Huh. I don't see that as a red flag at all. IMO most individuals - and by extension most couples - could benefit from therapy.Also, if you are going to counseling to resolve issues, that’s a red flag. If it’s just going as a matter of course before marriage, that’s cool.
F that S.TL;DR version - A couples therapist with a Christian background is referring my fiancee to Bible verses which say Christians shouldn't marry non-Christians. What do you do?
re-read the thread. or read it.How Christian is your fiancé? Are we talking C&E (Christmas and Easter), or does she attend mass/service on the regular?
Also, if you are going to counseling to resolve issues, that’s a red flag. If it’s just going as a matter of course before marriage, that’s cool.
I'd view "cafeteria Christian" as someone who just picks and chooses what they want without a ton of thought into it rather than someone who simply doesn't follow all the rules. A lot of people fail to follow rules, but truly believe they should follow them and they want to do better. Others have well-reasoned beliefs on why they interpret a Scripture differently than the norm. To me, those don't fit the "cafeteria Christian" idea.I think your general premise is sound but, even if her intent was to look out for the both of us, she is using poor tact. It's pretty demeaning to label someone a 'cafeteria Christian' if they don't follow Biblical rules to the T. I don't know of any Christian today that doesn't blow off a fair amount of Biblical rules as unnecessary or antiquated. Are they all 'cafeteria Christians'?
As an evangelical Christian...My fiancee and I have been having a difficult time 'hearing' each other at times and decided to go to an Emotionally Focused Therapy counselor to get us in touch with what might be causing the disconnect. The therapist is Christian and, at the outset, asked whether it was ok that she use her faith perspective when she thought it applied. Despite being an atheist, I was fine with this because my fiancee is Christian and I know how to ignore that type of stuff. The first 3 sessions of the therapy started off fine and had me feeling like this was the correct method of counseling that we needed. All 3 sessions were attended by the both of us. However, the following two sessions were 'individual' as the counselor wanted to discuss our upbringing and past relationships alone.
Yesterday, my fiancee has an individual session just before mine. After my session, I drove over to her place so we could spend some time together. We discussed our respective sessions to which she tells me the counselor had referred her to Bible verses last week that guide Christians on whether they should marry non-Christians. The interpretation is pretty clear that the Bible teaches that they should not. During this week's session, the counselor follows up and asks what she thought about the verses. My fiancee told her what she thinks they meant but that she doesn't care and she is committed to a relationship with me. The counselor then says, 'What do you think God would feel about that?' and then goes on to say she doesn't want to be a 'cafeteria Christian'. My fiancee was pretty upset by the episode and didn't want to go back, at least for another individual session. Despite this obvious misstep on her part, I still want to continue with the therapy with the caveat that she nix any further Christian elements and that it's only couples sessions going forward.
So what do you do in this situation? Cancel the next appt and never see her again? If so, do you bother explaining why? Do you ask for a refund?
TL;DR version - A couples therapist with a Christian background is referring my fiancee to Bible verses which say Christians shouldn't marry non-Christians. What do you do?
Not even C&E. She's someone who believes Jesus died on the cross for her sins, tries to live a good life, and hopes that her and her loved ones reach heaven one day. That brings her comfort.How Christian is your fiancé? Are we talking C&E (Christmas and Easter), or does she attend mass/service on the regular?
I want to continue seeing the counselor for couples sessions. Other than this blip, I like the counselor, she's good at talking through things with us, and I like the EFT method she uses. I spoke to my fiancee and we agreed to go to our next session together and see how we feel about proceeding. I haven't decided if I want to bring this up although I'm considering dropping her an email to explain our feelings.I like Gally's take on all of this.
I'm more of a "line has been crossed" type of guy, especially regarding somebody who I'm paying that's supposed to be impartial. plus, going again to this person isn't what the fiance wants to do- which I'd support more than anything else. but I appreciate the sentiment of wanting to work through things, even with therapists that by all accounts appear to be operating with a faith-based and biased agenda to their payed-for counseling.
I appreciate the explanation. However, I'm not so sure about the bolded. Do we want to call women who teach or speak out in church 'cafeteria Christians? 1 Timothy 2:11-15 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 How about calling out the counselor for wearing too much jewelry? 1 Timothy 2:9-15I'd view "cafeteria Christian" as someone who just picks and chooses what they want without a ton of thought into it rather than someone who simply doesn't follow all the rules. A lot of people fail to follow rules, but truly believe they should follow them and they want to do better. Others have well-reasoned beliefs on why they interpret a Scripture differently than the norm. To me, those don't fit the "cafeteria Christian" idea.
But, if a Christian just dismisses Scripture because they don't like it or it's not convenient or because it will just make things less enjoyable for them, then the label might fit. To your point, though, that probably does describe most, if not all, Christians on some issue. But, when confronted with it, what do they do? Christians should want other Christians to "demean" them by calling them out on their perceived sin. That's one thing we're supposed to do for each other. From a Christian perspective, I think it would be good for your fiancée to determine why she dismisses this particular "rule". And maybe she has done that. I'm not trying to imply that she hasn't thought about it in-depth.
She didn't want Christian counseling. I booked it with a Christian counselor without her suggesting it be Christian. She's since said she wants to go to a secular counselor.I think you might have to give more weight to the fact that she wanted Christian based counseling despite the fact you are an atheist. IMO, lot of these relationships end up with one side thinking they can evangelize the other and the other side thinking they'll grow out of it. More often than not both sides end up resenting the other. Finding out before the big commitment may be a blessing.
I'm not sure exactly how to word it, but I think a follower of Christ needs a better approach than "Eh, I disagree with that verse" or "Well, other churches aren't doing it that way anymore". Those verses exist and I think it's fair to ask someone "How do you deal with those verses?" Just like there are explanations of why we eat shellfish and don't execute adulterers, there are explanations of why we let women speak in church.I appreciate the explanation. However, I'm not so sure about the bolded. Do we want to call women who teach or speak out in church 'cafeteria Christians? 1 Timothy 2:11-15 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 How about calling out the counselor for wearing too much jewelry? 1 Timothy 2:9-15
Do you think most of the Christian women you know adhere to these rules? If not, do they need to analyze why they're purposely rejecting God? Or can it be assumed that they, and society, have determined that certain rules in the Bible are not relevant in their lives and don't stand between them and a relationship with God.
Picking and choosing which doctrines of Christianity you want to or don't want to follow (i.e. Pro-Choice Catholics) - instead of following it all.Then labeling her a 'cafeteria Christian', whatever the hell that means.
I assume you don't live together? I'll say this much; you need to live together before getting married, it's for the benefit of both of you. If you are finding yourself in a counseling situation prior to moving in together, it does not get easier when you're under the same roof. I don't care if she spends 3-4 days a week at your place or vice versa, it's a different dynamic. I would not delay this if I was you.After my session, I drove over to her place so we could spend some time together.
My fiancee and I have been having a difficult time 'hearing' each other at times and decided to go to an Emotionally Focused Therapy counselor to get us in touch with what might be causing the disconnect. The therapist is Christian and, at the outset, asked whether it was ok that she use her faith perspective when she thought it applied. Despite being an atheist, I was fine with this because my fiancee is Christian and I know how to ignore that type of stuff. The first 3 sessions of the therapy started off fine and had me feeling like this was the correct method of counseling that we needed. All 3 sessions were attended by the both of us. However, the following two sessions were 'individual' as the counselor wanted to discuss our upbringing and past relationships alone.
Yesterday, my fiancee has an individual session just before mine. After my session, I drove over to her place so we could spend some time together. We discussed our respective sessions to which she tells me the counselor had referred her to Bible verses last week that guide Christians on whether they should marry non-Christians. The interpretation is pretty clear that the Bible teaches that they should not. During this week's session, the counselor follows up and asks what she thought about the verses. My fiancee told her what she thinks they meant but that she doesn't care and she is committed to a relationship with me. The counselor then says, 'What do you think God would feel about that?' and then goes on to say she doesn't want to be a 'cafeteria Christian'. My fiancee was pretty upset by the episode and didn't want to go back, at least for another individual session. Despite this obvious misstep on her part, I still want to continue with the therapy with the caveat that she nix any further Christian elements and that it's only couples sessions going forward.
So what do you do in this situation? Cancel the next appt and never see her again? If so, do you bother explaining why? Do you ask for a refund?
TL;DR version - A couples therapist with a Christian background is referring my fiancee to Bible verses which say Christians shouldn't marry non-Christians. What do you do?
Something is not really adding up here. Why would you intentionally book an advertised Christian therapist if the religious part of what they had to say is just going to be noise to you? Further, why on earth would you want go back to this one knowing it will bother you (and your ol lady) if she doesn't nix the Xtian elements?Not even C&E. She's someone who believes Jesus died on the cross for her sins, tries to live a good life, and hopes that her and her loved ones reach heaven one day. That brings her comfort.
I want to continue seeing the counselor for couples sessions. Other than this blip, I like the counselor, she's good at talking through things with us, and I like the EFT method she uses. I spoke to my fiancee and we agreed to go to our next session together and see how we feel about proceeding. I haven't decided if I want to bring this up although I'm considering dropping her an email to explain our feelings.
I appreciate the explanation. However, I'm not so sure about the bolded. Do we want to call women who teach or speak out in church 'cafeteria Christians? 1 Timothy 2:11-15 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 How about calling out the counselor for wearing too much jewelry? 1 Timothy 2:9-15
Do you think most of the Christian women you know adhere to these rules? If not, do they need to analyze why they're purposely rejecting God's policies? Or can it be assumed that they, and society, have determined that certain rules in the Bible are not relevant in their lives and don't stand between them and a relationship with God.
She didn't want Christian counseling. I booked it with a Christian counselor without her suggesting it be Christian. She's since said she wants to go to a secular counselor.
I didn't blow off your point at all. I said there is no way to tell if she was being demeaning without being part of the conversation. You are getting only your fiancé's side of the situation and have no idea what the counselor really meant or was alluding too. I also have never heard of the cafeteria christian term so I am not sure what it really means. My guess is the counselor was just trying to gauge your fiancé's commitment to her faith........unless of course the counselor is terrible and is just pushing religion. There is still that possibility but I would say it should be investigated more before giving up.You kind of just blew off my point. This is your chance to work on communication skills.
Paul's letter to Timothy was overwhelmingly about false teaching in the church where Timothy was trying to work. And much of the problems were women who weren't learned in the scripture - mainly because they weren't allowed to by the powers that be and the culture. It was not a command to silence women in church because they are women, but a call to teach them, and if they aren't taught, to not let them lead. If you take 1 Timothy out of context then 2 Timothy makes no sense when Paul specifically tells him to go to a specific women for leadership, and ignores that a woman taught Apollos that was a leader in her church. As for 1 Corinthians, in other verses Paul specifically says that women can lead worship and lead prayer. So again, if you take one out of context - when Paul was specifically addressing a specific problem in that specific church at the time - you miss the point generally.I appreciate the explanation. However, I'm not so sure about the bolded. Do we want to call women who teach or speak out in church 'cafeteria Christians? 1 Timothy 2:11-15 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 How about calling out the counselor for wearing too much jewelry? 1 Timothy 2:9-15
I am not sure why everyone thinks the counselor crossed the line. The counselor advised if it was ok to bring religion into the sessions and then she specifically asked the religious person about their religious beliefs. I would say that is specifically applicable to a situation of two people wanting to get married. Asking the person to look at a certain scripture pertaining to marrying a non-believer seems pertinent to this specific situation.1) Counselor def crossed the line. You are paying this person for impartial advice, you were upfront about the situation, and this person crossed a line, and did so quickly. Was it his/her (?) recommendation for these individual sessions? If so, my assumption is that bringing this up to your fiancee was part of their plan from start. Absolutely zero reason to go back to this person, none. Find someone else.
2) Based on this quote:
I assume you don't live together? I'll say this much; you need to live together before getting married, it's for the benefit of both of you. If you are finding yourself in a counseling situation prior to moving in together, it does not get easier when you're under the same roof. I don't care if she spends 3-4 days a week at your place or vice versa, it's a different dynamic. I would not delay this if I was you.
There may also be differing core values. This might not always be the case, but an atheist and a devout Christian seem pretty opposite when it comes to values. How do you resolve conflict if you both have different standards for life?I’d never recommend an atheist marry a religious person and vice versa and that’s mainly because I think there’s a fundamental respect issue that will always be there. Can it work, sure but if venture more times than not that it will fail (or one of the two will change their position). YMMV.
I queried the various therapists in my area on psychologytoday's website and she was one of about fifteen. Over half of them had the "Christian" denotation on the list so I didn't think much of it. The method she uses (EFT) didn't say anything about Christ or faith being a requisite of the program. Being brought up in a Christian home and with my fiancee being Christian, I didn't have a problem with going to a "Christian" counselor.Something is not really adding up here. Why would you intentionally book an advertised Christian therapist if the religious part of what they had to say is just going to be noise to you? Further, why on earth would you want go back to this one knowing it will bother you (and your ol lady) if she doesn't nix the Xtian elements?
What would make you think you're entitled to a refund?
Please explain.There may also be differing core values. This might not always be the case, but an atheist and a devout Christian seem pretty opposite when it comes to values. How do you resolve conflict if you both have different standards for life?
new counselor most definitely - #### that judgemental ####.But she did. She said it was never a doubt in her mind and attempted to blow the counselor off during the first pass last week. Now she's really upset at the counselor for pressing the issue. She wants me in her life. Her Mom who is Christian wants me in her life. Her daughter who is Christian wants me in her life. The only person who has a problem with this is the counselor (and apparently God).
I agree. But probably not the best time to convince her to live in sin.2) Based on this quote:
I assume you don't live together? I'll say this much; you need to live together before getting married, it's for the benefit of both of you. If you are finding yourself in a counseling situation prior to moving in together, it does not get easier when you're under the same roof. I don't care if she spends 3-4 days a week at your place or vice versa, it's a different dynamic. I would not delay this if I was you.
She's a good girl. She's got a neck tattoo and everything.I agree. But probably not the best time to convince her to live in sin.
Roger that. I thought you intentionally chose a therapist because she was advertising a Christian element and it didn't seem to make sense you'd do that and then be unhappy when she went with the Christian element in the therapy.I queried the various therapists in my area on psychologytoday's website and she was one of about fifteen. Over half of them had the "Christian" denotation on the list so I didn't think much of it. The method she uses (EFT) didn't say anything about Christ or faith being a requisite of the program. Being brought up in a Christian home and with my fiancee being Christian, I didn't have a problem with going to a "Christian" counselor.
As far as going back, I liked the way the program was progressing before this incident. EFT is a scientific method, not a spiritual one. If the counselor can put the whole religious element on pause, at least in the context of trying to split us up, then I think we will benefit from the program. It's a smaller town, so there's not a ton of EFT options.
oh yeah- 100% agree with this.I agree.2) Based on this quote:
I assume you don't live together? I'll say this much; you need to live together before getting married, it's for the benefit of both of you. If you are finding yourself in a counseling situation prior to moving in together, it does not get easier when you're under the same roof. I don't care if she spends 3-4 days a week at your place or vice versa, it's a different dynamic. I would not delay this if I was you.
From my understanding of the overall situation, the line being crossed here is an indirect (if not actual direct) challenge to both the fiancée’s personal faith and relationship with Capt Cranks, sort of a “can you have both?” kind of thing. They went to the counselor under the assumed pretext of communication issues and wanting to work better together as they proceed toward marriage. The challenge of faith, I think, is unwarranted in this environment. Doing it solo to the fiancée also feels opposite the goal of improved communication skills.I am not sure why everyone thinks the counselor crossed the line. The counselor advised if it was ok to bring religion into the sessions and then she specifically asked the religious person about their religious beliefs. I would say that is specifically applicable to a situation of two people wanting to get married. Asking the person to look at a certain scripture pertaining to marrying a non-believer seems pertinent to this specific situation.
For example, in Christian doctrine, marriage is a covenant between the husband, wife AND God. You don't break a promise with God by getting a divorce. As an atheist, that belief doesn't come into play. A non-believer can marry and divorce willy-nilly, or they can also never entertain the idea of divorce as a personal (non-religious) belief. It all depends on what their basic core values are. Similar to political philosophies; a couple that don't agree on core political values may encounter more conflict when an important decision needs to be made for the family.Please explain.
Never ever see a therapist you don't trust. If you can't see the therapist individually, you don't trust the therapist.My fiancee and I have been having a difficult time 'hearing' each other at times and decided to go to an Emotionally Focused Therapy counselor to get us in touch with what might be causing the disconnect. The therapist is Christian and, at the outset, asked whether it was ok that she use her faith perspective when she thought it applied. Despite being an atheist, I was fine with this because my fiancee is Christian and I know how to ignore that type of stuff. The first 3 sessions of the therapy started off fine and had me feeling like this was the correct method of counseling that we needed. All 3 sessions were attended by the both of us. However, the following two sessions were 'individual' as the counselor wanted to discuss our upbringing and past relationships alone.
Yesterday, my fiancee has an individual session just before mine. After my session, I drove over to her place so we could spend some time together. We discussed our respective sessions to which she tells me the counselor had referred her to Bible verses last week that guide Christians on whether they should marry non-Christians. The interpretation is pretty clear that the Bible teaches that they should not. During this week's session, the counselor follows up and asks what she thought about the verses. My fiancee told her what she thinks they meant but that she doesn't care and she is committed to a relationship with me. The counselor then says, 'What do you think God would feel about that?' and then goes on to say she doesn't want to be a 'cafeteria Christian'. My fiancee was pretty upset by the episode and didn't want to go back, at least for another individual session. Despite this obvious misstep on her part, I still want to continue with the therapy with the caveat that she nix any further Christian elements and that it's only couples sessions going forward.
So what do you do in this situation? Cancel the next appt and never see her again? If so, do you bother explaining why? Do you ask for a refund?
TL;DR version - A couples therapist with a Christian background is referring my fiancee to Bible verses which say Christians shouldn't marry non-Christians. What do you do?
Reasons and rules are not the same thing as values.For example, in Christian doctrine, marriage is a covenant between the husband, wife AND God. You don't break a promise with God by getting a divorce. As an atheist, that belief doesn't come into play. A non-believer can marry and divorce willy-nilly, or they can also never entertain the idea of divorce as a personal (non-religious) belief. It all depends on what their basic core values are. Similar to political philosophies; a couple that don't agree on core political values may encounter more conflict when an important decision needs to be made for the family.
Oddly enough, because of her faith, she stayed with her first husband longer than she wanted. It wasn't until he became abusive that she decided to leave. She wonders why God punished her for having tried to follow through on her commitment despite the fact that she wanted to leave.For example, in Christian doctrine, marriage is a covenant between the husband, wife AND God. You don't break a promise with God by getting a divorce. As an atheist, that belief doesn't come into play. A non-believer can marry and divorce willy-nilly, or they can also never entertain the idea of divorce as a personal (non-religious) belief. It all depends on what their basic core values are. Similar to political philosophies; a couple that don't agree on core political values may encounter more conflict when an important decision needs to be made for the family.
JFCOddly enough, because of her faith, she stayed with her first husband longer than she wanted. It wasn't until he became abusive that she decided to leave. She wonders why God punished her for having tried to follow through on her commitment despite the fact that she wanted to leave.
If you adopt Judeo-Christian values, then those become your values. Some people are following rules, some adopt and share traditional values. My example for Cranks was the latter.Reasons and rules are not the same thing as values.
If an atheist doesn't like divorce because he believes in honoring commitment to one's self and to one's partner and a theist doesn't like divorce because she believes in honoring commitment to one's self and to one's partner and to God, they both have the same or substantially similar values, just different paths to getting there.
Well if she thinks it's punishment, then that's a different issue. Not many answers from a third party.Oddly enough, because of her faith, she stayed with her first husband longer than she wanted. It wasn't until he became abusive that she decided to leave. She wonders why God punished her for having tried to follow through on her commitment despite the fact that she wanted to leave.
Like a standing double back flip on on flat ground?As an evangelical Christian...
…. tell the therapist to do something anatomically impossible.
But isn't that something a pre-marriage counselling session should be investigating? Pushing a person to see how strong or important their faith is to them and whether or not the other person being of a different faith (or no faith) is an important issue or not? I just don't see that as crossing the line. I see it is pushing to see what is important. Now after you look into it and come to your conclusion based on the line of questioning from the counselor and the counselor keeps trying to force you into something you don't want then it's over the line. That may have happened here but I didn't get that from the description of what happened.From my understanding of the overall situation, the line being crossed here is an indirect (if not actual direct) challenge to both the fiancée’s personal faith and relationship with Capt Cranks, sort of a “can you have both?” kind of thing. They went to the counselor under the assumed pretext of communication issues and wanting to work better together as they proceed toward marriage. The challenge of faith, I think, is unwarranted in this environment. Doing it solo to the fiancée also feels opposite the goal of improved communication skills.
Like you said, though, if they’ve lost their trust in the counselor rightly or wrongly, it’s time to find a new one.
On a related note, I recently heard the following fantastic quote:Then the decision seems even easier. That person isn't the counselor you need. Find a new one.
To me, it sounds like you two are mostly good. Sounds like you need to learn some good negotiation and deescalation techniques.
I find that most young couple don't even know that you CAN deescalate a confrontation! Lol
Excellent!On a related note, I recently heard the following fantastic quote:
"When you and your wife have a problem, remember, it's not you vs. your wife, it's you and your wife vs. the problem".
Adding in the religious aspect makes it a no-brainer.Leaving the religious aspect out of it, If you aren't even married yet and already in counseling, maybe it is time to rethink?
Run!Oddly enough, because of her faith, she stayed with her first husband longer than she wanted. It wasn't until he became abusive that she decided to leave. She wonders why God punished her for having tried to follow through on her commitment despite the fact that she wanted to leave.