What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

#QAnon (5 Viewers)

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/does-the-jeffrey-epstein-indictment-qanon.html

So Was QAnon … Right?

By Max Read

If anything, the QAnon adherent are too optimistic. Photo: Maddie McGarvey/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Over Independence Day weekend, as most of the rest of us set off fireworks and grilled at cookouts, a cadre of conspiracy obsessives awaited the fulfillment of a message-board prophecy. In its broadest strokes, QAnon, as the expansive and complicated theory to which these people have dedicated their energy is known, claims that a group within the federal government has been conducting a secret investigation into a network of elite pedophiles. On the Fourth of July, or maybe on the fifth — depending on which version of the theory you subscribe to — with the nation watching, John F. Kennedy Jr., who faked his own death 20 years ago this month, would reveal himself, and then, as QAnon interpreter Will Sommer puts it, “team up with Trump and ship a huge number of top Democrats off to Guantanamo Bay” for their participation in these global child-sex rings.

Of course, this wild theory turned out to be bogus. They got the date wrong: July 4 and 5 both passed without incident. It wasn’t until July 6 that the feds handed out an indictment over a global underage sex-trafficking ring implicating U.S. presidents, heads of government, top lawyers, world-famous actors, and a member of the English royal family. And, to be fair, JFK Jr. didn’t emerge from hiding. Otherwise, though, the Saturday arrest of well-connected financier and convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein on one count of sex traffickingand one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking went a long way toward fulfilling the QAnon prediction — and therefore raised a troubling question: Did QAnon turn out to be kind of, well, right?

Epstein, the federal indictment alleges, “created a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit, often on a daily basis.” He’s said to have groomed girls as young as 14 in his mansions in New York and Palm Beach, and alleged to have forced them to have sex with the powerful people who ran in his circles. One woman says that she was coerced into sex with both superlawyer Alan Dershowitz and the Prince of Wales’s younger brother Prince Andrew; President Bill Clinton, as the right-wing press is fond of pointing out, was a frequent guest on Epstein’s jet, which was apparently nicknamed the “Lolita Express” by locals on the U.S. Virgin Islands hideaway where Epstein allegedly hosted orgies.

If you believe the most sweeping version of the allegations, Epstein and a handful of helpers were running what was in essence a mobile teenage-prostitution ring catering to the one percent aboard his private jet and in his palatial estates — themselves decked out in full occult-orgy fashion, with a mysterious Eastern European hostess, a custom erotic chess board, and “a life-size female doll in a wedding dress hanging from a chandelier.” Until this weekend, he’d managed to escape justice, thanks to a strange leniency from top prosecutors, including Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance and former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, now Trump’s Secretary of Labor. One-percenter sex rings? Creepy mansions rife with dark symbolism? A culture of impunity emanating from the highest levels of government? That sure sounds like QAnon.

But it’s not quite QAnon. In many details, the Epstein case is QAnon’s inverse. The charges aren’t coming from a zombie JFK Jr., who faked his own death to escape the system, but from the establishment-aligned U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Southern District of New York. Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring seems possibly to have been a sort of awful side hustle to a real business that involved money laundering, or offshore banking, or even just blackmailing and ponzi scheming, rather than the center of a fantastical satanic cult based out of a pizza parlor. (Though, don’t think too hard about the fact that Epstein once said that his dinner parties were “like eating pizza at the ballet.”)

Get unlimited access to Intelligencer and everything else New York.

LEARN MORE »

Most conspicuously, in the world of QAnon, Donald Trump is a crusading savior, the face of a deep-state conspiracy to expose the moral depravity of the global elite and bring a cabal of child molestors to justice. In real life, Trump was friendly with Epstein. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” he told New York in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Trump is not the only person who’s known for decades about Epstein’s conspicuous preference for young women. The journalist Vicky Ward says that references to Epstein’s abuse in a 2003 article she wrote for Vanity Fair were killed by editors. Stories emerged anyway; many of the details of his alleged crimes have been extensively reported over the last fifteen years, and the charges levied against Epstein over the weekend are extremely similar to those brought against him in 2008. The “conspiracy theory” of a network of predators centered around a wealthy enabler, protected by the privileged cohort in which he ran, was easily found in the Miami Herald, or on Gawker, or pieced together through court documents. If QAnon was kind of right, it was as a twisted, telephone-game rendition of a story already out in the open, filtered through Satanist moral panic, right-wing partisanship, Christian prophecy, and Kennedy nostalgia.

What was surprising about this weekend’s news wasn’t the specifics of the allegations, but the fact that anything happened regarding them. Back in 2008, thanks to his sweetheart plea deal with Alex Acosta, Epstein served only 13 months of an 18 month sentence, mostly on work release, for the reduced crime of soliciting an underage prostitute. As more victims came forward and new details emerged, Epstein remained free, and the powerful men who once made up his social circle untainted by their relationships to him. The name Jeffrey Epstein became synonymous with, as Michelle Goldberg puts it, “deep corruption among mostly male elites across parties, and the way the very rich can often purchase impunity for even the most loathsome of crimes.”

If anything, QAnon was a more palatable version of this story — a rendition in which elites spent decades secretly working toward justice, in which the forces arrayed against them were supernaturally malevolent rather than simply rich and networked, and in which the president of the United States is a covert agent for good, rather than a former Epstein acquaintance and enabler. Or rather than, for that matter, a multiply accused sex abuser himself.

In that light, QAnon sounds less like a paranoid conspiracy than a kind of optimistic fantasy. The world of QAnon isn’t a happy one, but as the Epstein case demonstrates, neither is the world the rest of us live in. At least QAnon promises justice, victory, a resurrected JFK Jr., and a nice bit of drama over a holiday weekend.

 
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/does-the-jeffrey-epstein-indictment-qanon.html

So Was QAnon … Right?

By Max Read

...Saturday arrest of well-connected financier and convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein on one count of sex traffickingand one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking went a long way toward fulfilling the QAnon prediction — and therefore raised a troubling question: Did QAnon turn out to be kind of, well, right?

...

If QAnon was kind of right, it was as a twisted, telephone-game rendition of a story already out in the open, filtered through Satanist moral panic, right-wing partisanship, Christian prophecy, and Kennedy nostalgia.
I've been wondering about this. If a global elite pedo ring gets outed and a bunch of rich, well connected people end up in jail (hopefully), then does that justify some of the Q fervor?

But then, in Q land, Trump was the guy that was going to be responsible for nailing these POS's. What happens if he is one of those implicated and also goes down for it?

Would a q-anon adherent spontaneously implode if this happened?

Would DJT's involvement somehow just be written off as the deep state's revenge against the heroic Trump?

Are there actually any Q believers left out in the wild?

So many 'Q'uestions...

 
I've been wondering about this. If a global elite pedo ring gets outed and a bunch of rich, well connected people end up in jail (hopefully), then does that justify some of the Q fervor?

But then, in Q land, Trump was the guy that was going to be responsible for nailing these POS's. What happens if he is one of those implicated and also goes down for it?

Would a q-anon adherent spontaneously implode if this happened?

Would DJT's involvement somehow just be written off as the deep state's revenge against the heroic Trump?

Are there actually any Q believers left out in the wild?

So many 'Q'uestions...


The "pedo ring" was outed years ago. 

 
I've been wondering about this. If a global elite pedo ring gets outed and a bunch of rich, well connected people end up in jail (hopefully), then does that justify some of the Q fervor?

But then, in Q land, Trump was the guy that was going to be responsible for nailing these POS's. What happens if he is one of those implicated and also goes down for it?

Would a q-anon adherent spontaneously implode if this happened?

Would DJT's involvement somehow just be written off as the deep state's revenge against the heroic Trump?

Are there actually any Q believers left out in the wild?

So many 'Q'uestions...
“Outed”? We’ve known about Epstein for many years. 

 
The "pedo ring" was outed years ago. 
Yes. I should have been more clear.

If items found in Epstein's possession or Epstein's testimony can lead to the successful prosecution of other rich, powerful, influential people that were also involved in said pedo ring, etc...

 
Did Edward Snowden's 2013 revelations about a huge secret data center collecting everything everyone is doing online mean that Alex Jones was right?

No, it did not.

It just shows that even a broken clock is right twice a day.

These conspiracy extremists do not get to claim they're right when one of the many things they claim turns out to be true. It's all the stuff they claim that is wrong that defines whether or not they are right or wrong. 

That said, the conspiracy extremists being wrong does not mean we aren't living in a plutocracy. Of course we are. It's just a chaotic plutocracy where the rich disagree on a ton of stuff. What matters is that the opinions of the non-rich masses don't matter. These conspiracy extremists actually make that situation worse as most people can't tell the difference, so when they write off the extremists, they write off those who recognize we live in a plutocracy, and thus live in the fiction of a their non-rich opinion actually has a voice in their democracy. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Did Edward Snowden's 2013 revelations about a huge secret data center collecting everything everyone is doing online mean that Alex Jones was right?

No, it did not.

It just shows that even a broken clock is right twice a day.

These conspiracy extremists do not get to claim they're right when one of the many things they claim turns out to be true. It's all the stuff they claim that is wrong that defines whether or not they are right or wrong. 

That said, the conspiracy extremists being wrong does not mean we aren't living in a plutocracy. Of course we are. It's just a chaotic plutocracy where the rich disagree on a ton of stuff. What matters is that the opinions of the non-rich masses don't matter. These conspiracy extremists actually make that situation worse as most people can't tell the difference, so when they write off the extremists, they write off those who recognize we live in a plutocracy, and thus live in the fiction of a their non-rich opinion actually has a voice in their democracy. 
This is some righteously muted anger. 

 
A high school classmate posted a meme on Facebook that said:

"Epstein himself DID NOT come into federal jurisdiction!  His plane did.  Port Authority boarded his plane and arrested him.  Epstein never touched foot on US soil before the arrest.  Epstein's plan has the warrant on it!  That is why his willing to put it up as collateral for bail along with his 77 mil NY location (also under seizure related to Trump EO). His lawyers are forcing the jurisdiction subject while knowing he won't get bail.

The lawyer's filing document for bail is not about getting him bail.  They are attempting to put the Judge in a box.  The Judge kicked the can down the road because he doesn't want to rule on bail.  That is why he reaised the 3 days rule for the defendant and sent it to another Judge to hear later.

FOLKS!  We have our first Military tribunal about to happen!  This case is outside the civil court system!"

THIS HAS to be IT!  Ready the memes for the Great Awakening!!  ;)

 
FBI document warns conspiracy theories are a new domestic terrorism threat
 

The FBI for the first time has identified fringe conspiracy theories as a domestic terrorist threat, according to a previously unpublicized document obtained by Yahoo News. (Read the document below.)

The FBI intelligence bulletin from the bureau’s Phoenix field office, dated May 30, 2019, describes “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists,” as a growing threat, and notes that it is the first such report to do so. It lists a number of arrests, including some that haven’t been publicized, related to violent incidents motivated by fringe beliefs.

The document specifically mentions QAnon, a shadowy network that believes in a deep state conspiracy against President Trump, and Pizzagate, the theory that a pedophile ring including Clinton associates was being run out of the basement of a Washington, D.C., pizza restaurant (which didn’t actually have a basement).

“The FBI assesses these conspiracy theories very likely will emerge, spread, and evolve in the modern information marketplace, occasionally driving both groups and individual extremists to carry out criminal or violent acts,” the document states. It also goes on to say the FBI believes conspiracy theory-driven extremists are likely to increase during the 2020 presidential election cycle.

The FBI said another factor driving the intensity of this threat is “the uncovering of real conspiracies or cover-ups involving illegal, harmful, or unconstitutional activities by government officials or leading political figures.” The FBI does not specify which political leaders or which cover-ups it was referring to.

President Trump is mentioned by name briefly in the latest FBI document, which notes that the origins of QAnon is the conspiratorial belief that “Q,” allegedly a government official, “posts classified information online to reveal a covert effort, led by President Trump, to dismantle a conspiracy involving ‘deep state’ actors and global elites allegedly engaged in an international child sex trafficking ring.” ...

 
NOW listen up guys.

1 If North Korea launches a missile at any time, regardless of the circumstances I will no longer post here.

Is that clear enough for you?

No excuses, no explanations, no walking back for ANY reason. 

WHY? Because Q has told us that. It is that simple and concise.

So again there are the two things that Q can be busted for, that will make me disbelieve him.
Ah here we are. 

 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/08/02/hours-after-an-fbi-warning-about-qanon-is-published-qanon-slogan-turns-up-trumps-rally/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f97ef25320ef&utm_source=reddit.com (caution paywall)

Before President Trump came to the stage at his rally in Cincinnati on Thursday, several other speakers warmed up the crowd.

One was Brandon Straka, founder of the “Walk Away” movement. Straka was a liberal, until, as he told the crowd, he learned that the media falsely reported that Trump had mocked a disabled reporter during the 2016 campaign. (Trump did do that.) Straka is a minority within Trump’s coalition, a gay Democrat-turned-Trump-supporter, and he presented himself to the audience as a validator for Trump’s relationship with non-majority groups.

...

"Where we go one,” Straka added, “we go all."

To the casual observer, that last line may seem fairly anodyne, a clunky but earnest way of capturing the sentiment behind “e pluribus unum.” But it is not anodyne. It is, in fact, the main rallying cry of QAnon conspiracy theorists.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top