What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Jordan Love, GB (1 Viewer)

I picked a terrible time to trade for Jacobs. :kicksrock:

Maybe he’ll get more work with a bad QB. Probably not.
I picked a terrible time to turn down 2x2025 1st’s for Love….
It’s always a terrible time to turn down 2 firsts for Love.
In SF I wouldn’t sell love for that
I tried to buy for that in SF. dude laughed. :shrug:
Currently 12 Team PPR TE+ 1 QB
but we voted to go SF in 2026 so today is value is questionable but Sept 2026 those 2x1st will look bad (most likely)
 
Grade one is same as Hopkins
2+ weeks then the next week the docs and trainers work him back til they're comfy

So we'll be looking for reports like those of Hopkins. Love practicing on the side, working with trainers, maybe gave it a go at practice for these drills etc
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
Their next 3 games are all very winnable assuming they have someone even halfway competent behind center.
They have Willis. Nothing is a gimmie and a bad start is very possible.
Guessing Clifford before Willis. More familiar with the offense and likely would run it more similar to Love.
Why would they start the guy on thier practice squad instead of the guy that is the actual backup?
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
Their next 3 games are all very winnable assuming they have someone even halfway competent behind center.
They have Willis. Nothing is a gimmie and a bad start is very possible.
Guessing Clifford before Willis. More familiar with the offense and likely would run it more similar to Love.
Why would they start the guy on thier practice squad instead of the guy that is the actual backup?
Familiarity with the offense where Willis was more that able to step in for a play or two. Its a guess only…
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
Their next 3 games are all very winnable assuming they have someone even halfway competent behind center.
They have Willis. Nothing is a gimmie and a bad start is very possible.
Guessing Clifford before Willis. More familiar with the offense and likely would run it more similar to Love.
I’m thinking no, but wtf do I know.
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
 
This thread/forum is funny. On one hand, you have posters advocating that they have to bring in a veteran QB with Love out so not to hurt the development of the young WRs. And on the other hand, you have posters advocating sitting Love the rest of the season if the Packers have a bad record by the time he returns.
 
Are Love owners holding him to pickup a backup hoping he returns on the short end of the 3-6 week timeline or letting him go because he's a potential roster clogger during byeweeks on the long end?
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
No, just no.

The Cardinals brought back their injured franchise QB for his first game back when they were 1-8 last year.
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
this has been happening for some time.

but Green Bay has a pretty solid team. I think they can win a couple games. I'd be surprised if they went 0-6
 
Looks like he dodged a bullet.

4-5 weeks.
says 3-6 (I know its almost the same) but I'd keep him out all 6 and trot out Malik. If he blows then maybe rethink that but I rather not rush back my 220 mil QB
Oh he freaking blows man….they gotta sign a veteran.

Tannehill is out there and can hold it down till he gets back.
maybe so, but Tanehill doesnt know the offense.

its not reasonable to expect a QB to learn an offense in 1 week. even in 2.

Dobbs did it, but thats atypical. and likely he didnt learn the whole offense. he likely learned the base offense and a handful of special plays. and Dobbs main calling card is his ability to pick up an offense quickly. he has flaws, but this is one of his strengths. for that reason he will likely be a highly sought after backup for a long time
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
Again, cards were 1-8 and brought kyler back. You don't sit a healthy qb for 17 weeks. The fans would go nuts for one thing.
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
So you think…after one game…they now regret paying him?

No
 
I think you start your backup w2, see how he does and then reexamine. Best case scenario, Malik does ok and you sign a 3rd QB to either backup or replace Clifford on the PC.
 
Looks like he dodged a bullet.

4-5 weeks.
says 3-6 (I know its almost the same) but I'd keep him out all 6 and trot out Malik. If he blows then maybe rethink that but I rather not rush back my 220 mil QB
Oh he freaking blows man….they gotta sign a veteran.

Tannehill is out there and can hold it down till he gets back.
maybe so, but Tanehill doesnt know the offense.

its not reasonable to expect a QB to learn an offense in 1 week. even in 2.

Dobbs did it, but thats atypical. and likely he didnt learn the whole offense. he likely learned the base offense and a handful of special plays. and Dobbs main calling card is his ability to pick up an offense quickly. he has flaws, but this is one of his strengths. for that reason he will likely be a highly sought after backup for a long time
Welp……Willis is god awful.

So good luck Packer fans…..it’s gonna be a tough 4-6 weeks.

I think 3-4 is highly optimistic and 4-6 is realistic.
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
Again, cards were 1-8 and brought kyler back. You don't sit a healthy qb for 17 weeks. The fans would go nuts for one thing.
agreed. you gotta give the fans something to cheer for.

but what you dont do is rush your franchise guy back before he is ready. Kyler Murray was solid upon his return. and he got to shake off the rust. He will be better for having had that experience this year I think
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
Again, cards were 1-8 and brought kyler back. You don't sit a healthy qb for 17 weeks. The fans would go nuts for one thing.
agreed. you gotta give the fans something to cheer for.

but what you dont do is rush your franchise guy back before he is ready. Kyler Murray was solid upon his return. and he got to shake off the rust. He will be better for having had that experience this year I think
Yep. Not saying rush him back, my only point was there's 0% chance they're going to sit him out for the rest of the season from this. That's absolutely a ridiculous notion.
 
Looks like he dodged a bullet.

4-5 weeks.
says 3-6 (I know its almost the same) but I'd keep him out all 6 and trot out Malik. If he blows then maybe rethink that but I rather not rush back my 220 mil QB
Oh he freaking blows man….they gotta sign a veteran.

Tannehill is out there and can hold it down till he gets back.
maybe so, but Tanehill doesnt know the offense.

its not reasonable to expect a QB to learn an offense in 1 week. even in 2.

Dobbs did it, but thats atypical. and likely he didnt learn the whole offense. he likely learned the base offense and a handful of special plays. and Dobbs main calling card is his ability to pick up an offense quickly. he has flaws, but this is one of his strengths. for that reason he will likely be a highly sought after backup for a long timehe
Welp……Willis is god awful.

So good luck Packer fans…..it’s gonna be a tough 4-6 weeks.

I think 3-4 is highly optimistic and 4-6 is realistic.
he was. and may still be. but he knows the offense at least to some degree.

this does not mean the team wont bring in someone. Especially if they think Willis cant get the job done. at the very least they need a warm body who can play in the event something happens to Willis.

Tanehill may be the better QB but he cant come in and start next week. hed need at least another week or so so Willis will get the start next week for sure. I dont see how he cant. after that, it depends how things go.
They may bring in Tanehill but they may trade for a guy like Dobbs who is known for his ability to pick up an offense quickly. Dobbs is the fast Band aid solution. if it turns out Love is out a bit longer than the initial prediction you may wanna bring someone in who can play all year. (just in case) and that makes Tanehill perhaps the better option
 
When he’s healthy - he plays. They won’t risk him, but when he’s ready he’s back out there. No reason to shut a healthy franchise QB down.

I drafted Geno and he has good matchups weeks 3-5. Don’t love him next week @NE so will make a one week pickup for that start.
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
So you think…after one game…they now regret paying him?

No
More than 1/2 of his games have been brutal. Mix that with how he ended last season and you have a very mediocre (at best) QB who is the highest paid player in the history of the NFL. So yes, after one game, they regret this,
 
When he’s healthy - he plays. They won’t risk him, but when he’s ready he’s back out there. No reason to shut a healthy franchise QB down.

I drafted Geno and he has good matchups weeks 3-5. Don’t love him next week @NE so will make a one week pickup for that start.
What constitutes a "franchise QB"? If you have 7 good games in 5 years are you a franchise QB?
 
Wonder if they start off bad, if they keep him out all year??
what? no. no chance of that at all.

Even if you're 0-5, and your 200 million dollar QB is ok enough to play, you don't sit him out an extra 13 weeks lol.
By all accounts, MCL is tricky.. Say he is out 6 weeks and they start out 0-6, why risk a bigger injury by rushing him back? They probably aren't making the playoffs at that point.

I think you are going to start to see QB be treated by teams like big paid pitchers are in baseball. The owners have too much of a investment to throw them out in meaningless times IMO.
And for the record, I am not saying they do this, but just bringing the notion forward that depending on a bad start, it's possible they could, especially if his injury has a set back.
A lot of good points @karl.Racki

Maybe the Packers' owners realize they have an overpaid and overrated QB and are fine with throwing him to the lions.
They don't play the Lions until later in the season.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top