Yes. Favorites win more than half the time, but less than all the time.Serious question, wasn't HC also a favorite to win the general?
Yes. Favorites win more than half the time, but less than all the time.Serious question, wasn't HC also a favorite to win the general?
Been going on since W and Obama. Nothing new here.Doesnt matter...pivot to stock market and unemployment...forget about cuts to social programs and exploding deficits.
Yes Obama dod at the start to spend out of a recession. Then lower towards the end. Now during expansion...blowing it up even worse than before is not a good thing.Been going on since W and Obama. Nothing new here.
I think you’re missing the point here, by comparing Bernie to Hillary. Instead, compare him to Obama: Obama’s coalition included white union workers and suburban women. In 2016, these two groups abandoned Hillary in large numbers in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Trump won. In order for the Democrats to win this time we need them back. And they won’t come back for Bernie.I see Bernie doing better than Hillary in 2016 vs. Trump (percentage of votes and/or turnout) in the following demographic categories:
1. People under 35 years old
2. Minorities
3. White, rural voters (although a demographic Trump will still win, Bernie will perform better than Hillary due to being more of outsider, a populist, and being perceived to be more trustworthy than Hillary)
I really don't see a Demographic where Bernie will do worse than Hillary in a sizable way.
Bernie has some advantages over Obama:I think you’re missing the point here, by comparing Bernie to Hillary. Instead, compare him to Obama: Obama’s coalition included white union workers and suburban women. In 2016, these two groups abandoned Hillary in large numbers in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Trump won. In order for the Democrats to win this time we need them back. And they won’t come back for Bernie.
As far as young people go: my daughter and all Her friends will vote for Bernie, assuming they show up to vote at all. To which I say, so what? If we win California by another 2 million votes, how does that help us?
For worse. America won't be voting in Socialism regardless of all the lipstick you put on it. Socialism is still a pig.After tonight’s debate, I’m more certain than
ever that Bernie will be the nominee, for better or worse
Wait....is he a socialist or a communist? You need to pick a lane here...zig zagging back and forth lends itself to some obvious credibility issues.For worse. America won't be voting in Socialism regardless of all the lipstick you put on it. Socialism is still a pig.
While I agree that America won't vote for a self-described socialist, Bernie is 100% correct that we already have socialism and corporate America is the biggest piglet sucking on the teat of America.For worse. America won't be voting in Socialism regardless of all the lipstick you put on it. Socialism is still a pig.
Socialism is the stepping stone to communism.Wait....is he a socialist or a communist? You need to pick a lane here...zig zagging back and forth lends itself to some obvious credibility issues.
No way. In a society where the politicians control the means of production we can absolutely trust those politicians to always act in the best interest of the people.Socialism is the stepping stone to communism.
They're almost interchangeable so it doesn't really matter if we talk about socialism or communism. No need to pick a lane since they both occupy the same lane. That would be the far left lane.
It's worse. Much worse. Dems should have kicked Bernie out of the party. I think any of the current candidates, but him, beats Trump.After tonight’s debate, I’m more certain than
ever that Bernie will be the nominee, for better or worse
I'm not so sure about that. I'm looking around for a reliable, electable non-Socialist candidate to get behind, and I'm not sure there is one. Biden? Bloomberg? Pete? They all have major flaws.It's worse. Much worse. Dems should have kicked Bernie out of the party. I think any of the current candidates, but him, beats Trump.
True, forgot about Warren. She wouldn't beat him.I'm not so sure about that. I'm looking around for a reliable, electable non-Socialist candidate to get behind, and I'm not sure there is one. Biden? Bloomberg? Pete? They all have major flaws.
Never thought I'd find myself longing for a John Kerry type.
He rocks the blue suit too often.True, forgot about Warren. She wouldn't beat him.
What major flaw does Pete have?
All the polling says that you are incorrect.It's worse. Much worse. Dems should have kicked Bernie out of the party. I think any of the current candidates, but him, beats Trump.
Good luck with that.I have zero concerns about Bernie in the general. He's going to crush Trump. He's consistently beat him in head to head polling for about 5 years now, and that's also with 5 years worth of bleating about all the scary "socialism" from both the centrist Dems and Republicans. I just hope you all appreciate all of the nice things the younger generations are going to fight for on your behalf.
This will end up being a bigger misfire than your 'Ameer Abdullah looks like the next Barry Sanders' take.I have zero concerns about Bernie in the general. He's going to crush Trump. He's consistently beat him in head to head polling for about 5 years now, and that's also with 5 years worth of bleating about all the scary "socialism" from both the centrist Dems and Republicans. I just hope you all appreciate all of the nice things the younger generations are going to fight for on your behalf.
The Democrats have big policy wants. It's really about the legislature and executive for them. Judges are a Republican issue because of what is in their purview.If the Democrats don't wake up and realize it's all about the judges then the things they value are done.
Which doesn't mean #### if a Republican Senate doesn't even vote on anything and a Republican President just uses EOs to do what he wants. Once the courts back them up then what? Bernie Sanders isn't going to turn America communist in 4 years. 4 more years of a Republican president and Senate will hurt the Democratic cause more then Sanders ever would.The Democrats have big policy wants. It's really about the legislature and executive for them. Judges are a Republican issue because of what is in their purview.
Oh, I was assuming that you worried more about electable candidates than the judges they'd appoint. I totally agree with you that they'd need a D Pres and a D Congress to get what they want done. But my point was simply: they've already achieved what they want to in the courts if we're being fair in our assessment of judicial philosophy. Now it's time to make legislative hay, one would figure.Which doesn't mean #### if a Republican Senate doesn't even vote on anything and a Republican President just uses EOs to do what he wants. Once the courts back them up then what? Bernie Sanders isn't going to turn America communist in 4 years. 4 more years of a Republican president and Senate will hurt the Democratic cause more then Sanders ever would.
Surely you know that a big reason of why they abandoned Hillary in Wisconsin and Michigan is that Bernie won those states primaries and they felt he should have gotten the nomination.I think you’re missing the point here, by comparing Bernie to Hillary. Instead, compare him to Obama: Obama’s coalition included white union workers and suburban women. In 2016, these two groups abandoned Hillary in large numbers in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Trump won. In order for the Democrats to win this time we need them back. And they won’t come back for Bernie.
As far as young people go: my daughter and all Her friends will vote for Bernie, assuming they show up to vote at all. To which I say, so what? If we win California by another 2 million votes, how does that help us?
I've heard "pant suit" jokes for the last 25 years or so, some of them quite funny, I could deal with this.He rocks the blue suit too often.
They aren't interchangeable....as I said before....you take "the view" up far enough and everything looks similar. That, however, is a dishonest approach IMO. Though it is absolutely a popular approach.Socialism is the stepping stone to communism.
They're almost interchangeable so it doesn't really matter if we talk about socialism or communism. No need to pick a lane since they both occupy the same lane. That would be the far left lane.
In fairness, the folks he's ran against have been afraid of alienating his voters. They haven't laid a glove on him, much less tore into him the way the Republican attack machine will. He may survive it, I'm not writing Bernie off by any means against Trump. But if he wins, he's going to win while essentially having to step onto the debate stage wearing a hammer and sickle jacket while singing the Soviet national anthem. The oppo stuff is out there and there will be no hesitation to use it the way there has been up to this point come the general.I have zero concerns about Bernie in the general. He's going to crush Trump. He's consistently beat him in head to head polling for about 5 years now, and that's also with 5 years worth of bleating about all the scary "socialism" from both the centrist Dems and Republicans. I just hope you all appreciate all of the nice things the younger generations are going to fight for on your behalf.
In fact, the most dire H2H polling (from Emerson College) shows that Sanders is the only Democratic candidate who beats Trump.All the polling says that you are incorrect.
Until last night Bloomberg was the only one favored over Trump head to head in the betting markets.In fact, the most dire H2H polling (from Emerson College) shows that Sanders is the only Democratic candidate who beats Trump.
This is just unconscionably wrong. How many times have they been asked on a debate stage about whether a "socialist" can win, or is the right person to be leading the party? Bloomberg finally borrowed from the MSNBC talking head / Trump playbook (what a weird combination, right?) and dropped the "c" word last night. What is this mythical oppo research going to be that's so much worse than what the media has been writing about him since 2015? His "honeymoon" to the USSR? His words 30 years ago about Castro or the Sandinistas? The sex story thing he wrote 40 years ago?In fairness, the folks he's ran against have been afraid of alienating his voters. They haven't laid a glove on him, much less tore into him the way the Republican attack machine will. He may survive it, I'm not writing Bernie off by any means against Trump. But if he wins, he's going to win while essentially having to step onto the debate stage wearing a hammer and sickle jacket while singing the Soviet national anthem. The oppo stuff is out there and there will be no hesitation to use it the way there has been up to this point come the general.
Also, I don't get all the comments Bernie backers give about fighting on your behalf. I get I'm not the target market because I don't want nor need this greater good all one big pot thing he preaches. But even to folks on the left or Democrats who aren't Bernie supporters now, what does that earn you? It's a pretty condescending tone to take with someone you need for your coalition. It's basically saying since they don't support you that you know what's better for people than they do themselves.
FWIW, here was an interaction between Bloomberg's campaign manager and a former Hillary adviser wrt oppo research on Bernie:The oppo stuff is out there and there will be no hesitation to use it the way there has been up to this point come the general.
Kevin Sheekey (TEXT MIKE TO 80510) @ksheekey
The opposition research on @BernieSanders could fill @realDonaldTrump’s empty Foxconn facility in Wisconsin. It is very damaging, perhaps even disqualifying.
Peter Daou @peterdaou
FOR THE RECORD: This is an absolute fabrication about #Bernie. And I was in a position to see ALL the oppo in 2016.
Sure, #Bernie has policy weaknesses and bad votes. And yes, in 2016/2017, I thought the socialism/communism stuff would be damaging, and I said so. But the landscape has changed dramatically since then and there are no big surprises waiting.
I do think that. I have much more respect for the younger Trump voters than the older ones. The olders ones have had 20-30-40 years to get it right; yet they're constantly willing to lay their perceived faults in the country at the feet of the youth.This is just unconscionably wrong. How many times have they been asked on a debate stage about whether a "socialist" can win, or is the right person to be leading the party? Bloomberg finally borrowed from the MSNBC talking head / Trump playbook (what a weird combination, right?) and dropped the "c" word last night. What is this mythical oppo research going to be that's so much worse than what the media has been writing about him since 2015? His "honeymoon" to the USSR? His words 30 years ago about Castro or the Sandinistas? The sex story thing he wrote 40 years ago?
Bernie has been vetted extensively for years. I highly doubt there's some secret knockout blow that Trump is holding in reserve. If it existed, you could be damn sure that the Centrist wing of the Democratic party would have already used it.
As for your other paragraph, it won't be a popular opinion I'm sure, but the highlighted is right for me. I do think the younger generations fighting for Medicare For All, living wages, worker rights, addressing climate change, and getting money out of politics know what's better for you. We've got ample evidence that all of these are fundamental problems with our society, and they are FAR from new problems.
Nearly every other country has figured out healthcare. Study after study after study from leading economists show that decreases in income inequality in capitalist systems lead to greater economic growth and opportunity for everyone. Our own history is marked by the literal lives that were expended in securing better working conditions for everyone against the wishes of the those protecting the existing system. Damn near every climate scientist across the entire world has been yelling at anyone who will listen that we have to do something now or we're screwed down the road.
Despite all of this, the older generations of this country have shown zero interest or ability in solving these problems. Forgive me if I'm a bit sick of playing nice on these issues for the sake of appeasing hurt feelings. They're too important, and at this point we're going to try to do something about it whether people like you will ever agree or not.
National polls showed Hillary winning the popular vote by 2-4 points and she won by 2.1 points. There were some issues in certain swing states where pollsters underrepresented white people without a college degree, one of Trump's best demographics--since then, many pollsters have started re-weighting results by educational attainment to fix that problem.Why are people using polling data to bolster arguments? Didn't we learn in 2016 that polling data is garbage especially when Trump is involved?
Could you imagine thoWhy would everyone have no money? I'm not proposing a tube that sucks money into outer space as one of the social safety nets.
If you think Mike Bloomberg and the powder puff "hits" the Democratic candidates have tried on him is equivalent to what he will face I don't think there's anything I can say. Republican political history, and I assume you have that knowledge, tends to say otherwise. I've always thought Bernie's win equity was non-zero. Most years I wouldn't say that, but Trump and Bernie are both unique figures. I think Trump is the favorite and it's going to be a rough, rough ride along the way. Much rougher than what we've seen so far. Regardless of who wins the Trump/Bernie finals, the next 4 1/2 years are gonna be some really nasty times. To the point it's pretty laughable people talk about how bad the tone has been the past 3+ years. It's not getting any better regardless of who wins, but that's off topic and irrelevant.This is just unconscionably wrong. How many times have they been asked on a debate stage about whether a "socialist" can win, or is the right person to be leading the party? Bloomberg finally borrowed from the MSNBC talking head / Trump playbook (what a weird combination, right?) and dropped the "c" word last night. What is this mythical oppo research going to be that's so much worse than what the media has been writing about him since 2015? His "honeymoon" to the USSR? His words 30 years ago about Castro or the Sandinistas? The sex story thing he wrote 40 years ago?
Bernie has been vetted extensively for years. I highly doubt there's some secret knockout blow that Trump is holding in reserve. If it existed, you could be damn sure that the Centrist wing of the Democratic party would have already used it.
As for your other paragraph, it won't be a popular opinion I'm sure, but the highlighted is right for me. I do think the younger generations fighting for Medicare For All, living wages, worker rights, addressing climate change, and getting money out of politics know what's better for you. We've got ample evidence that all of these are fundamental problems with our society, and they are FAR from new problems.
Nearly every other country has figured out healthcare. Study after study after study from leading economists show that decreases in income inequality in capitalist systems lead to greater economic growth and opportunity for everyone. Our own history is marked by the literal lives that were expended in securing better working conditions for everyone against the wishes of the those protecting the existing system. Damn near every climate scientist across the entire world has been yelling at anyone who will listen that we have to do something now or we're screwed down the road.
Despite all of this, the older generations of this country have shown zero interest or ability in solving these problems. Forgive me if I'm a bit sick of playing nice on these issues for the sake of appeasing hurt feelings. They're too important, and at this point we're going to try to do something about it whether people like you will ever agree or not.
I was just grateful she covered up those cankles.I've heard "pant suit" jokes for the last 25 years or so, some of them quite funny, I could deal with this.
Sometimes what seems like a devastating hit turns out not to matter a whole lot to the electorate. A candidate with a loyal and committed base can potentially withstand negatives that seem unthinkable. There were probably a dozen revelations in 2016 that seemed like they would obviously kill the Trump campaign based on conventional political wisdom.If you think Mike Bloomberg and the powder puff "hits" the Democratic candidates have tried on him is equivalent to what he will face I don't think there's anything I can say.
On this I think you're 100% right. The loyal base on either side is not going to be swayed by any kind of attack. I think Sanders is a huge threat to Trump from that loyal following standpoint. I do think his being the opponent opens doors back up for Trump with suburban women, and especially in a state like PA that's basically two large cities, huge swaths of rural areas, and pockets of union voters who he won in 2016 but needs to find a way again. Just as Trump shook up the map some, it's foolish to not think Bernie has that potential.Sometimes what seems like a devastating hit turns out not to matter a whole lot to the electorate. A candidate with a loyal and committed base can potentially withstand negatives that seem unthinkable. There were probably a dozen revelations in 2016 that seemed like they would obviously kill the Trump campaign based on conventional political wisdom.
My impression is that Sanders has some of the same untouchability that Trump has. If he gets the nomination I guess we'll find out.
Time for the young to seize the moment. If not now when?Despite all of this, the older generations of this country have shown zero interest or ability in solving these problems. Forgive me if I'm a bit sick of playing nice on these issues for the sake of appeasing hurt feelings. They're too important, and at this point we're going to try to do something about it whether people like you will ever agree or not.
No way you can trust Bernie to stop at Socialism once he gets in. History proves time and time again that socialism is just a thinly veiled form of communism. They're cousins. One leads to the other.They aren't interchangeable....as I said before....you take "the view" up far enough and everything looks similar. That, however, is a dishonest approach IMO. Though it is absolutely a popular approach.
Genuine Question....on your estimation, what % of the policies ever proposed in the history of our country were achieved by a President alone exactly as he promised in his campaign? I appreciate the fear mongering and I know it's the goto for "the sides" but it's pretty silly. That we are talking about four more years of public education for those who want it as "socialism" is laughable as well. Populist? Sure....socialism? Not so much. Same with healthcare. An actual socialist platform will NEVER be accepted by the people of this country.No way you can trust Bernie to stop at Socialism once he gets in. History proves time and time again that socialism is just a thinly veiled form of communism. They're cousins. One leads to the other.
Come on...a giant wall that the people whom it affects most directly are going to gladly pay for....locking up your political rival the minute you have the power...., buying Greenland, Space Force?...…. Seems like there's been a few "crazy" ideas that got results.Find someone for 2024, get them as close to center as you can because once Trump is done independents will choose whoever is the closest to the center. 2020 is lost already. Get off all the disastrous ideas like illegal immigration and sanctuary cities, free everything, reparations, etc. Simply trying to grab votes with impossible and crazy ideas doesn't work.
I agree with you, but typically a candidate cant win elections by promising that his ideas will be rejected.Genuine Question....on your estimation, what % of the policies ever proposed in the history of our country were achieved by a President alone exactly as he promised in his campaign? I appreciate the fear mongering and I know it's the goto for "the sides" but it's pretty silly. That we are talking about four more years of public education for those who want it as "socialism" is laughable as well. Populist? Sure....socialism? Not so much. Same with healthcare. An actual socialist platform will NEVER be accepted by the people of this country.
Maybe....maybe not. I KNOW what I'm getting from Trump. The possibility of being able to reign Bernie in once he gets in is much more palatable.No way you can trust Bernie to stop at Socialism once he gets in. History proves time and time again that socialism is just a thinly veiled form of communism. They're cousins. One leads to the other.
I think its probably a mistake for Sanders to have proudly adopted the "Democratic Socialist" label. Too many people focus on semantics and are unable to scratch even a millimeter beneath the surface. Constant hammering of the word "socialism" will play big with the uneducated white demographic that Trump has ridden the past 4 years.Genuine Question....on your estimation, what % of the policies ever proposed in the history of our country were achieved by a President alone exactly as he promised in his campaign? I appreciate the fear mongering and I know it's the goto for "the sides" but it's pretty silly. That we are talking about four more years of public education for those who want it as "socialism" is laughable as well. Populist? Sure....socialism? Not so much. Same with healthcare. An actual socialist platform will NEVER be accepted by the people of this country.