What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Zach Charbonnet, SEA (14 Viewers)

Walker is more susceptible to being game flowed and scripted out of the game, making charbs interesting in games like the 49ers where it’s a strong opposing offense. Problem is the 49ers also have a good defense lol. Won’t complain about 10 ppr points but the only leagues I started him were PPR. Wasn’t great start outside of that.

Walker is guaranteed to get High value touches but those fluctuate. His role isn’t going away because this is what Walker is good at. Chubb Hunt on a worse team
Solid post.
 
People actually thought this guy could produce behind that OL? Sheesh. He is a mudder behind a bad OL. No room to run. If Walker finds the smallest crease he can take it all the way. Same play thats like a 10 yard gain for charbs.
Amazing how people can't see the forest for the trees here
Too lazy to look, but did you make this declaration BEFORE the game?
No I made it before the season.
Show the world the post and your brilliance then.
Look through the Walker or Charbs threads. It's in there. There is no need to get emotional bud.
There was no emotion in my post.

Repost your post.

It's that simple.
I'm not going to go re-read both threads because you got emotional and told me to. That's not how I operate.
 
People actually thought this guy could produce behind that OL? Sheesh. He is a mudder behind a bad OL. No room to run. If Walker finds the smallest crease he can take it all the way. Same play thats like a 10 yard gain for charbs.
Amazing how people can't see the forest for the trees here
Too lazy to look, but did you make this declaration BEFORE the game?
No I made it before the season.
Show the world the post and your brilliance then.
Look through the Walker or Charbs threads. It's in there. There is no need to get emotional bud.
There was no emotion in my post.

Repost your post.

It's that simple.
There was a handful of us who claimed Walker is a better RB than Charbs. There were some who claimed Charbs would produce better than Walker....before he ever took a snap.

To answer Hot Sauce Guys question about when Walker comes back, is he an automatic RB1, the answer is obviously yes. With a very tough schedule.
Weeks 1-10, before his injury, Walker was RB8 overall. Charbs was 57th.
 
How are we feeling about him for tomorrow night? Looks like Walker is out.
I'll say the same thing I said before last weeks game. I have more confidence in Charbonnet with Walker out then I do starting Walker while Charbonnet is eating into his role. I got the duo together on 2 teams that matter anymore, and I'll say I've been pulling for Walker to be out all week....and I think he's the superior talent, just like the distribution of labor more when one is out.
 
People actually thought this guy could produce behind that OL? Sheesh. He is a mudder behind a bad OL. No room to run. If Walker finds the smallest crease he can take it all the way. Same play thats like a 10 yard gain for charbs.
Amazing how people can't see the forest for the trees here
Too lazy to look, but did you make this declaration BEFORE the game?
No I made it before the season.
Show the world the post and your brilliance then.
Look through the Walker or Charbs threads. It's in there. There is no need to get emotional bud.
There was no emotion in my post.

Repost your post.

It's that simple.
There was a handful of us who claimed Walker is a better RB than Charbs. There were some who claimed Charbs would produce better than Walker....before he ever took a snap.
Absolutely no one claimed Charbonnet would produce better than Walker. It’s a boogeyman that a couple people created and then argued against all year, which is why this thread is such a train wreck.
 
How are we feeling about him for tomorrow night? Looks like Walker is out.
He's in over Jaylen Warren, Jerome Ford in (.5ppr). All 3 seem to be fringe RB2's High Floor flex plays this week. I think Charb should be over them based on the volume argument if KW sits.
 
How are we feeling about him for tomorrow night? Looks like Walker is out.
He's in over Jaylen Warren, Jerome Ford in (.5ppr). All 3 seem to be fringe RB2's High Floor flex plays this week. I think Charb should be over them based on the volume argument if KW sits.
My only additional point here is that Warren gets to go against a cardinals team that was just gashed and is known to be weak against RBs.

That plus the additional factor that Thursday games can always be a bit clunky, especially after a holiday… and I’d lean to start Warren over Charbs.

Having said that I’m individually starting them both in two different leagues.
 
How are we feeling about him for tomorrow night? Looks like Walker is out.
He's in over Jaylen Warren, Jerome Ford in (.5ppr). All 3 seem to be fringe RB2's High Floor flex plays this week. I think Charb should be over them based on the volume argument if KW sits.
Hmmm. I wasn’t considering him but with walker out I have to choose between him, Singletary (Pierce back). Warren (splitting with Harris) or Brian Robinson who’s also splitting time. It’s a conundrum. Moreover, I have to consider Metcalf. Two Seahawks against that Dallas buzzsaw is not ideal…
 
I will just say that people who think this discussion was a binary one that one of these RB being clearly better than the other in all phases was not the only point of view that was presented.

It was only a handful of people here who saw this as an all or nothing scenario. Just as many people if not more saw it as a mixture where one RB may be better than the other at some things and vice-versa, which might lead to some form of time share even though the Head Coaches history showed a tendency to lean more heavily on one RB than to have a RBBC.

I for one didn't have a strong opinion about this either way. I just pointed out that Carrol has shown a preference for RB who are tough and are good at gaining yards after contact. That Carrol has chosen lesser athletes like Rawls and Carson over higher draft picks with more athletic abilities like Christine Michael and Rashaad Penny before.

That was not to say that this would happen again in this scenario but just to point out that it has happened before, and to perhaps not be so dismissive of Carrols previous preference for RB that some might view (including me to an extent) as just a guy compared to others. I certainly didn't think Rawls or Carson seemed great. It doesn't matter what I think though. I can smell what Carroll has cooking.
 
Last edited:
This thread and the Gibbs thread will be fun to revisit in a few years.

Gibbs has already made the doubters look like fools. So far Charbs has made the doubters look smart.

It is okay to just admit that he has not lived up to expectations this season. Two weeks over 10 points in ppr. RB50 in ppr after 12 weeks. Not even flex worthy except the 2 games Walker missed in which he was barely a low end RB2/flex.

I admit I was wrong on Kyren last season. Added him after the Shefter tweet week 1, prior to injury, held onto him all season waiting for that breakout that never came. Ended up drafting him last pick this season and it has paid off. Maybe that will be Charbs next season. Or maybe he is the next Christine Michael.
I drafted Charbonnet, but did so with absolutely zero expectations beyond being Walker's handcuff. The little I've seen of him this year I've thought he looks pretty good, but he's also about to face some tough defenses.
 
Anyone starting him tonight? I have to in one standard league due to byes and debating Hollywood vs Charb in a double flex ppr league as well.

Almost feels like one of those games where everyone predicts a terrible game due to match up and the player pops off.
 
Don't have to start him tonight, but looking forward to watching him. Seems like a good chunk of people think he's a big stiff.
 
I’ve gotta choose 2 of these players for RB2 and a flex. Charbs, Singletary, Brian Robinson and Warren. And either Metcalf or one of the aforementioned backs. I’m leaning Charbs bec he’s going to get almost every snap where the other guys are in timeshares although Singletary most likely will be my flex. Hate that two of these choices are tonight. I personally think in half PPR Charbs has a safe floor. He might get 15-20 touches.
 
FBG likes him. He's been on my roster 3 months. He gets the start in flex.
Any idea what the rational is? I’m assuming volume.
I'm guessing volume. Most are playing him because of a bye week for other options. Did a quick Vegas bet search and his over/under for rushing is 53 yds and receiving is 20 yds and o/u 3.5 receptions. Take that for what it is.
 
Anyone starting him tonight? I have to in one standard league due to byes and debating Hollywood vs Charb in a double flex ppr league as well.

Almost feels like one of those games where everyone predicts a terrible game due to match up and the player pops off.
I am because it's dynasty and I just sold off CMC at the trade deadline and needed to plug the hole.
 
Anyone starting him tonight? I have to in one standard league due to byes and debating Hollywood vs Charb in a double flex ppr league as well.

Almost feels like one of those games where everyone predicts a terrible game due to match up and the player pops off.
Late to the party here but I started him in the three of my leagues where he’s rostered.

1. Went with him over Najee in a standard scoring league in an even matchup (dynasty).
2. Over Achane (injury makes me nervous) and Hubbard in a PPR league where I’m a slight favorite.
3. With Taylor and Jones hurt he’s my only real option in another standard league where I’m an underdog (keeper league).

I was high on him when he was drafted to Seattle because Carroll has a history of bell cow backs who are hard runners. While I don’t think Charbonnet is the next Lynch and he lacks that second gear in the open field, I’ve been overall pleased with what I’ve seen. He runs hard, seems to have decent vision, and he receives the ball very well. So, in contrast to Walker who is more of a burner, Charbonnet seems like a good nfl rb at all aspects of the position and, if give the opportunity, would excel as an every down back in a run heavy system.
 
Last edited:
I knew I could come in here after that game for some unbiased viewpoints about him.
On the drive he scored the TD my opinion was he didn't have space or not taking advantage of his opportunities. The few drives after that it seemed he was regularly getting 3 and 4 yards a carry. I didn't watch the second half so no idea, but seems Seattle exploited this Dallas D like no one else has this year.
 
I knew I could come in here after that game for some unbiased viewpoints about him.
On the drive he scored the TD my opinion was he didn't have space or not taking advantage of his opportunities. The few drives after that it seemed he was regularly getting 3 and 4 yards a carry. I didn't watch the second half so no idea, but seems Seattle exploited this Dallas D like no one else has this year.
Dallas's defense was definitely exposed a bit through the air (Bland, but for a really nice pick, had a bad game) and Settle WRs looked open every play. FWIW, Geno (who otherwise played very well) missed like 3 wide open passes, Lockett had an uncharacteristic drop, and JSN had a long TD called back on a very close call. So, frankly, Dallas's pass defense stats could have been significantly worse than the already bad night Dallas had.

But, I thought the Dallas run defense still played solidly all night (Charbonnet really maybe only had a handful of good running lanes all game) and the line got some pressure on Geno so it wasn't like some total exploitation. Dallas still handled the run well and got pressures.
 
Here's what rotowire has on his injury:
(Rotowire) Charbonnet suffered a knee bruise in Thursday's game against Dallas, John Boyle of the Seahawks' official site reports. Analysis: Charbonnet exited Thursday's game in the fourth quarter, though it appears that he avoided any significant injury. With nine days to recover until Seattle's next contest, he may be available for a matchup against the 49ers.
 
He isn't very good. Zero explosion. He's physical so he's a great complement to Walker but I don't see him as a starting rb.
Anne Hathaway isn't pretty. Her lips are 1 millimeter too wide and her knees are sharp. She'd be a great one night stand but I don't see her as marriage material.
Partied with her one night in Vegas, she's cute without trying, nice and not the least bit stuck up, but I can't say she really blew me or anyway away just on pure looks but I'd add she was not really trying to either.
 
He isn't very good. Zero explosion. He's physical so he's a great complement to Walker but I don't see him as a starting rb.
Anne Hathaway isn't pretty. Her lips are 1 millimeter too wide and her knees are sharp. She'd be a great one night stand but I don't see her as marriage material.
Looked her up just now and I'd say maybe 40 millimeters too wide. Looks like she has a Glasgow smile.
 
He isn't very good. Zero explosion. He's physical so he's a great complement to Walker but I don't see him as a starting rb.
Anne Hathaway isn't pretty. Her lips are 1 millimeter too wide and her knees are sharp. She'd be a great one night stand but I don't see her as marriage material.
Partied with her one night in Vegas, she's cute without trying, nice and not the least bit stuck up, but I can't say she really blew me or anyway away just on pure looks but I'd add she was not really trying to either.
My only interaction w/ her was at a gala event and she was done up and I found her stunning. Understand that she might not be everyone's cup of tea.
 
He isn't very good. Zero explosion. He's physical so he's a great complement to Walker but I don't see him as a starting rb.
Anne Hathaway isn't pretty. Her lips are 1 millimeter too wide and her knees are sharp. She'd be a great one night stand but I don't see her as marriage material.
Partied with her one night in Vegas, she's cute without trying, nice and not the least bit stuck up, but I can't say she really blew me or anyway away just on pure looks but I'd add she was not really trying to either.
😳
 
He isn't very good. Zero explosion. He's physical so he's a great complement to Walker but I don't see him as a starting rb.
Anne Hathaway isn't pretty. Her lips are 1 millimeter too wide and her knees are sharp. She'd be a great one night stand but I don't see her as marriage material.
Partied with her one night in Vegas, she's cute without trying, nice and not the least bit stuck up, but I can't say she really blew me or anyway away just on pure looks but I'd add she was not really trying to either.
😳

Those too wide lips could yet be useful :ponder:
 
(Rotowire) Charbonnet (knee) is listed as questionable for Sunday's game at San Francisco, Michael-Shawn Dugar of The Athletic reports.
Analysis: The same goes for Kenneth Walker, who missed the past two games with an oblique injury. Both Walker and Charbonnet missed practice Wednesday before returning Thursday as limited participants, and it's possible one or both ends up coming down to a game-time decision ahead of the 4:05 p.m. ET kickoff this Sunday. The machup is tough, but Charbonnet's large workloads the past two weeks suggest he'd make for a solid fantasy start if he's active and Walker isn't.
 
Ya, I don't think he is a plodder at all. When the conversation between the two happens my response is to watch that nice screen play from Walker. Charbs can't do that. Two good rbs. One is a strong, consistent legit RB. One has the dynamic ability to be elite. All my opinion and I reserve the right to change that opinion when I want.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top