I prefer the old school bell cow as well, unfortunately that is going the way of the dinosaur. The benefit for FFers is it does provide more options and flexibility, but I do miss the days of 25-30 carries a game from my back.
Sure. It also depends on the bell cow. There's a bell cow like, say, a D'Onta Foreman. Guy can be a bell cow and tote the ball twenty-five times a game and hold up. But is he interesting to watch? I don't think so. So it's not the bell cow/workhorse compiler I'm after. It's the beautiful, fast, big, gamebreaker I'm looking for. So there you have your Halls and your McCaffreys and they make the game more "interesting," which is the criteria we're discussing.
Now the allocation of resources, especially a second contract for an RB, probably isn't wise. But I mean, we're not talking about the replacement level player and wise allocation of resources in a salary cap league in order to garner wins. We're talking about "interesting" to watch. Tell me your attention goes to these committee guys over Hall or McCaffrey. I mean, nobody that watches football can say that. It might not be wise for the team to pay them huge salaries, but as far as interesting goes, well . . . I think most of us see it.