SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Tariffs are totally at odds with that concept.The right believes in free markets and less government.
Tariffs are totally at odds with that concept.The right believes in free markets and less government.
Because these people are driven by "belief" systems. Truth, facts, studies, and such mean nothing to them. They will come up with an anecdote to counter whatever is presented and allow them to sit in their little mistaken belief world. We can see this play out again and again across a myriad of topics.So how does that make sense?
Sometimes you have to do what you got to do at different times for the greater good, but that doesn't mean you are against free markets.Tariffs are totally at odds with that concept.
That's pretty much exactly what it means.Sometimes you have to do what you got to do at different times for the greater good, but that doesn't mean you are against free markets.
Ok "greater good" is a liberal argument, even a socialist one, just to be clear. And manipulating markets is not a conservative argument, ie "the right".Sometimes you have to do what you got to do at different times for the greater good, but that doesn't mean you are against free markets.
LOL, but if it works to create a more fair trade agreement, then you gotta do what you gotta do.Ok "greater good" is a liberal argument, even a socialist one, just to be clear. And manipulating markets is not a conservative argument, ie "the right".
I think it will be decades before Trump supporters "believe" in polls again. "Look how wrong they were on Election Night! That's why I don't believe them now when they say Trump's approval is only 41%! How can it be that low with this great economy!"Because these people are driven by "belief" systems. Truth, facts, studies, and such mean nothing to them. They will come up with an anecdote to counter whatever is presented and allow them to sit in their little mistaken belief world. We can see this play out again and again across a myriad of topics.
Ok fine, you did make the statement about right/left though.LOL, but if it works to create a more fair trade agreement, then you gotta do what you gotta do.
Everyone on the left believes Chuck Todd and Rachel MaddowI think it will be decades before Trump supporters "believe" in polls again. "Look how wrong they were on Election Night! That's why I don't believe them now when they say Trump's approval is only 41%! How can it be that low with this great economy!"
I don't know what this means in relation to Trump supporters not believing in poll results.Everyone believes Chuck Todd and Rachel Maddow
The right doesn't believe in reality, facts, or science.Virtually every election poll was within the margin of error. So even if you are naive enough to think that the polls about The Wall are similarly "wrong", it still would mean that the majority of Americans don't want to build a wall.
Why on earth would you want to deny that reality?
This is mostly false. The main element with mexico concerned wages for automobile workers. The big winners, as usual, are big business. Specifically, Pharma gets a big win with extended times on patents. And CA/MX got a nice deal when Trump caved on unilateral tariff actions. So, more expensive cars, more money to pharma companies and less negotiation leverage. But hey, we got a bit more access to CA dairy markets.Just because unemployment is low doesn't mean we shouldn't have re-worked the deal with Mexico. We're still talking about manufacturing jobs that are better suited over here than over there from an American point of view.
I suspect I'm in the range of person your looking for.New polling I heard this morning: 73% of Republicans now support tariffs. We already know that the vast majority of Republican voters (80%) support President Trump’s policies on Russia and NATO, and may also be in favor of limiting legal immigration.
This suggests that the Republican Party, at least for now, has moved from a traditional conservative party to a nationalist party. And that leads us to two possibilities:
1. This is all largely the result of support of Donald Trump; when Trump is gone, the voters will return to a more traditional conservatism.
2. This transformation of the Republican Party will survive Donald Trump.
I’m curious as to what people think is more likely. I’d especially like to hear from those who have traditionally voted Republican. And of your answer is #2, what do you think are the reasons for this change?
The right doesn't believe in reality, facts, or science.
Which is why we support labor unions.LOL, but if it works to create a more fair trade agreement, then you gotta do what you gotta do.
More revisionist hillary defending. Your statement was false. It was junk. I am sure you had to even google what i was talking about. The fact that you keep saying "staffer" like it was some low level intern is freaking dumb.She sent an email claiming that a woman who suffered lead poisoning would specifically ask what Hillary would do for the people of Flint. However, no such thing happened.
She sent an email containing the text of an alleged debate question about the death penalty. However, the actual question that was asked was different from what Brazile had claimed. And at any rate, there's no proof that Hillary's staffer had forwarded the question to Hillary in the first place. (Oh, and nevermind the fact that it was a generic topic for which Hillary already had a canned response.)
Once again, my bolded statement was not false.
Once again, this illustrates the difference between the Republicans and Democrats. Democrats shrugged their shoulders at debate questions, while Republicans tried to make a scandal out of it. Meanwhile, Democrats shrug their shoulders at South Carolina primary hijinks, while Republicans act like it's no big deal.
Once again, freedom for me but not for thee.
Labor unions love tariffs.Which is why we support labor unions.
1.3.2019 update
Total Women in the US House:
1989:
16 Democrats
13 Republicans
2019:
89 Democrats
13 Republicans
Are you aware of the details of the tax bill that passed just last year? If so...I have a couple questions.The left thrive on victimhood and want to take from others and give to the victims to achieve their goal of economic equality.. The right believes in free markets and less government. Yes the left is more about taking from others and redistribution.
This board hated unions a few years back.Which is why we support labor unions.
Might only be a one party system in 30 years. When voting we will be choosing from two candidates from the same party. Or many candidates will be running unopposed.I wouldn't want to be the GOP trying to sell their 19th century policies to the generation of voters on its way, one that hasn't made a huge dent yet but will eventually be the biggest in the nation's history and ready to assume leadership at the exact moment the Boomers are leaving.
Yes I remember there was a Scott Walker thread where a very many posters here cheered on his efforts to crush the unions. I’m not sure where they are now.Da Guru said:This board hated unions a few years back.
I feel they have their place.
Actually their 19th century policies would be an improvementroadkill1292 said:I wouldn't want to be the GOP trying to sell their 19th century policies to the generation of voters on its way, one that hasn't made a huge dent yet but will eventually be the biggest in the nation's history and ready to assume leadership at the exact moment the Boomers are leaving.
That was my complaint about 8-10 or so years ago- the 2 parties were too similar. This wasn’t the change I was looking for though.Da Guru said:Might only be a one party system in 30 years. When voting we will be choosing from two candidates from the same party. Or many candidates will be running unopposed.
Always wonder how well his silent partner Pence will do once Trump is done.Fan of Charles McCoy said:One word: bleak
Has he come out of the coma he was in during that Trump-Schumer-Pelosi meeting?Always wonder how well his silent partner Pence will do once Trump is done.
I did enjoy that one day where Pence seemed to trade neckties with Trump.Has he come out of the coma he was in during that Trump-Schumer-Pelosi meeting?
I remember this board destroyed anyone who supported unions and organized labor years ago. Now the times they are a changing. With Dems probably taking over everything in 2020 I expect unions to rise up strong again. Go Teamsters!Yes I remember there was a Scott Walker thread where a very many posters here cheered on his efforts to crush the unions. I’m not sure where they are now.
I'm Union. And for the most part am thankful.
But we have some I want to punch in the face
I always felt bad for the anti-union people. Most were voting against their own self interest.I remember this board destroyed anyone who supported unions and organized labor years ago. Now the times they are a changing. With Dems probably taking over everything in 2020 I expect unions to rise up strong again. Go Teamsters!
Prior to 2016, Pence would have had about as much success as Pat Robertson or Mike Huckabee. But thanks to his unholy alliance with Trump, there's a good chance that he could attract a large chunk of Trump's base along with a significant percentage of the debased Christians who support Trump.Always wonder how well his silent partner Pence will do once Trump is done.Fan of Charles McCoy said:One word: bleak
I was never a huge union guy - felt some weren't actually looking out for employees. BUT that has changed over the years.I always felt bad for the anti-union people. Most were voting against their own self interest.
Add up the stupod union rules and lazy workers on ome side. Then add up all the money execs are stealing and lazy execs on the other? Which is worse? Its never, ever the unions.I was never a huge union guy - felt some weren't actually looking out for employees. BUT that has changed over the years.
I still do have a problem with some unions and unions guys that are all "OMG, THE UNION WAS NOT NOTIFIED FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS FREE TRAINING or I CANT SCREW IN THIS LIGHTBULB BECAUSE THATS NOT MY UNION DESCRIPTION" but for the most part positive.
Certainly there are negative elements to unions and I do think there was a time where some industry unions were guilty of abusing their power. So I did support some of the conservative measures to reign them in. However, it has swung so wildly against unions and unions (as they typically have been) have been villainized in the media and by politicians. In my opinion they are essential for keeping a balance between labor and ownership/management. I don't think it is any coincidence that when union membership was at it's peak, the middle class was also at it's peak.I was never a huge union guy - felt some weren't actually looking out for employees. BUT that has changed over the years.
I still do have a problem with some unions and unions guys that are all "OMG, THE UNION WAS NOT NOTIFIED FOR DISCUSSION ON THIS FREE TRAINING or I CANT SCREW IN THIS LIGHTBULB BECAUSE THATS NOT MY UNION DESCRIPTION" but for the most part positive.
Iowa's longest-serving Republican lawmaker defects to Democratic partyTwo Kansas Republicans Change Parties, Blaming Extremist GOP
Trump negotiates what he tells us all is this fantastic US MCA deal but then in nothing more than bad faith refuses to remove steel and aluminum tariffs with them to get the deal done. And worse yet before this wonderful deal is approved he tries to threaten Mexico with 25% tariffs if the don’t do more to stop the flow of drugs and migrants from coming into the US. What other countries are learning just like we already knew is Trump’s word is worthless and he is all talk and no action when it comes to getting trade deals completed. How much you want to bet the majority of his base naively think that the USMCA deal has been approved?LOL, but if it works to create a more fair trade agreement, then you gotta do what you gotta do.
I think they are going to be introduced to RICOI'm truly curious as to where the GOP goes post-Trump. Will they continue the path they've been since embracing Trump? And try to get more on board with the fear and hatred agenda? And disregard for the deficit? Maybe push Ivanka or Don Jr in 2024? Or will they treat it like the Steroid Era in baseball and just say 'oops' and pretend it never happened?