Three weeks in a row makes the probabilities quite small; about .2% given equal distribution assumptions. Of course you're right that certain teams don't have a lot of players worth buying so the distribution isn't equal, but getting into that level of analysis is more than I'm prepared to do while killing time in a meaningless second half of a stupid game.Also, same thing here…no Skins, Giants, Vikes, or packers on my roster either. hmmm…no Falcoms or Bucs either. That's three straight weeks for me. No Colts or Texans either…will be four straight weeks. Would be five except I have Gronk in two weeks if he's not hurt. I have a 28 man roster.
I have AP, Lacey and Jarius Wright on my roster. Wright saved my bacon last week. Lacey may have to carry me through this week, with Ingram, Peterson, D. Williams, and J. Stewart on my roster. I purposely went with more WRs and TEs this year than I have in the past. I thought those 5 RBs would serve me well throughout the year, even though I knew there was a high probability I would lose either Williams or Stewart or both at various times throughout the year, just not both at the same time. Of course, I couldn't count on Peterson's suspension and Ingram going down early was a blow as well. Couple those with Eifert and V. Davis injuries and it's been a challenge already to survive.Three weeks in a row makes the probabilities quite small; about .2% given equal distribution assumptions. Of course you're right that certain teams don't have a lot of players worth buying so the distribution isn't equal, but getting into that level of analysis is more than I'm prepared to do while killing time in a meaningless second half of a stupid game.Also, same thing here…no Skins, Giants, Vikes, or packers on my roster either. hmmm…no Falcoms or Bucs either. That's three straight weeks for me. No Colts or Texans either…will be four straight weeks. Would be five except I have Gronk in two weeks if he's not hurt. I have a 28 man roster.
Kill TNF.
You're correct. Looks like something happened and the teams that were eliminated last week were still being included in the leaderboard/cutoff calculations. I just fixed it. Thanks for the heads up!I'm confused. Didn't it get trimmed to 7500 teams last week? How is 15 kicker guy in 8230 place?
Thanks!You're correct. Looks like something happened and the teams that were eliminated last week were still being included in the leaderboard/cutoff calculations. I just fixed it. Thanks for the heads up!I'm confused. Didn't it get trimmed to 7500 teams last week? How is 15 kicker guy in 8230 place?
I'm sweating it, at 137 with whatever DJAckson does in his game (only needs 2 pts to start gaining)Feel like I'm going to be sweating it. I'm at 149 with the ability to move if LaFell tops 9.7 or Nugent tops 11. Neither seems likely.
I don't Dodds projections are the way to go. Historically the line moves around 8-10 points on Monday night alone. Sunday night generally features bigger name teams that would have higher ownership. Last night the Sunday game moved the line more than Dodds projected it to move over two games. I thinning the Dodds fractional TD numbers becoming real 6 pointers is the weak spot.Current cutoff: 126.60
Projected Final Cutoff (based on Dodds's projections for SNF and MNF): 134.75
That's possible, but that would be accounted for in my calculation since I'm running it on the actual rosters. I could just add 8-10 points and call it a day but I'm trying to account for the actual ownership distribution, etc. If SNF features a bunch of heavily-owned players, that will be captured in the projection.I don't Dodds projections are the way to go. Historically the line moves around 8-10 points on Monday night alone. Sunday night generally features bigger name teams that would have higher ownership.
Sure, Dodds wasn't predicting a 43-17 game. Vegas had it at like 23-22. Any time a lot of points are scored, it's going to move the cutline more than was predicted.Last night the Sunday game moved the line more than Dodds projected it to move over two games.
Well some of those fractional TD numbers become zeroes, too. If Dodds gets the overall team output close to the actual thing, then the fractional stuff should mostly average out. The problem with last night is that the Patriots outproduced what Dodds had them projected for. I don't think that's a failing of the method.I thinning the Dodds fractional TD numbers becoming real 6 pointers is the weak spot.
Vegas set the O/U in the game last night at 46. The fact that 60 points were scored only indicates that Dodd's projections were in line but the scoring barrage skewed everything. I don't think there is anything wrong with using Dodd's projections as a predictor of the cut line move. They projections get decayed by real numbers as they come to reality.I don't Dodds projections are the way to go. Historically the line moves around 8-10 points on Monday night alone. Sunday night generally features bigger name teams that would have higher ownership. Last night the Sunday game moved the line more than Dodds projected it to move over two games. I thinning the Dodds fractional TD numbers becoming real 6 pointers is the weak spot.Current cutoff: 126.60
Projected Final Cutoff (based on Dodds's projections for SNF and MNF): 134.75
I think if you broke down CIN projections vs. CIN reality you'd see that the projections were not too far off. I would assume that NE's contribution to inflating the cut line move was greater than CIN's contribution since they far surpassed anyone's prediction for how many points they would score.Sure, Dodds wasn't predicting a 43-17 game. Vegas had it at like 23-22. Any time a lot of points are scored, it's going to move the cutline more than was predicted.
The ones I plugged in were too low, so the projected cutline for tonight will probably be a few points higher. I don't have time to fix and re-run it right now but I'll try to do it tonight before the game starts.you are better off then me.. Need a Career day from Roy Helu, like 20 points, to get above the current cut line.. :(Need a big game from Lynch or I'm cut... sitting about 5 points below the previous cut line (before MNF projections). :(
Someone broke Iggy :(I think I may have used the wrong projections for tonight's game.The ones I plugged in were too low, so the projected cutline for tonight will probably be a few points higher. I don't have time to fix and re-run it right now but I'll try to do it tonight before the game starts.
Looks like a big number again this week...
I like what you did here.This is such a fun contest!
Somehow surviving multiple weeks with zero rb production because of injury (ingram and Moreno), inactive (Peterson), and Ball (ball)
I have at least 11 guys. The Redskins defense and special teamsAverage ownership of tonight's players is low. Average entry only has .856 guys going tonight.
-QG
There were 329 entries with these players.OK. How many guys are left that have put up 5 surviving weeks in a row that have AP and Rice? This is ridiculous. I thought I'd be WAAY out by now.
http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/index.php?teamid=113666
I thought I'd be done by week 4, turns out not so much. Now I'm following but simply for comedic value!