What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2014 Subscriber Contest is LIVE (4 Viewers)

That and not many players outside of ADP were selected on the Vikings. Same for the Giants.

 
Also, same thing here…no Skins, Giants, Vikes, or packers on my roster either. hmmm…no Falcoms or Bucs either. That's three straight weeks for me. No Colts or Texans either…will be four straight weeks. Would be five except I have Gronk in two weeks if he's not hurt. I have a 28 man roster.

 
Also, same thing here…no Skins, Giants, Vikes, or packers on my roster either. hmmm…no Falcoms or Bucs either. That's three straight weeks for me. No Colts or Texans either…will be four straight weeks. Would be five except I have Gronk in two weeks if he's not hurt. I have a 28 man roster.
Three weeks in a row makes the probabilities quite small; about .2% given equal distribution assumptions. Of course you're right that certain teams don't have a lot of players worth buying so the distribution isn't equal, but getting into that level of analysis is more than I'm prepared to do while killing time in a meaningless second half of a stupid game.

Kill TNF.

 
Also, same thing here…no Skins, Giants, Vikes, or packers on my roster either. hmmm…no Falcoms or Bucs either. That's three straight weeks for me. No Colts or Texans either…will be four straight weeks. Would be five except I have Gronk in two weeks if he's not hurt. I have a 28 man roster.
Three weeks in a row makes the probabilities quite small; about .2% given equal distribution assumptions. Of course you're right that certain teams don't have a lot of players worth buying so the distribution isn't equal, but getting into that level of analysis is more than I'm prepared to do while killing time in a meaningless second half of a stupid game.

Kill TNF.
I have AP, Lacey and Jarius Wright on my roster. Wright saved my bacon last week. Lacey may have to carry me through this week, with Ingram, Peterson, D. Williams, and J. Stewart on my roster. I purposely went with more WRs and TEs this year than I have in the past. I thought those 5 RBs would serve me well throughout the year, even though I knew there was a high probability I would lose either Williams or Stewart or both at various times throughout the year, just not both at the same time. Of course, I couldn't count on Peterson's suspension and Ingram going down early was a blow as well. Couple those with Eifert and V. Davis injuries and it's been a challenge already to survive.

I also noticed there were quite a few Rudolph owners (2,412) and R. Rodgers owners (939) as well. There were also more than 3000 Patterson owners

 
Last edited by a moderator:
RB's

Ball

Gore

Bell--injured

Deangelo--injured

Stewart--injured

Cunningham

TE's

Graham

Rudolph--injured

Rivera--bye

I need my only RB's and all WR's to step up. No margin for error this week.

 
I'm confused. Didn't it get trimmed to 7500 teams last week? How is 15 kicker guy in 8230 place?
You're correct. Looks like something happened and the teams that were eliminated last week were still being included in the leaderboard/cutoff calculations. I just fixed it. Thanks for the heads up!

 
I'm confused. Didn't it get trimmed to 7500 teams last week? How is 15 kicker guy in 8230 place?
You're correct. Looks like something happened and the teams that were eliminated last week were still being included in the leaderboard/cutoff calculations. I just fixed it. Thanks for the heads up!
Thanks!

The cutline was quite high, I thought. Went down a ton after that change was made!

 
Curious to see how many Graham owners get booted this week. I feel comfortable at 143 + lynch - 8.4 or whatever kelce ends with.

 
116.40 right now :unsure:

I still have

Morris

Hill

Turbin

Green

and

Sanu left

They will be (hopefully replacing an RB score of 0, a WR score of 6.8 and Flex scores of 6.8 and 7.8)

:scared:

-QG

 
90.75 ... think I'm leaving this week...

Still have Wilson (-9), White (-0), Sanu (-6.8), Wright (-7.8)

Don't think it's enough. :cry:

 
So long 15-kicker guy. You will be missed unless Marshawn comes through big for you.

My team is sitting a 176.35 thanks to Sanu and Vereen going off in the Sunday nighter. Not a great week but I'll take it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
18 player team. 3 of my 5 RBs are injured. Graham and Megatron went down today.

Somehow have over 170 points with Gronk and Sanu still playing.

 
Sanu, Green, and Hill all came through in the garbage-time portion of this game to get me up to a more healthy looking 149.80.

I have Morris and Turbin to go (minus 7.80 and 9.90)

But given the high unofficial cutline of 136.25 I don't feel like I'm out of the woods yet :scared:

Good luck everyone!

-QG

 
hope y'all make it through. I'm sitting pretty at 188. highest score all season. VJAX and Demaryius finally showed up, and my TE backup (Wright-NE) outscored Jimmy Graham for me.

 
Changed things up this year and went with a small 19 man roster seemed to be working until yesterday.Sitting at 138.25 with Lynch (-3.2)and Morris (-7.6).Should be ok I'm thinking but a little close for comfort.

 
Current cutoff: 126.60

Projected Final Cutoff (based on Dodds's projections for SNF and MNF): 134.75
I don't Dodds projections are the way to go. Historically the line moves around 8-10 points on Monday night alone. Sunday night generally features bigger name teams that would have higher ownership. Last night the Sunday game moved the line more than Dodds projected it to move over two games. I thinning the Dodds fractional TD numbers becoming real 6 pointers is the weak spot.

 
I'm 2.2 below the cut right now. Have a shot with Wilson, Kerse, and Baldwin still left if they can do enough to better other scores.

4 of my five 5 RBs are currently hurt, so I'll be taking one zero until I'm eliminated.

 
I don't Dodds projections are the way to go. Historically the line moves around 8-10 points on Monday night alone. Sunday night generally features bigger name teams that would have higher ownership.
That's possible, but that would be accounted for in my calculation since I'm running it on the actual rosters. I could just add 8-10 points and call it a day but I'm trying to account for the actual ownership distribution, etc. If SNF features a bunch of heavily-owned players, that will be captured in the projection.

Last night the Sunday game moved the line more than Dodds projected it to move over two games.
Sure, Dodds wasn't predicting a 43-17 game. Vegas had it at like 23-22. Any time a lot of points are scored, it's going to move the cutline more than was predicted.

I thinning the Dodds fractional TD numbers becoming real 6 pointers is the weak spot.
Well some of those fractional TD numbers become zeroes, too. If Dodds gets the overall team output close to the actual thing, then the fractional stuff should mostly average out. The problem with last night is that the Patriots outproduced what Dodds had them projected for. I don't think that's a failing of the method.

 
Current cutoff: 126.60

Projected Final Cutoff (based on Dodds's projections for SNF and MNF): 134.75
I don't Dodds projections are the way to go. Historically the line moves around 8-10 points on Monday night alone. Sunday night generally features bigger name teams that would have higher ownership. Last night the Sunday game moved the line more than Dodds projected it to move over two games. I thinning the Dodds fractional TD numbers becoming real 6 pointers is the weak spot.
Vegas set the O/U in the game last night at 46. The fact that 60 points were scored only indicates that Dodd's projections were in line but the scoring barrage skewed everything. I don't think there is anything wrong with using Dodd's projections as a predictor of the cut line move. They projections get decayed by real numbers as they come to reality.

 
Sure, Dodds wasn't predicting a 43-17 game. Vegas had it at like 23-22. Any time a lot of points are scored, it's going to move the cutline more than was predicted.
I think if you broke down CIN projections vs. CIN reality you'd see that the projections were not too far off. I would assume that NE's contribution to inflating the cut line move was greater than CIN's contribution since they far surpassed anyone's prediction for how many points they would score.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I may have used the wrong projections for tonight's game. :bag: The ones I plugged in were too low, so the projected cutline for tonight will probably be a few points higher. I don't have time to fix and re-run it right now but I'll try to do it tonight before the game starts.

 
Over 200 this week, but I am scared for next week. No Ball. Saints are on a bye, Stewart is still hurt and Demarco is playing the Seahawks.

 
Need a big game from Lynch or I'm cut... sitting about 5 points below the previous cut line (before MNF projections). :(
you are better off then me.. Need a Career day from Roy Helu, like 20 points, to get above the current cut line.. :(

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is such a fun contest!

Somehow surviving multiple weeks with zero rb production because of injury (ingram and Moreno), inactive (Peterson), and Ball (ball)

 
I think I may have used the wrong projections for tonight's game. :bag: The ones I plugged in were too low, so the projected cutline for tonight will probably be a few points higher. I don't have time to fix and re-run it right now but I'll try to do it tonight before the game starts.
Someone broke Iggy :(

;)

-QG

 
yea d thomas finally... romo and cutler has been the perfect qb pairing thus far... too bad my only RB's for next week are going to be vereen and turbin (ball, j stew, ingram)

 
Crazy...thank you Tim Wright for stepping in for Graham.

I'm not long for this thing when my top RBs are Reggie Bush and Shonn Greene. I made the decision to go heavy wr and te but the extended losses of Moreno and Peterson will catch up to me.

 
This is such a fun contest!

Somehow surviving multiple weeks with zero rb production because of injury (ingram and Moreno), inactive (Peterson), and Ball (ball)
I like what you did here.

Same for me on this contest with RB's. So far I believe I'd have survived every week with zero RB points but so it's only a matter of time until it catches up to me. Benny Cunningham and Denard Robinson were my only two RB's to produce a point this week and it does not look any better next week.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top