainly and all the runners couldn't race. But the major ones and local ones could.

My office is underwater and I'm working out of the Marriott marquis right now. Full of euro runners. Nearly all oblivious to the situation they're in.

But if Bloomberg and the state can unilaterally make all crossings HOV lanes, taxis can be put on a multi passenger Zone system, then surely this race can be staged.

And outside of your point IK, a few other personal thoughts on this

The ship has sailed as far as public sentiment. You run across literally NO ONE in town who supports this. The brain trust of this event are juiced in wine and cheeseheads that probably aren't even aware that chelsea is part if the city, never mind staten island.

This event COULD have been what they are shouting from the hilltops it will be with a delay. A rebound from a bend but don't break moment. Now it feels like a unilateral slap in the face that no one supports. Hell I wouldn't WANT To run in This. People are mad and they don't know at what at this has become the lightening rod.

Not saying its productive energy but it wouldn't shock me to see these runners pelted with fruit or eggs or what have you.

I mean, to start in staten island is just so staggeringly stupid, it's crazy. It's a pure war zone on the south shore and to fire a starting gun and have this "celebration" while bodies are being plucked a mile away is appalling.
When your "solution" involves the imposition of martial law, you've answered the question of why postponment isn't a realistic option.
My point is, the city can, and does act unilaterally with reasonable windows of notice. Roads are closed for construction or film shoots with as little as 3 weeks notice. To you this is a Herculean feat.

 
Whoever turned these guys away should be burned at the stake.

m.waff.com/autojuice?targetUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.waff.com%2fstory%2f19981857%2fsome-nonunion-ala-crews-turned-away-from-sandy-recovery
####### BS #### in times of need, crap like that really infuriates me, oh nice link hipple....GD's link
Nobody from Alabama or the area is cited noted this happening. Basically it's just a rumor that's useful to some people it seems.-QG

 
A lot of runners don't want to run in it. You think postponing is a logistical nightmare? How about running it when streets are littered with debris, power is out, getting around the city is difficult at best, hotels are closed or full? Can they do it? Of course they can. Should they? No. Can it be postponed? Of course it can, it's not unprecedented to postpone a marathon.
You can keep saying that if you want to, but the fact is that no, they can't postpone it for the reasons that I explained. In addition, since you seem to need more convincing, a postponment pretty much destroys the travel plans for tens of thousands of people who suddenly need to scramble for flights and hotel rooms that may or may not be available, to say nothing of the fact that if you've trained for a marathon, you don't just put it off a month (marathon training doesn't work that way). The logistics of staging an event like this mean postponment isn't an option, but runners who are registered for the event would probably just as soon see the event cancelled than postponed too. Like I mentioned earlier, cancellation would have been a perfectly reasonable choice. Everybody who registers for a race does so knowing that there is a non-zero probability that it may be cancelled. Every once in a while a marthon is cancelled a couple of days before the race. Sometimes they get cancelled mid-race (this happened with the Green Bay marathon earlier this spring). I can't imagine that any runners would have seriously objected to a cancellation.The only reason why I'm posting about this at all is so those of you who are wondering "Why didn't they just postpone it a few weeks" understand now why that wasn't seriously considered.
And you can keep arguing the point. It doesn't make you right. They're already scrambling for flights and hotel rooms. Professional marathoners train all the time. Marathons have been postponed (as well as cancelled) before. It's not unprecedented and it is an option. NYRR likes to bill themselves as swift and nimble and able to plan for anything from storms to security threats and they can certainly postpone this until spring.
 
If they were going to cancel it, now it's probably too late for the storm. They needed to pull the plug Tuesday. Now they are pot committed for better or worse.

 
'Gawain said:
Finally getting a chance to check in.

I live (lived) in a 110 apartment complex on the corner of Atlantic and Rockaway Aves in Oceanside next to the East Rockaway train station. I stayed through Sandy. The last time I went outside to check was at 6pm. At 7pm, while the wife and I played penny-ante poker, I heard a neighbor exclaim that the water had already reached our front steps (the Irene high water mark.) I went into my backup plan, because I knew then we were getting flooded. There was a vacant apartment upstairs, so I took everything that was irreplaceable upstairs. I had sandbags in my car from when I had lived upstate, so I had previously brought them inside. Right before the water hit the front door, I sandbagged the door. We were the only complex where water did not breach the front door.

We had 4 inches of water seep through the walls. Every other complex saw between 2 and 6 feet. I spent Monday night in the hallway, watching the water creep up the window, while Mangano political signs floated by. The only noise besides the wind and the water was as water shorted out each car. A new car alarm sounded eery 30 seconds or so for what seemed like an hour.

The stories I heard from my neighbors blew my mind and broke my heart. One fellow had to climb on top of his refrigerator for two hours because the water was over his head in his apartment. A woman, somehow, managed to run out of her apartment once water reached her chest, while she was still holding her two cats. A woman showed me the only thing she managed to save, the only remaining picture of her great grandfather. I spent Tuesday finishing the move into the upstairs apartment. Saw a woman come back to check her car. as she opened her trunk and saw the leaves and smelled the mildew she broke into tears. Wednesday was spent helping various people go through their wreckage. A woman told me it was as if she was throwing away her memories. Today I helped my 75-year-old neighbor move what he managed to save. Even though we only got 4 inches of water, mold and mildew are a prime concern. So, the management company is kicking all lower level tenants out by Saturday. Once the announcement was made a wave of emotions, from rage to resignation, swept through the complex. Many of these people have no where to go and the prospect of a shelter is an unwanted thought.

Right now, I'm hoping to fly under the radar and just have my lease changed. The rental market in Long Island is about to go crazy. Any place with vacancies is going to raise rates tremendously. People are going to have cash from insurance checks and no where to go. Managed to shower for the first time since Sunday today. The weather isn't helping either. I grew up near Rochester, so I'm familiar with sleeping in the cold, but many people aren't prepared to stay in sub-40 degree temperatures. More fires are going to come as people turn to fires to try to stay warm. Just hope there are no carbon monoxide deaths.

Island park, Freeport, Oceanside, East Rockaway, Baldwin Harbor...all have parts that are devastated. Long Beach/Nautical Mile looks like it was bombed. Some parts are flattened.

Thoughts and wishes to all that have been effected by this storm. The journey back will be long, but I'm sure we can get through it.

And if you live in an area with street lights out, it's a 4-way stop. People are driving like no street light=green light.
Somehow that should not be allowed. I believe you but that shouldn't happen. Best wishes, thanks for the update/story, you actually sound mildly lucky compared to others.

 
A lot of runners don't want to run in it. You think postponing is a logistical nightmare? How about running it when streets are littered with debris, power is out, getting around the city is difficult at best, hotels are closed or full? Can they do it? Of course they can. Should they? No. Can it be postponed? Of course it can, it's not unprecedented to postpone a marathon.
You can keep saying that if you want to, but the fact is that no, they can't postpone it for the reasons that I explained. In addition, since you seem to need more convincing, a postponment pretty much destroys the travel plans for tens of thousands of people who suddenly need to scramble for flights and hotel rooms that may or may not be available, to say nothing of the fact that if you've trained for a marathon, you don't just put it off a month (marathon training doesn't work that way). The logistics of staging an event like this mean postponment isn't an option, but runners who are registered for the event would probably just as soon see the event cancelled than postponed too. Like I mentioned earlier, cancellation would have been a perfectly reasonable choice. Everybody who registers for a race does so knowing that there is a non-zero probability that it may be cancelled. Every once in a while a marthon is cancelled a couple of days before the race. Sometimes they get cancelled mid-race (this happened with the Green Bay marathon earlier this spring). I can't imagine that any runners would have seriously objected to a cancellation.The only reason why I'm posting about this at all is so those of you who are wondering "Why didn't they just postpone it a few weeks" understand now why that wasn't seriously considered.
And you can keep arguing the point. It doesn't make you right. They're already scrambling for flights and hotel rooms. Professional marathoners train all the time. Marathons have been postponed (as well as cancelled) before. It's not unprecedented and it is an option. NYRR likes to bill themselves as swift and nimble and able to plan for anything from storms to security threats and they can certainly postpone this until spring.
While you are correct about marathoners training all the time, most are using periodization techniques that have them peaking for a specific week. As far as moving it to spring, many are signed up for Boston or have other events in their racing calendar. Postponement isn't a realistic option, it should have been canceled.I heard this event is being televised on ESPN. If that's true, then I'm sure revenue was the driver behind this decision.
 
Does New York not have anti-price-gouging laws? I know it's less often that they have these kinds of emergencies than in the South - at least historically - but people charging $5 a battery at a convenience store would go to jail in Gulf states.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GB you guys up there. This thing is going to be one helluva stimulus plan for the economy though.
Don Boudreaux's letter to the Philadelphia Inquirer is on point:
Peter Morici argues that hurricane Sandy might prove to be an economic boon (“Disaster has economic benefits, too,” Oct. 30). There’s nothing surprising in Prof. Morici’s argument that the spending necessary to repair damaged buildings and other assets can help the economy. Predictions of economy-wide wealth springing from devastation are issued after every natural disaster. These predictions are examples of what the English jurist A.V. Dicey called “the idle contentions of paradox-mongers” – predictions that are just clever enough to strike economically uninformed people as being profoundly insightful.

But what appears to many to be profoundly insightful is, in fact, fallacious.

If Prof. Morici is correct, then surely he also applauds, say, the economic consequences of drunk driving. As with hurricanes and earthquakes, he can bemoan the loss of life caused by drunk driving and then get on with explaining how, paradoxically, the economy benefits from drunk driving. After all, drunk driving creates unnecessarily large numbers of destroyed automobiles to replace, damaged automobiles to repair, dead victims to bury, and injured victims to be cared for by first-responders, doctors, nurses, physical therapists, and hospital administrators and clerks.

If you sense – as you should – that the economy in fact does not benefit from drunk driving, then you should reject Prof. Morici’s argument that the economy benefits from natural disasters.

Sincerely,

Donald J. Boudreaux

Professor of Economics

George Mason University

Fairfax, VA 22030

 
Last edited by a moderator:
....and apparently John Stossel has been arguing on Fox News that price gouging is actually a good thing after a disaster because it means that only people who really need the item will buy it. Nice.

 
Does New York not have anti-price-gauging laws? I know it's less often that they have these kinds of emergencies than in the South - at least historically - but people charging $5 a battery at a convenience store would go to jail in Gulf states.
If 47 people want batteries (when they are priced at $1 each), but there are only 8 batteries available, how should they be distributed?It seems to me that a pretty good way to distribute them is to raise the price until only 8 people want them at that price. We want to get the batteries to the people who need them most; and while willingness to pay isn't a perfect proxy for need, it seems at least as good as anything else I can think of.What are some better alternatives?
 
....and apparently John Stossel has been arguing on Fox News that price gouging is actually a good thing after a disaster because it means that only people who really need the item will buy it. Nice.
He's right, of course. If a store isn't allowed to raise its prices to the point where supply and demand intersect, hoarders will buy up the whole supply of batteries at the store's low price and then sell them on the black market to whoever is willing to pay the most.Why is a black market preferable to a legal market?

 
Does New York not have anti-price-gauging laws? I know it's less often that they have these kinds of emergencies than in the South - at least historically - but people charging $5 a battery at a convenience store would go to jail in Gulf states.
If 47 people want batteries (when they are priced at $1 each), but there are only 8 batteries available, how should they be distributed?It seems to me that a pretty good way to distribute them is to raise the price until only 8 people want them at that price. We want to get the batteries to the people who need them most; and while willingness to pay isn't a perfect proxy for need, it seems at least as good as anything else I can think of.What are some better alternatives?
Give the batteries away for free to the 1st 8 people who ask for them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top