What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Tyreek Hill Detained On The Way To The Game (1 Viewer)

No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.

See, my first instinct is to assume the multiple cops in the video handcuffing a guy who's already on the ground and not resisting after a traffic stop were probably going overboard. You're allowed to talk to the police (albeit probably inadvisable). It's not illegal to say "do you know who I am?"
why do you think the police take you to the ground in the first place? To serve you lunch? He went to the ground BECAUSE they wanted to put cuffs on him for <reason unknown at this time>. My first instinct is that he was resisting, being belligerent and/or threatening, which is why you go to the ground in the first place.
Right, your default assumption is that the cops were justified, and mine is that they weren't. Since neither of us was there and the only video I've seen doesn't show him doing anything that would warrant being handcuffed, I'm going to side with the citizen over the public servants until more info comes out.
 
No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.

See, my first instinct is to assume the multiple cops in the video handcuffing a guy who's already on the ground and not resisting after a traffic stop were probably going overboard. You're allowed to talk to the police (albeit probably inadvisable). It's not illegal to say "do you know who I am?"
why do you think the police take you to the ground in the first place? To serve you lunch? He went to the ground BECAUSE they wanted to put cuffs on him for <reason unknown at this time>. My first instinct is that he was resisting, being belligerent and/or threatening, which is why you go to the ground in the first place.
Right, your default assumption is that the cops were justified, and mine is that they weren't. Since neither of us was there and the only video I've seen doesn't show him doing anything that would warrant being handcuffed, I'm going to side with the citizen over the public servants until more info comes out.
That's fair. If more evidence comes out showing the police overreacted then I'd have no problem changing my opinion, but more often than not you go to the ground because of what I specified.
 
Responding to a post from the Tyreek thread in here where it belongs—but the person said “attitude with authority will get you cuffed”…and imo this is a major perception problem with a significant portion of our population. The police aren’t “authority”, they enforce it. They’re public servants. Attitude is not a crime, though a good attitude can mitigate the consequences you may face because they’re human. There’s no reason someone should even be pulled out of their car for a moving violation, he should have a ticket and be on his way no matter how much of an ******* he was. Being an ******* from inside a car is not dangerous. Trying to leverage “who you are” in an arrogant way is not dangerous. Unless he got out of the car himself (which should generally lead to cuffs), then something else happened here.
 
This just in:
The police were Duval County Deputies disguised at Miami-Dade officers.
Waiting on confirmation from Schefter.
 
No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.

See, my first instinct is to assume the multiple cops in the video handcuffing a guy who's already on the ground and not resisting after a traffic stop were probably going overboard. You're allowed to talk to the police (albeit probably inadvisable). It's not illegal to say "do you know who I am?"
why do you think the police take you to the ground in the first place? To serve you lunch? He went to the ground BECAUSE they wanted to put cuffs on him for <reason unknown at this time>. My first instinct is that he was resisting, being belligerent and/or threatening, which is why you go to the ground in the first place.
Right, your default assumption is that the cops were justified, and mine is that they weren't. Since neither of us was there and the only video I've seen doesn't show him doing anything that would warrant being handcuffed, I'm going to side with the citizen over the public servants until more info comes out.
This is how all of these videos are. They literally never provide full context, just the perception that the cops are being bad guys. I’m sure more context will come out eventually and the good news is it sounds like everyone is ok and hill will play as planned.
 
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
 
Disturbing seeing this and I don't care if he barked at cops. They are public servants, not above the law, not above being yelled at. Unless they thought were in physical danger absolutely no need for that kind of crap.
The possibility of danger increases if the person they are dealing with doesn't obey their instructions
That's the job, if they can't handle a verbal altercation without putting a guy face down on the ground in cuffs they suck at their job. I don't want to discuss this with you any longer.
I don't think you understand how this works with police. If you're belligerent and/or threatening then down you go and rightly so. Not saying that did or did not happen but typically police don't take you down if you're cooperative.

It sounds more to me like you have Hill on your FF team.
No Mr. MAGA, that's not how it works and I've seen plenty of people over the years yell at cops and not get taken down. They are usuallly white.
Would love to see the statute that makes yelling at law enforcement a crime. Is it a felony or just a misdemeanor?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JAA
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
Outside of a physical threat, I am not aware of a First Amendment limit that restricts what you can say to a LEO.
 
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
So if I am out in my yard and my neighbor starts on me about something.. I can go over, tackle him, and cuff him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAA
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
Outside of a physical threat, I am not aware of a First Amendment limit that restricts what you can say to a LEO.
Do we know what he said?
 
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
So if I am out in my yard and my neighbor starts on me about something.. I can go over, tackle him, and cuff him?
If you have the full facts and that’s what happened, ok. I haven’t seen everything yet.
 
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
So if I am out in my yard and my neighbor starts on me about something.. I can go over, tackle him, and cuff him?
If you're an on duty police officer who is for some reason in his own yard and in the process of issuing his neighbor a ticket for something else ... sure. Depending on what he's saying.
 
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
Outside of a physical threat, I am not aware of a First Amendment limit that restricts what you can say to a LEO.
Do we know what he said?
If he threatened them, then they should by all means take him in and book him.
 
Some people seem to have a very skewed version of what is appropriate vs inappropriate behavior by law enforcement. The limited snippets of video shown, and the high media profile of this incident make me think the officers involved overreacted and will face discipline.

I reserve the right to change my opinion, based on a full accounting of facts.
 
Dolphins spokesman saying the police went overboard in this.

Not sure what else they would say.
I know it’s really hard to do, but maybe don’t say anything until you have the full story.

So Tyreek don't have a first amendment right?

The first amendment has limits.
I have no idea if he crossed those limits but I’ll wait to make judgment of the officers. If they overreacted, they should face discipline. If not, tyreek probably deserves some.
So if I am out in my yard and my neighbor starts on me about something.. I can go over, tackle him, and cuff him?
No, you can't because you're not designated by the government to do so. But no PO is going to tackle and cuff someone simply yelling at them and if they did then that would be an overreaction.

Again, you typically get taken down for threats and/or resisting/obstruction. Very well could be the car smelled like weed and he was being detained. I don't know but if shown to be an overreaction I'll change my opinion.
 
Some people seem to have a very skewed version of what is appropriate vs inappropriate behavior by law enforcement. The limited snippets of video shown, and the high media profile of this incident make me think the officers involved overreacted and will face discipline.

I reserve the right to change my opinion, based on a full accounting of facts.
Most of us are at least willing to listen to the facts if they’re released. We just have different presumptions, possibly based on our own experience.
 
Calais Campbell is known to be a gentle giant. Let's see what the video shows. One of the officers has been placed on administrative leave.

>>Dolphins DL Calais Campbell just told me he was detained in handcuffs by police this morning trying to deescalate the Tyreek Hill matter. He says never in his 17-year career or life has he had anything like that happen.<<

 
Calais Campbell is known to be a gentle giant. Let's see what the video shows. One of the officers has been placed on administrative leave.

>>Dolphins DL Calais Campbell just told me he was detained in handcuffs by police this morning trying to deescalate the Tyreek Hill matter. He says never in his 17-year career or life has he had anything like that happen.<<

After seeing the video of the one hitting Hill as he was in cuffs.. There are going a few cops unemployed soon.

Glad to see a huge public outcry about this.. I am pro-Police for the most part, but this is not how police are suppose to act.
 
Tyreek Hill is known to be a massive dirtbag and it's irrational not to take that into consideration when he finds himself in trouble.
i was cuffed and had all my possessions thrown out my car in Illinois 4 years ago because the cop smelled marijuana in my car when pulled over for going 5 over the speed limit. When the second cop showed up and opened my bag and saw my coast guard uniforms they stopped and then let me out and uncuffed me and took off after giving me a warning. After I put my **** in the car and drove off I called a coast guard lawyer, a week later we put in an inquiry and surprisingly the cops had no dash cam video nor body cam footage.

The police have their own shady past not to take that into consideration
 
Worth noting they also handcuffed Calais Campbell as well.

Sounds like overzealous police to me.

Calais Campbell is known to be a gentle giant. Let's see what the video shows. One of the officers has been placed on administrative leave.

>>Dolphins DL Calais Campbell just told me he was detained in handcuffs by police this morning trying to deescalate the Tyreek Hill matter. He says never in his 17-year career or life has he had anything like that happen.<<

Why would he even be there? I’ve driven past friends that were pulled over. I’ve never decided to pull over and get involved
 
Anyone defending these police officers after that video of the one kicking 'reek need to have their heads examined. I give cops the benefit of the doubt, and they do a great thankless service to our country, but they do have some bad apples in their ranks that get protected by unions. Real police reform starts there, but I digress. This is Scottie Scheffler level bullsh!t and you're not going to convince me otherwise at this point. If Hill had done anything wrong besides speeding (gun, drugs, combativeness, whatever) he would be have been in a jail cell, not playing an NFL football game. That's facts. These cops have nothing on him and some of them should be unemployed on Monday. But they won't be, and there's where the problem is.
 
Anyone defending these police officers after that video of the one kicking 'reek need to have their heads examined. I give cops the benefit of the doubt, and they do a great thankless service to our country, but they do have some bad apples in their ranks that get protected by unions. Real police reform starts there, but I digress. This is Scottie Scheffler level bullsh!t and you're not going to convince me otherwise at this point. If Hill had done anything wrong besides speeding (gun, drugs, combativeness, whatever) he would be have been in a jail cell, not playing an NFL football game. That's facts. These cops have nothing on him and some of them should be unemployed on Monday. But they won't be, and there's where the problem is.
Actually, we don't have all the "facts" yet, just some carefully chosen video. I'm willing to change my mind on this when the actual "facts" come out, but some online forum guy isn't going to convince me otherwise because "some cops are dirty". And doesn't the opposite also hold true? That some people are dirty? MOST traffic stops are uneventful and of the ones that aren't, only a very small percentage of those are the result of bad cops.

I would say anyone defending Tyreek with his history probably should have THEIR head examined. How does that sound? You like that?

Again, I'm willing to change my mind when the actual facts and evidence come out, but I give cops the benefit of the doubt knowing what they have to deal with day in and day out.
 
Anyone defending these police officers after that video of the one kicking 'reek need to have their heads examined. I give cops the benefit of the doubt, and they do a great thankless service to our country, but they do have some bad apples in their ranks that get protected by unions. Real police reform starts there, but I digress. This is Scottie Scheffler level bullsh!t and you're not going to convince me otherwise at this point. If Hill had done anything wrong besides speeding (gun, drugs, combativeness, whatever) he would be have been in a jail cell, not playing an NFL football game. That's facts. These cops have nothing on him and some of them should be unemployed on Monday. But they won't be, and there's where the problem is.
Actually, we don't have all the "facts" yet, just some carefully chosen video. I'm willing to change my mind on this when the actual "facts" come out, but some online forum guy isn't going to convince me otherwise because "some cops are dirty". And doesn't the opposite also hold true? That some people are dirty? MOST traffic stops are uneventful and of the ones that aren't, only a very small percentage of those are the result of bad cops.

I would say anyone defending Tyreek with his history probably should have THEIR head examined. How does that sound? You like that?

Again, I'm willing to change my mind when the actual facts and evidence come out, but I give cops the benefit of the doubt knowing what they have to deal with day in and day out.
This has nothing to do with Tyreek's history. Nothing. So why even bring it up?

Carefully chosen video? LMAO. Dude, are you trying to say kicking a handcuffed detainee is OK under any circumstance? Are you saying it was warranted? Or are you saying the video was manipulated?

It's unlikely all the "facts" in this case will ever come out. They never do. Municipalities and police unions ensure it. Charges will dropped and these guys will be back on the beat in days. Look at the Scheffler case. We will never know the whole story, but Scottie is a golden boy that has no dirt on him. Yet he was treated like the scum of the earth and it was all swept under the rug from the public eye. Now imagine if this happened to someone without the means to defend themselves and you might know where I'm going with it. I'm a white male with zero record and I've had an instance where I was worried for my safety during a traffic violation. I was going 12 over the limit on a turn on a highway, yet the cop made me feel extremely uncomfortable even as I afforded him every bit of respect I could. It happens. Get your head out of the sand.

Here's the only fact that really matters to me right now. They did not take Tyreek to jail. That's a fact. Now, why do you think this is? Do you think after all that went down, cuffing 'reek face down on the pavement, kicking him while detained, they went ahead and said, "let's be nice here and let him go now just because?" You don't think they'd have thrown him in lockup if they had any bit of justification?

Or more likely, do you think it was because the guy did nothing wrong past a simple traffic violation, possibly speeding and maybe...maybe being disrespectful? Be real here. You're digging yourself a moral hole you won't be able to climb out of not that you seem to care. This is not the hill to die on.

The cops messed up here and that's pretty clear at this point.
 
Scheffler now Hill, when will the cops be held accountable?
Not until unions and the system are reformed. Most police are good people and like with most sectors, unions do more to protect the bottom of the barrel than the cream of the crop. I’m friends with multiple police officers and they’re great people. They know who the bad apples are in the building, the ticking time bombs with an unknown time of detonation. The problem is, there aren’t any good mechanisms or processes in place to remove them from the force unless they do something so atrocious it catches the eye of the Feds. Look at the cop that arrested Scheffler. His service record was egregious, meme level stupidity and violations yet he was still on the beat at an A level event.
 
We have a busted prize in our league and this may be the quickest its ever been won. Kidding aside, not sure why 4 police officers were needed with a single individual traffic stop.
 
Anyone defending these police officers after that video of the one kicking 'reek need to have their heads examined. I give cops the benefit of the doubt, and they do a great thankless service to our country, but they do have some bad apples in their ranks that get protected by unions. Real police reform starts there, but I digress. This is Scottie Scheffler level bullsh!t and you're not going to convince me otherwise at this point. If Hill had done anything wrong besides speeding (gun, drugs, combativeness, whatever) he would be have been in a jail cell, not playing an NFL football game. That's facts. These cops have nothing on him and some of them should be unemployed on Monday. But they won't be, and there's where the problem is.
Actually, we don't have all the "facts" yet, just some carefully chosen video. I'm willing to change my mind on this when the actual "facts" come out, but some online forum guy isn't going to convince me otherwise because "some cops are dirty". And doesn't the opposite also hold true? That some people are dirty? MOST traffic stops are uneventful and of the ones that aren't, only a very small percentage of those are the result of bad cops.

I would say anyone defending Tyreek with his history probably should have THEIR head examined. How does that sound? You like that?

Again, I'm willing to change my mind when the actual facts and evidence come out, but I give cops the benefit of the doubt knowing what they have to deal with day in and day out.
This has nothing to do with Tyreek's history. Nothing. So why even bring it up?

Carefully chosen video? LMAO. Dude, are you trying to say kicking a handcuffed detainee is OK under any circumstance? Are you saying it was warranted? Or are you saying the video was manipulated?

It's unlikely all the "facts" in this case will ever come out. They never do. Municipalities and police unions ensure it. Charges will dropped and these guys will be back on the beat in days. Look at the Scheffler case. We will never know the whole story, but Scottie is a golden boy that has no dirt on him. Yet he was treated like the scum of the earth and it was all swept under the rug from the public eye. Now imagine if this happened to someone without the means to defend themselves and you might know where I'm going with it. I'm a white male with zero record and I've had an instance where I was worried for my safety during a traffic violation. I was going 12 over the limit on a turn on a highway, yet the cop made me feel extremely uncomfortable even as I afforded him every bit of respect I could. It happens. Get your head out of the sand.

Here's the only fact that really matters to me right now. They did not take Tyreek to jail. That's a fact. Now, why do you think this is? Do you think after all that went down, cuffing 'reek face down on the pavement, kicking him while detained, they went ahead and said, "let's be nice here and let him go now just because?" You don't think they'd have thrown him in lockup if they had any bit of justification?

Or more likely, do you think it was because the guy did nothing wrong past a simple traffic violation, possibly speeding and maybe...maybe being disrespectful? Be real here. You're digging yourself a moral hole you won't be able to climb out of not that you seem to care. This is not the hill to die on.

The cops messed up here and that's pretty clear at this point.
I think it's fine that the wife-beater got ruffed up a little bit by people in a position of power over him. Serves him right. I'm extremely comfortable with that moral position, and I don't plan to climb out of it.

Great player. Horrible human being. Zero sympathy.
 
No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.
Yea, this was my first thought as well.

And now in the current "atmosphere" of this country, he can double down on it.

Honestly, who would want to be cop anymore?
 
No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.

This is schtick right
 
No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.

See, my first instinct is to assume the multiple cops in the video handcuffing a guy who's already on the ground and not resisting after a traffic stop were probably going overboard. You're allowed to talk to the police (albeit probably inadvisable). It's not illegal to say "do you know who I am?"
why do you think the police take you to the ground in the first place? To serve you lunch? He went to the ground BECAUSE they wanted to put cuffs on him for <reason unknown at this time>. My first instinct is that he was resisting, being belligerent and/or threatening, which is why you go to the ground in the first place.
Right, your default assumption is that the cops were justified, and mine is that they weren't. Since neither of us was there and the only video I've seen doesn't show him doing anything that would warrant being handcuffed, I'm going to side with the citizen over the public servants until more info comes out.
That's fair. If more evidence comes out showing the police overreacted then I'd have no problem changing my opinion, but more often than not you go to the ground because of what I specified.
Does the fact the cop has already been put on leave count as evidence that ya know, he messed up here?
 
No one is above the law. My first reaction w/out having all of the evidence is police don't take you down like that unless you're being belligerent or threatening. I can certainly see Hill saying, "do you know who I am" and insisting it's okay for him to break the law because he's a superstar and has to get to his game, but I don't know. My first instinct is to side with the police because more often than not they're justified.
Yea, this was my first thought as well.

And now in the current "atmosphere" of this country, he can double down on it.

Honestly, who would want to be cop anymore?
Hopefully the ones that won't break the law.
 
I posted in another thread, didn't see this one yesterday and largely wanted to not think about it when the game started..

It has now been reported on the Dan LeBatard Show that Tyreek Hill after being handcuffed behind his back after being laid out flat on his stomach, face down on the asphalt, that after they cuffed Hill that he was struck or hit by at least 1 of the officers there on duty.
That is being reported by "Roy" on the DLS if you watch the show and know who he is

-It just gets sadder for me as more details unfold
There were so many videos, cameras and people around that most of what unfolded was all recorded so the police never had a chance to get ahead of this story and try to cover it up
They can't because the public has already seen the video and I believe that is what prompted the police chief to suspend or put the officer involved on Admin Leave

Trying to just keep up with the actual facts and football so please don't salt n pepper this up.
I'm grateful Hill was mentally and physically still ready to go

I'm shocked this all happened right outside the Hard Rock Stadium
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top