What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Jordan Mason, MIN (6 Viewers)

It was a really sloppy rain game could be a reason Wilson had all the touches. Indicating they trusted the vet more in those conditions. The problem is with Jeff's stat line is he barely ate the skin off the chicken and left all the meat.
That feels like an excuse that ignores an extensive, data filled history. Wilson isn't a world beater but I don't buy that rain was the reason Mason didn't see touches but gets over looked as a potential reason the run game was largely ineffective for both teams. That's fitting the evidence to the desired outcome.

Of course I could be wrong. I roster Mason (drafted him actually) and didn't pick up Wilson when I dumped Elijah this week so I hope I am wrong. I would love to be wrong. But there is such a large body of evidence pointing to Wilson being #1 as long as he is healthy that it simply should not be ignored.

My gamble is Wilson won't hold up for 8 games and Mason will get a crack at that point. But until/if Wilson gets hurt, he's lead back in SF.
Where else you gonna get this insight?
 
If they give him a fair shot he will play lights out.
IMO this is the issue. He's not going to get a fair shot this week. Mitchell went down and Wilson ended up on the field for 40 plays, Mitchell was in for 17, the Niners ran 68 plays total. Mason got 0 snaps on offense.

I know everyone thinks Shanahan plays games with his RBs, but that's mostly perception not reality. Shanahan is one of the very few HCs who reliably feeds his lead back until the wheels fall off and then it's next man up.

Wilson is the lead back this week. He's going to eat all the 🥧. If he goes down we'll see who Shanahan likes more among whoever is active this week.
I'm not sure I agree with this. Imo they didn't give mason any carries is mostly due to preparation. He had an extra full week of practice this week. Jeff certainly has the first crack, but if he looks pedestrian (which I think he is) then Mason is going to get touches.
I doubt that passionately. They had three RBs active. You don't put someone who is unprepared on the GameDay roster. Mitchell went down with 12:15 left in the 2nd. Jeff Wilson's first touch was at 8:43 in the 2nd quarter.

That's not a coincidence. That's how Shanahan rolls. The lead back eats, everyone else gets to chew the 🦴 afterwards.

ETA: Mason had 5 snaps on STs. 15 players had more, so it's difficult to argue STs is why he was active.
Except he’s already said last year scared him(losing backs)and he’s gonna roll with the hot hand. I think he is preparing Mason this week
 
If they give him a fair shot he will play lights out.
IMO this is the issue. He's not going to get a fair shot this week. Mitchell went down and Wilson ended up on the field for 40 plays, Mitchell was in for 17, the Niners ran 68 plays total. Mason got 0 snaps on offense.

I know everyone thinks Shanahan plays games with his RBs, but that's mostly perception not reality. Shanahan is one of the very few HCs who reliably feeds his lead back until the wheels fall off and then it's next man up.

Wilson is the lead back this week. He's going to eat all the 🥧. If he goes down we'll see who Shanahan likes more among whoever is active this week.
I'm not sure I agree with this. Imo they didn't give mason any carries is mostly due to preparation. He had an extra full week of practice this week. Jeff certainly has the first crack, but if he looks pedestrian (which I think he is) then Mason is going to get touches.
I doubt that passionately. They had three RBs active. You don't put someone who is unprepared on the GameDay roster. Mitchell went down with 12:15 left in the 2nd. Jeff Wilson's first touch was at 8:43 in the 2nd quarter.

That's not a coincidence. That's how Shanahan rolls. The lead back eats, everyone else gets to chew the 🦴 afterwards.

ETA: Mason had 5 snaps on STs. 15 players had more, so it's difficult to argue STs is why he was active.
Except he’s already said last year scared him(losing backs)and he’s gonna roll with the hot hand. I think he is preparing Mason this week
Sometimes I think this is a gag, because I highly doubt that you really believe what you are saying. You have to know that Mason will be lucky to get just a few carries.
 
Last edited:
If they give him a fair shot he will play lights out.
IMO this is the issue. He's not going to get a fair shot this week. Mitchell went down and Wilson ended up on the field for 40 plays, Mitchell was in for 17, the Niners ran 68 plays total. Mason got 0 snaps on offense.

I know everyone thinks Shanahan plays games with his RBs, but that's mostly perception not reality. Shanahan is one of the very few HCs who reliably feeds his lead back until the wheels fall off and then it's next man up.

Wilson is the lead back this week. He's going to eat all the 🥧. If he goes down we'll see who Shanahan likes more among whoever is active this week.
I'm not sure I agree with this. Imo they didn't give mason any carries is mostly due to preparation. He had an extra full week of practice this week. Jeff certainly has the first crack, but if he looks pedestrian (which I think he is) then Mason is going to get touches.
I doubt that passionately. They had three RBs active. You don't put someone who is unprepared on the GameDay roster. Mitchell went down with 12:15 left in the 2nd. Jeff Wilson's first touch was at 8:43 in the 2nd quarter.

That's not a coincidence. That's how Shanahan rolls. The lead back eats, everyone else gets to chew the 🦴 afterwards.

ETA: Mason had 5 snaps on STs. 15 players had more, so it's difficult to argue STs is why he was active.
Except he’s already said last year scared him(losing backs)and he’s gonna roll with the hot hand. I think he is preparing Mason this week
Sometimes I think this is a gag, because I highly doubt that you really believe what you are saying. You have to know that Mason will be lucky to get just a few Carrie’s.
If it's shtick, it's good shtick.
 
If they give him a fair shot he will play lights out.
IMO this is the issue. He's not going to get a fair shot this week. Mitchell went down and Wilson ended up on the field for 40 plays, Mitchell was in for 17, the Niners ran 68 plays total. Mason got 0 snaps on offense.

I know everyone thinks Shanahan plays games with his RBs, but that's mostly perception not reality. Shanahan is one of the very few HCs who reliably feeds his lead back until the wheels fall off and then it's next man up.

Wilson is the lead back this week. He's going to eat all the 🥧. If he goes down we'll see who Shanahan likes more among whoever is active this week.
I'm not sure I agree with this. Imo they didn't give mason any carries is mostly due to preparation. He had an extra full week of practice this week. Jeff certainly has the first crack, but if he looks pedestrian (which I think he is) then Mason is going to get touches.
I doubt that passionately. They had three RBs active. You don't put someone who is unprepared on the GameDay roster. Mitchell went down with 12:15 left in the 2nd. Jeff Wilson's first touch was at 8:43 in the 2nd quarter.

That's not a coincidence. That's how Shanahan rolls. The lead back eats, everyone else gets to chew the 🦴 afterwards.

ETA: Mason had 5 snaps on STs. 15 players had more, so it's difficult to argue STs is why he was active.
Except he’s already said last year scared him(losing backs)and he’s gonna roll with the hot hand. I think he is preparing Mason this week
Sometimes I think this is a gag, because I highly doubt that you really believe what you are saying. You have to know that Mason will be lucky to get just a few Carrie’s.
If it's shtick, it's good shtick.
You got that right.
 
Train leaves the station tomorrow…get on board baby
Even if I thought he had a chance tomorrow I sure as hell wouldn’t start him. I would have to give it a game to be sure. Starting him is like you don’t care if you get a goose egg, unless you’re desperate.
I am considering him over Hall
Why would you ever consider starting him until you know what kind of role he will have? I know fantasy players are gamblers at heart, but this smells of wanting to give a game away. Or is this shtick and I’m not in on it?
 
Train leaves the station tomorrow…get on board baby
Even if I thought he had a chance tomorrow I sure as hell wouldn’t start him. I would have to give it a game to be sure. Starting him is like you don’t care if you get a goose egg, unless you’re desperate.
Yeah. If you are having to dig deep to fill your RB spot(s), Mason is a decent outside shot play. But if you have anyone else with moderate reliability, come on. Gotta give it at least one game without Mitchell to see what happens.
 
Train leaves the station tomorrow…get on board baby
Even if I thought he had a chance tomorrow I sure as hell wouldn’t start him. I would have to give it a game to be sure. Starting him is like you don’t care if you get a goose egg, unless you’re desperate.
I am considering him over Hall
Why would you ever consider starting him until you know what kind of role he will have? I know fantasy players are gamblers at heart, but this smells of wanting to give a game away. Or is this shtick and I’m not in on it?
Hard to imagine him not having a good sized share unless It is TDP. That seems unlikely. Hall is certainly in a share and against a better D
 
Hard to imagine him not having a good sized share unless It is TDP. That seems unlikely. Hall is certainly in a share and against a better D
This week? It's easier to imagine him not seeing the field than it is to imagine him getting a "good sized share".

Shanahan has a history and it's not the one that a lot of people seem to believe it is.

The smart money is Wilson, Deebo & Lance will see 95%+ of the carries.
 
I won't say Mason won't get the bulk of the carries. I just wouldn't bet my fantasy week on it. Especially if you have other guys like Breece Hall, who just had a 45 percent snap share last game and figures to improve upon that if things break right for him. Don't forget, the Jets have every reason to want him to start over Michael Carter. It's just that there's no substitute for experience sometimes, and the bumps will be there along the way.

But betting my day on Mason when Wilson and TDP are there? Wouldn't do it. Shanahan did say he'd ride hot hand, it seems, but that's too rich of a bet for my blood.
 
Train leaves the station tomorrow…get on board baby
Even if I thought he had a chance tomorrow I sure as hell wouldn’t start him. I would have to give it a game to be sure. Starting him is like you don’t care if you get a goose egg, unless you’re desperate.
Or in full rebuild and he is your "Best RB2" or Flex 2 Option. Mason, B Edwards, or Calvin Ridley (yeah, I know Suspended) ....
 
Got an open roster spot and looking to snag Mason unless he’s somehow relegated to the RB3.

Anyone have new news on this RB corp since yesterday?
 
I knew Wilson would be the lead back but I'm very surprised by how many opportunities TDP has gotten so far.
 
Update:

Wilson—20 touches for 103 total yards (including 2 receptions on 2 targets)

TDP—14 rushes for 33 rushing yards
(0 targets)

Juszczyk—2 rushes for 1 yard, 1 TD
(0 receptions on 1 target)

Mason—0 touches for 0 total yards
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top