Confirmed.Bust of the year maybe.
Because you GOTTA' have faith!I'm keeping the faith.
I’m sure he will, when I finally decide to bench himI don’t have it handy, but saw a blurb where Harbaugh said ‘Andrews is definitely going to have big games catching the ball’.
I think Harbaugh traded Andrews to Andy Reid in his fantasy league and that's why he isn't getting much work. Jokes aside, the team make-up right now on offense isn't dictating work for Andrews because everything else is working, namely the running game. Simply put, they don't need Andrews, except to block. As bad as that sounds for fantasy, it is a reality. Is he droppable as you said? In shallow redraft leagues he probably is. In dynasty he's a hold for now. I'm still not convinced he is washed up. He's only 29 years old.Is he droppable at this point?
I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
That sounds like a terrible situation to be in because you have no idea which of the 2 TE's to start each week.I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
At this point it doesn't matter until it sorts itself out. Right now that is play Likely and worry about your other positions until then. Sometimes you just have to punt a position and sometimes you're strong enough to overcome it at other positions. Hell, TE has been bad for everyone so far this year.That sounds like a terrible situation to be in because you have no idea which of the 2 TE's to start each week.I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
Yea - awfulThat sounds like a terrible situation to be in because you have no idea which of the 2 TE's to start each week.I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
Maybe so, but I'd rather have Likely and play him if I'm benching Andrews each week until we see something. Like I said, sometimes you have to punt the TE position. It's not as if everyone else is feasting at the position.Yea - awfulThat sounds like a terrible situation to be in because you have no idea which of the 2 TE's to start each week.I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
Does this imply that you traded Ertz for him—or will he be your starter over Ertz moving forward?I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
Over the last 3 weeks in PPR leagues, Likely has ranked as TE40 and Andrews as TE42. Can't say that rostering a BAL TE is going to help anyone this year. At some point, one of the two might have a decent week . . . but is it worth the weeks where neither one does much of anything?I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
Like I said, I don't enjoy having Andrews on my team, but if I do, I might as well have Likely, who I think is a good long term dynasty asset, even if it doesn't pan out this year. I don't see other TEs setting the woods on fire either.Over the last 3 weeks in PPR leagues, Likely has ranked as TE40 and Andrews as TE42. Can't say that rostering a BAL TE is going to help anyone this year. At some point, one of the two might have a decent week . . . but is it worth the weeks where neither one does much of anything?I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
Dynasty is a little different in that you are playing beyond this season. But for the season we are currently in, I don't see Likely or Andrews doing much the rest of the way. As you said, it's not like there are great TE options out there, but streaming guys off the wire would have yielded more points the past two weeks than playing Andrews.Like I said, I don't enjoy having Andrews on my team, but if I do, I might as well have Likely, who I think is a good long term dynasty asset, even if it doesn't pan out this year. I don't see other TEs setting the woods on fire either.Over the last 3 weeks in PPR leagues, Likely has ranked as TE40 and Andrews as TE42. Can't say that rostering a BAL TE is going to help anyone this year. At some point, one of the two might have a decent week . . . but is it worth the weeks where neither one does much of anything?I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
He'll likely be my starter over Ertz going forward. I still own Ertz.Does this imply that you traded Ertz for him—or will he be your starter over Ertz moving forward?I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
What did you give up to get him? It might be of value to others that are thinking about moving him or making a move to get him.He'll likely be my starter over Ertz going forward. I still own Ertz.Does this imply that you traded Ertz for him—or will he be your starter over Ertz moving forward?I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
Roschon JohnsonWhat did you give up to get him? It might be of value to others that are thinking about moving him or making a move to get him.He'll likely be my starter over Ertz going forward. I still own Ertz.Does this imply that you traded Ertz for him—or will he be your starter over Ertz moving forward?I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
I don’t want to derail the thread—but I’m not sure I would have made that move. I don’t know if Andrews will be much better than Ertz as Baltimore is a team that is massively committed to the run. Deandre Swift was a guy that before this past weekend was hugely disappointing—and he’s a guy that has had issues staying healthy. If you are big on Andrews—I think you did well—but I personally don’t think Roschon is peanuts. In my 12 team superflex team—if both roschon and Andrews were on waivers—Roschon would command more FAAB to acquire. Regardless—thank you for sharing the information.Roschon JohnsonWhat did you give up to get him? It might be of value to others that are thinking about moving him or making a move to get him.He'll likely be my starter over Ertz going forward. I still own Ertz.Does this imply that you traded Ertz for him—or will he be your starter over Ertz moving forward?I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
Nobody was playing Likely in game 1, so you would have got 3 points from Andrews in PPR.Maybe so, but I'd rather have Likely and play him if I'm benching Andrews each week until we see something. Like I said, sometimes you have to punt the TE position. It's not as if everyone else is feasting at the position.Yea - awfulThat sounds like a terrible situation to be in because you have no idea which of the 2 TE's to start each week.I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
I'm not saying I enjoy have Andrews on my team, but since I do, I'm kind of glad I have Likely.
I'm coming at this from a dynasty perspective, not redraft. I agree with sentence one. Sentence two I kept Andrews in and didn't switch to Likely after his big game. I hadn't played Likely at all this year until this week. I don't like having Andrews in dynasty, but I am kind of glad I have Likely in dynasty. I snatched up all the Tucker Kraft shares I could in my leagues, including on minor trade. I like him going forward as much, if not more, than Likely.Nobody was playing Likely in game 1, so you would have got 3 points from Andrews in PPR.Maybe so, but I'd rather have Likely and play him if I'm benching Andrews each week until we see something. Like I said, sometimes you have to punt the TE position. It's not as if everyone else is feasting at the position.Yea - awfulThat sounds like a terrible situation to be in because you have no idea which of the 2 TE's to start each week.I believe I'm in the best possible scenario for an Andrews owner and that is having Likely too. While I don't think Baltimore will make either all that attractive, it's still better than having Andrews without also having Likely.
I'm not saying I enjoy have Andrews on my team, but since I do, I'm kind of glad I have Likely.
Game 2 you would have switched to Likely and got 4 points instead of 9 from Andrews.
Then maybe you switch back to Andrews for game 3 and got 0. Or even if you stuck with Likely you got 1 point.
Then game 4 what the hell do you do? Either way, you got 0 or 3 points.
I have Andrews. Likely is available. I won't be picking him up though. I'll grab a random TE of the week and see what happens.
Based on how my lineup is constructed, Roschon was never going to start, so I was ok with taking this calculated risk to see of Andrews can regain some value. Plus I expect Ertz will get injured at some point.I don’t want to derail the thread—but I’m not sure I would have made that move. I don’t know if Andrews will be much better than Ertz as Baltimore is a team that is massively committed to the run. Deandre Swift was a guy that before this past weekend was hugely disappointing—and he’s a guy that has had issues staying healthy. If you are big on Andrews—I think you did well—but I personally don’t think Roschon is peanuts. In my 12 team superflex team—if both roschon and Andrews were on waivers—Roschon would command more FAAB to acquire. Regardless—thank you for sharing the information.Roschon JohnsonWhat did you give up to get him? It might be of value to others that are thinking about moving him or making a move to get him.He'll likely be my starter over Ertz going forward. I still own Ertz.Does this imply that you traded Ertz for him—or will he be your starter over Ertz moving forward?I just got him for peanuts so as long he's as good or better than Zach Ertz, I'm ahead.He's a disaster. He's going to have a 7 catch, 98 yards and a TD-game soon. On your bench. That will be followed by three straight 2 catches for 18 yards-games. In your starting lineup.
He was a draft killer.
You know the answer to that already. Just look at other player threads. It's all about what have you done for me lately. Now with Andrews, I've already said I don't really want him on my team and have him in one with Likely, but when you factor current usage, it's not hard to say bad things about him right now. I don't factor the off-season wreck into the equation at all, but I do wonder if these injuries are playing a role in his lack of a role. But I'm more inclined to think it's because of their current game planning and that is to run and run some more.I haven't spent a lot of time here because he has always just been a guy I wished was on my team.
I get that he suffered a bad injury last November. I get that Likely has emerged, and yes, that's going to present a major challenge to ever being featured in the receiving game to the degree that he was. I get that he's probably not going to be very helpful to your re-draft team this season. Given all of that, I still don't get the dynasty hate. Current TE#16 behind Evan Engram on KTR. He just turned 29 and has stacked seasons of fantasy greatness. I think the debate was whether LaPorta had passed him for TE#1 at this point last season. Was the hip-drop injury considered career altering? That's the only thing that makes sense for his dynasty value to tank this low.
I think you're hitting on an important point, which was probably brought up pages ago. When Andrews was a fantasy stud, the offense ran through him amid few other viable passing options and a modest running game outside of Lamar himself. That dynamic has assuredly changed with Henry back there and Andrews getting plenty of target competition with Flowers and Likely, coupled with a relatively low volume passing offense. The talent may still be there for Andrews, but the situation is not.My view is that his struggles are mostly related to how gams have flowed, and the Ravens game plan going in to games. A few of the games Ravens were up early, and didn't really need to pass the ball, and instead ran out the clock because the run game was working so well. But teams will pick up on this, and will start to game plan to stop the Ravens run game, which will force them to pass the ball more, resulting in more opportunities for Andrews. Andrews isn't going to return to being a fantast stud this season, but I expect he will be a top 12 TE the rest of the season. He's not washed at age 29.
Situation is definitely worse for him, compared to a few years ago, but I still think he puts up solid numbers this season. Opposing defenses will adjust to stop the Ravens run, which will create opportunities for Andrews.I think you're hitting on an important point, which was probably brought up pages ago. When Andrews was a fantasy stud, the offense ran through him amid few other viable passing options and a modest running game outside of Lamar himself. That dynamic has assuredly changed with Henry back there and Andrews getting plenty of target competition with Flowers and Likely, coupled with a relatively low volume passing offense. The talent may still be there for Andrews, but the situation is not.My view is that his struggles are mostly related to how gams have flowed, and the Ravens game plan going in to games. A few of the games Ravens were up early, and didn't really need to pass the ball, and instead ran out the clock because the run game was working so well. But teams will pick up on this, and will start to game plan to stop the Ravens run game, which will force them to pass the ball more, resulting in more opportunities for Andrews. Andrews isn't going to return to being a fantast stud this season, but I expect he will be a top 12 TE the rest of the season. He's not washed at age 29.
Yes, he can and probably will still more passing game opportunities, but so will Flowers and Likely. Which goes to my main point.Situation is definitely worse for him, compared to a few years ago, but I still think he puts up solid numbers this season. Opposing defenses will adjust to stop the Ravens run, which will create opportunities for Andrews.I think you're hitting on an important point, which was probably brought up pages ago. When Andrews was a fantasy stud, the offense ran through him amid few other viable passing options and a modest running game outside of Lamar himself. That dynamic has assuredly changed with Henry back there and Andrews getting plenty of target competition with Flowers and Likely, coupled with a relatively low volume passing offense. The talent may still be there for Andrews, but the situation is not.My view is that his struggles are mostly related to how gams have flowed, and the Ravens game plan going in to games. A few of the games Ravens were up early, and didn't really need to pass the ball, and instead ran out the clock because the run game was working so well. But teams will pick up on this, and will start to game plan to stop the Ravens run game, which will force them to pass the ball more, resulting in more opportunities for Andrews. Andrews isn't going to return to being a fantast stud this season, but I expect he will be a top 12 TE the rest of the season. He's not washed at age 29.
No doubt, LOL.I’m sure he will, when I finally decide to bench himI don’t have it handy, but saw a blurb where Harbaugh said ‘Andrews is definitely going to have big games catching the ball’.
None of the Baltimore receivers are doing anything. Even Flowers has done nothing last couple games, and aside from one game, has been a disappointment as well. Ravens will start passing the ball more soon.No doubt, LOL.I’m sure he will, when I finally decide to bench himI don’t have it handy, but saw a blurb where Harbaugh said ‘Andrews is definitely going to have big games catching the ball’.
I sat him this week. All we can do is play it by ear and hope he gets back on track. It's not as if Likely is tearing it up.
I would have done the same if there was someone more viable. Put in for Kraft and drop Andrews, but someone beat me to Kraft.Woke up this AM to look at the transactions in my league. Andrews dropped. Yikes.