Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
She was a mercenary defense lawyer who defended Enron crooks and junk bond traders (unsuccessfully), made money off of a book about it, and has been pushing government conspiracy theories for years. She’s not reputable or particularly good.
I would like to congratulate Democrats on what appears to be the Perfect Crime. The key to it was packetizing the large theft into smaller events so every identified instance would be "too small to change the outcome" and therefore would be ignored by courts. Bravo.NorvilleBarnes said:
The other factor to consider is that having their Complaints and Motions repeatedly dismissed on procedural grounds that would embarrass a 2nd year law student means that they are not having courts determine that their claims are factually nonsense. Thus, they (and their client) are free to spend the next four years claiming that the Courts were biased parts of the Deep State that refused to address their "legitimate" factual allegations.
Of course they do. Even towns and cities have their own ballots. There are county and even city issues they were voted on.
And even districts within cities have different ballots. I only vote for one City Council member, not all City Council members.
If they don’t bring back Victoria Jackson this weekend to play this woman, I’d be shocked.
As Trevor Noah noted several weeks ago, it’s weird the Democrats didn’t upgrade to the Full Blown Election Fraud package. Apparently the Free version with in-app purchases didn’t include the Senate. Genuine lack of foresight on their part.
Seems like the only plausible explanation for continuing the fund drive into month two. There is virtually no limit or regulation governing on how the hundreds of millions raised for the Election Defense PAC is doling our their dollars.
Yup. I mean the way the funds are being allocated are already shady af imo, but legal of course. If a there is strong argument for fraud, one would think there would be some pretty well seasoned and costly lawyers representing plaintiffs in each state. But it doesn’t seem like there are. To me, it’s going through the motions of some semblance of litigation while pocketing the bulk of the cash for other purposes. This is grifting to me.
The perfect crime....not only did they not go after the Senate...they gave up House seats to really cover their tracks.
This is an unabashedly conservative court which has repeatedly denied the Wisconsin governor's efforts to implement reasonable measures to combat COVID-19. In this case, one of the conservative justices sided with the liberal wing, making it a 4-3 decision to decline to accept the case (https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020AP1971-OA.pdf).
The GA hearing showed CCTV videos of people still working after they sent home the majority of the workers and poll watchers. Where it gets interesting is that they pull out a hidden ballot suitcase not stored with the rest of the ballots and those were the only ones scanned with no one around.
When do you finally give up on this? It's been weeks. If there was anything egregious, it would have come out by now. Every meaningful attempt to identify voter fraud has been debunked and tossed out and yet you're still looking for some sliver of something.
This bs comment not withstanding (Covid not a real issue while Trump fake fraud porn is), this gentleman has been breaking down fraud claims excellently since they’ve emerged. I’m mainly posting for non TrueBelievers as this silliness is beyond parody now. Here’s his thread on it:
So another deflection. Got it. Thanks.
I never called OANN fake news. I stated that Facebooks algorithm inferenced OANN as fake news.
Just to play devil's advocate, why should we believe those videos show what OAN claims they show? If I can show you that this particular claim is garbage, will you finally admit that OAN and the rest of these clowns are just spewing trash?
Huh, What deflection? I answered your concern with a thread of a journalist looking into this exact video....who has been looking into every one of these claims. I answered and helped explain your very query.
I thought they (or you?) are claiming they show something nefarious. If the only claim is that this is a video feed that happened, then I'm unclear why it needs to be investigated.
Something about a hidden suitcase full of ballots.
Unfortunately I thought you were actually interested in real discussion and unlike some other posters here. It seems I was mistaken.
I can quote the thread here, for folks who can't get on twitter. Thought it was a reasonable breakdown:
from the Twitterverse:
I don't find the article persuasive. It's essentially an argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court made an incorrect judgment call on the doctrine of laches based on prior Pennsylvania case law, and thus incorrectly interpreted the Pennsylvania state constitution.
The logic is based on disproving a non-disprovable claim, which makes the logic.....illogical.
