JoeSteeler
Footballguy
Pacman "making it rain" on the sidelines after the game?
The play doesn't seem that bad to me. I might be in the minority but it's the way I feel. It doesn't help Brown weighs 100 lbsAnd how the hell would you know what he was attempting for, Lombardi?Burfict made zero attempt at the ball. Watch the angle from the sideline. He lined him upIdk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.
the hit on Wheaton in the 1st half was no walk in the parkI know I'll catch crap for this but watching the hits on Bernard and Brown reinforces two things for me:
1. I'll never let my boys play football
2. I think the NFL has peaked in popularity
They're paid to build drama with what they say. Not sure why that garners respect. Just like Nance always pulls his bsRespect them more after hearing them say it.Surprised to see Cowher and Esiason calling for Lewis' head.
As I posted above, the Panthers lost to Atlanta because of an itchy trigger finger of a ref after the Odell game. When you get tempers flaring it, the refs throw flags. They use that to try and keep control thinking players/coaches will restrain people to not get them. It wasn't bad, but it didn't surprise me that it was called.That's seriously all there was? Ref gets accidentally bumped and Porter gets pushed while he's on the field when he shouldn't be?They showed one angle where there was some jawing and Jones came flying in from the side and bumped into the group of refs. The ref who got hit from behind threw the flag.I watched replay over and over. Still can't see where the second personal foul was.
Please stop are you kidding.Guys are going super fast and Brown came down at last second. I'm sure Burflict had no idea he hadn't caught the ball.Idk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.
See post 1092...it's illegalCrown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not apply.ARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive team’s end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
Lolz. "Jerry Porter". Oh Pacman, your pain is delicious.
Stop. It's not Tomlin's fault Pacman is a ####in dummy.It's very real. I have never been a Tomlin fan, felt he won with Cowher's team and the talent eroded on defense slowly over the years but I know some folks love the guy. He put his team in harm's way when he needed to keep things cool. He also is getting a pass for allowing his coaches on the field inciting the Bengals and especially Pacman Jones.I agree with this and that is why I hated when Tomlin went for the fumble call. He just got away with killing one of their players and no flag on the crown of the helmet. 1st half they crucified the Cinci DB for just making a tackle at a guy running right at him full speed and leading with his helmet into the defender. Glad the media saw it that way.Jim Diapolis on ESPN saying Shazier's hit should've been penalized for leading with the crown of his helmet.This can't be for real, right?
Of course not. He likely had both eyes focused on Brown's noggin.Guys are going super fast and Brown came down at last second. I'm sure Burflict had no idea he hadn't caught the ball.Idk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.
Is that an actual quote?"Every time we had the ball it rained , it didn't when they had it"I don't feel that's fair today for someone who was just trying to play QB and win a game. If Burfict were crying then alright but AJ...look at his g/f, of course he is going to be a softie.Wow McCarron is a crybaby
McCarron is also the back up QB, let's let him be.
If Dalton were out there tonight, different game IMHO.![]()
![]()
![]()
Agree with both. I think the NFL peaked last year. Would be curious to see the ratings.the hit on Wheaton in the 1st half was no walk in the parkI know I'll catch crap for this but watching the hits on Bernard and Brown reinforces two things for me:
1. I'll never let my boys play football
2. I think the NFL has peaked in popularity
Makes no difference. He was clearly outside the tackle box.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not apply.ARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive team’s end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
Refs will always affect the outcomes. It's how the NFL is set up now. It's not changing.A million times this. Eight years of this ####, and he doesn't even have control of his team.I don't even know why I'm so upset, I'm not even a Bengals fan; but Jesus, I am tried of seeing games where the refs affect the outcome more than the players do.Time for Marvin to go.
Except 1/2 the soccer games are decided on a refs judgement call of a trip/dive in the box and off course if it's within 5 yes inside the 18 it magically happened just outside of the 18.Games like this are why I watch. I think your instincts are right.This close to becoming a soccer fan.
If it was anyone other than Burfict, I may agree with you. But you have to look at the historyThey're paid to build drama with what they say. Not sure why that garners respect. Just like Nance always pulls his bsRespect them more after hearing them say it.Surprised to see Cowher and Esiason calling for Lewis' head.
Noone's comparing them but the refs lost control of this game once Shazier knocked our Bernard.DON'T compare shazier & burfict hits..One player making a tackle one taking a cheap shot. Case closed!!!!!
When has a shoulder to the head of a wr coming across the middle not been a penalty in the last 5 yearsThe play doesn't seem that bad to me. I might be in the minority but it's the way I feel. It doesn't help Brown weighs 100 lbsAnd how the hell would you know what he was attempting for, Lombardi?Burfict made zero attempt at the ball. Watch the angle from the sideline. He lined him upIdk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.
Jean Van de Velde would love it if he could move down to number two on the list.Dec 13th: Marcus Gilbert, "All I want for Christmas is the Bengals. Would love to see them in the playoffs where they choke"
He got what he wanted and called it.
Between the fumble AND boneheaded penalties that is the biggest choke job I've ever seen.
It's never ending.NFL refs tarnish this game.A million times this. Eight years of this ####, and he doesn't even have control of his team.I don't even know why I'm so upset, I'm not even a Bengals fan; but Jesus, I am tried of seeing games where the refs affect the outcome more than the players do.Time for Marvin to go.
Nope. Thought you were arguing that it was a split second play on Bernard being defenseless which he clearly wasn't.So you were pointing out the one rule, not "the rules", in your earlier post? Got it...If folks want to argue that was leading with the crown, that's at lest subjective and can be debated.Total BS hit, felt that way at the time. Glad others not only see it but are finding the media members to say it. Fans in here, how can you listen to a Steelersfan on that hit? Of course they are going to say Bernard was not defenseless.Red on ESPN said he was leading with the crown of his helmet which is illegal and should have been flagged![]()
There's no way Bernard was defenseless tho.
Made my edit and he was behind the LOS...so illegal....but it does matter...once past 3 yards of the LOS, the tackle box ends by the rule above.Makes no difference. He was clearly outside the tackle box.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not apply.ARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive team’s end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
He fumbled 3 times during the season, and I don't think Gio was available (not that he would have been out there).I have no idea why Hill with his issues is icing the game but that was the end of the game. That's a Bengal win if he doesn't fumble that ball.Normally I would, but the circumstances of what followed are pretty unique. Had Pitt at Cincy 45 with NO timeouts left and 18 seconds on the clock. Somehow Cincy found a way to squeeze 2 15 yard penalties in that time span to give the kicker a chipshot. That's entirely on the defense IMO.Literally no one talking about Jeremy Hill's fumble
More or lessIs that an actual quote?"Every time we had the ball it rained , it didn't when they had it"I don't feel that's fair today for someone who was just trying to play QB and win a game. If Burfict were crying then alright but AJ...look at his g/f, of course he is going to be a softie.Wow McCarron is a crybaby
McCarron is also the back up QB, let's let him be.
If Dalton were out there tonight, different game IMHO.![]()
![]()
![]()

That means that hits with the crown of the helmet are illegal when they are beyond three yards from the line of scrimmage even when they are between the tackels. It defines the area where it is allowed as a box with two sides being the tackles and the two other sides being 3 yards from the LOS.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not applyARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive team’s end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
Edit...2 yard loss....yes, should have been called.
I take it you've had a few concussions yourself.Seems like proper use to me. Look at people freaking out of Burfict's hit. A couple of decades"Unconsciousable" huh?
ago that's called a great play. I remember with LBs were lauded for destroying WRs going over the middle. But no, we get proof of an increased risk of future mental problems that we've been
dealing with fine forever and that somehow changes everything.
Huge embarrassment. Ending any game in that fashion is a complete embarrassmentThat was an embarrassment for the league.This close to becoming a soccer fan.
I think if you watch the replays, Burfict's head was up when the ball went off Brown's hands. We can debate about whether he had time to slow down or pull up, but I'm certain he saw the ball go by.Guys are going super fast and Brown came down at last second. I'm sure Burflict had no idea he hadn't caught the ball.Idk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.
If that was Gronk or Witten out there they would have barely moved. Sure call a penalty, but it wasn't that malicious. Some of you guys act like he should be thrown in prison.When has a shoulder to the head of a wr coming across the middle not been a penalty in the last 5 yearsThe play doesn't seem that bad to me. I might be in the minority but it's the way I feel. It doesn't help Brown weighs 100 lbsAnd how the hell would you know what he was attempting for, Lombardi?Burfict made zero attempt at the ball. Watch the angle from the sideline. He lined him upIdk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.![]()
As I posted above, the Panthers lost to Atlanta because of an itchy trigger finger of a ref after the Odell game.
I think you need to see the footage. Porter is standing there in the Cinci huddle practically. Not justifying Pacman but I will send out coaches for any team at highly emotional moments and bet I can get a reaction out of the opposing team almost every time.Stop. It's not Tomlin's fault Pacman is a ####in dummy.It's very real. I have never been a Tomlin fan, felt he won with Cowher's team and the talent eroded on defense slowly over the years but I know some folks love the guy. He put his team in harm's way when he needed to keep things cool. He also is getting a pass for allowing his coaches on the field inciting the Bengals and especially Pacman Jones.I agree with this and that is why I hated when Tomlin went for the fumble call. He just got away with killing one of their players and no flag on the crown of the helmet. 1st half they crucified the Cinci DB for just making a tackle at a guy running right at him full speed and leading with his helmet into the defender. Glad the media saw it that way.Jim Diapolis on ESPN saying Shazier's hit should've been penalized for leading with the crown of his helmet.This can't be for real, right?
Aka, PIT vs SEA in the Super Bowl. Worst game ever.THE FIX IS IN AND ALWAYS WILL BE THAT WAY
They do have a boss. It comes from above, blame Goodell.It's never ending.NFL refs tarnish this game.A million times this. Eight years of this ####, and he doesn't even have control of his team.I don't even know why I'm so upset, I'm not even a Bengals fan; but Jesus, I am tried of seeing games where the refs affect the outcome more than the players do.Time for Marvin to go.
What exactly are you arguing? It was a penalty. Get over your hate.If that was Gronk or Witten out there they would have barely moved. Sure call a penalty, but it wasn't that malicious. Some of you guys act like he should be thrown in prison.When has a shoulder to the head of a wr coming across the middle not been a penalty in the last 5 yearsThe play doesn't seem that bad to me. I might be in the minority but it's the way I feel. It doesn't help Brown weighs 100 lbsAnd how the hell would you know what he was attempting for, Lombardi?Burfict made zero attempt at the ball. Watch the angle from the sideline. He lined him upIdk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.![]()
Don't believe so.That means that hits with the crown of the helmet are illegal when they are beyond three yards from the line of scrimmage even when they are between the tackels. It defines the area where it is allowed as a box with two sides being the tackles and the two other sides being 3 yards from the LOS.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not applyARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive team’s end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
Edit...2 yard loss....yes, should have been called.
You are misinterpreting.Made my edit and he was behind the LOS...so illegal....but it does matter...once past 3 yards of the LOS, the tackle box ends by the rule above.Makes no difference. He was clearly outside the tackle box.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not apply.ARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive teams end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
It doesn't matter whether or not he caught the ball. Hits like that have been illegal for the last five years. I don't like it, but I understand why the NFL has made hits like those illegal. And in 2015, hits like that cost you 15 yards EVERY TIME.Please stop are you kidding.Guys are going super fast and Brown came down at last second. I'm sure Burflict had no idea he hadn't caught the ball.Idk. I feel like the Brown hit wasn't as bad as people think. It did seem like an attempt at the ball in real time, but with Burficts history and anytime you make such solid contact with the head, you won't get any benefit of the doubt.
I'd probably watch it.Aka, PIT vs SEA in the Super Bowl. Worst game ever.THE FIX IS IN AND ALWAYS WILL BE THAT WAY
So sick of seeing Ben Limp around every week like he's dying and then people make a big deal about him coming back on every time.He gets carted off every other week.Not a Big Ben fan, but props to him for being a tough sob.
I actually used to have his address.I'm sending Joey Porter a belated Christmas card
Nobody in the NFL cares about fines. Least of all PacmanHow much does Pacman get fined for that video?
Not a smart move.
Serious? From tackle to tackle AND 3 yards.Don't believe so.That means that hits with the crown of the helmet are illegal when they are beyond three yards from the line of scrimmage even when they are between the tackels. It defines the area where it is allowed as a box with two sides being the tackles and the two other sides being 3 yards from the LOS.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not applyARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive teams end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
Edit...2 yard loss....yes, should have been called.
Its saying they are illegal when both are clearly outside the tackle box...and defines that as the areas outside form 3 yards beyond the LOS, extending backwards to the offensive team's endzone.
Exactly! If it occurs between the tackles and 4 yards beyond the LOS, then it's illegal to lead with the crown. If it occurred between the tackles and 2 yards beyond the LOS, then it's legal.Don't believe so.That means that hits with the crown of the helmet are illegal when they are beyond three yards from the line of scrimmage even when they are between the tackels. It defines the area where it is allowed as a box with two sides being the tackles and the two other sides being 3 yards from the LOS.Crown of the helmet is not illegal people.
Here is the rule.
Now...I would have to go back...but was Bernard past 3 yards of the LOS? If so, the rule would not applyARTICLE 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box (an area extending from tackle to tackle and from three yards beyond the line of scrimmage to the offensive team’s end line). Incidental contact by the helmet of a runner or tackler against an opponent shall not be a foul. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box.
Edit...2 yard loss....yes, should have been called.
Its saying they are illegal when both are clearly outside the tackle box...and defines that as the areas outside form 3 yards beyond the LOS, extending backwards to the offensive team's endzone.
Yet the refs decided to flag Williams for a hit that wasn't even to the helmet. Eventually the league is going to have to outlaw all hits that are helmet to helmet, period. Otherwise the officials will just continue to be made to look foolish and inconsistent in their calls.It wasn't borderline. Bernard was not defenseless, Shazier can go helmet to helmet all day long and it's not illegal.Legal tackle or not (and it was borderline) bragging on the sideline about concussing another player is not exactly classyCheck the rules BUFFOON, shazier was a legal tackle.Learn how to spell check you buffoon. Both were completely illegal hits to the head.Really dude you are clueless just stop. IdioitLove how Burfict is a thug but Shazier is Man of the year. #### all of you.