B Maverick
Footballguy
Oh I am all for robot umps calling strikes. Just not a fan of drawing the lines to call an offside. Even is on. Me wearing a size 11 shoe should not be off just because the defender wears a size 6.They are making it to fine a point. And ignoring the spirit of the Law. I am saying don't draw the lines and just look at it. If he is not clearly off, then its onside.
But this is how it used to be and it sucked.
There was SO much more controversy. Take the controversy around the "he was only an inch offsides" decision people were talking about from the Euros and multiply it by 10 and that's how every major tournament was. It was just "player x got called offsides, but player y didn't and he was more offsides!". Just nothing but arguing about offsides calls for weeks.
A single ref can't even consistently decide what is "clearly" off from one call to another in the same game, much less different refs across different games. So then you have a scenario where any reasonably close offsides call is just a coin flip based on how the ref is arbitrarily feeling about a completely subjective thing, and then it inevitably gets compared to all the other coin flips where the ref decided to flip the coin the other way.
Anything in sports that can be changed from a subjective "how am I feeling about this today" whim to an empirical and binary result should, imo. I'll die on that hill. Same thing for balls/strikes in baseball. Just terrible.
But regardless, they can't win. You hate it one way, I hate it another.
