as was noted above, LT had level of competition concerns far more serious... so does deangelo, who was drafted ahead of white...
when scouts break down film of a RB & his attributes, they have to have the imagination to make educated guesses about how they would do against common opponents...
so your opinion is that white's numbers were inflated due to being in a weak conference & than when an example is brought forth showing how he did well against a non-pac 10 defense, you dismiss it as "just one game"... in the previous championship game in which USC destroyed oklahoma, white had 15-118 (7.9) & 2 TDs... guess that is "just two games" (just so happened to be the two biggest games of the 2004-2005 seasons)... it must be convenient in your world to dismiss evidence to the contrary of your view point as "unimportant"...
how many big games against non pac 10 opponents would he have to have before you would concede the point... 20-30-40? and what is your point here, really... its almost like you are suggesting white's success against texas was a fluke & didn't count... do you think he got lucky? if white played texas 10 times, do you have cause to think texas would have done any better in games 2-10? you may have a reason for thinking this, but you haven't stated it & i couldn't guess what it would be based on?
it is obfuscation to suggest that scouts don't base opinion on one game, when you know he put up historic numbers over the course of three seasons... that is what they call a body of work...
reggie bush has been dubbed by many observers as one of the best collegiate RBs EVER... funny how you don't hear many scouts knocking bush's stats because they came from the maligned pac 10? why do you think that is? because when you look at film of bush in fresno state game, & he makes a nasty sideline cutback move that only a few people on the planet could make, & only a few players in the history of the game would be capable of (sayers, sanders?), scouts can lift that ability out of the delimited context of that specific game & that weeks opponents... that would be hard to defend even if you had a time machine & got to go against the steel curtain circa seventies or monsters of the midway circa eighties...
white didn't have a history of injuries or missing games... then he gets a hamstring injury & now he is all of a sudden a slacker & grossly out of shape... you are entitled to whatever opinion you want, but if it doesn't fit the facts, it will be questioned... a single hamstring injury doesn't make a player a slacker or out of shape... & if he was able to do what he did dominating every level he has played at so far... all time state leader (CO) as star prep RB, than broke multiple school & conference rushing records in college, than i guess i want more out of shape dudes on my team...
this is reminiscent of when lincoln was told by some aghast union officials that general ulysses grant was a drunk... lincoln advised the officials to find out what he was drinking & send a barrell to the other generals...
one of the pac 10 records that white tied was rushing TDs in a season (23 i think) by corey dillon... he seemed to do OK despite coming from the maligned pac 10 conference...
RBs like marcus allen & OJ simpson were among the best RBs of their generation... white put up superior numbers in some respects... OJ & allen turned out to be decent prospects, & translated their collegiate skills from a "lesser" conference & fluorished in the NFL...
the amazing thing, which the detractors don't have an answer for, is that white put up his historic numbers, breaking school and conference rushing TD records for season & career... not only leaving a year early... but in a time share with bush all three seasons!