What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official "Space Blanket" for Better Call Saul*** (2 Viewers)

Most definitely. If she were still around in the BB timeline then Saul wouldn't be Saul
I am guessing she moved far away (Nebraska is too easy for these writers) and we see her come back to say hi to him at some point in the finale. Saul is sitting there doing something, and she pulls up a chair next to him or whatever. Something subtle like the final BB scene between Walt and Skylar. 

 
Who the F--- would take the time to figure that out?  Do they have absolutely nothing else to do in life?
All you do is give an average estimate A M and Z. (Time for 1 ring + time for 13 rings + time for 26 rings…that total number of seconds divided by 3 is your average seconds per letter).  
 

Then count how many total letters are in the statement (just pause the TV and count number of letters)

Avg seconds per letter x number of total letters in statement = total seconds to complete. 
 

Total seconds to complete / 60 = total minutes to complete. 
 

And there you have it. I could’ve figured it out in probably 15 mins. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was just thinking back to Howard's memorial and the news that HHM is no more.  If Howard's death wasn't enough, pretty sure the firm's demise was the nail in the coffin for Jimmy and Kim's relationship.  They are both responsible for its collapse while it was the vessel that gave them an opportunity to succeed.  The McGill and Hamlin legacy ruined by pettiness.  As much as I love Jimmy and Kim, I also hate them.  

 
I am guessing she moved far away (Nebraska is too easy for these writers) and we see her come back to say hi to him at some point in the finale. Saul is sitting there doing something, and she pulls up a chair next to him or whatever. Something subtle like the final BB scene between Walt and Skylar. 
I dunno. The Walt/Skylar scene* was a coda that provided a resolution to their relationship (and Walt finally being honest with her, and himself, about his motivations). It was a brief respite before his final showdown with the bikers.

I see Kim playing a more central role in the end-of-series narrative.

* By the way, did anyone else find that scene wholly implausible? All these police/DEA agents are looking for Walt, they know he's in ABQ, but he's somehow able to have a leisurely conversation with Skylar in her kitchen? No way that place wasn't crawling with cops. I loved the BB finale, but that always bothered me.

 
I was just thinking back to Howard's memorial and the news that HHM is no more.  If Howard's death wasn't enough, pretty sure the firm's demise was the nail in the coffin for Jimmy and Kim's relationship.  They are both responsible for its collapse while it was the vessel that gave them an opportunity to succeed.  The McGill and Hamlin legacy ruined by pettiness.  As much as I love Jimmy and Kim, I also hate them.  
Yeah, their scams led directly (more or less) to the deaths of the firm's two remaining named partners. That was definitely more than Kim bargained for.

 
All you do is give an average estimate A M and Z. (Time for 1 ring + time for 13 rings + time for 26 rings…that total number of seconds divided by 3 is your average seconds per letter).  
 

Then count how many total letters are in the statement (just pause the TV and count number of letters)

Avg seconds per letter x number of total letters in statement = total seconds to complete. 
 

Total seconds to complete / 60 = total minutes to complete. 
 

And there you have it. I could’ve figured it out in probably 15 mins. 
I have a physics and a mathematics degree.  I can easily figure out how to do it.  I would never make the effort to search for the text.  Why would anyone want to waste time on it??

 
All you do is give an average estimate A M and Z. (Time for 1 ring + time for 13 rings + time for 26 rings…that total number of seconds divided by 3 is your average seconds per letter).  
 

Then count how many total letters are in the statement (just pause the TV and count number of letters)

Avg seconds per letter x number of total letters in statement = total seconds to complete. 
 

Total seconds to complete / 60 = total minutes to complete. 
 

And there you have it. I could’ve figured it out in probably 15 mins. 


They said they transcribed the speech in Spanish, and input it as a Python string in a code that counted character frequency. Assuming one second per letter, plus one second for each place in the Spanish alphabet, (27 letters including Ñ), this yields an approximate time of 1 hour, 38 minutes, and 12 seconds.

 
They said they transcribed the speech in Spanish, and input it as a Python string in a code that counted character frequency. Assuming one second per letter, plus one second for each place in the Spanish alphabet, (27 letters including Ñ), this yields an approximate time of 1 hour, 38 minutes, and 12 seconds.
Typical over-complication by programmers. Always building a battleship when you only need a row boat.

 
I have a physics and a mathematics degree.  I can easily figure out how to do it.  I would never make the effort to search for the text.  Why would anyone want to waste time on it??
You just fast forward to that part on your DVR, pause and count the letters. It wasn’t that long of a statement. Probably 5 minutes to count the letters, 3 minutes to figure out the avg seconds per letter and a few more minutes to figure out the simple calculations to minutes. 
 

It’s 10-15 mins of time. 🤷‍♂️. I’ve wasted way more time for way more of a ridiculous thing to post about. :cough femaleattractivenessscale cough:

 
I'm not troubled by it.  But out of curiosity, what details would you have liked to have seen in between?
She was a major player and for them to go from one scene with them "breaking up" to the next with Saul in a new house sleeping with a hooker seemed too quick.

 
Are people thinking that last part with "Saul" was like the next day or something?  You know we've had flash-forwards to Saul's house before, right?  I thought this was just showing again what he would eventually become.  Now I feel like I've missed something.

 
Are people thinking that last part with "Saul" was like the next day or something?  You know we've had flash-forwards to Saul's house before, right?  I thought this was just showing again what he would eventually become.  Now I feel like I've missed something.
They showed the license plate with the 2005 sticker to make it clear it was a time jump. I’m not sure what people are upset about really. 

 
Are people thinking that last part with "Saul" was like the next day or something? 
Obviously not literally. Given that the license plate said 2005, it was at least a few years (I think the main BCS story is in 2001?)

But I certainly think we were meant to get the impression that without Kim serving as his anchor, he spiraled down into Saul-dom relatively quickly

 
They showed the license plate with the 2005 sticker to make it clear it was a time jump. I’m not sure what people are upset about really. 


YOU didn't miss anything.


Thanks.  It's not just the latest posts but a couple of days of this that finally broke me!  :lol:    We've got possibly a couple of years, right?  My expectation was that, after the jump forward, we would go back and still see Jimmy/Saul progression (or regression) in the next episodes.  They've bounced around the timeline throughout the show.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Obviously not literally. Given that the license plate said 2005, it was at least a few years (I think the main BCS story is in 2001?)

But I certainly think we were meant to get the impression that without Kim serving as his anchor, he spiraled down into Saul-dom relatively quickly
Season 1 began timeline began May 2002.  The earlier part of this last episode was June 2004 before the switch to the "future" sometime before Nov. 2005.

 
Thanks.  It's not just the latest posts but a couple of days of this that finally broke me!  :lol:    We've got like three years, right?  My expectation was that, after the jump forward, we would go back and still see Jimmy/Saul progression (or regression) in the next episodes.  They've bounced around the timeline throughout the show.
I am guessing (always wrong!) that the intro to the next episode is one of their famous song montages with a bunch of clips of Saul doing Saul stuff and then very shortly afterwards it will be clear we are in the breaking bad era.  

 
But I certainly think we were meant to get the impression that without Kim serving as his anchor, he spiraled down into Saul-dom relatively quickly


I agree with this, of course.

Season 1 began timeline began May 2002.  The earlier part of this last episode was June 2004 before the switch to the "future" sometime before Nov. 2005.


Thanks, this is helpful.  I said two years but maybe more like 18 months.  That seems like plenty of time still to play with.

 
According to the Fandom Wiki...

After the time jump, as Saul is driving into his office, it is stated in the radio that the S&P 500 rose by 5 points the prior day. If you narrow down this period to November 1, 2004 - November 30, 2005 (based on the license plate expiring in November, 2005), the only day the S&P 500 rose by exactly 5 points is February 10, 2005. Therefore, the next day when he’s driving into work would be February 11, 2005.

 
According to the Fandom Wiki...


:lmao:   Thanks for finding that.  Their level of obsession knows no bounds.  But as someone pointed out, we're here on a fantasy football message board talking about it, so can't cast stones.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao:   Thanks for finding that.  Their level of obsessiveness knows no bounds.  But as someone pointed out, we're here on a fantasy football message board talking about it, so can't cast stones.
Just fort reference, the same site shows the BB timeline beginning September of 2008.  So we got 3 1/2 years to play with still if the writers so choose.

 
I was just thinking back to Howard's memorial and the news that HHM is no more.  If Howard's death wasn't enough, pretty sure the firm's demise was the nail in the coffin for Jimmy and Kim's relationship.  They are both responsible for its collapse while it was the vessel that gave them an opportunity to succeed.  The McGill and Hamlin legacy ruined by pettiness.  As much as I love Jimmy and Kim, I also hate them.  


Not that it's unique to BB/BCS but they do a great job of having horrible people that you care about.  Walt, Jesse, Mike, Gus, Saul, Kim, Nacho - all of these people are not good people.  Pretty vile and disgusting but we like them.

 
Not that it's unique to BB/BCS but they do a great job of having horrible people that you care about.  Walt, Jesse, Mike, Gus, Saul, Kim, Nacho - all of these people are not good people.  Pretty vile and disgusting but we like them.


I guess with Jimmy and Kim I never thought of them as horrible.  Sure they did some malicious things but definitely not killers.   That all changed with Howard's death.  Broke bad so to speak.  

 
I guess with Jimmy and Kim I never thought of them as horrible.  Sure they did some malicious things but definitely not killers.   That all changed with Howard's death.  Broke bad so to speak.  


Well, with Jimmy we already had all of his BB material to go on.  Kim would be the least objectionable from that list.

 
Don't like how quickly they went from Jimmy/Kim to Saul


I dunno, they have been going Jimmy to Saul for six seasons. We really don't need anymore "what will it take?"

edit - sorry, I see this was answered / picked on already :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not that it's unique to BB/BCS but they do a great job of having horrible people that you care about.  Walt, Jesse, Mike, Gus, Saul, Kim, Nacho - all of these people are not good people.  Pretty vile and disgusting but we like them.
They're all paying tribute to Tony Soprano (or, if you want to stretch it back even further, to Tarantino and Pulp Fiction).

I don't know how many people read that famous long blog post that advanced the theory that Tony definitely got whacked in the final scene, but the part of the argument I found the most convincing was that it was all a big FU from David Chase to the audience. He was, in effect, telling them: You cheered on Tony even though I kept trying to tell you what an awful human being he was. So if you identify with him so much, you get to experience his death the same way he does, without any emotional distance. You'll never see it coming.

ETA: Don't feel like going through that entire exegesis to find the quote, but I found this quote from Chase in a separate article that expresses a similar sentiment:

“They wanted to know that Tony was killed. They wanted to see him go face-down in linguini, you know?” Chase continued. “And I just thought, ‘God, you watched this guy for seven years, and I know he’s a criminal. But don’t tell me you don’t love him in some way, don’t tell me you’re not on his side in some way. And now you want to see him killed? You want justice done? You’re a criminal after watching this #### for seven years.’ That bothered me, yeah.”

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although as Alan Sepinwall pointed out in his review, can we really put it past Saul to be driving around on expired tags?


first thing i thought of when the uber nerds are deciphering the date via the stock market(impressive) 
Just to add...I also saw a close up somewhere of the handicap tag Saul hung in his car and it had a 11/20/2008 date on it.  Handicap placards need to be renewed every 4 years in New Mexico.  So it was obtained about 5 months after the Kim split.  This, of course, does not negate the point highlighted by ignatius, but the writers throw these nuggets of detail in in there intentionally.  I doubt the explanation is that Saul has expired tags.

 
Podcast said Kim's conversation with Hamlin's wife was her breaking point. She twisted the knife in when it wasn't necessary and realized almost immediately afterwards in the garage that they had to break up. She didn't like the person she was becoming with Saul. While she wanted a clean break and to change her ways, Jimmy went the opposite direction and became full-on Saul.

 
Just to add...I also saw a close up somewhere of the handicap tag Saul hung in his car and it had a 11/20/2008 date on it.  Handicap placards need to be renewed every 4 years in New Mexico.  So it was obtained about 5 months after the Kim split.  This, of course, does not negate the point highlighted by ignatius, but the writers throw these nuggets of detail in in there intentionally.  I doubt the explanation is that Saul has expired tags.
I agree. Just messing with the über nerds

 
I feel like you haven't read my posts (or, sometimes, seen the show :lol:  ).  What I've been saying is that she was bad all along.
No one reads your posts. 😂😂😜😜

I was teasing about the “care about” portion of the post.  She’s is made of sterner stuff after all. 
 

which is another reason I didn’t like her exit. 

 
I am guessing (always wrong!) that the intro to the next episode is one of their famous song montages with a bunch of clips of Saul doing Saul stuff and then very shortly afterwards it will be clear we are in the breaking bad era.  
Well you've certainly been right all along. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top