What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

The future of the Republican Party: Wipeout? (1 Viewer)

  So how does that make sense?
Because these people are driven by "belief" systems.  Truth, facts, studies, and such mean nothing to them. They will come up with an anecdote to counter whatever is presented and allow them to sit in their little mistaken belief world. We can see this play out again and again across a myriad of topics.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sometimes you have to do what you got to do at different times for the greater good, but that doesn't mean you are against free markets. 
Ok "greater good" is a liberal argument, even a socialist one, just to be clear. And manipulating markets is not a conservative argument, ie "the right".

 
Because these people are driven by "belief" systems.  Truth, facts, studies, and such mean nothing to them. They will come up with an anecdote to counter whatever is presented and allow them to sit in their little mistaken belief world. We can see this play out again and again across a myriad of topics.
I think it will be decades before Trump supporters "believe" in polls again. "Look how wrong they were on Election Night! That's why I don't believe them now when they say Trump's approval is only 41%! How can it be that low with this great economy!"

 
I think it will be decades before Trump supporters "believe" in polls again. "Look how wrong they were on Election Night! That's why I don't believe them now when they say Trump's approval is only 41%! How can it be that low with this great economy!"
Everyone on the left believes Chuck Todd and Rachel Maddow  :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Virtually every election poll was within the margin of error. So even if you are naive enough to think that the polls about The Wall are similarly "wrong", it still would mean that the majority of Americans don't want to build a wall.

Why on earth would you want to deny that reality?

 
Virtually every election poll was within the margin of error. So even if you are naive enough to think that the polls about The Wall are similarly "wrong", it still would mean that the majority of Americans don't want to build a wall.

Why on earth would you want to deny that reality?
The right doesn't believe in reality, facts, or science.  

 
Just because unemployment is low doesn't mean we shouldn't have re-worked the deal with Mexico.  We're still talking about manufacturing jobs that are better suited over here than over there from an American point of view.
This is mostly false.  The main element with mexico concerned wages for automobile workers.  The big winners, as usual, are big business.  Specifically, Pharma gets a big win with extended times on patents.  And CA/MX got a nice deal when Trump caved on unilateral tariff actions.  So, more expensive cars, more money to pharma companies and less negotiation leverage.  But hey, we got a bit more access to CA dairy markets.

 
New polling I heard this morning: 73% of Republicans now support tariffs. We already know that the vast majority of Republican voters (80%) support President Trump’s policies on Russia and NATO, and may also be in favor of limiting legal immigration. 

This suggests that the Republican Party, at least for now, has moved from a traditional conservative party to a nationalist party. And that leads us to two possibilities: 

1. This is all largely the result of support of Donald Trump; when Trump is gone, the voters will return to a more traditional conservatism. 

2. This transformation of the Republican Party will survive Donald Trump. 

I’m curious as to what people think is more likely. I’d especially like to hear from those who have traditionally voted Republican. And of your answer is #2, what do you think are the reasons for this change? 
I suspect I'm in the range of person your looking for. 

NPA.  Never voted for a dem POTUS.  Never Trumper who voted for the pot head. 

I reject your premise that the republican party has moved to a "Nationalist Party" 

 
She sent an email claiming that a woman who suffered lead poisoning would specifically ask what Hillary would do for the people of Flint. However, no such thing happened.

She sent an email containing the text of an alleged debate question about the death penalty. However, the actual question that was asked was different from what Brazile had claimed. And at any rate, there's no proof that Hillary's staffer had forwarded the question to Hillary in the first place. (Oh, and nevermind the fact that it was a generic topic for which Hillary already had a canned response.)

Once again, my bolded statement was not false.

Once again, this illustrates the difference between the Republicans and Democrats. Democrats shrugged their shoulders at debate questions, while Republicans tried to make a scandal out of it. Meanwhile, Democrats shrug their shoulders at South Carolina primary hijinks, while Republicans act like it's no big deal.

Once again, freedom for me but not for thee.
More revisionist hillary defending. Your statement was false. It was junk. I am sure you had to even google what i was talking about. The fact that you keep saying "staffer" like it was some low level intern is freaking dumb. 

I dont care if somebody thinks it was no big deal. Just dont make crap up in order to make it look like it was different than what it was in order to make that argument. Just be honest. 

Oh wait...it's you.

 
The left thrive on victimhood and want to take from others and give to the victims to achieve their goal of economic equality..  The right believes in free markets and less government.  Yes the left is more about taking from others and redistribution.  
Are you aware of the details of the tax bill that passed just last year?  If so...I have a couple questions.

 
Republican Party, 1868.

Source, this appears to be from the convention, not the actual platform.

Actual platform below.

The National Union Republican Party of the United States, assembled in National Convention, in the city of Chicago, on the 20th day of May, 1868, make the following declaration of principles:

First—We congratulate the country on the assured success of the reconstruction policy of Congress, as evinced by the adoption, in the majority of the States lately in rebellion, of constitutions securing equal civil and political rights to all, and regard it as the duty of the Government to sustain those constitutions, and to prevent the people of such States from being remitted to a state of anarchy or military rule.

Second—The guaranty by Congress of equal suffrage to all loyal men at the South was demanded by every consideration of public safety, of gratitude, and of justice, and must be maintained; while the question of suffrage in all the loyal States properly belongs to the people of those States.

Third—We denounce all forms of repudiation as a national crime; and national honor requires the payment of the public indebtedness in the utmost good faith to all creditors at home and abroad, not only according to the letter, but the spirit of the laws under which it was contracted.

Fourth—It is due to the labor of the nation, that taxation should be equalized and reduced as rapidly as the national faith will permit.

Fifth—The National Debt, contracted as it has been for the preservation of the Union for all time to come, should be extended over a fair period of redemption, and it is the duty of Congress to reduce the rate of interest thereon whenever it can be done honestly.

Sixth—That the best policy to diminish our burden of debt, is to so improve our credit that capitalists will seek to loan us money at lower rates of interest than we now pay and must continue to pay so long as repudiation, partial or total, open or covert, is threatened or suspected.

Seventh—The Government of the United States should be administered with the strictest economy; and the corruptions which have been so shamefully nursed and fostered by Andrew Johnson call loudly for radical reform.

Eighth—We profoundly deplore the untimely and tragic death of Abraham Lincoln, and regret the accession of Andrew Johnson to the Presidency, who has acted treacherously to the people who elected him and the cause he was pledged to support; has usurped high legislative and judicial functions; has refused to execute the laws; has used his high office to induce other officers to ignore and violate the laws; has employed his executive powers to render insecure the property, the peace, the liberty, and life of the citizen; has abused the pardoning power; has denounced the National Legislature as unconstitutional; has persistently and corruptly resisted, by every means in his power, every proper attempt at the reconstruction of the States lately in rebellion; has perverted the public patronage into an engine of wholesale corruption; and has been justly impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and properly pronounced guilty thereof by the vote of thirty-five senators.

Ninth—The doctrine of Great Britain and other European powers, that because a man is once a subject, he is always so, must be resisted, at every hazard, by the United States, as a relic of the feudal times, not authorized by the law of nations, and at war with our national honor and independence. Naturalized citizens are entitled to be protected in all their rights of citizenship, as though they were native-born; and no citizen of the United States, native or naturalized, must be liable to arrest and imprisonment by any foreign power, for acts done or words spoken in this country; and, if so arrested and imprisoned, it is the duty of the Government to interfere in his behalf.

Tenth—Of all who were faithful in the trials of the late war, there were none entitled to more especial honor than the brave soldiers and seamen who endured the hardships of campaign and cruise, and imperilled their lives in the service of the country. The bounties and pensions provided by law for these brave defenders of the nation, are obligations never to be forgotten. The widows and orphans of the gallant dead are the wards of the people—a sacred legacy bequeathed to the nation's protecting care.

Eleventh—Foreign immigration, which in the past, has added so much to the wealth, development of resources, and increase of power to this nation—the asylum of the oppressed of all nations—should be fostered and encouraged by a liberal and just policy.

Twelfth—This Convention declares its sympathy with all the oppressed people which are struggling for their rights.

Thirteenth—We highly commend the spirit of magnanimity and forgiveness with which men who have served in the rebellion, but now frankly and honestly co-operate with us in restoring the peace of the country, and reconstructing the Southern State Governments upon the basis of impartial justice and equal rights, are received back into the communion of the loyal people; and we favor the removal of the disqualifications and restrictions imposed upon the late rebels, in the same measure as the spirit of disloyalty will die out, and as may be consistent with the safety of the loyal people.

Fourteenth—We recognize the great principles laid down in the immortal Declaration of Independence as the true foundation of Democratic Government; and we hail with gladness every effort toward making these principles a living reality on every inch of American soil.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn't want to be the GOP trying to sell their 19th century policies to the generation of voters on its way, one that hasn't made a huge dent yet but will eventually be the biggest in the nation's history and ready to assume leadership at the exact moment the Boomers are leaving.

 
I wouldn't want to be the GOP trying to sell their 19th century policies to the generation of voters on its way, one that hasn't made a huge dent yet but will eventually be the biggest in the nation's history and ready to assume leadership at the exact moment the Boomers are leaving.
Might only be a one party system in 30 years. When voting we will be choosing from two candidates from the same party. Or many candidates will be running unopposed.

 
Da Guru said:
This board hated unions a few years back.

I feel they have their place.
Yes I remember there was a Scott Walker thread where a very many posters here cheered on his efforts to crush the unions. I’m not sure where they are now.

 
roadkill1292 said:
I wouldn't want to be the GOP trying to sell their 19th century policies to the generation of voters on its way, one that hasn't made a huge dent yet but will eventually be the biggest in the nation's history and ready to assume leadership at the exact moment the Boomers are leaving.
Actually their 19th century policies would be an improvement 

 
Da Guru said:
Might only be a one party system in 30 years. When voting we will be choosing from two candidates from the same party. Or many candidates will be running unopposed.
That was my complaint about 8-10 or so years ago- the 2 parties were too similar. This wasn’t the change I was looking for though. 

 
Yes I remember there was a Scott Walker thread where a very many posters here cheered on his efforts to crush the unions. I’m not sure where they are now.
I remember this board destroyed anyone who supported unions and organized labor years ago. Now the times they are a changing. With Dems probably taking over everything in 2020 I expect unions to rise up strong again. Go Teamsters!

 
I'm Union.  And for the most part am thankful.

But we have some I want to punch in the face


I remember this board destroyed anyone who supported unions and organized labor years ago. Now the times they are a changing. With Dems probably taking over everything in 2020 I expect unions to rise up strong again. Go Teamsters!
I always felt bad for the anti-union people. Most were voting against their own self interest. 

 
Fan of Charles McCoy said:
One word: bleak
Always wonder how well his silent partner Pence will do once Trump is done.
Prior to 2016, Pence would have had about as much success as Pat Robertson or Mike Huckabee. But thanks to his unholy alliance with Trump, there's a good chance that he could attract a large chunk of Trump's base along with a significant percentage of the debased Christians who support Trump.

 
I always felt bad for the anti-union people. Most were voting against their own self interest. 
I was never a huge union guy - felt some weren't actually looking out for employees.   BUT that has changed over the years.

I still do have a problem with some unions and unions guys that are all "OMG, THE UNION WAS NOT NOTIFIED FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS FREE TRAINING or I CANT SCREW IN THIS LIGHTBULB BECAUSE THATS NOT MY UNION DESCRIPTION" but for the most part positive.

 
I was never a huge union guy - felt some weren't actually looking out for employees.   BUT that has changed over the years.

I still do have a problem with some unions and unions guys that are all "OMG, THE UNION WAS NOT NOTIFIED FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS FREE TRAINING or I CANT SCREW IN THIS LIGHTBULB BECAUSE THATS NOT MY UNION DESCRIPTION" but for the most part positive.
Add up the stupod union rules and lazy workers on ome side. Then add up all the money execs are stealing and lazy execs on the other? Which is worse?  Its never, ever the unions.

 
I was never a huge union guy - felt some weren't actually looking out for employees.   BUT that has changed over the years.

I still do have a problem with some unions and unions guys that are all "OMG, THE UNION WAS NOT NOTIFIED FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS FREE TRAINING or I CANT SCREW IN THIS LIGHTBULB BECAUSE THATS NOT MY UNION DESCRIPTION" but for the most part positive.
Certainly there are negative elements to unions and I do think there was a time where some industry unions were guilty of abusing their power. So I did support some of the conservative measures to reign them in. However, it has swung so wildly against unions and unions (as they typically have been) have been villainized in the media and by politicians. In my opinion they are essential for keeping a balance between labor and ownership/management. I don't think it is any coincidence that when union membership was at it's peak, the middle class was also at it's peak. 

 
LOL, but if it works to create a more fair trade agreement, then you gotta do what you gotta do.
Trump negotiates what he tells us all is this fantastic US MCA deal but then in nothing more than bad faith refuses to remove steel and aluminum tariffs with them to get the deal done. And worse yet before this wonderful deal is approved he tries to threaten Mexico with 25% tariffs if the don’t do more to stop the flow of drugs and migrants from coming into the US. What other countries are learning just like we already knew is Trump’s word is worthless and he is all talk and no action when it comes to getting trade deals completed. How much you want to bet the majority of his base naively think that the USMCA deal has been approved? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm truly curious as to where the GOP goes post-Trump. Will they continue the path they've been since embracing Trump? And try to get more on board with the fear and hatred agenda? And disregard for the deficit? Maybe push Ivanka or Don Jr in 2024?  Or will they treat it like the Steroid Era in baseball and just say 'oops' and pretend it never happened?

 
I'm truly curious as to where the GOP goes post-Trump. Will they continue the path they've been since embracing Trump? And try to get more on board with the fear and hatred agenda? And disregard for the deficit? Maybe push Ivanka or Don Jr in 2024?  Or will they treat it like the Steroid Era in baseball and just say 'oops' and pretend it never happened?
I think they are going to be introduced to RICO

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top