What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

It was a tremendous raid. (2 Viewers)

Another lie exposed

This dude has changed his story and lied about this so many times. Here's the latest:

Trump said the FBI found classified documents at his home because federal workers packed them. But emails Bloomberg got show boxes were already packed when movers arrived.​

The lawyers must just go bang their heads on the wall every time he comes up with a new lie.
I really hope he's actually paying his bills.
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
 
Another lie exposed

This dude has changed his story and lied about this so many times. Here's the latest:

Trump said the FBI found classified documents at his home because federal workers packed them. But emails Bloomberg got show boxes were already packed when movers arrived.​

The lawyers must just go bang their heads on the wall every time he comes up with a new lie.
Eventually one sticks!
Problem is that there have already been multiple filings now in three different courts. By signing the pleadings, the attorneys are saying that they have a good faith belief that the facts are true. Every time he comes up with a new lie that contradicts the previous filings, those pleadings put the attorneys at risk for sanctions. I can't believe anyone would still represent him. Just career suicide.
Eh, I'd just make sure he'd sign an attached affidavit/declaration to any substantive pleading.
 
Another lie exposed

This dude has changed his story and lied about this so many times. Here's the latest:

Trump said the FBI found classified documents at his home because federal workers packed them. But emails Bloomberg got show boxes were already packed when movers arrived.​

The lawyers must just go bang their heads on the wall every time he comes up with a new lie.
I really hope he's actually paying his bills.

They're being paid in exposure. They have to know that going in, right?
 
Another lie exposed

This dude has changed his story and lied about this so many times. Here's the latest:

Trump said the FBI found classified documents at his home because federal workers packed them. But emails Bloomberg got show boxes were already packed when movers arrived.​

The lawyers must just go bang their heads on the wall every time he comes up with a new lie.
I really hope he's actually paying his bills.

They're being paid in exposure. They have to know that going in, right?
A lot of us don't need "exposure" or even want that. That's a public myth.
 
Another lie exposed

This dude has changed his story and lied about this so many times. Here's the latest:

Trump said the FBI found classified documents at his home because federal workers packed them. But emails Bloomberg got show boxes were already packed when movers arrived.​

The lawyers must just go bang their heads on the wall every time he comes up with a new lie.
I really hope he's actually paying his bills.

They're being paid in exposure. They have to know that going in, right?
A lot of us don't need "exposure" or even want that. That's a public myth.

I would say most lawyers, 95%+ wouldn't, GB.

In this case, I can't reason why any lawyer that wanted anything but exposure would take the case. He didn't even pay Giuliani. Make a name for yourselves in the MAGA circles and make a fortune.

JMHO but would love to hear your thoughts as always.:)

ETA


Also, I don't think that's the public opinion of lawyers. Back in the 70's, that seemed like a thing to stereotype lawyers as ambulance chasers but the 80's turned them into super stars. You of course would know better.
 
Last edited:
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
 
Another lie exposed

This dude has changed his story and lied about this so many times. Here's the latest:

Trump said the FBI found classified documents at his home because federal workers packed them. But emails Bloomberg got show boxes were already packed when movers arrived.​

The lawyers must just go bang their heads on the wall every time he comes up with a new lie.
I really hope he's actually paying his bills.

They're being paid in exposure. They have to know that going in, right?
A lot of us don't need "exposure" or even want that. That's a public myth.
A#######men
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands

No, it's not okay. They shouldn't be taking ANY documents.
 
Apologies if this has been brought up before, but what would prevent Trump, or anyone, from making copies (or taking pictures of) Top Secret docs? IOW, if you wanted Top Secret information to sell to others, why do you need the originals that can be easily identified as unreturned?
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
Why are you so certain?
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
Why are you so certain?
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
Because The NY Times says so? Please.
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
Why are you so certain?
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
You’re laying it on a little too thick.
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
Why are you so certain?
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
Do you apply this same logic to Hillary and her emails?
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
Because The NY Times says so? Please.

Where did I quote the NYT? There are plenty of sources reporting what he had, showing they claimed they returned it all, showing they didn't really return it all leading to the raid in questions...and now questioning whether he still has not returned it all.


And of all people to question a source...sorry if I roll my eyes at a fan of pjmedia, gatewaypundit, redstate...questioning sources? Please.
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
Why are you so certain?
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
Do you apply this same logic to Hillary and her emails?
No. Hillary is a deep state scoundrel
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
Because The NY Times says so? Please.

Where did I quote the NYT? There are plenty of sources reporting what he had, showing they claimed they returned it all, showing they didn't really return it all leading to the raid in questions...and now questioning whether he still has not returned it all.


And of all people to question a source...sorry if I roll my eyes at a fan of pjmedia, gatewaypundit, redstate...questioning sources? Please.
NYT is the source of the story that Trump has more documents?
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
Because The NY Times says so? Please.

Where did I quote the NYT? There are plenty of sources reporting what he had, showing they claimed they returned it all, showing they didn't really return it all leading to the raid in questions...and now questioning whether he still has not returned it all.


And of all people to question a source...sorry if I roll my eyes at a fan of pjmedia, gatewaypundit, redstate...questioning sources? Please.
NYT is the source of the story that Trump has more documents?
They were the first to report it...has it been questiioned?
Read down to "The Wall Street Journal also corroborated the story and spoke to Trump’s spokesperson Taylor Budowich, who attacked the “weaponized Department of Justice and the politicized FBI” for spending tax dollars on a “witch hunt.”

So...still want to just question the source?
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
Because The NY Times says so? Please.

Where did I quote the NYT? There are plenty of sources reporting what he had, showing they claimed they returned it all, showing they didn't really return it all leading to the raid in questions...and now questioning whether he still has not returned it all.


And of all people to question a source...sorry if I roll my eyes at a fan of pjmedia, gatewaypundit, redstate...questioning sources? Please.
NYT is the source of the story that Trump has more documents?
They were the first to report it...has it been questiioned?
Read down to "The Wall Street Journal also corroborated the story and spoke to Trump’s spokesperson Taylor Budowich, who attacked the “weaponized Department of Justice and the politicized FBI” for spending tax dollars on a “witch hunt.”

So...still want to just question the source?
Yes. Just using the same leak.
 
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
So it was all just a mistake. Great schtick...really.
Was it also just a mistake when they lied that they gave it all back and the FBI had to go in and get it? How about now that there seems to be more they still have not returned?
Because The NY Times says so? Please.

Where did I quote the NYT? There are plenty of sources reporting what he had, showing they claimed they returned it all, showing they didn't really return it all leading to the raid in questions...and now questioning whether he still has not returned it all.


And of all people to question a source...sorry if I roll my eyes at a fan of pjmedia, gatewaypundit, redstate...questioning sources? Please.
NYT is the source of the story that Trump has more documents?
They were the first to report it...has it been questiioned?
Read down to "The Wall Street Journal also corroborated the story and spoke to Trump’s spokesperson Taylor Budowich, who attacked the “weaponized Department of Justice and the politicized FBI” for spending tax dollars on a “witch hunt.”

So...still want to just question the source?
Yes. Just using the same leak.
WSJ corroborated it...so no, not just from the NYT...care to actually discuss that? Seems several reputable sources are agreeing the leak is authentic and they are getting this from the DOJ.
Add in that we know he already had some stuff...and his attorneys claimed they gave it all back. Why not deal with the facts on this rather than schtick?
 
Random question (given that it's now clear that he had top secret documents): does anybody here actually think it's okay/no issue that Trump took top secret documents after he left the White House? I'm genuinely curious here. To be clear, this question does not concern or consider criminal culpability. I'm simply wondering whether there are people who may actually think his actions were just fine (regardless of whether it was a criminal act, broke some policy, etc.).

Put more simply: is it okay for a former president to just take top secret documents home after his term?

I guess I'll (perhaps unfairly) call our @knowledge dropper @Stealthycat @BladeRunner @quick-hands
If Trump took any top secret documents that he hadn’t declassified I am certain it was just a gaffe.
Why are you so certain?
He’s older, it happens. Also, he was relatively new to governmentmental archive requirements after a legendary successful career in the private sector. Rules are different. Mistakes happen.
This post is total BS.
Numerous people in his admin have stated in interviews that he was clearly explained how this all works many, many times. To the point where one guy grossly enlarged documents so that Trump could not tear them up.

Many documents had to be taped back together.
 
Has Trump been found guilty and arrested for anything yet?

Just curious how the hunt is going
pretty good summary of where we are at
so...no
Why ask when you already know the answer?
maybe you guys know something i dont,maybe i missed something that has him going down for real
Yes breaking news like that…definitely would not hear about it anywhere but here.
 
There were no weapons Jan 6 according to a few in this thread. So nothing to see here.

Kyle Cheney

@kyledcheney


NEW: 'I had not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military.' Oath Keeper describes huge weapons cache outside D.C. on Jan. 6.



A member of the Oath Keepers who traveled with the group to Washington D.C. ahead of the Jan. 6 riot described a massive stockpile of firearms and other weaponry that allies had stashed in an Arlington, Va. hotel.

“I had not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military,” recalled Terry Cummings, a Florida resident who said he joined the Oath Keepers in 2020
 
There were no weapons Jan 6 according to a few in this thread. So nothing to see here.
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney


NEW: 'I had not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military.' Oath Keeper describes huge weapons cache outside D.C. on Jan. 6.



A member of the Oath Keepers who traveled with the group to Washington D.C. ahead of the Jan. 6 riot described a massive stockpile of firearms and other weaponry that allies had stashed in an Arlington, Va. hotel.

“I had not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military,” recalled Terry Cummings, a Florida resident who said he joined the Oath Keepers in 2020
Yeah, but that's Arlington, not DC. The tourists at the capital that day weren't armed. ;)
 
There were no weapons Jan 6 according to a few in this thread. So nothing to see here.
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney


NEW: 'I had not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military.' Oath Keeper describes huge weapons cache outside D.C. on Jan. 6.



A member of the Oath Keepers who traveled with the group to Washington D.C. ahead of the Jan. 6 riot described a massive stockpile of firearms and other weaponry that allies had stashed in an Arlington, Va. hotel.

“I had not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military,” recalled Terry Cummings, a Florida resident who said he joined the Oath Keepers in 2020
Yeah, but that's Arlington, not DC. The tourists at the capital that day weren't armed. ;)
Arlington used to be part of DC before they gave it to Virginia.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top