A lot. Plus, he's coming off that nasty injury last year. I'm not saying he can't be a value, I'm just saying I wouldn't bank on it. The good news is it should get better than thisHow much of it might have to do with the car accident and/or the practice time he missed because of it?I don't know. He's lumbering around out there and doesn't look 100%.Buy low candidate.
The good news is it should get better than this
Is that really saying much. How many good TE duos are there in the league?@ryanmink
Eric DeCosta expects Mark Andrews and Isaiah Likely to be the best tight end tandem in the league this season.
Knox & Kincaid and I guess, in theory Mayer & Bowers. After that, none are coming to mind.
Is that really saying much. How many good TE duos are there in the league?@ryanmink
Eric DeCosta expects Mark Andrews and Isaiah Likely to be the best tight end tandem in the league this season.
Knox & Kincaid and I guess, in theory Mayer & Bowers. After that, none are coming to mind.
Is that really saying much. How many good TE duos are there in the league?@ryanmink
Eric DeCosta expects
Mark Andrews
and
Isaiah Likely
to be the best tight end tandem in the league this season.
Knox
&
Kincaid
and I guess, in theory
Mayer
&
Bowers
. After that, none are coming to mind.
Not at all. He looked like he was laboring out there. Both him and Kelce looked old and slow.Buy low candidate.
Which has pretty much nothing to do with performance.. LJ has just built a relationship with Likely and likes him better. It happens.I mean Andrews came of a pretty serious injury last year plus a mystery accident
I only took him in best ball and that feels like 5 bucks wasted across drafts
Likely certainly has showed ability, would have been a top 10 TE last year if on about 30 other teams. There are target opps in Baltimore though, Flowers is a gadget player miscast as a number 1 WR, so there's a place for Andrews to eat but I don't know if his body is going to allow it.Which has pretty much nothing to do with performance.. LJ has just built a relationship with Likely and likes him better. It happens.I mean Andrews came of a pretty serious injury last year plus a mystery accident
I only took him in best ball and that feels like 5 bucks wasted across drafts
When Noah Gray outscores Kelce, you need to be worried.When Noah Gray outscores Andrews, you need to be worried.
Not at all. He looked like he was laboring out there. Both him and Kelce looked old and slow.Buy low candidate.
Likely isn't going away and fits this offense way better. Andrews isn't the best TE on his team anymore.
I think he's not in game shape. He missed 2 weeks after the accident. He came back to practice ~5 days ago according to google.Not at all. He looked like he was laboring out there. Both him and Kelce looked old and slow.Buy low candidate.
Likely isn't going away and fits this offense way better. Andrews isn't the best TE on his team anymore.
Player |
1. Hunter Henry |
2. Hayden Hurst |
3. Donald Parham Jr. |
4. Blake Bell |
5. Harrison Bryant |
6. Pat Freiermuth |
7. Luke Musgrave |
8. Evan Engram |
9. Tyler Higbee |
10. Durham Smythe |
11. Kyle Pitts |
12. Cole Kmet |
Yeah, but this is different. He has a guy who showed elite talent last night competing with him.Just want to point out the top TEs in Week 1 of 2023. We got the full weekend to process. More games will be played and we will see the volatility of the NFL continue- Lots of surprises are coming. I'm giving Andrews some time to get into football shape. If over the weekend we don't get a shinier FA then sure I will place a faab at most of 33% on Likely. My guess is that this is Likely's best game of season though.
Player 1. Hunter Henry 2. Hayden Hurst 3. Donald Parham Jr. 4. Blake Bell 5. Harrison Bryant 6. Pat Freiermuth 7. Luke Musgrave 8. Evan Engram 9. Tyler Higbee 10. Durham Smythe 11. Kyle Pitts 12. Cole Kmet
Re-watched every snap that Mark Andrews was on the field last night. I was the lowest on our show on Andrews coming into the year so I could take a pretend victory lap, but instead, I have a message after watching the film. DO NOT PANIC...here's why:I added up every "opportunity for a target" through the entire night, based on the coverage and routes run.1st Half:1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)1 Dump Off Opp (Caught, Penalty)1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)2nd Half:Over the Middle Opp 1 on 1 (Catch)1 Dump off Opp (No Target)1 Flat Opp (Catch)*MAYBE* a brief seam chance at 5:15*MAYBE* a Dump Off Opp (No Target)He was bracketed on anything downfield all night. On the final 2 plays of the game, he had THREE defenders covering him.This will NOT be the norm. Pass rush led to piles of designed screens where he blocked, to Likely and Hill.He had 6 MAYBE 7 or 8 total OPPORTUNITIES for targets in this one. And no these weren't plays where if he "got better separation he'd have had the shot" plays.There's legitimately no reason to panic here. I didn't rank him as high because I believed Likely's talent was impossible to keep off the field but Andrews is going to be FINE. This play is an example of pretty much every opportunity he had to run down field:
Chiefs chose to remove Andrews from the gameplan knowing downfield opportunities wouldn't be there with their pass rush. Ravens settled for screens and QB runs to combat the pass rush cause O line was trash. This was not the norm, nor will it be. Can happily argue whether Andrews is "top tier" anymore or has chance at top 1-3, but he will be fine overall. He'll get into the end zone and have way way more opportunities moving forward.
These are not the same thing:Just want to point out the top TEs in Week 1 of 2023. We got the full weekend to process. More games will be played and we will see the volatility of the NFL continue- Lots of surprises are coming. I'm giving Andrews some time to get into football shape. If over the weekend we don't get a shinier FA then sure I will place a faab at most of 33% on Likely. My guess is that this is Likely's best game of season though.
Player 1. Hunter Henry 2. Hayden Hurst 3. Donald Parham Jr. 4. Blake Bell 5. Harrison Bryant 6. Pat Freiermuth 7. Luke Musgrave 8. Evan Engram 9. Tyler Higbee 10. Durham Smythe 11. Kyle Pitts 12. Cole Kmet
There was clearly a game-plan to take Andrews out of the game.x.com
x.com
Re-watched every snap that Mark Andrews was on the field last night. I was the lowest on our show on Andrews coming into the year so I could take a pretend victory lap, but instead, I have a message after watching the film. DO NOT PANIC...here's why:
I added up every "opportunity for a target" through the entire night, based on the coverage and routes run.
1st Half:
1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)
1 Dump Off Opp (Caught, Penalty)
1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)
2nd Half:
Over the Middle Opp 1 on 1 (Catch)
1 Dump off Opp (No Target)
1 Flat Opp (Catch)
*MAYBE* a brief seam chance at 5:15
*MAYBE* a Dump Off Opp (No Target)
He was bracketed on anything downfield all night. On the final 2 plays of the game, he had THREE defenders covering him.
one issue last night was the one time he tried to do that his leg didn’t cooperate. He had an each catch & run for a 1st down +, but his leg gave out on him before he tried to cut.when he sticks his foot in the ground past the sticks and
Good thread.x.com
x.com
Re-watched every snap that Mark Andrews was on the field last night. I was the lowest on our show on Andrews coming into the year so I could take a pretend victory lap, but instead, I have a message after watching the film. DO NOT PANIC...here's why:I added up every "opportunity for a target" through the entire night, based on the coverage and routes run.1st Half:1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)1 Dump Off Opp (Caught, Penalty)1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)2nd Half:Over the Middle Opp 1 on 1 (Catch)1 Dump off Opp (No Target)1 Flat Opp (Catch)*MAYBE* a brief seam chance at 5:15*MAYBE* a Dump Off Opp (No Target)He was bracketed on anything downfield all night. On the final 2 plays of the game, he had THREE defenders covering him.This will NOT be the norm. Pass rush led to piles of designed screens where he blocked, to Likely and Hill.He had 6 MAYBE 7 or 8 total OPPORTUNITIES for targets in this one. And no these weren't plays where if he "got better separation he'd have had the shot" plays.There's legitimately no reason to panic here. I didn't rank him as high because I believed Likely's talent was impossible to keep off the field but Andrews is going to be FINE. This play is an example of pretty much every opportunity he had to run down field:
x.com
x.com
Chiefs chose to remove Andrews from the gameplan knowing downfield opportunities wouldn't be there with their pass rush. Ravens settled for screens and QB runs to combat the pass rush cause O line was trash. This was not the norm, nor will it be. Can happily argue whether Andrews is "top tier" anymore or has chance at top 1-3, but he will be fine overall. He'll get into the end zone and have way way more opportunities moving forward.
After seeing this thread from Andy, decided to look at the data.
Mark Andrews was double covered on a higher percentage of his routes in this game than any of his other games from 2021-2023.
Two:Chiefs take away Mark Andrews early.
When given time -- first time Lamar Jackson had time to stay in the pocket in the first quarter--Jackson manipulates the secondary defender to open a deeper passing lane to hit Zay Flowers
Three:Mark Andrews draws 3-4 #ChiefsKingdom defenders up the seam and it opens the leak to Isaiah Likely off this play-action backside throw that draws 6 defenders to Derrick Henry early.
Mark Andrews getting the bulk of zone attention to open the shallow check to Isaiah Likely in the late second quarter.
The following play, the same thing vs Andrews and an attempt to a crossing route underneath to WR.
Ravens took what Chiefs gave them. They gave them Likley.
There was clearly a game-plan to take Andrews out of the game.x.com
x.com
Re-watched every snap that Mark Andrews was on the field last night. I was the lowest on our show on Andrews coming into the year so I could take a pretend victory lap, but instead, I have a message after watching the film. DO NOT PANIC...here's why:
I added up every "opportunity for a target" through the entire night, based on the coverage and routes run.
1st Half:
1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)
1 Dump Off Opp (Caught, Penalty)
1 Dump Off Opp (No Target)
2nd Half:
Over the Middle Opp 1 on 1 (Catch)
1 Dump off Opp (No Target)
1 Flat Opp (Catch)
*MAYBE* a brief seam chance at 5:15
*MAYBE* a Dump Off Opp (No Target)
He was bracketed on anything downfield all night. On the final 2 plays of the game, he had THREE defenders covering him.
That said, if it’s that easy to do that, and if the results are a frustrated LJax & a checkmark in the W column, why wouldn’t every other team now do this?
What would you want to pay for him? I got an offer for my DHop and Taysom Hill for his Andrews.I'd still like to target him as a buy low if I can find some panicked owners.
I'd pay that easilyWhat would you want to pay for him? I got an offer for my DHop and Taysom Hill for his Andrews.I'd still like to target him as a buy low if I can find some panicked owners.
Flowers looked awesome.I didn't see any other WR worth a darn on the team,
Andrews won't be blanketed every week now that they have to account for Likely and Flowers.BTW, Andrews outsnapped Likely. It didn't seem like it during the game, but it was 59 (74%) to 53 (66%) in Andrews' favor.
Yeah, dud game for Andrews, but it very well may be a good thing going forward.Andrews won't be blanketed every week now that they have to account for Likely and Flowers.BTW, Andrews outsnapped Likely. It didn't seem like it during the game, but it was 59 (74%) to 53 (66%) in Andrews' favor.
Isn't that a contradiction? "not loyal" and "likely".I hung out with a guy this weekend at the Pearl Jam concert in Philly. His contact list is a who’s who in the NFL, From Troy Aikman to Andy Reid to OBJ to Lamar Jackson to McNabb.
He said Lamar Jackson is not loyal to who he throws balls to. He said grab Isaiah Likely because he will most “likely” be the guy going forward this season to own.
Yes. The not loyal part was in regards to Mark Andrew’s, my bad. . He’s not afraid to move onto the next thing that’s going to help him.Isn't that a contradiction? "not loyal" and "likely".I hung out with a guy this weekend at the Pearl Jam concert in Philly. His contact list is a who’s who in the NFL, From Troy Aikman to Andy Reid to OBJ to Lamar Jackson to McNabb.
He said Lamar Jackson is not loyal to who he throws balls to. He said grab Isaiah Likely because he will most “likely” be the guy going forward this season to own.
I'd easily pay that but think I would still need a late 1st to sell him.Dynasty price check …
Would a ‘25 2nd round rookie pick do the trick? Too much? Not enough?
I’d pay that, and probably add in an upside bench player. Not sure I would
Go any higher than that - what say you Andrews owners?
Depending on league (is it TEP?) its in the ballpark. Problem is if the Likely owner wants to cash out or if they think they can win big by holding. Always the tricky part in dynasty. Each league is so different and each manager is different. Does the manager prefer picks or players?Dynasty price check …
Would a ‘25 2nd round rookie pick do the trick? Too much? Not enough?
I’d pay that, and probably add in an upside bench player. Not sure I would
Go any higher than that - what say you Andrews owners?
@32BeatWriters
“Last week, Andrews played seven-of-eight snaps in 11 personnel in the first half, but Likely was the leader in the second half with eight-of-13. This week, we were back to Andrews being the primary tight end in 11 personnel throughout the game, playing 21-of-28 snaps while Likely played the other seven.”