They all sound the same to you, racist?He is Venezuelan.You mean the guy with a Mexicaned accent favors a Mexican player? Gtfoi hate this guy on color commentary - he might as well be Stevie Wonder. No way was that a yellow![]()
![]()
I don't think most people are upset with guys going down when knocked down. I think it's the laying on the ground, writhing in pain until a whistle is blown, then hopping up and clapping.I also think people wildly underestimate how little contact with your feet/ankles it takes to bring you down when you are running full speed. They also underestimate how much it hurts to be sprinting and have someone trip you.I'm not going to get sucked into the flopping conversation, but I will say that I believe at least a decent amount of what people think are "flops" in soccer are not really flops. As a player, you are taught to disengage on contact. If I've got the ball and Jermaine Jones is trying to slide tackle me at full speed, I'm probably going to go airborne at the slightest contact....otherwise he's going right through my legs for a gruesome compound fracture. If you watch the slow-mo, it looks like there was minimal contact and that I flopped. But is that really the case? IMO, no.That said, the embellishment is a problem. If you go down on that slide and no foul is called and you're not hurt, get up and play. It's the guys rolling around on the ground for 5 minutes screaming in fake agony that piss me off.Flopping is extremely annoying, in any sport, but especially so in soccer. I think someone caught flopping should get punched either in the face or the ####. Then they'd have something to flop about.
I think 6 to 10 is a good estimate.Roughly how much do the players run in a game? Someone claimed the other day that it was 18 miles but I didn't have the heart to point out that would be at a world class marathon pace.
My guess is around 6-8.
You'll enjoy the game winning goal from Switzerland then. The Swiss player was fouled, rolled right back up and kept going and it led to the game winning shot.linkFor people that hate the flopping, I'd use Dempsey yesterday as an example. (Disclaimer, I've watched Dempsey play exactly 1 game but what I saw from him yesterday, he's the poster guy for anti flopping)
J
Oh, so now we have to be all PC and call each Mexican from which country they're from? This PC crap is annoying.They all sound the same to you, racist?He is Venezuelan.You mean the guy with a Mexicaned accent favors a Mexican player? Gtfoi hate this guy on color commentary - he might as well be Stevie Wonder. No way was that a yellow![]()
![]()
yes- it was card worthy, especially stopping the break as the last man. But Alves and others have been hammering guys and are getting away with it without cards.Pretty hard tackle IMO. Not your run of the mill tackle where the idiot flops for a minute.lol... Alves gets to do it over and over, but Ramires gets the yellow on his first tackle.
An error occurredYou have reached your quota of positive votes for the dayIt is a serious coincidence that both goalkeepers are named "Puto."
He's currently a free agent. His agent's phone should be blowing up right now.Why exactly was it that Liverpool let Ochoa get away again? He's been huge in goal. Can we give Reina and Brad Jones to get him back? Please?
I don't mind the guys trying to avoid contact, but it's the embellishment that bugs me the most. Those are the guys who should get punished somehow.I'm not going to get sucked into the flopping conversation, but I will say that I believe at least a decent amount of what people think are "flops" in soccer are not really flops. As a player, you are taught to disengage on contact. If I've got the ball and Jermaine Jones is trying to slide tackle me at full speed, I'm probably going to go airborne at the slightest contact....otherwise he's going right through my legs for a gruesome compound fracture. If you watch the slow-mo, it looks like there was minimal contact and that I flopped. But is that really the case? IMO, no.That said, the embellishment is a problem. If you go down on that slide and no foul is called and you're not hurt, get up and play. It's the guys rolling around on the ground for 5 minutes screaming in fake agony that piss me off.Flopping is extremely annoying, in any sport, but especially so in soccer. I think someone caught flopping should get punched either in the face or the ####. Then they'd have something to flop about.
HehSorry. Sarcasm didn't play well there.This is the WC thread. The soccer thread has over 73k posts in it.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=305522
J
Nobody can have better hair than HendersonWhy exactly was it that Liverpool let Ochoa get away again? He's been huge in goal. Can we give Reina and Brad Jones to get him back? Please?
An error occurredIt is a serious coincidence that both goalkeepers are named "Puto."
You won't find even the most die-hard soccer fan in here who would disagree with you.I don't mind the guys trying to avoid contact, but it's the embellishment that bugs me the most. Those are the guys who should get punished somehow.I'm not going to get sucked into the flopping conversation, but I will say that I believe at least a decent amount of what people think are "flops" in soccer are not really flops. As a player, you are taught to disengage on contact. If I've got the ball and Jermaine Jones is trying to slide tackle me at full speed, I'm probably going to go airborne at the slightest contact....otherwise he's going right through my legs for a gruesome compound fracture. If you watch the slow-mo, it looks like there was minimal contact and that I flopped. But is that really the case? IMO, no.That said, the embellishment is a problem. If you go down on that slide and no foul is called and you're not hurt, get up and play. It's the guys rolling around on the ground for 5 minutes screaming in fake agony that piss me off.Flopping is extremely annoying, in any sport, but especially so in soccer. I think someone caught flopping should get punched either in the face or the ####. Then they'd have something to flop about.
That requires FIFA to be progressive and fix real problems.I don't mind the guys trying to avoid contact, but it's the embellishment that bugs me the most. Those are the guys who should get punished somehow.I'm not going to get sucked into the flopping conversation, but I will say that I believe at least a decent amount of what people think are "flops" in soccer are not really flops. As a player, you are taught to disengage on contact. If I've got the ball and Jermaine Jones is trying to slide tackle me at full speed, I'm probably going to go airborne at the slightest contact....otherwise he's going right through my legs for a gruesome compound fracture. If you watch the slow-mo, it looks like there was minimal contact and that I flopped. But is that really the case? IMO, no.That said, the embellishment is a problem. If you go down on that slide and no foul is called and you're not hurt, get up and play. It's the guys rolling around on the ground for 5 minutes screaming in fake agony that piss me off.Flopping is extremely annoying, in any sport, but especially so in soccer. I think someone caught flopping should get punched either in the face or the ####. Then they'd have something to flop about.
It is a serious coincidence that both goalkeepers are named "Puto."
Mexican is easier to say than VuvuzelanOh, so now we have to be all PC and call each Mexican from which country they're from? This PC crap is annoying.They all sound the same to you, racist?He is Venezuelan.You mean the guy with a Mexicaned accent favors a Mexican player? Gtfoi hate this guy on color commentary - he might as well be Stevie Wonder. No way was that a yellow![]()
![]()
I will try.yes- it was card worthy, especially stopping the break as the last man. But Alves and others have been hammering guys and are getting away with it without cards.Pretty hard tackle IMO. Not your run of the mill tackle where the idiot flops for a minute.lol... Alves gets to do it over and over, but Ramires gets the yellow on his first tackle.
impossible for you to let go of the flopping,eh, chet. had nothing to do with that play, but you feel like it's important to bring up here.
But he did lay on the ground for a while before getting up and walking off, and I think left us playing short-handed for a few minutes. I think the anti-flopping crowd would focus on this rather than on the fact that he kept playing.FWIW, I thought Dempsey was a great answer to people who don't like the flopping.F their point. If you don't like it, don't watch. But don't tell me that the flopping is the only thing keeping them from watching.Captain Quinoa said:Dempsey's reasonable reaction to having his nose broken only amplifies how awful some of the theatrics are that the 'haters' complain about. You're making their point for them.Ilov80s said:Only thing worse than these soccer players like Dempsey rolling around holding their face and holding the game up are these boxers that take a left hook to the chin and lay on the ground like they are dead waiting for the ref to count to 10.
He broke his nose, took a hard kick to the head, refused the little paramedic boat and went back in the game with gauze stuffed up his nose.
Not sure how you play any tougher than that.
For people that hate the flopping, I'd use Dempsey yesterday as an example. (Disclaimer, I've watched Dempsey play exactly 1 game but what I saw from him yesterday, he's the poster guy for anti flopping)
J
Scooby predicted this months ago.yes- it was card worthy, especially stopping the break as the last man. But Alves and others have been hammering guys and are getting away with it without cards.Pretty hard tackle IMO. Not your run of the mill tackle where the idiot flops for a minute.lol... Alves gets to do it over and over, but Ramires gets the yellow on his first tackle.
impossible for you to let go of the flopping,eh, chet. had nothing to do with that play, but you feel like it's important to bring up here.
Wow. Didn't know this. No room for this. MAKE THEM PAY, FRED!On top of this competitive dynamic there the whole incident where we lost a game at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City and some in their crowd decided to chant us with "Osama Osama" chants. For this reason, there are many of us for whom Mexico can't lose enough games. This is where it's at for me.
Not trying to wreck the thread, and as I mentioned above, I will do my best to refrain going forward. Didn't know it was such a hot button issue.Scooby predicted this months ago.yes- it was card worthy, especially stopping the break as the last man. But Alves and others have been hammering guys and are getting away with it without cards.Pretty hard tackle IMO. Not your run of the mill tackle where the idiot flops for a minute.lol... Alves gets to do it over and over, but Ramires gets the yellow on his first tackle.
impossible for you to let go of the flopping,eh, chet. had nothing to do with that play, but you feel like it's important to bring up here.
The flopping crap is making this thread awful to read.
Only when he opens his mouthFirst US player in the Serie A. He's no Brad Davis, but he's got the minimals- plus he's not afraid to say stupid things... and often does.So Alexi Lalas is the front line A team booth crew for ESPN? Is this primarily because he had a funny haircut while playing at a C-/D+ level?
Will Donovan bump him out of that role?
This is probably rich coming from a CONCACAF guy, but Asia seems waaaaaaay too weak for 4 spots.Quick cliff notes for Joe on the mixed feeling with Mexico that may come across in the thread.
Mexico, as our neighbor and as what was once the longtime power in our region (CONCACAF - The Confederation of North, Cenral Amercian and Caribbean Association Football) and pretty much the sole representative of any merit on the world stage for the region from basically 1934 until 1994. We were sort of the Clippers (at best) to their Lakers in the region (if the Lakers didn't actually win anything but just always made the playoffs). Anyway, as the game has grown in the USA, we've gotten on par with them and really have passed them in recent years. It's turned it into a two-way rivalry that is one of the best in the entire world.
On top of this competitive dynamic there the whole incident where we lost a game at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City and some in their crowd decided to chant us with "Osama Osama" chants. For this reason, there are many of us for whom Mexico can't lose enough games. This is where it's at for me.
The conflict comes in that the spaces in the World Cup are allotted by Confederation. (in the list below ".5" means that the last team from the Confederation has a playoff for a spot vs the last team from another conderation - Mexico defeated New Zealand in a playoff for their spot, so there are 4 CONCACAF teams - we are allotted 3.5). After every World Cup, confederations jockey for position with each other - generally trying to increase their allotment of spots (or at least not lose any). So Mexico winning helps our confederation keep more spots - giving the USA a better chance to qualify each time. But Mexico can't lose enough games for our taste. Thus a conflict.
UEFA (Europe - and because of the fun of global politics, Israel is in Europe): 13 spaces
CONMEBOL (South America) Usually it's 4.5. They got an extra one as Brazil is host and they kept the allotment the same so it's 5.5. 6 South American teams qualified (Brazil, Argentina Chile, Colombia Uruguay, Ecuador).
AFC (Asia - and because Oceania is so weak, Australia while in the real world it's own continent is a part of Asia for FIFA purposes): 4.5 (they lost the playoff so they only have 4 teams this year). Our region generally tries to fight with this confederation over allotment.
CAF (Africa) They have 5 spots. They didn't have to deal with any inter-confederation playoffs. If Africa does poorly our confederation and Asia will try to pluck at least 0.5 of one of these spots.
CONCACAF (The confederation including the US - this confederation also includes tons of tiny island countries as well as the the 3 small countries in the northern part of South America who prefer not to get routinely pummeled by their continent mates). So we get 3.5 spots as mentioned above.
OFC (Oceania - basically New Zealand and a handful of tiny islands of which Tahiti is probably the only real thread). They get 0.5 spots. New Zealand lost a playoff to Mexico so there are no teams from this confederation in the World Cup. This confederation always argues that it should get a whole spot of its own to which other confederation say "um, basically your confederation is just New Zealand". This confederation used to have Australia too - part of why they left was they felt like they had a better chance to qualify in Asia and avoiding a 2-leg playoff for a spot and also b/c you can only become so good beating American Samoa 31-0.
So there you go.
-QG
http://www.houstonpress.com/2006-06-22/culture/why-do-mexican-soccer-fans-chant-osama-osama-when-they-play-the-united-states/full/Wow. Didn't know this. No room for this. MAKE THEM PAY, FRED!On top of this competitive dynamic there the whole incident where we lost a game at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City and some in their crowd decided to chant us with "Osama Osama" chants. For this reason, there are many of us for whom Mexico can't lose enough games. This is where it's at for me.
What else would it say?Fred
lololol
if i had time i would paste a brazil jersey onto Fred Flintstone
and does hulk's jersey say hulk???
http://www.soccershopusa.com/Images_Products/2013-11/21_hulk_brazil_home_jersey_1011-13854107965720.jpgFred
lololol
if i had time i would paste a brazil jersey onto Fred Flintstone
and does hulk's jersey say hulk???
Membership:This is probably rich coming from a CONCACAF guy, but Asia seems waaaaaaay too weak for 4 spots.Quick cliff notes for Joe on the mixed feeling with Mexico that may come across in the thread.
Mexico, as our neighbor and as what was once the longtime power in our region (CONCACAF - The Confederation of North, Cenral Amercian and Caribbean Association Football) and pretty much the sole representative of any merit on the world stage for the region from basically 1934 until 1994. We were sort of the Clippers (at best) to their Lakers in the region (if the Lakers didn't actually win anything but just always made the playoffs). Anyway, as the game has grown in the USA, we've gotten on par with them and really have passed them in recent years. It's turned it into a two-way rivalry that is one of the best in the entire world.
On top of this competitive dynamic there the whole incident where we lost a game at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City and some in their crowd decided to chant us with "Osama Osama" chants. For this reason, there are many of us for whom Mexico can't lose enough games. This is where it's at for me.
The conflict comes in that the spaces in the World Cup are allotted by Confederation. (in the list below ".5" means that the last team from the Confederation has a playoff for a spot vs the last team from another conderation - Mexico defeated New Zealand in a playoff for their spot, so there are 4 CONCACAF teams - we are allotted 3.5). After every World Cup, confederations jockey for position with each other - generally trying to increase their allotment of spots (or at least not lose any). So Mexico winning helps our confederation keep more spots - giving the USA a better chance to qualify each time. But Mexico can't lose enough games for our taste. Thus a conflict.
UEFA (Europe - and because of the fun of global politics, Israel is in Europe): 13 spaces
CONMEBOL (South America) Usually it's 4.5. They got an extra one as Brazil is host and they kept the allotment the same so it's 5.5. 6 South American teams qualified (Brazil, Argentina Chile, Colombia Uruguay, Ecuador).
AFC (Asia - and because Oceania is so weak, Australia while in the real world it's own continent is a part of Asia for FIFA purposes): 4.5 (they lost the playoff so they only have 4 teams this year). Our region generally tries to fight with this confederation over allotment.
CAF (Africa) They have 5 spots. They didn't have to deal with any inter-confederation playoffs. If Africa does poorly our confederation and Asia will try to pluck at least 0.5 of one of these spots.
CONCACAF (The confederation including the US - this confederation also includes tons of tiny island countries as well as the the 3 small countries in the northern part of South America who prefer not to get routinely pummeled by their continent mates). So we get 3.5 spots as mentioned above.
OFC (Oceania - basically New Zealand and a handful of tiny islands of which Tahiti is probably the only real thread). They get 0.5 spots. New Zealand lost a playoff to Mexico so there are no teams from this confederation in the World Cup. This confederation always argues that it should get a whole spot of its own to which other confederation say "um, basically your confederation is just New Zealand". This confederation used to have Australia too - part of why they left was they felt like they had a better chance to qualify in Asia and avoiding a 2-leg playoff for a spot and also b/c you can only become so good beating American Samoa 31-0.
So there you go.
-QG
I don't know if this makes it better or worse, but they also chanted "USA! USA!" when they played Iran. They really have no shame when it comes to pissing off (or on) the opposition.Wow. Didn't know this. No room for this. MAKE THEM PAY, FRED!On top of this competitive dynamic there the whole incident where we lost a game at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City and some in their crowd decided to chant us with "Osama Osama" chants. For this reason, there are many of us for whom Mexico can't lose enough games. This is where it's at for me.
I wouldn't go that far- but I just don't get the quasi-hateful need to obsess about that part of the game when so much else is going on.Scooby predicted this months ago.yes- it was card worthy, especially stopping the break as the last man. But Alves and others have been hammering guys and are getting away with it without cards.Pretty hard tackle IMO. Not your run of the mill tackle where the idiot flops for a minute.lol... Alves gets to do it over and over, but Ramires gets the yellow on his first tackle.
impossible for you to let go of the flopping,eh, chet. had nothing to do with that play, but you feel like it's important to bring up here.
The flopping crap is making this thread awful to read.