This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Nobody should be disputing your last point.
This is true, but it also won't be an issue since we'll have our QB on a rookie contract for 4 more years.
That is huge.
That was from last April.
Never said it was going to be an issue. Just that we could have made the bridge QB/future backup QB a 3/4 year FA signing now and kept 3.01. Like I said, they have alot more information than we do, so I'm sure there are reasons. And maybe they could not equate the two into 1 player.
Understand we won't need someone like Taylor. Just not convinced we could not accomplish both now and have 3.01.
Why? Suh is a better player but don't think his game fits any better than Shelton's. Just MHO.
I think they were looking for a combo best starter for 18 and influence on whoever is drafted #1. I think it's pretty difficult to argue anyone available is a better fit than Taylor. You could argue there are better free agents, but will they be willing to mentor the rook? And a lesser talented QB would make it difficult to avoid repeating the mistake this team is prone to - rushing along the rook before it's time.
Not sure how anyone could be convinced of anything regarding our QB room/QB moves at the moment.
I am convinced that we finally have a competent starting QB on the roster.
lollers, first effing sentence
Unfortunately, that's Mike SLIVER. FakePeak said:
True, but it's also posted on another site by someone more credible. Can't cross-link, but I feel confident in my statement.
Even better....
Unless the Browns also traded for a 5th quarter, they's no way bringing in Landry to catch 100 balls helps 3 other receivers. Should have left it at helping the overall offense rather than going overboard.
News is that Dorsey is pushing hard for Solder right now. You know it's true when MKC piles on with her regurgitation of other's online work.
I think it'd be crazy to move Joe regardless, but especially if he plays lighter as he almost certainly would have to.
Man...the Cousins to Minny news today really must've done a number on you. I know he was your big FA get this off season, but to go from one extreme to another is a big shift. We may not see a lot of splashy big signings, but I think we'll get a few good ones and then some back up type players. I'd expect Pryor, T.Johnson, and maybe Solder - along with some nice role players. But to say we're not going to do anything? Buck-up little buckaroo!! Things are just getting started!
For the most part. He doesn't turn the ball over and has done well with little around him. I still see him as a bridge QB, but he could surprise some people. He didn't have a lot of WR talent in Buff, so having Gordon, Landry, Njoku, and Duke (along with another WR - Pryor?, and RB FA) - this could be the best supporting cast Tyrod has had around him. As long as he makes smart football decisions and doesn't turn the ball over he will do just fine.
Sure he did: Watkins, Woods, Hogan, Goodwin, Matthews, Benjamin, Zay Jones, McCoy, Clay - most of those guys went on to be much better once they got away from Taylor.
Not saying anything bad about Buff talent, just my opinions. The bolded I'll give you, but the others are iffy. McCoy and Clay benefited the most from Taylor.
Not sure how you can say that about Cleveland, specifically Coleman when you look at the QBs they (he) had.
Not a fan of Coleman. I think he was a wasted pick, definitely not as good as advertised. He hasn't come along much at all and is barely a role player on a WR starved team. For being a 1st rnd pick, that's not too good. I'd be shocked if he is on the team when training camp starts. I think he'll be traded between now and the draft.
Jets and Bills have the biggest need left. Sounds like the Jets are going to go after Teddy and the Bills are looking to leap into the top 5 of the draft (hello, Browns).
Was just coming to post the same thing. Doors are closing quickly for the FA QBs.
It's starting to look that way isn't it. I think Hill or Hyde may be in the cards for CLE, along with a rookie RB. Take a QB at 1 and then either take Chubb or trade #4 is how I see it playing out. As much as I like Barkley, I do think you need to get a QB first and then look at the next hole to fill. DE may be a luxury at 4, which is why I think they'll trade out (Buff maybe?) and try to fill multiple holes in the 1st (Ridley?, McGlinchey?, Vea?, Payne? J. Jackson?). I wouldn't be upset with Guice, or even K.Johnson, if Barkley isn't the selection.
Would love to see McCown back here as a backup. LOVE I SAID! He is a player coach at this point with more coach than player left in the tank.
QB + Chubb IMO. Made room ditching Shelton, I'd rather not trade out of it but if the deal is good you can't pass it up. Pick up Guise in the 2nd if he's still around.
You can probably say goodbye to Orchard or Nassib with this pick up. May not be a starter, but solid depth.
Well, when you don't sign the only available QB that makes you a playoff contender, your philosophy has to change a bit. You can't spend all the cap space yet if you are gonna draft a QB at 1 and not be able to really win for a year or two.Peak said:
Is there an OT worth signing in the 1st? We just signed a beast from DEN, rather not waste a 1st rounder on OL unless he's a stud.
