This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I finished at 190 and was tied for 7588th. The scores were nuts - if this were week 2, the cutoff would've been 165.15. Most of the common players performed well. I also attribute the good scores to the pricing. As a whole, people went with smaller rosters, and with smaller rosters comes higher volatility, but higher scores.
Minor detail, I don't have the data handy but I'm 97% sure that on average, larger rosters score higher than smaller rosters. Small rosters have higher variance and therefore it may be more likely for a small roster to sit atop the standings on any given week, and presumably player selection is correlated with roster size so on any given week the performance of a certain players will move the line up or down. But I wouldn't really attribute the high week 1 scores to there being more small rosters.
You're probably right. I think I'm just chaffing over being to stubborn to drop Jack Doyle for Mark Andrews.TheWinz said:
Only wish I drafted as well as you in here.Solomon Grundy said:
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
Hadn’t used it!This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
I just gave, thanx Steeler!This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
Sent a 5 spot. Hopefully you get at least 50-100 folks to do the same.
sure it wasn't the same guy using 318 different proxies?This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
I sent mine last week or over the weekend. I assume you got it and that I was 1 of the 2.This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
Donated. Thanks for doing this.This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
Thank you for reminding me. $20 donated.This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
I started with 3 QBs and I’m down to 1 already. Foles on IR, Darnold has mono and likely out a few weeks. I’m left with only Derek Carr...
My only issue is LAC WR Mike Williams but he is 1 of 6 WR so I should be ok if he misses. Rough for those with Foles & Darnold.... 170 rosters with both!
Dude, you have a rough road ahead if Darnold sits multiple weeks. Carr should be fine this week vs KC, but then he gets MIN, IND, CHI, and his bye. Yikes
yeah i did the same and have roughly the same team as you. i feel like this year lent itself very well to a big roster with a bunch of the 'backup' rbs and cheap QB/TE on it.
Done. Thanks for putting the site together - it's a great help!This is the yearly reminder to the group that calcomatic cost money for hosting and requires some time each week during the season to manage.
There were 228 unique visitors to calcomatic on Sunday and 318 unique visitors on Monday so the site is being used by plenty of people. So far I have received 2 donations since the season started. If you already donated thank you! If you are planning to donate there is no time like the present
There are 8 teams out there that had only Darnold and Foles and have no QB this week (or for the foreseeable future).
/ Jackson / Brady 
