@BobbyLayne I think you're the one who has expressed his displeasure with the phrase "same old Lions". Well, this Sunday is a good opportunity to start putting that phrase to bed. This is the kind of game that the SOLs
always lose.
IMO the playoffs are almost beside the point. Lions hoping for a chance to get pounded in the wildcard round? Been there, done that. But if they can beat the Pack in Lambeau, that will indicate that something fundamental has changed. In a way, it would mean even more if it came in a game that was meaningless for Detroit and meant everything for GB.
Aaron Rodgers said Sunday "this isn't the same old Lions any more." It's the smart thing to say. Be respectful, don't say something to fuel their desire. But I'm sure in the back of his mind he's gotta be thinking
"but they always have been."
Go look on YouTube and NFL.com and any ****bird 4-letter site rn. Very clear narrative about this week: it's Green Bay, it's cold, it's the last game of the year, they have ARod, and they're playing the Lions. The Packers are a dangerous team no one wants to play right now. The defense, their return game, the run game - it's all coming together, they are peaking at the right time, 4 straight wins and in control of their own destiny. Lions have had a good year but they're not the same team on the road or in cold weather. yada yada yada everywhere you look.
Few weeks ago....on a Friday afternoon after practice, casual locker room interviews before the Vikings game somebody -
it was probably Carlos Monarrez bc he's a negative **** and always asks **** Qs like this - asked Taylor Decker a baited Q. It was something like
"Well you've been here the longest, so you know what fans say....this is a game the same ole Lions always lose. How do you...."
This isn't the ****ing same old Lions.
He didn't get mad, didn't lose his cool, but he's tired of people bringing it up. Wish I could find the tweet/clip. BTW, in the locker room after Thanksgiving he told the team the same thing. "Losing sucks, but this ain't the SOL. This is different. We're different." They won three straight after that.
Decker went 50-4 in college, played on Urban Meyer's championship team. He's in his 7th year and they've only won 42 games. Imagine what that's like - with longer seasons, it will have taken him 8 years to win as many as he won in college. Brutal.
I remember how frustrating it was for Golden Tate. He came over from a successful franchise, and didn't understand all the negativity. "What does that have to do with us? None of us were here when that happened." People used to talk about how Megatron was worn down, he became Lionized from never playing on a team that had a legitimate shot. Barry went to 10 straight Pro Bowls, was about to break Walter Payton's record (~1500 short, which was an average year for him), but he was tired of the grind of never being more than just barely good enough to qualify. Stuff wears on athletes. It's not about the money or prestige. They all want to win. Accolades and honors and records don't mean jack if you are not getting closer to winning the Lombardi.
But it kind of always has been the same deal for Detroit. They might win 9 games, some years get to 10 or 11, but the end was always the same: Wild Card berth, lose the playoff game.
***************
There are 32 teams in the league, meaning the Lions have active W/L records versus 31 of them.
24 teams have a winning record against them.
Of the seven franchises we're over .500 against, three of those are by 1-2 games: another is 4 (25-21-1 v NYG.)
We've held a clear advantage over three teams lol: ARI ATL and CLE. Like wgaf, eh....nobody cares how we do against them.
We are literally doormats to everyone. The freaking Bears are .573 against us, Packers .583, Vikings are whopping .659. You look at any list of greatest NFL rivalries and virtually no thoughtful list has Detroit. Rival? Hell, they don't even think about us. We're nothing. To any franchise.
***************
Think they've lost their last 8 playoff games and all 11 times as a Wild Card. Have to go back to 1957 in SF to find a road playoff win.
Of course it's not even just the endless string of playoff futility. It's the way they have lost games. MFers find obscure rules nobody ever heard of that keep us from winning. Untimed plays, obvious blown calls, record setting FGs at the gun (at least twice - Dempsey and Tucker), et al. No reason to list them all out, we all know about the history of this franchise. Sometimes it really does feel like a curse sometimes.
Sort of like saying a guy is injury prone. Until he starts stacking up 16-17 game seasons, he is. Logically, no one is "injury prone." But if you miss 2, 3, 5 games year after year, can't really blame people for laying that moniker on you.
I don't like dwelling on negativity because it impedes progress. It reinforces the feeling your destiny is to fail. I could write books on it but I think it's pretty easily understood.
The thing is, until they start writing a new narrative, people are still going to drag that SOL **** out as long as they keep coming up short. Don't like it, not changing until you write a new narrative. Talk is cheap. Don't say it, just do it.
***************
Long winded setup, and maybe a bit unnecessary. But here is what I find different about Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell. They talked about SOL. They know what this city has been through.
MCDC played here. He was on the team (IR) when they went 0-16. He knows how much football means to Michiganders, and he knows the frustration the fans have endured for decades.
Holmes knew all about it, too. Most of his career was with the Rams, but his uncle (CB Luther Bradley) played here several years. He's been around, albeit back in the Silverdome era. They both knew about SOL and they knew the "curse of Bobby Layne" and they came in with eyes wide open. There was a toxic culture of negativity leftover from the Quinntricia era that had to be undone.
Holmes got the GM job six days before Campbell was announced. He didn't really actively take part in the search. He talked to him before they made the decision, but it was really up to the owner (being advised by Chris Spielman and a few others.) But Brad and Dan knew from their first conversation they shared the same vision about what it would take. Before they even talked about players or roster construction or how to go about rebuilding, they talked about the mood in the building. They had to shift the culture or none of this was going to work.
I have said from day 1 that while all the positivity and cultural shift was great, sooner or later it had to translate into wins. It's not real until it equates to winning football.
The guys have a big challenge this week. I think they will be up for it. But the Packers are a good team, they're a lot better than the team we beat on November 6. Detroit is better team as well. But this isn't a legacy game for Rodgers or anyone else over there. If they come up short, everything zen. He's got a pretty impressive resume either way.
This is a huge game for Goff. It's been a long road from Super Bowl LIII. He's had a good year but this game will tell us a lot if he's the long term solution.
The defense is the youngest in the league. They'll be a lot of snaps with 5-6 rookies on the field and 8-9 guys in their Y1/Y2. Sometimes they stop players like Saquon Barkley, Dalvin Cook, Justin Fields. Other weeks they struggle against Bailey Zappe or D'Onta Foreman. They're inconsistent. But when they are good, they have an amazing ability to put pressure on the QB. They are capable of shutting down a running game, full stop. But they're not there yet in terms of consistency.
The line is -4.5 and I don't think it has moved. I think most people think this is a classic end of year game Rodgers' Packers always win. Lions have a very bright future win or lose. But they have a lot to prove to themselves this weekend.