**Wildcard Sunday - Packers at Eagles**(-5, 46) 4:30 FOX (1 Viewer)

[fred_1_15301]

Obvious missed DPI in the end zone. Game begins and ends with horrible calls

Meh - Packers offense didn’t do anything. Love was pretty bad. Injuries piled up. I don’t think the refs dictated this game. Probably missed calls on both sides. However, I will say the Eagles were the least impressive looking “elite “ team of the weekend (Buffalo and Baltimore)

GB had the #5 offense and #5 defense this year. They held the #5 offense to 10 points and could have put up 30 if Barkley doesn't give himself up. I think GB probably beats Denver and Pittsburgh by 2 scores, maybe more. It's an apples to oranges comparison.

But I also think Baltimore has turned into a different team really since their loss to the Eagles. They look unbeatable to me.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Zero idea why anybody would pick the Pack in this game. Totally irrational.

Packers are capable of beating the Eagles IF they put it all together. They have not put it all together all season.

Not only do the Packers have to "put it all together", the Eagles have to play below what they're capable of. If both teams bring their A game, I don't think GB can win.

Packers literally have no chance here. I fully expect an Eagles blow out. 31-10ish. They just don’t have the coaching to win big games. LaFleur ****s the bed every. single. time. Panic city.

lol. This doesn’t work.

There’s nothing to work. I 100% completely believe what I wrote.

To be fair it's kinda hard to take your post seriously when you finish your post with LaFleur can't win the big games. They beat Dallas last year as a 7 seed. Or doesn't that count as a big game?

Well we all saw what kind of team Dallas really was. Overrated. Sure it was a playoff game on the road so I’ll give him that but that’s only one game. The pattern is him choking in big games, that’s undeniable.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

 

[KingPrawn]

Zero idea why anybody would pick the Pack in this game. Totally irrational.

Packers are capable of beating the Eagles IF they put it all together. They have not put it all together all season.

Not only do the Packers have to "put it all together", the Eagles have to play below what they're capable of. If both teams bring their A game, I don't think GB can win.

Packers literally have no chance here. I fully expect an Eagles blow out. 31-10ish. They just don’t have the coaching to win big games. LaFleur ****s the bed every. single. time. Panic city.

lol. This doesn’t work.

There’s nothing to work. I 100% completely believe what I wrote.

To be fair it's kinda hard to take your post seriously when you finish your post with LaFleur can't win the big games. They beat Dallas last year as a 7 seed. Or doesn't that count as a big game?

Well we all saw what kind of team Dallas really was. Overrated. Sure it was a playoff game on the road so I’ll give him that but that’s only one game. The pattern is him choking in big games, that’s undeniable.

Did he fumble the opening kickoff? Did he throw 3 INTs? Did he have the two unsportsmanlike late hits?

Many in here were predicting a blowout by the Eagles. The Packers were down their top CB,their top 3 WRs and their top offensive lineman and were in the game well.in to the 4th quarter. That's not exactly choking.

 

[Mr.Pack]

I kind of hope the Packer fans in here complain about that opening kickoff all the way until the game ends

Whatever. Listen, no one thinks the Packers are the better team so let's win the game honestly at least. No need to have the NFL helping you out if you think you're THAT good.

Exactly. If that would have happened to the Eagles @modogg would crying all week.

 

[need2know]

Obvious missed DPI in the end zone. Game begins and ends with horrible calls

Meh - Packers offense didn’t do anything. Love was pretty bad. Injuries piled up. I don’t think the refs dictated this game. Probably missed calls on both sides. However, I will say the Eagles were the least impressive looking “elite “ team of the weekend (Buffalo and Baltimore)

GB had the #5 offense and #5 defense this year. They held the #5 offense to 10 points and could have put up 30 if Barkley doesn't give himself up. I think GB probably beats Denver and Pittsburgh by 2 scores, maybe more. It's an apples to oranges comparison.

But I also think Baltimore has turned into a different team really since their loss to the Eagles. They look unbeatable to me.

Wait until they play the nfl/refs/chiefs

 

[need2know]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

You lost

 

[Snotbubbles]

Obvious missed DPI in the end zone. Game begins and ends with horrible calls

Meh - Packers offense didn’t do anything. Love was pretty bad. Injuries piled up. I don’t think the refs dictated this game. Probably missed calls on both sides. However, I will say the Eagles were the least impressive looking “elite “ team of the weekend (Buffalo and Baltimore)

GB had the #5 offense and #5 defense this year. They held the #5 offense to 10 points and could have put up 30 if Barkley doesn't give himself up. I think GB probably beats Denver and Pittsburgh by 2 scores, maybe more. It's an apples to oranges comparison.

But I also think Baltimore has turned into a different team really since their loss to the Eagles. They look unbeatable to me.

Wait until they play the nfl/refs/chiefs

They played NYG, PIT, HOU, CLE, PIT. Of course they look good.

 

[Mr.Pack]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

You lost

No ****??? Well I’ll be

 

[Gjallarhorn]

Just noticed that the Eagles are the only non NFC North team to beat the Packers this year. On a similar note, the only non NFC North team to beat the Vikings this year is the Rams.

 

[renesauz]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

You lost

Oh boy. Wow. Any more scintillating game analysis you got, Captain Obvious?

Can't wait for your deep breakdown of the WAS-TB game.

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

 

[fred_1_15301]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

 

[Snotbubbles]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

 

[fred_1_15301]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

I literally did the opposite of blaming the refs.

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

100% irrefutable and undeniable.

 

[Snotbubbles]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

 

[Payne]

I'm not going through 20 pages, I'll just say as a Lions fan, Detroit would have rolled Philly yesterday.

GB was beat up coming in, lost several key players throughout the game, had to also go against the refs right from the start (not sure what a helmet to helmet is if that wasn't it) and they were still in the game up until the end.

Somebody last week mentioned maybe Detroit and Minnesota just aren't that good. I would suggest maybe Philly isn't.

 

[Donny Loved Bowling]

Zero idea why anybody would pick the Pack in this game. Totally irrational.

Packers are capable of beating the Eagles IF they put it all together. They have not put it all together all season.

Not only do the Packers have to "put it all together", the Eagles have to play below what they're capable of. If both teams bring their A game, I don't think GB can win.

Packers literally have no chance here. I fully expect an Eagles blow out. 31-10ish. They just don’t have the coaching to win big games. LaFleur ****s the bed every. single. time. Panic city.

lol. This doesn’t work.

There’s nothing to work. I 100% completely believe what I wrote.

To be fair it's kinda hard to take your post seriously when you finish your post with LaFleur can't win the big games. They beat Dallas last year as a 7 seed. Or doesn't that count as a big game?

Well we all saw what kind of team Dallas really was. Overrated. Sure it was a playoff game on the road so I’ll give him that but that’s only one game. The pattern is him choking in big games, that’s undeniable.

Did he fumble the opening kickoff? Did he throw 3 INTs? Did he have the two unsportsmanlike late hits?

Many in here were predicting a blowout by the Eagles. The Packers were down their top CB,their top 3 WRs and their top offensive lineman and were in the game well.in to the 4th quarter. That's not exactly choking.

Would have been 29-10 if Saquon doesn't take pity on GB and lay it down.

 

[Snotbubbles]

I'm not going through 20 pages, I'll just say as a Lions fan, Detroit would have rolled Philly yesterday.

GB was beat up coming in, lost several key players throughout the game, had to also go against the refs right from the start (not sure what a helmet to helmet is if that wasn't it) and they were still in the game up until the end.

Somebody last week mentioned maybe Detroit and Minnesota just aren't that good. I would suggest maybe Philly isn't.

I'll be interested to see how Detroit does against Washington. Jayden Daniels is tough to get off the field, he just keeps plays alive.

But Philly just held GB to their lowest point total of the season and had Saquon not given himself up at the end, would have scored 30. That being said, the Eagles didn't even play well and still manhandled the Packers. Just beat them up physically, all game.

 

[CletiusMaximus]

Zero idea why anybody would pick the Pack in this game. Totally irrational.

Packers are capable of beating the Eagles IF they put it all together. They have not put it all together all season.

Not only do the Packers have to "put it all together", the Eagles have to play below what they're capable of. If both teams bring their A game, I don't think GB can win.

Packers literally have no chance here. I fully expect an Eagles blow out. 31-10ish. They just don’t have the coaching to win big games. LaFleur ****s the bed every. single. time. Panic city.

lol. This doesn’t work.

There’s nothing to work. I 100% completely believe what I wrote.

To be fair it's kinda hard to take your post seriously when you finish your post with LaFleur can't win the big games. They beat Dallas last year as a 7 seed. Or doesn't that count as a big game?

Well we all saw what kind of team Dallas really was. Overrated. Sure it was a playoff game on the road so I’ll give him that but that’s only one game. The pattern is him choking in big games, that’s undeniable.

Did he fumble the opening kickoff? Did he throw 3 INTs? Did he have the two unsportsmanlike late hits?

Many in here were predicting a blowout by the Eagles. The Packers were down their top CB,their top 3 WRs and their top offensive lineman and were in the game well.in to the 4th quarter. That's not exactly choking.

Would have been 29-10 if Saquon doesn't take pity on GB and lay it down.

True but the game was completely over at that point so it was pure garbage time. The fact is the Packers played their worst game of the season and were only down by 6 going into the 4th quarter. The Packers were 1-5 in the NFC North this year, an extremely lucky blocked FG on the last play of a game or it would have been 0-6. They're not a good team on O, D or ST and only got into the playoffs because the NFL created a 7th seed a few years ago. Their youth and lack of depth showed last night with stupid mistake after stupid mistake and no ability to patch holes left by injury. I think the Eagles probably would say they also played a poor game and will have to be much better against whoever wins tonight.

 

[packer_junkie]

Eagles fans are absolutely insane. Video after video of them pushing, shoving, and calling women names at games. Get those losers out of nfl stadiums and charge them with crimes.

Im sure the response will be "boo hoo"... You are part of the problem.

Psychos

 

[Snotbubbles]

Zero idea why anybody would pick the Pack in this game. Totally irrational.

Packers are capable of beating the Eagles IF they put it all together. They have not put it all together all season.

Not only do the Packers have to "put it all together", the Eagles have to play below what they're capable of. If both teams bring their A game, I don't think GB can win.

Packers literally have no chance here. I fully expect an Eagles blow out. 31-10ish. They just don’t have the coaching to win big games. LaFleur ****s the bed every. single. time. Panic city.

lol. This doesn’t work.

There’s nothing to work. I 100% completely believe what I wrote.

To be fair it's kinda hard to take your post seriously when you finish your post with LaFleur can't win the big games. They beat Dallas last year as a 7 seed. Or doesn't that count as a big game?

Well we all saw what kind of team Dallas really was. Overrated. Sure it was a playoff game on the road so I’ll give him that but that’s only one game. The pattern is him choking in big games, that’s undeniable.

Did he fumble the opening kickoff? Did he throw 3 INTs? Did he have the two unsportsmanlike late hits?

Many in here were predicting a blowout by the Eagles. The Packers were down their top CB,their top 3 WRs and their top offensive lineman and were in the game well.in to the 4th quarter. That's not exactly choking.

Would have been 29-10 if Saquon doesn't take pity on GB and lay it down.

True but the game was completely over at that point so it was pure garbage time. The fact is the Packers played their worst game of the season and were only down by 6 going into the 4th quarter. The Packers were 1-5 in the NFC North this year, an extremely lucky blocked FG on the last play of a game or it would have been 0-6. They're not a good team on O, D or ST and only got into the playoffs because the NFL created a 7th seed a few years ago. Their youth and lack of depth showed last night with stupid mistake after stupid mistake and no ability to patch holes left by injury. I think the Eagles probably would say they also played a poor game and will have to be much better against whoever wins tonight.

The underrating of the Packers needs to stop. They are/were a good team.

 

[FunkyPlutos]

Didn't read through the entire thread but I don't understand how a "stiff arm" to the face or slap to the helmet by any runner is not illegal hands to the face?? I know it is the rule but I don't understand why it is ok for a ball carrier and not ok for anyone else on the field?!?!?!?!?

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

 

[Snotbubbles]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

 

[need2know]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

 

[Donnybrook]

Unacceptable behaviour.

https://x.com/i/status/1878815960083403036

 

[menobrown]

Unacceptable behaviour.

https://x.com/i/status/1878815960083403036

That's a small man.

 

[unckeyherb]

Unacceptable behaviour.

https://x.com/i/status/1878815960083403036

Totally representative of an entire fan base-a fan base that is one of the largest in the NFL-and matching examples of a one-off douchebag acting like a douchebag can't be replicated by any other city.

 

[renesauz]

Didn't read through the entire thread but I don't understand how a "stiff arm" to the face or slap to the helmet by any runner is not illegal hands to the face?? I know it is the rule but I don't understand why it is ok for a ball carrier and not ok for anyone else on the field?!?!?!?!?

I've always wondered about that too

 

[Insein]

Unacceptable behaviour.

https://x.com/i/status/1878815960083403036

People have found out who it is. He's not having a good day.

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

Sorry, pal. That's not gonna' fly. The angle was clear and it clearly showed possession. The ball was NOT moving at all after he was clearly touched by several Eagles players and that was patently obvious. You can continue to make excuses for the blown call but that's not going to change the fact that it was a blown call.

I get it - it benefitted your team so you're going to go down with the ship on this one in their defense. It's okay to admit that it was a blown call that benefitted the Eagles. You should NEVER be okay with blown calls regardless of who it benefits.

And side note: the bolded above is probably one of the dumbest statements I've seen in a while. Seriously, refs make blown calls ALL the time so your statement is self-serving at best.

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

 

[Lehigh98]

Eagles fans are absolutely insane. Video after video of them pushing, shoving, and calling women names at games. Get those losers out of nfl stadiums and charge them with crimes.

Im sure the response will be "boo hoo"... You are part of the problem.

Psychos

Lol, reminds me of the whiny 49er fans in 2022 and Vikings fans in 2017.
Can't win a game so take it out on the fanbase.
There are jerks everywhere but seems like people only choose to label the Eagles fanbase from bad apples like this.
Our skin is thicker than yours, try getting sympathy for your loss elsewhere.
"No one likes us, we don't care"

BTW, there was a Packer fan (well, "owner" he keeps telling me) in my SBL seats for the game, my Uncle.

 

[Lehigh98]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

 

[need2know]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

Might need to get your eyes checked

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

Might need to get your eyes checked

Maybe you do:

Keisean Nixon: I recovered my fumble, and there should have been a penalty on the Eagles

The opening kickoff proved to be one of the biggest plays of Sunday's Packers-Eagles game, as Packers returner Keisean Nixon fumbled, the Eagles recovered, and they scored three plays later to take a lead they would never relinquish.

www.nbcsports.com

"The replays showed Nixon was right: He got on top of the ball and possessed it on the ground with Eagles players touching him. That should have been a dead ball at the time. It’s hard to blame the officials on the field for not being able to sort it out when a dozen players were all fighting for the ball in a big pile, but the whole reason replay review exists is to fix mistakes when the officials couldn’t get a good view of it. In this case, the overhead replay angle shown on the Fox broadcast made it clear that Nixon had the ball. That angle should have been used to correct the mistake and award Nixon a recovery."

You're in the small minority on this.

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

Maybe just don't respond if it hurts your feelings. That's a free tip for you, but you only get one.

 

[Pip's Invitation]

Eagles fans are absolutely insane. Video after video of them pushing, shoving, and calling women names at games. Get those losers out of nfl stadiums and charge them with crimes.

Im sure the response will be "boo hoo"... You are part of the problem.

Psychos

To the ignore list you go.

 

[Lehigh98]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

Maybe just don't respond if it hurts your feelings. That's a free tip for you, but you only get one.

Way to keep it going, you're almost there, just a few more probably!

 

[Cowboysfan8]

No one likes us, we don't care"

Yeah. We get it.
The problem with Philly fans is so many have to prove it.
If you don’t see that these things happen more in Philly than anywhere else then idk what to tell you

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

Maybe just don't respond if it hurts your feelings. That's a free tip for you, but you only get one.

Way to keep it going, you're almost there, just a few more probably!

No one is making YOU respond. That's a you problem.

 

[Lehigh98]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

Maybe just don't respond if it hurts your feelings. That's a free tip for you, but you only get one.

Way to keep it going, you're almost there, just a few more probably!

No one is making YOU respond. That's a you problem.

You alright! I learned it by watching you!

 

[packer_junkie]

Eagles fans are absolutely insane. Video after video of them pushing, shoving, and calling women names at games. Get those losers out of nfl stadiums and charge them with crimes.

Im sure the response will be "boo hoo"... You are part of the problem.

Psychos

To the ignore list you go.

LOL... yea lets just be fine w/ eagles fans calling women "ugly C*nts" at NFL football games lol

 

[packer_junkie]

Eagles fans are absolutely insane. Video after video of them pushing, shoving, and calling women names at games. Get those losers out of nfl stadiums and charge them with crimes.

Im sure the response will be "boo hoo"... You are part of the problem.

Psychos

Lol, reminds me of the whiny 49er fans in 2022 and Vikings fans in 2017.
Can't win a game so take it out on the fanbase.
There are jerks everywhere but seems like people only choose to label the Eagles fanbase from bad apples like this.
Our skin is thicker than yours, try getting sympathy for your loss elsewhere.
"No one likes us, we don't care"

BTW, there was a Packer fan (well, "owner" he keeps telling me) in my SBL seats for the game, my Uncle.

I've had more than my share of playoff wins and enough super bowls to die happy. Hopefully more to come but good luck next round and the rest of the way. I don't think your passing offense is good enough to win 3 more games but we will see.

Your fans are embarassing. I love that they are getting doxxed and fired on twitter. Calling women the C word at an NFL game shows how low some people really are.

Don't think any Giants, Falcons, or Bucs fans who came into Lambeau experienced what people who go to philly deal with.. maybe we are just better people

 

[BladeRunner]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

Maybe just don't respond if it hurts your feelings. That's a free tip for you, but you only get one.

Way to keep it going, you're almost there, just a few more probably!

No one is making YOU respond. That's a you problem.

You alright! I learned it by watching you!

I appreciate your trolling efforts to derail the thread, but I'd like to talk about the actual topic and not your hurt feelings.

I'll let you have the last word, last word guy.

 

[Lehigh98]

Yeah, that WAS CLEARLY a Packers recovery. Looks like the game has already been decided by the NFL

He clearly had possession and was on the ground touched by the D. I don’t care if it’s who comes out of the pile, normally you can’t tell UNTIL they come out of the pile. This was obvious.
Not the reason they lost at all but it was a terrible call

neither of us is impartial here, but the video really wasn't enough to overturn it. In real time, we saw less then 1/4 of a second where it looked like Packers had it before more bodies were in the way. I THINK he did have it, but I also think the video proof to overturn wasn't very strong. It was a tough break for sure if you're a Packers fan, but if it was a miss (and it probably was) it wasn't a particularly egregious miss...refs miss worse in literally every game, including this one. (rarely as impactful)

And I agree that it didn't likely change the outcome. Eagles were uncharacteristically conservative with their defense looking so good, but opened up and easily drove the ball when Pack cut it back to one score. Didn't like the look of the Eagles offense in this game but have a feeling they were holding back a little (knocking off rust?) and playing more to avoid mistakes then to make plays

Sure, we can disagree. I think it was patently obvious Nixon recovered his fumble. What good is IR if the replay clearly showed the recovery and they ignored it anyways? Don't believe your lying' eyes, I guess.

If that had happened to the Eagles, you would have heard a lot of vocal Eagles fans in here “voicing their opinions” lol. It was funny seeing them defend it yesterday. The refs screwed the Packers on that one big time.

With that said, there were missed calls the other way as well. The Packers couldn’t get it going on offense when their D repeatedly kept them in the game. The Eagles D is really good. Pretty valiant effort by the Packers though.

Blaming the refs is a loser mentality. The Packers had another 59 minutes and 45 seconds after that call to play better than the Eagles. Instead, they proceeded to turn the ball over 5 times and score 10 points.

Enough with the strawmen.

No one is really blaming the refs for the Packers losing anymore. What we're saying is that it was a clear and obvious blown call that gifted the Eagles a TD.

The Eagles didn't score on that play. The Packers had to opportunity to stop the Eagles, they didn't. Plain and simple.

It's almost as if you're deliberately evading the actual discussion to push some strawman. Okay. You do you.

The actual discussion is ridiculous, and like I said, just a loser mentality. The turnover call wasn't obvious, if it was, it would have been overturned. The Packers player didn't have control of the ball at any point in time and you can clearly see, it was moving around in his bread basket from the overhead shot. Then you lose sight of it.

And they called it eagles ball on the field. Not going to change it on that one angle where its clearly moving

Except that it wasn't clearly moving.

How many subquotes do you need to get to in order to change the past?

Maybe just don't respond if it hurts your feelings. That's a free tip for you, but you only get one.

Way to keep it going, you're almost there, just a few more probably!

No one is making YOU respond. That's a you problem.

You alright! I learned it by watching you!

I appreciate your trolling efforts to derail the thread, but I'd like to talk about the actual topic and not your hurt feelings.

I'll let you have the last word, last word guy.

Awesome, thanks! And that word is... "Fumble!"