But but the analytic charts say go for 2.I hated that 2-pt conversion play and I hated them going for it there, just keep rolling, now they are going to need more possessions than they can possibly get trying to overcome a 29 point, 4 TD deficit, just not enough time to mount a comeback.
29-22 Would have been sensational.
29-20 just not the same
I’m still here.Should someone go get @fred_1_15301and have him shut off "The Facts of Life" reboot?
This was looking so good a few minutes ago, can we just rewind all this for a minute, my goodness.Ministry of Pain said:The Magic 8-Ball which is for entertainment purposes only says...
Minnesota 27...Pittsburgh 17
Vikings seem like an easy winner tonight which always is worrisome...
Try the Dolphins on for size....no really.....try it.Being a Vikings' fan has to be excruciating.
Oh, it's just fine. We're just happy to be here.Being a Vikings' fan has to be excruciating.
It was statistically the right call to go for it. The play call on the other hand…….Pittsburgh has always been aggressive going for 2 but they didn't need to there at all.
I get the analytics, but there's a tendency (i think that's ok to do it) to wait until you need it.It was statistically the right call to go for it. The play call on the other hand…….
Not if you're a girl or a woman, though.If you are a RB or WR, cut your ####ing hair.
It looked like it live but the replay didn’t show anythingWow that looked like an obvious push off
That's as obvious as offensive pass interference gets. What was the ref looking at?
Oh you mean you did not see the CB hooking his arm???? Come on man....there was all kinds of contact going on. Obvious? Obvious they both were hand fighting.That's as obvious as offensive pass interference gets. What was the ref looking at?