What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (3 Viewers)

Playing a 4-4-2 with 2 defensive midfielders in the middle is always going to make us look weak.
we're playing with defensive midfielders because that's all we've got IMHO.
then please explain Bradley's success in Europe scoring so much?
Bradley is an enigma...probably because he's young. Kid looks lost at times in International play.
I will certainly agree that he does not have his club form at international level but hopefully you will agree that he is not being used the same tactically between club and country.He simply might not be a good holding/defensive midfielder. His skill set seems to point to a more old fashioned 2 way midfielder, kid of like Harkes was back in the 90's.
Hmmm...he's certainly being used differently, but I think he's seeing stiffer competition in International play which is exposing his weaknesses IMHO. Bradley is one of the most overrated players on the team IMHO. He's young, so it's not like I'm writing him off, but I think it's safe to say his play at the international level has been disappointing.
 
I don't like Adu on the wing...he'll never be fast enough to excel there...he excels in a forward middle position where he can better utilize his great vision and ball skills IMHO. To me Altidore would be much better on the wing than Adu.
good lord no. Altidore must remain in the middle of the field where he size and power can be of use. He would get eaten alive outside since his skill set does not involve quick dribbling or a great first step.As for Adu, I still don't know where his best position is but I do hope the coaching staff realizes that even if they don't find a perfect position for him, that he will still add value and a skill set that does not exist in the US team. As good as Donovan is (IMO the best US player alive right now), even Landon can not do the special things that Adu can. I am not talking about tricks either, I am talking about that nano-second ability to see and thread a killer pass.
 
Playing a 4-4-2 with 2 defensive midfielders in the middle is always going to make us look weak.
we're playing with defensive midfielders because that's all we've got IMHO.
then please explain Bradley's success in Europe scoring so much?
Bradley is an enigma...probably because he's young. Kid looks lost at times in International play.
I will certainly agree that he does not have his club form at international level but hopefully you will agree that he is not being used the same tactically between club and country.He simply might not be a good holding/defensive midfielder. His skill set seems to point to a more old fashioned 2 way midfielder, kid of like Harkes was back in the 90's.
Hmmm...he's certainly being used differently, but I think he's seeing stiffer competition in International play which is exposing his weaknesses IMHO. Bradley is one of the most overrated players on the team IMHO. He's young, so it's not like I'm writing him off, but I think it's safe to say his play at the international level has been disappointing.
it will be interesting to see how he does in qualifying....
 
WOW, Germany really screwed up that 2nd goal. How does a shot from the wing 30 out hit the near post?? And bounce right to the Croatian forward for an open net goal?

It is Croatia's day for sure.

****

For the US, they need Altidore to develop into the goal scorer everyone hopes. Adu needs to over come his size and pace to become the playmaker/qb of the midfield and LD needs to stay on the wing and make things happen with his pace and service, whether its a cross or a run at the goal.

IF these 3 things happen, the US has as good a shot at making something happen in the WC. If none of these things happen, they are in trouble again. However, i use these names but keep in mind that it doesnt have to be Altidore and Adu as long as it is someone.

 
B Maverick said:
WOW, Germany really screwed up that 2nd goal. How does a shot from the wing 30 out hit the near post?? And bounce right to the Croatian forward for an open net goal?It is Croatia's day for sure.
Not so fast, senor. This is going to be a good finish. 2-1 Croats.
 
B Maverick said:
WOW, Germany really screwed up that 2nd goal. How does a shot from the wing 30 out hit the near post?? And bounce right to the Croatian forward for an open net goal?It is Croatia's day for sure.
Not so fast, senor. This is going to be a good finish. 2-1 Croats.
:goodposting: Sweet goal by Germany. too bad for the Croat Defender who set the ball on the tee for Germany. Good game so far. Does Germany have a 2nd in them? 10 mins to go.....
 
LHUCKS said:
Hmmm...he's certainly being used differently, but I think he's seeing stiffer competition in International play which is exposing his weaknesses IMHO. Bradley is one of the most overrated players on the team IMHO. He's young, so it's not like I'm writing him off, but I think it's safe to say his play at the international level has been disappointing.
Yes, let's not write off the 20 year old that has become a mainstay for the USMNT. I'm sorry you are disappointed in his play but he's playing an extremely difficult position at an elite level and performing adequately at that. He makes a lot of "rookie" mistakes but if you think he is overrated, I think you have completely unrealistic expectations from the guy at this point.
 
B Maverick said:
WOW, Germany really screwed up that 2nd goal. How does a shot from the wing 30 out hit the near post?? And bounce right to the Croatian forward for an open net goal?It is Croatia's day for sure.
Not so fast, senor. This is going to be a good finish. 2-1 Croats.
:lmao: Sweet goal by Germany. too bad for the Croat Defender who set the ball on the tee for Germany. Good game so far. Does Germany have a 2nd in them? 10 mins to go.....
Linesmen are really inconsistent tonight. Gomez was onside and called off a few times while that last run by Croatia the forward was two steps offside.
 
B Maverick said:
For the US, they need Altidore to develop into the goal scorer everyone hopes. Adu needs to over come his size and pace to become the playmaker/qb of the midfield and LD needs to stay on the wing and make things happen with his pace and service, whether its a cross or a run at the goal.
why does everyone continually want to stick our best player out on the wing where he can be neutralized and marginalized?Have people not been seeing that he is by far at his best when he plays centrally and not on the wing? He has been by far the best player in MLS by playing centrally and when he is at his best for the US, it is also a central position. And when Landon is at his best, he lifts the entire US side. Sadly his consistency is not what it needs to be for our best player.I will never get the "play him out wide" issue. Its almost like people have only seen him play a couple of times.
 
i just saw the other angle on the 2nd goal for Croatia. Didnt realize it hit the defender on the cross then went off the post. Unlucky for Germany.

The yellow for Croatia in extra time was a bad call, great tackle, took the ball and was off and running one on the keeper.

 
Nice to see the goal scoring improve.

After a lackluster start to the tournament of only 6 goals in the first 5 games, there have now been 20 goals in the last 6 games.

 
As someone who doesnt know a ton about the game, im curious...

why is a great player (obviously, im asking about altidore although he isnt great yet) easier to neutralize if he plays on the wing? To a lay person, it seems that a great talent would have more space out there to create. Is it that his size (one of his best assets) isnt a factor since he wont be in the box as much. Does he lack the ability to break down an outside back? I've only seen the kid play once or twice. Thanks.

 
As someone who doesnt know a ton about the game, im curious...why is a great player (obviously, im asking about altidore although he isnt great yet) easier to neutralize if he plays on the wing? To a lay person, it seems that a great talent would have more space out there to create. Is it that his size (one of his best assets) isnt a factor since he wont be in the box as much. Does he lack the ability to break down an outside back? I've only seen the kid play once or twice. Thanks.
Hi Tlef,I have watched a ton of Jozy's games. He does not really possess the skill set to be a winger.He has good footwork, especially for his size, but his main strength, is well, his strength and power. In the middle of the field he has the ability to hold off two player while going to goal. He also has something you can't teach and thats a goal scoring knack (even if it seems to go astray at times in MLS).As you said he is not a great player yet (or arguably even a consistently good player yet), but its obviously his potential that every one sees and hopes he can grow into.But lets for a second protend he was a great striker. That wouldn't mean he would be a good wing player or a good holding midfielder. Look at Van Nistrelroy for example. One of the most potent strikers of his generation and he came from a culture in Holland where they believe in training the kids growing up in every position and even he would look lost on the wing.Back to Jozy, I am sure over time he could learn to use the touch line to his advantage and might learn the skill to cross (some players never learn this), but why would the US bother? His potential is in scoring goals, not in providing them from the wing, IMO.The best of the best of the best can move between wing play and striker and be affective at both (Henry and CRo both spring to mind here), but those are truely special players. Even in our wildest dreams for Jozy, he is not going to be anywhere close to that level.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pretty inconsistent refereeing all game. One of the Croatian defenders took a backhanded swing at Podolski in retaliation, but because it didnt connect he didn't get a card. Schweinsteiger gives a guy a pretty weak push in retaliation and gets a straight red.

Overall Croatia played better than the Germans who have no one to blame but themselves. Hopefully Lehmann has started his last match in international play.

 
Last edited:
I'm a proponent of playing LD on the wing. Sure he's the US's best player, but I think he's more versatile on the wing where he can serve crosses. In fact I like him on the right and DMB on the left pretty nicely. Go with 1 striker up top, and an offensive midfielder behind him (read: Adu) to range all around the midfield, spring DMB or LD on runs or set up a cross coming back into the box for the striker or the opposite winger.

This formation up top requires a LOT of out 3 players, namely the attacking central MF, and the two holding/defensive MFs behind him. It's not something that's easily put together, as if any of those 3 have a propensity for losing the ball or not stringing together passes, the offense shuts down.

The alternative is to have LD playing behind the striker, and then have DMB further back on the left and someone else on the right. I don't think Adu fits in well there. He's not good enough on D to contribute on the flank, and I don't think he's go the pure speed or crossing ability to be effective out there.

LD can play either position, but I like him better on the wing. I think it frees him up to play his game and not worry about the players around him as much. He's got a good workrate when he's on, but can disappear from games. I don't want that right in the middle of the offense, setting up everything.

 
The Germans losing a football game will never stop making my day! :lmao:
I feel the same way about England. But I'm glad to see Germany lose as well.Personally, I think Germany can take Portugal, as the have the defenders and MF to neutralize the Portugal attack, and can make plays on set pieces and through Klose to make it interesting.
 
Mjolnirs said:
Since I will not be able to watch the Germany game until around 8:30pm tonight I am going into a self impossed media blackout. But, before I go:

Deutschland!

Deutschland!

Deutschland!

Carry on.
Whoops!
 
B Maverick said:
For the US, they need Altidore to develop into the goal scorer everyone hopes. Adu needs to over come his size and pace to become the playmaker/qb of the midfield and LD needs to stay on the wing and make things happen with his pace and service, whether its a cross or a run at the goal.
why does everyone continually want to stick our best player out on the wing where he can be neutralized and marginalized?Have people not been seeing that he is by far at his best when he plays centrally and not on the wing? He has been by far the best player in MLS by playing centrally and when he is at his best for the US, it is also a central position. And when Landon is at his best, he lifts the entire US side. Sadly his consistency is not what it needs to be for our best player.I will never get the "play him out wide" issue. Its almost like people have only seen him play a couple of times.
By your standards Cristiano Ronaldo should be in the center. He is the best player on the planet and plays mostly on the left MF. I am not comparing the two as players, just your analogy of the US' best player not being effective on the outside.With a good playmaker in the middle who will switch the ball and set LD up, getting "neutralized and marginalized" wont happen. LD may be our best player, our best central player, etc, but HIS best position is out wide. His speed and services are better suited for the outside. His ability to get in behind the defense is better on the outside. Right now, he may need to play center until we find a playmaker for the middle. BUT ultimately, his best is from the wing.
I'm a proponent of playing LD on the wing. Sure he's the US's best player, but I think he's more versatile on the wing where he can serve crosses. In fact I like him on the right and DMB on the left pretty nicely. Go with 1 striker up top, and an offensive midfielder behind him (read: Adu) to range all around the midfield, spring DMB or LD on runs or set up a cross coming back into the box for the striker or the opposite winger.This formation up top requires a LOT of out 3 players, namely the attacking central MF, and the two holding/defensive MFs behind him. It's not something that's easily put together, as if any of those 3 have a propensity for losing the ball or not stringing together passes, the offense shuts down.The alternative is to have LD playing behind the striker, and then have DMB further back on the left and someone else on the right. I don't think Adu fits in well there. He's not good enough on D to contribute on the flank, and I don't think he's go the pure speed or crossing ability to be effective out there.LD can play either position, but I like him better on the wing. I think it frees him up to play his game and not worry about the players around him as much. He's got a good workrate when he's on, but can disappear from games. I don't want that right in the middle of the offense, setting up everything.
:goodposting: To further your point, with the speed of LD getting him in behind the defense to make a run at the goal is easier from the wing as well. That also plays to his strengths.
 
Andy, i think you hit the nail on the head with Jozy and the comparison to Ruud. The potential is there to be that big, strong striker who can put a head, a foot, or whatever on the ball and create goals.

The key will be two things, first, learning to play with his back to the goal. Ruud does this beautifully, and creates a lot of goals of two touches. he uses his body like a power forward in basketball, shielding the ball from the defender and creating space to take a shot. He's got a lot of power and deadly accuracy with the right foot from medium range an closer. Jozy needs to work on this skill set. Second, Jozy's got to learn to work off the ball, creating spaces for his teammates even if he never touches the ball or is only peripherally involved in the play. This will free up Adu, LD, or DMB to make runs and short passes into the box. This is something that the US does extremely poorly, and what nearly all elite teams can do in the offensive zone.

 
Also, LD has been playing the central attacking MF slot for the Galaxy because they have another big name player that plays well on the right wing and can serve the ball into the box pretty damn well... maybe you've heard of him?

 
As someone who doesnt know a ton about the game, im curious...why is a great player (obviously, im asking about altidore although he isnt great yet) easier to neutralize if he plays on the wing? To a lay person, it seems that a great talent would have more space out there to create. Is it that his size (one of his best assets) isnt a factor since he wont be in the box as much. Does he lack the ability to break down an outside back? I've only seen the kid play once or twice. Thanks.
I think a great (true) winger is the second most valuable asset to a team behind a great GK. And it's the most difficult position. There just aren't many of them. I haven't seen Altidore much, but what I have seen of him he doesn't look to me like he has the ball skill to be a winger. The job of a winger is to stretch the defense sideline to sideline. And you can only do that if you stay out there. So many "wingers" today tend to drift inside. And this defeats the whole purpose of the position (I think that's why you think you see so much space out there).I don't know if any of the guys here are old enough to remember him or even if you are whether you followed English football in the '70s and early 80s. But one of the best true wingers to ever play the game was a Scottish player named John Robertson who played for Nottingham Forest. He was a magician. As for why a great central player can be neutralized on the wing, that sideline is a pretty nice additional defender. And a FB who knows how to use it can kill you unless you are a magician.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, LD has been playing the central attacking MF slot for the Galaxy because they have another big name player that plays well on the right wing and can serve the ball into the box pretty damn well... maybe you've heard of him?
I will ignore the snide comment and just inform you that Becks plays a more central role for the Galaxy. He does not play his normal wide wing role.Also Landon does not normally play in the midfield. He is an out and out striker for the Galaxy.Outside of those two things, your comment was right on the money ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
B Maverick said:
For the US, they need Altidore to develop into the goal scorer everyone hopes. Adu needs to over come his size and pace to become the playmaker/qb of the midfield and LD needs to stay on the wing and make things happen with his pace and service, whether its a cross or a run at the goal.
why does everyone continually want to stick our best player out on the wing where he can be neutralized and marginalized?Have people not been seeing that he is by far at his best when he plays centrally and not on the wing? He has been by far the best player in MLS by playing centrally and when he is at his best for the US, it is also a central position. And when Landon is at his best, he lifts the entire US side.

Sadly his consistency is not what it needs to be for our best player.

I will never get the "play him out wide" issue. Its almost like people have only seen him play a couple of times.
By your standards Cristiano Ronaldo should be in the center. He is the best player on the planet and plays mostly on the left MF. I am not comparing the two as players, just your analogy of the US' best player not being effective on the outside.
When the US produces a player 1/10th as good as Deco, I would be fine with Landon outside.
With a good playmaker in the middle who will switch the ball and set LD up, getting "neutralized and marginalized" wont happen.
exactly. The US does not have this player. You are recommending a switch that is almost certain to marginalize our best player. Its not logical with the current make up of the team.If Adu could assume this role in the middle, I would be more than happy to have Landon outwide. The sad thing is that Freddy is pretty much the only player in the country who might fit the good playmaker role and we all agree that he has a long way to go to be an affective 90 minute a game player at the club level, much less at the international level

To further your point, with the speed of LD getting him in behind the defense to make a run at the goal is easier from the wing as well. That also plays to his strengths.
Check out Landon's youtube links. You will see that he gets behind the defense through the middle MUCH more than on the wing. On the wing his blazing speed is mitigated a bit by going against speedy wing defenders. I would argue that there is not a single center back in the World who has the pace to keep up with Landon once he kicks it into high gear. Thats why you see so many of his break away goals come via the middle part of the field.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's got a good workrate when he's on, but can disappear from games. I don't want that right in the middle of the offense, setting up everything.
Its a shame that our best player can disappear from times in games and you are right, when that happens its better he is stuck out in the wilderness instead of the middle of the park.Although I think we can all agree it won't matter too much. If Landon visits LA-LA land too often, we are screwed no matter where he plays on the pitch.
 
The US Roster that was listed earlier in the thread is not going to be the final roster I guess. I read on ESPN that the roster has to be trimmed to 18 by game time.

I wonder if this 18 man roster size is a CONCACAF rule for qualifiers?

 
Also, LD has been playing the central attacking MF slot for the Galaxy because they have another big name player that plays well on the right wing and can serve the ball into the box pretty damn well... maybe you've heard of him?
I will ignore the snide comment and just inform you that Becks plays a more central role for the Galaxy. He does not play his normal wide wing role.Also Landon does not normally play in the midfield. He is an out and out striker for the Galaxy.Outside of those two things, your comment was right on the money :shrug:
Really? Shows how much MLS I watch.I stand corrected.Personally, I would think that Becks in the central midfield would be a huge liability on the defensive end. He's got heart, but poor defending skills. He's not an endline to endline midfielder.
 
BTW, more rumors are swirling between ManU and Real.

Aside from real making a play for Ronaldo, it appears that ManU has taken an interest in both Sergio Ramos AND Robinho. According to this link from Marca, ManU is looking to pay 65m€ for Sergio Ramos and 45m€ for Robinho.

Obviously, I would think that it is contingent upon the Ronaldo xfer.

This might not be a terrible play for ManU. They will get a good right back and a good winger to replace Ronaldo, plus money to spare.

 
Watching Poland vs Austria on DVR and I feel terrible for Poland. Ref gave Austria some nice home cooking with a weak penalty kick in stoppage. Just awful.

 
The US Roster that was listed earlier in the thread is not going to be the final roster I guess. I read on ESPN that the roster has to be trimmed to 18 by game time.I wonder if this 18 man roster size is a CONCACAF rule for qualifiers?
Adu better be on that list.
 
For the Landon Donovan fans on this board, what international player(s) would you compare him too? I know he is considered the greatest US player but how does he rank compared to his peers on the international stage? USA is ranked #21 by FIFA, but do you think LD would be included on any of other the top 20 teams? I assume yes to Mexico and perhaps a couple others, but would he actually be able to crack the starting lineup on any of the better clubs, let alone make the team?

1 Argentina 1559 0 39

2 Brazil 1513 0 -5

3 Italy 1424 0 28

4 Spain 1303 0 -20

5 Germany 1274 0 10

6 Czech Republic 1246 0 2

7 France 1143 0 -62

8 Greece 1133 0 -63

9 England 1123 2 25

10 Netherlands 1111 0 -12

11 Portugal 1094 -2 -37

12 Romania 1069 0 -13

13 Cameroon 1041 3 36

14 Mexico 1020 3 32

15 Croatia 1017 -2 -27

16 Ghana 986 -2 -24

17 Scotland 978 -2 -29

18 Bulgaria 949 0 1

19 Colombia 904 0 -5

20 Turkey 877 5 21

21 USA 874 0 -15

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What happened to Benny Feilhaber?
He choose Europe over MLS. He was transfered from Germany to England at which point his experience in picking splinters out of his butt sky rocketed from never seeing the field. At the most crucial time in his development as a player he is not playing.MLS needs to fix this issue with in the next 5 years to make sure kids don't run over seas for the paycheck only and stop developing right when they need it the most.I don't blame the players for grabbing the checks though. From what MLS pays any non big name player, I wouldn't play their either if I had an offer 3-4 times bigger (sometimes much bigger).
 
For the Landon Donovan fans on this board, what international player(s) would you compare him too? I know he is considered the greatest US player but how does he rank compared to his peers on the international stage? USA is ranked #21 by FIFA, but do you think LD would be included on any of other the top 20 teams? I assume yes to Mexico and perhaps a couple others, but would he actually be able to crack the starting lineup on any of the better clubs, let alone make the team?1 Argentina 1559 0 39 2 Brazil 1513 0 -5 3 Italy 1424 0 28 4 Spain 1303 0 -20 5 Germany 1274 0 10 6 Czech Republic 1246 0 2 7 France 1143 0 -62 8 Greece 1133 0 -63 9 England 1123 2 25 10 Netherlands 1111 0 -12 11 Portugal 1094 -2 -37 12 Romania 1069 0 -13 13 Cameroon 1041 3 36 14 Mexico 1020 3 32 15 Croatia 1017 -2 -27 16 Ghana 986 -2 -24 17 Scotland 978 -2 -29 18 Bulgaria 949 0 1 19 Colombia 904 0 -5 20 Turkey 877 5 21 21 USA 874 0 -15
Hard to say. Its not far off to say that the only squad in the top 10 he would roster on would be Greece. None of the others he would even have a sniff.As for the other teams, there are plenty of spots when he would fit in and and some where he would see significant playing time. There is a huge drop off in depth of talent once you get past the top 8 or so countries.
 
andy_b said:
Bonzai said:
What happened to Benny Feilhaber?
He choose Europe over MLS. He was transfered from Germany to England at which point his experience in picking splinters out of his butt sky rocketed from never seeing the field. At the most crucial time in his development as a player he is not playing.MLS needs to fix this issue with in the next 5 years to make sure kids don't run over seas for the paycheck only and stop developing right when they need it the most.I don't blame the players for grabbing the checks though. From what MLS pays any non big name player, I wouldn't play their either if I had an offer 3-4 times bigger (sometimes much bigger).
He barely played this past year, IIRC. He's shown some flashes (the Mexico goal...) but I haven't seen enough out of him to warrant a consistent inclusion into the squad. I'd rather see Bradley, Edu, Kljestan, etc. than Feilhaber at this point.
 
andy_b said:
TwinTurbo said:
For the Landon Donovan fans on this board, what international player(s) would you compare him too? I know he is considered the greatest US player but how does he rank compared to his peers on the international stage? USA is ranked #21 by FIFA, but do you think LD would be included on any of other the top 20 teams? I assume yes to Mexico and perhaps a couple others, but would he actually be able to crack the starting lineup on any of the better clubs, let alone make the team?1 Argentina 1559 0 39 2 Brazil 1513 0 -5 3 Italy 1424 0 28 4 Spain 1303 0 -20 5 Germany 1274 0 10 6 Czech Republic 1246 0 2 7 France 1143 0 -62 8 Greece 1133 0 -63 9 England 1123 2 25 10 Netherlands 1111 0 -12 11 Portugal 1094 -2 -37 12 Romania 1069 0 -13 13 Cameroon 1041 3 36 14 Mexico 1020 3 32 15 Croatia 1017 -2 -27 16 Ghana 986 -2 -24 17 Scotland 978 -2 -29 18 Bulgaria 949 0 1 19 Colombia 904 0 -5 20 Turkey 877 5 21 21 USA 874 0 -15
Hard to say. Its not far off to say that the only squad in the top 10 he would roster on would be Greece. None of the others he would even have a sniff.As for the other teams, there are plenty of spots when he would fit in and and some where he would see significant playing time. There is a huge drop off in depth of talent once you get past the top 8 or so countries.
This is an interesting argument. I have to think about it....
 
jonessed said:
Watching Poland vs Austria on DVR and I feel terrible for Poland. Ref gave Austria some nice home cooking with a weak penalty kick in stoppage. Just awful.
I felt awful for Poland until I realized the linesmen missed the offsides on their goal.It actually made me feel good to see the Austrians going nuts when Vastic hit that strike. It was like Trinidad and Tobago earning that draw against Sweden in the 06 World Cup....here's a team that probably shouldn't be here playing their hearts out. They were on the back foot most of the game....but football is a results game.
 
andy_b said:
TwinTurbo said:
For the Landon Donovan fans on this board, what international player(s) would you compare him too? I know he is considered the greatest US player but how does he rank compared to his peers on the international stage? USA is ranked #21 by FIFA, but do you think LD would be included on any of other the top 20 teams? I assume yes to Mexico and perhaps a couple others, but would he actually be able to crack the starting lineup on any of the better clubs, let alone make the team?1 Argentina 1559 0 39 2 Brazil 1513 0 -5 3 Italy 1424 0 28 4 Spain 1303 0 -20 5 Germany 1274 0 10 6 Czech Republic 1246 0 2 7 France 1143 0 -62 8 Greece 1133 0 -63 9 England 1123 2 25 10 Netherlands 1111 0 -12 11 Portugal 1094 -2 -37 12 Romania 1069 0 -13 13 Cameroon 1041 3 36 14 Mexico 1020 3 32 15 Croatia 1017 -2 -27 16 Ghana 986 -2 -24 17 Scotland 978 -2 -29 18 Bulgaria 949 0 1 19 Colombia 904 0 -5 20 Turkey 877 5 21 21 USA 874 0 -15
Hard to say. Its not far off to say that the only squad in the top 10 he would roster on would be Greece. None of the others he would even have a sniff.As for the other teams, there are plenty of spots when he would fit in and and some where he would see significant playing time. There is a huge drop off in depth of talent once you get past the top 8 or so countries.
Ok I want to revisit this because I think it's a fun argument. LD, at his current level, which is his peak, would not start for any of those top 10 teams, and would probably make the Greek squad. I agree with you there.But I think you're leaving out the contingency factor that comes with playing for years in a top country against top competition. I realize that Donovan played in Bradenton, FL with the likes of Bobby Convey and Beasley, but I mean real competition. If LD was, say, Brazilian, he would be a hell of a lot better player than he is right now. Am I saying he'd be on the Brazil squad? No....probably not. But growing up with Brazilian coaches, playing Brazilian ball against top youth players (for a point of reference, LD and Kaka are the same age) instead of US college scrubs (no offense...I'm nowhere near scrub-worthy myself), he would be a much much better player.Growing up in a more soccer-charged country would have given him a much better shot of being a star overseas. You think Landinho, the not-quite-good-enough-to-make-the-Brazil-squad MF/FW would have sat the bench at Bayer Leverkusen? I doubt it, personally.I honestly think that if he was born in a different country, with different coaches and different competition, he could have cracked a top 10 squad, and maybe even started every once in a while.
 
andy_b said:
Bonzai said:
What happened to Benny Feilhaber?
He choose Europe over MLS. He was transfered from Germany to England at which point his experience in picking splinters out of his butt sky rocketed from never seeing the field. At the most crucial time in his development as a player he is not playing.MLS needs to fix this issue with in the next 5 years to make sure kids don't run over seas for the paycheck only and stop developing right when they need it the most.I don't blame the players for grabbing the checks though. From what MLS pays any non big name player, I wouldn't play their either if I had an offer 3-4 times bigger (sometimes much bigger).
He barely played this past year, IIRC. He's shown some flashes (the Mexico goal...) but I haven't seen enough out of him to warrant a consistent inclusion into the squad. I'd rather see Bradley, Edu, Kljestan, etc. than Feilhaber at this point.
He had a stretch of 4 or 5 games where he looked like the second coming to me, and then he dropped off the face of the earth. Bradley has really stepped up, but Edu and Kljestan haven't blown me away. He and Bradley were actually looking like they were developing some chemistry for a few games there. At the very least, something to build on...
 
andy_b said:
Bonzai said:
What happened to Benny Feilhaber?
He choose Europe over MLS. He was transfered from Germany to England at which point his experience in picking splinters out of his butt sky rocketed from never seeing the field. At the most crucial time in his development as a player he is not playing.MLS needs to fix this issue with in the next 5 years to make sure kids don't run over seas for the paycheck only and stop developing right when they need it the most.I don't blame the players for grabbing the checks though. From what MLS pays any non big name player, I wouldn't play their either if I had an offer 3-4 times bigger (sometimes much bigger).
He barely played this past year, IIRC. He's shown some flashes (the Mexico goal...) but I haven't seen enough out of him to warrant a consistent inclusion into the squad. I'd rather see Bradley, Edu, Kljestan, etc. than Feilhaber at this point.
He had a stretch of 4 or 5 games where he looked like the second coming to me, and then he dropped off the face of the earth. Bradley has really stepped up, but Edu and Kljestan haven't blown me away. He and Bradley were actually looking like they were developing some chemistry for a few games there. At the very least, something to build on...
I mentioned it in here a few days ago, but I really want to see more out of Kljestan. Something about him...great first touch, good vision...I'd like to see more. I have no feelings towards Edu one way or the other. As for Bradley, I think he's got the potential to be a good CM for a long time....just needs to get a little more polish. Some games he controls the midfield....other games, he's completely anonymous.
 
Man did Germany look bad. Other than Schweinsteiger the entire team looked like they were running in sand. Podolski's goal was proof again as to his power, but Gomez looks awful and Klose just can't seem to find his pace. I was surprised Löw didn't put Neuville in over Kuranyi since his specialty seems to be last minute goals.

The back line is killing Germany and while Lehman has made some good saves I'm just waiting for him to blow it. The problem with that his backups are Enke (1 cap) and Adler (zero). I sure would feel better with Hildebrand on this squad.

Germany can still pull this off, they just need to regroup and do it the hard way.

Deutschland!

Deutschland!

Deutschland!
DISASTER STRIKES 23 MINS IN.... 1-0 CROATIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i know you wont see this but i am tormenting you telepathically! :lmao:
:lmao:
Deutschland!

Deutschland!

Deutschland!
Whoops!
:banned: still my team :goodposting: Regarding Austria v Poland - I agree it was a weak call for the PK, but like diving, if they don't start calling those type things it is only going to get worse. Beside, Hooray for Austria and Beer For Life for Vastic!

 
Realy enjoyed watching Coratia against Germany. Croatia was clearly the better team, had more chances and defended midfield very well. Olić had a good game. They also condinued to put preasure onto Germany after they were in the lead, instead of defending the lead. If they would do that on a more constant basis they would would win even more games.

For Germany Jansen was a total bust, lots of preasure came from his side, Odonkor was a unnecessary addition. Schweinsteiger gave a real impulse, once he entered the field, he craeted some good opportunities. I don´t think Lehmann had a bad game, the goals weren´t his fault.

Should Germany qualify for the next round they would meet Portugal, which would be avery nice game to watch :thumbdown:

After the game there were a couple of brawls in germany between Croats and German fans in several cities.

Austria got very lucky in overtime. But from what I saw they also tried hard throughout the games.

It will be interesting to watch both games today: Italy vs Romanis will Italy rebound, how strong is Romania realy.

And can the Netherland continue what they did to Italy.

 
Germany was going to have to go through Portugal anyway, now they may have to do it one round earlier (still much better to be on the A/B side of this bracket). Germany - Austria will be huge as the home side will view a win against Germany as their "superbowl" in this tournament and knocking the germans out of the Euro would give the Austrians something to crow about for many years.

More great games from the group of death today - very interested to see how Italy redeems itself.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top