What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who will own pick 1.1? Chi. And then what? (1 Viewer)

If Chicago ends up with the #1 via Carolina I guarantee they take a QB.

Their rebuild for the last 3 years has led to this moment. If they don't reset their QB rookie contract clock now you may as well take the franchise away from the family because they don't deserve to play in the NFL anymore.

Because Fields ain't it.
I agree that's what they should do. Guess it comes down to the locker room. Is fields that well liked that players will give the new rookie a hard time. If the answer is no, trade fields. Even if it's yes, trade all the players that complain. You will absolutely get another first or two for JF for the future. Start the rookie QB contract over again and set up that rookie with multiple 1st round picks for years on the cheap deal.
Wait, what?
You don't think Fields in his 4th year would get top value back from teams like Was, ATL, Ten, TB, NE, NO, Sea?
If Washington traded TWO firsts for Justin Fields that would be it, I'd be a Ravens fan moving forward. And I just got finished putting up with 30 years of Dan Snyder.

And honestly, I doubt they'd even send a single 3rd rounder for Fields. They're not desperate enough. Maybe another team that is a QB away, but that's not Washington.
 
If Chicago ends up with the #1 via Carolina I guarantee they take a QB.

Their rebuild for the last 3 years has led to this moment. If they don't reset their QB rookie contract clock now you may as well take the franchise away from the family because they don't deserve to play in the NFL anymore.

Because Fields ain't it.
I agree that's what they should do. Guess it comes down to the locker room. Is fields that well liked that players will give the new rookie a hard time. If the answer is no, trade fields. Even if it's yes, trade all the players that complain. You will absolutely get another first or two for JF for the future. Start the rookie QB contract over again and set up that rookie with multiple 1st round picks for years on the cheap deal.
Wait, what?
You don't think Fields in his 4th year would get top value back from teams like Was, ATL, Ten, TB, NE, NO, Sea?
If Washington traded TWO firsts for Justin Fields that would be it, I'd be a Ravens fan moving forward. And I just got finished putting up with 30 years of Dan Snyder.

And honestly, I doubt they'd even send a single 3rd rounder for Fields. They're not desperate enough. Maybe another team that is a QB away, but that's not Washington.
There's a difference between being a QB away and believing you're a QB away. A GM just had to convince his owner that they are.
 
If Chicago ends up with the #1 via Carolina I guarantee they take a QB.

Their rebuild for the last 3 years has led to this moment. If they don't reset their QB rookie contract clock now you may as well take the franchise away from the family because they don't deserve to play in the NFL anymore.

Because Fields ain't it.
I agree that's what they should do. Guess it comes down to the locker room. Is fields that well liked that players will give the new rookie a hard time. If the answer is no, trade fields. Even if it's yes, trade all the players that complain. You will absolutely get another first or two for JF for the future. Start the rookie QB contract over again and set up that rookie with multiple 1st round picks for years on the cheap deal.
Wait, what?
You don't think Fields in his 4th year would get top value back from teams like Was, ATL, Ten, TB, NE, NO, Sea?
If Washington traded TWO firsts for Justin Fields that would be it, I'd be a Ravens fan moving forward. And I just got finished putting up with 30 years of Dan Snyder.

And honestly, I doubt they'd even send a single 3rd rounder for Fields. They're not desperate enough. Maybe another team that is a QB away, but that's not Washington.
A QB away from what?
 
If Chicago ends up with the #1 via Carolina I guarantee they take a QB.

Their rebuild for the last 3 years has led to this moment. If they don't reset their QB rookie contract clock now you may as well take the franchise away from the family because they don't deserve to play in the NFL anymore.

Because Fields ain't it.
I agree that's what they should do. Guess it comes down to the locker room. Is fields that well liked that players will give the new rookie a hard time. If the answer is no, trade fields. Even if it's yes, trade all the players that complain. You will absolutely get another first or two for JF for the future. Start the rookie QB contract over again and set up that rookie with multiple 1st round picks for years on the cheap deal.
Wait, what?
You don't think Fields in his 4th year would get top value back from teams like Was, ATL, Ten, TB, NE, NO, Sea?
If Washington traded TWO firsts for Justin Fields that would be it, I'd be a Ravens fan moving forward. And I just got finished putting up with 30 years of Dan Snyder.

And honestly, I doubt they'd even send a single 3rd rounder for Fields. They're not desperate enough. Maybe another team that is a QB away, but that's not Washington.
There's a difference between being a QB away and believing you're a QB away. A GM just had to convince his owner that they are.
We haven't even hired the next GM yet. And if he's interviewing promising that the Manders are a QB away, he's a dummy setting himself up for immediate failure.
 
If Chicago ends up with the #1 via Carolina I guarantee they take a QB.

Their rebuild for the last 3 years has led to this moment. If they don't reset their QB rookie contract clock now you may as well take the franchise away from the family because they don't deserve to play in the NFL anymore.

Because Fields ain't it.
I agree that's what they should do. Guess it comes down to the locker room. Is fields that well liked that players will give the new rookie a hard time. If the answer is no, trade fields. Even if it's yes, trade all the players that complain. You will absolutely get another first or two for JF for the future. Start the rookie QB contract over again and set up that rookie with multiple 1st round picks for years on the cheap deal.
Wait, what?
You don't think Fields in his 4th year would get top value back from teams like Was, ATL, Ten, TB, NE, NO, Sea?
If Washington traded TWO firsts for Justin Fields that would be it, I'd be a Ravens fan moving forward. And I just got finished putting up with 30 years of Dan Snyder.

And honestly, I doubt they'd even send a single 3rd rounder for Fields. They're not desperate enough. Maybe another team that is a QB away, but that's not Washington.
A QB away from what?
From making a run.

Washington is like >8 players away from being a playoff team IMO.
 
I'm a huge Fields guy, think he's a solid NFL starter, and that the Bears should trade the pick. Having said all that, 0% chance they could get two 1sts for Fields. Maybe two 2nds...maybe.
 
Here's the thing with Fields. He's 2 years max from needing a new contract and any QB a team takes in round 1 is 5 years from that date.

I think every NFL team with a shot at Williams, Maye, and Daniels would unequivocally prefer to roll the dice picking one of those guys over trading for Fields. Without question. I'm less sure on Nix and Penix but given that 5 years for cheap thing plus the fact that those 2 are already pretty mature and supposedly "NFL ready", I would expect most NFL GMs would prefer to roll the dice on those two above trading for Fields.

Once those 5 are off the board, then you might see offers for Fields (assuming the Bear took a QB with one of their 1st 3 picks).

I think it's probably 50/50 when you get to JJ McCarthy. He's kinda polarizing though, GMs will have a strong opinion one way or another and if they like him, then they'd pick him over Fields and if they didn't, they'd prefer to trade for Fields.

For the Bears, assuming they went Williams at 1.1, the BEST scenario for them is 5 or 6 QBs go day 1 or early into day 2. If someone like Atlanta didn't end up taking one, then they'd probably ship their next pick for him. So maybe they can get Atlanta's second. But I'd wager for the majority of teams, the most they'd give up is a 3rd for him.
 
I'm a huge Fields guy, think he's a solid NFL starter, and that the Bears should trade the pick. Having said all that, 0% chance they could get two 1sts for Fields. Maybe two 2nds...maybe.
6 Qbs go in round one then yeah, they can maybe swing that from a QB needy team before round 2. Maybe even if 5 go. Otherwise, I think it's a 3rd. It really will depend on how quickly the top QBs go. Honestly, 3 are locks and probably going in the first 10 picks, another 3 could easily go in the next 22 picks.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.

The bolded is highly questionable. Average yes. Above average only in fantasy.

Nobody knows for sure if any of those QBs will be great. Far from it. But they know for sure Fields isn't. If he was he wouldn't be on the trade block
 
Unless they sell the pick for a boatload, they would be better served to take MHjr and keep Fields. No way should they take Caleb Williams or any other QB with the 1.1. Hell, it would be another year of development needed to start all over and I don't think that is needed.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.

The bolded is highly questionable. Average yes. Above average only in fantasy.

Nobody knows for sure if any of those QBs will be great. Far from it. But they know for sure Fields isn't. If he was he wouldn't be on the trade block
He's in the average+ tier of QBs and while not great, I think his OC holds him back.

Bears coaching Staff is getting fired at the end of the year as well. In part because they can't figure out how to use one of the most athletic QBs in the NFL.

The idea of a new staff and shiny new QB is a great way for a GM to keep his job for a while and excite a fanbase, but it doesn't always work out and takes some luck.

The Bears have a good young core, cap space and draft capital. Screwing up a draft pick at QB would stop this rebuild in its tracks.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.

The bolded is highly questionable. Average yes. Above average only in fantasy.

Nobody knows for sure if any of those QBs will be great. Far from it. But they know for sure Fields isn't. If he was he wouldn't be on the trade block
He's in the average+ tier of QBs and while not great, I think his OC holds him back.
I don't hate Fields nor do I think his coaches are good nor do I know if they should move on from him, but his QBR which takes a good bit of that out of the formula has him ranked 23rd. Behind Howell and just ahead of Ridder and Pickett. And that's where I see his abilities. Whether CHI keeps him I don't care one bit. But when it comes to trade value, CHI fans pitching getting back two #1s for him is ludicrous. That's the only point I'm making. 2nd rounders, maybe. 2nd and a 3rd maybe. But #1s? I don't see it.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.

The bolded is highly questionable. Average yes. Above average only in fantasy.

Nobody knows for sure if any of those QBs will be great. Far from it. But they know for sure Fields isn't. If he was he wouldn't be on the trade block
He's in the average+ tier of QBs and while not great, I think his OC holds him back.
I don't hate Fields nor do I think his coaches are good nor do I know if they should move on from him, but his QBR which takes a good bit of that out of the formula has him ranked 23rd. Behind Howell and just ahead of Ridder and Pickett. And that's where I see his abilities. Whether CHI keeps him I don't care one bit. But when it comes to trade value, CHI fans pitching getting back two #1s for him is ludicrous. That's the only point I'm making. 2nd rounders, maybe. 2nd and a 3rd maybe. But #1s? I don't see it.
I agree with that. I think at best JF can fetch a late first from a playoff team looking for an upgrade who gets a bit desperate. Otherwise a 2nd rd pick plus another 2nd or 3rd is probably the right value.

If the Bears do pickup the 5th year option, its only 20mil which is decent value for a starting QB in the NFL.
 
Unless they sell the pick for a boatload, they would be better served to take MHjr and keep Fields. No way should they take Caleb Williams or any other QB with the 1.1. Hell, it would be another year of development needed to start all over and I don't think that is needed.

We've seen this play out both ways recently and neither turned out especially better than the other. In 2018 the Jags had Blake Bortles, who like Fields was a decent starter level QB but certainly not elite and probably not going to win them a Lombardi. They extended him on a somewhat discount contract (compared to top QB contracts at that time) and tried to build around him in the draft. DJ Chark was the best pick of that draft class. Then the next year, the Jags took Gardner Minshew in the 6th and it was bench time for Bortles.

On the other side of the coin you have the Redskins, who had a likewise quality starter but not elite QB in Rex Grossman (and then later, Alex Smith). They decided to go with the new shiny toy and draft RG3 and then Dwayne Haskins. Obviously neither really worked out.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I would take him as the starter on Pittsburgh
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I would take him as the starter on Pittsburgh
Ultimately, this is where I think he goes.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I would take him as the starter on Pittsburgh
I agree that multiple teams would view him as a trade up from their present situation. But the question is, at what price. Would you want Pittsburg to ship their 1st rounder to Chicago for him? I would guess no, but worth asking still IMO
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.

If I'm another team who seriously thinks myself in the SB window and the Bears are offering Fields to me for a 2nd or something like that, I'd happily take that. Even if it was only for a 2 year rental at $25MM per season (5th year option at $20MM and 2026 transition tag at $30MM). He's a plus backup QB and you could easily use him the way the Saints use Taysom Hill. Given the carnage in starting QBs this year, having a quality backup no longer seems like a luxury for a team with serious SB aspirations.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.

That first sentence is truth. Franchises don't want an average QB. And rarely do they even want good ones that didn't make it elsewhere. Franchises want and are right to look for a super bowl winning QB. And there are only 4-8 of those in the NFL. Everyone is hunting for the next one. That's the lure of Caleb, Drake, and Jayden.
 
If I'm another team who seriously thinks myself in the SB window and the Bears are offering Fields to me for a 2nd or something like that, I'd happily take that. Even if it was only for a 2 year rental at $25MM per season (5th year option at $20MM and 2026 transition tag at $30MM). He's a plus backup QB and you could easily use him the way the Saints use Taysom Hill. Given the carnage in starting QBs this year, having a quality backup no longer seems like a luxury for a team with serious SB aspirations.
You pay 25 mill for a backup QB, you are getting fired.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.

That first sentence is truth. Franchises don't want an average QB. And rarely do they even want good ones that didn't make it elsewhere. Franchises want and are right to look for a super bowl winning QB. And there are only 4-8 of those in the NFL. Everyone is hunting for the next one. That's the lure of Caleb, Drake, and Jayden.
I think it comes down to want vs need. Sure every franchise wants a top tier QB, but until they get one or are in position to get one, a quality starter is a need. When a team has a solid core of players they have to go get the best available QB. They can't always wait around for the franchise guy to come along. Right now, JF is going to be the best QB available to teams not drafting early. Assuming Cousins re-signs with Minny.

2-3 First round picks for a solid QB/homerun chance is the going rate. A 2nd round pick is a fair price for a young QB who a team wants to give a second chance to. Rosen, Darnold, Wentz are all recent examples.

Bears could even make a trade with a conditional pick that protects both sides. The Wentz trade turned into a future first.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I would take him as the starter on Pittsburgh
Ultimately, this is where I think he goes.
If I’m Chicago, I would deal with Atlanta before Pitt.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
How many of those QBs were the #1 overall pick though?

2009 - Matthew Stafford
2010 - Sam Bradford
2011 - Cam Newton
2012 - Andrew Luck
2015 - Jameis Winston
2016 - Jared Goff
2018 - Baker Mayfield
2019 - Kyler Murray
2020 - Joe Burrow
2021 - Trevor Lawrence

How many of those guys are busts? 2? 3? 70% are quality starter+
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
How many of those QBs were the #1 overall pick though?

2009 - Matthew Stafford
2010 - Sam Bradford
2011 - Cam Newton
2012 - Andrew Luck
2015 - Jameis Winston
2016 - Jared Goff
2018 - Baker Mayfield
2019 - Kyler Murray
2020 - Joe Burrow
2021 - Trevor Lawrence

How many of those guys are busts? 2? 3? 70% are quality starter+
I see 1 championship total and it wasn't even on the team who drafted him.

or another way to look at it... how many of those guys would you not trade for 3 first round picks if you had a decent starter?
 
Last edited:
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
How many of those QBs were the #1 overall pick though?

2009 - Matthew Stafford
2010 - Sam Bradford
2011 - Cam Newton
2012 - Andrew Luck
2015 - Jameis Winston
2016 - Jared Goff
2018 - Baker Mayfield
2019 - Kyler Murray
2020 - Joe Burrow
2021 - Trevor Lawrence

How many of those guys are busts? 2? 3? 70% are quality starter+
I see 1 championship total and it wasn't even on the team who drafted him.

or another way to look at it... how many of those guys would you not trade for 3 first round picks if you had a decent starter?
You’re not wrong. But, don’t you honestly wish they’d have drafted C.J. Stroud last year instead of trading the pick?

And I don’t know why I’m so interested in this. I guess it’s the team building aspect around the #1 pick.

Just feel like the Bears have such a unique opportunity here. It’s fascinating to me and I can’t wait to see what they do.
 
CBS crunched the numbers on first round QBs over the last 15 years.

45 total QBs went in that time frame. Only 11 turned out to be franchise level guys.

Another 10 or so are average to above QBs in the NFL.

50+% of first rd qbs don't live up to expectations.

Fields is an average to above average QB in the NFL.

Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
How many of those QBs were the #1 overall pick though?

2009 - Matthew Stafford
2010 - Sam Bradford
2011 - Cam Newton
2012 - Andrew Luck
2015 - Jameis Winston
2016 - Jared Goff
2018 - Baker Mayfield
2019 - Kyler Murray
2020 - Joe Burrow
2021 - Trevor Lawrence

How many of those guys are busts? 2? 3? 70% are quality starter+
I see 1 championship total and it wasn't even on the team who drafted him.

or another way to look at it... how many of those guys would you not trade for 3 first round picks if you had a decent starter?
You’re not wrong. But, don’t you honestly wish they’d have drafted C.J. Stroud last year instead of trading the pick?

And I don’t know why I’m so interested in this. I guess it’s the team building aspect around the #1 pick.

Just feel like the Bears have such a unique opportunity here. It’s fascinating to me and I can’t wait to see what they do.
Its hard to say. Without the trade, the Bears don't have DJ Moore, a starting RT (Wright) or starting CB (Stevenson). I love what Stroud has done, but the pessimistic Bears fan in me also thinks we wouldn't be seeing the same Stroud with the Bears.

I'm right there with you though, these are franchise altering opportunities and I wish I liked Williams more so I could feel good that picking a QB is the right move.

I'm probably also overvaluing future first rd picks should the Bears trade back because of the whole Panthers implosion.
 
Maybe I missed it, but haven't seen anyone bring up the fact they are likely due for a coaching change as well. I feel like the Fields vs. Williams decision would likely be leveraged as not just a decision for a new HC, but a way to entice a top level HC. Is there a better situation to walk into as a first year new HC than having the 1.01 and being able to shoot your shot? I mean is there a better way to get Ben Johnson to take an offer seriously? Or even perhaps maybe coax Jim Harbaugh out of college? Either of those cases I'd imagine they'd lean towards taking Williams/their guy over Fields. Unless they can get a god-father offer for 1.01 to trade back and really build out the team how they want.
Well the Panthers sure got it wrong when they tried. :bag:
 
Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
Who’s saying they’re sure to be better? The risk with a rookie contract is worth taking.
If I’m Chicago, I would deal with Atlanta before Pitt
Why? I think Atlanta is almost perfect for fields. But they’ll probably just take the best offer (unless maybe it’s from Minnesota but they probably don’t want him anyway). Or do you just mean for the higher pick?
 
Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
Who’s saying they’re sure to be better? The risk with a rookie contract is worth taking.
If I’m Chicago, I would deal with Atlanta before Pitt
Why? I think Atlanta is almost perfect for fields. But they’ll probably just take the best offer (unless maybe it’s from Minnesota but they probably don’t want him anyway). Or do you just mean for the higher pick?
Atlanta and Pittsburgh are absolutely the two teams that are going to be in the mix. Both are well out of contention to ge a top three qb in the draft, but Fields would be a nice consolation prize. If Chicago gets a first rounder, it will be there. I could see a deal like Atlanta's first for Fields and a fourth?
The most likely scenario is a second and third from one of those teams though.
 
A lot of wild off base stuff with Fields speculation IMO.

I think Fields trade value is probably like a third round pick and I feel extremely confident saying the Steelers would rather have PIckett and if Arthur Smith returns to Atlanta there is no way in hell he's going to put his job on the line with Fields.

I don't see any team trading for Fields to be their starting QB. At most he'll be part of a competition/backup.
 
could see a deal like Atlanta's first for Fields and a fourth?
The most likely scenario is a second and third from one of those teams though.

I wonder if Tampa didn’t want to stick with Baker if they’d give a 2 and a player like Diaby or Tyson-Soyinka.

Atlanta or Pittsburgh presumably could do a similar deal.
 
I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I agree with everything you are saying except as I just said in the post above I'm not sure he'd going be a starter in 2024. I just don't see an opening for him with the influx of rookie QB's that are about to hit. I think there is a good chance he'll be given an opportunity to compete for a starting job in 2024, just not a given.

And the Bears are drafting a QB in round one. Bet the farm, your house, your life, your soul, whatever. It's a stone cold lock and only mystery would be if they tried to take a non-traditional approach and take MHJ with their first pick and address QB with their second first round pick. I don't see this going down like this, but that's at least possible, running it back with Fields is not happening.
 
I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I agree with everything you are saying except as I just said in the post above I'm not sure he'd going be a starter in 2024. I just don't see an opening for him with the influx of rookie QB's that are about to hit. I think there is a good chance he'll be given an opportunity to compete for a starting job in 2024, just not a given.

And the Bears are drafting a QB in round one. Bet the farm, your house, your life, your soul, whatever. It's a stone cold lock and only mystery would be if they tried to take a non-traditional approach and take MHJ with their first pick and address QB with their second first round pick. I don't see this going down like this, but that's at least possible, running it back with Fields is not happening.
If that’s the case, they should sit him for the rest of the season. The worst thing that could happen is another injury.
 
Point being anyone who says Williams, Maye and/or Daniels are sure to be better than JF are just blowing smoke.
Who’s saying they’re sure to be better? The risk with a rookie contract is worth taking.
If they don't grade out higher than your current starting QB, a team isn't drafting them.

If the argument is a rookie contract outweighs the risk I'd agree that some GMs absolutely believe that.

I think a lot of GMs have extremely flawed approaches to team building and Poles may be one of them. I'm not sure yet.

I often wonder what SF would look like if they didn't draft Purdy and had Trey Lance starting this year. Probably bot even a playoff team. Point being that swing and a miss could easily have set that franchise back for many years, but they were bailed out with some outstanding luck.
 
A lot of wild off base stuff with Fields speculation IMO.

I think Fields trade value is probably like a third round pick and I feel extremely confident saying the Steelers would rather have PIckett and if Arthur Smith returns to Atlanta there is no way in hell he's going to put his job on the line with Fields.

I don't see any team trading for Fields to be their starting QB. At most he'll be part of a competition/backup.
I'm pretty sure the Falcons are trying to trade up for HarrisonJr
 
A lot of wild off base stuff with Fields speculation IMO.

I think Fields trade value is probably like a third round pick and I feel extremely confident saying the Steelers would rather have PIckett and if Arthur Smith returns to Atlanta there is no way in hell he's going to put his job on the line with Fields.

I don't see any team trading for Fields to be their starting QB. At most he'll be part of a competition/backup.
I'm pretty sure the Falcons are trying to trade up for HarrisonJr
Arthur Smith will use his as a kickoff returner and lead blocker for Tyler Algier
 
could see a deal like Atlanta's first for Fields and a fourth?
The most likely scenario is a second and third from one of those teams though.

I wonder if Tampa didn’t want to stick with Baker if they’d give a 2 and a player like Diaby or Tyson-Soyinka.

Atlanta or Pittsburgh presumably could do a similar deal.
Baker Mayfield is light years better than Fields and they aren’t trading a young EDGE player+ for someone else’s castoff.

Fields is worth a mid-late second or early third at best.
 
A lot of wild off base stuff with Fields speculation IMO.

I think Fields trade value is probably like a third round pick and I feel extremely confident saying the Steelers would rather have PIckett and if Arthur Smith returns to Atlanta there is no way in hell he's going to put his job on the line with Fields.

I don't see any team trading for Fields to be their starting QB. At most he'll be part of a competition/backup.
I'm pretty sure the Falcons are trying to trade up for HarrisonJr
Who would see 3-4 targets a game.
 
I think a lot of GMs have extremely flawed approaches to team building and Poles may be one of them. I'm not sure yet.
I’ve never been one to assume all GMs have good plans, but they’re probably better than the vast majority of us posting on a FF board.
Many just don’t develop players well.
 
Two more games. I expect Jax to walk over Carolina, but Tampa might be a problem since they might have clinched the South by than.
 
Current top 10:

Chi (Car)
Zona
Wash
NE
Tenn
LAC
NYG
Chi
NYJ
LV
Oooooh, bad drop by NE with that win.
Also, does NE's win clinch the 1st pick for Chicago? Strength of schedule is one of the tie breakers and Carolina is winning there because the south is so bad.
 
If Chicago ends up with the #1 via Carolina I guarantee they take a QB.

Their rebuild for the last 3 years has led to this moment. If they don't reset their QB rookie contract clock now you may as well take the franchise away from the family because they don't deserve to play in the NFL anymore.

Because Fields ain't it.
I agree that's what they should do. Guess it comes down to the locker room. Is fields that well liked that players will give the new rookie a hard time. If the answer is no, trade fields. Even if it's yes, trade all the players that complain. You will absolutely get another first or two for JF for the future. Start the rookie QB contract over again and set up that rookie with multiple 1st round picks for years on the cheap deal.
Yeah if you had come to me 8 weeks ago, I wasn’t convinced that the right move was to trade Fields. Now I’m 100% convinced that is the right move. If they can get a future 1st in return? Whoa baby look out for the Bears because that will be setting themselves up to become juggernauts in the near future.
 
Plenty of drafted QB bust, but none of the 2024 drafted QBs have busted yet.

I kinda feel like Fields is a bust. I'm extremely skeptical that he's still a starter in 2026. Maybe, but I don't think he's great a quarterbacking. Definitely elite at running but he's not the full package and I think everyone outside of Chicago thinks about the same as I do.
I would take him as the starter on Pittsburgh
I agree that multiple teams would view him as a trade up from their present situation. But the question is, at what price. Would you want Pittsburg to ship their 1st rounder to Chicago for him? I would guess no, but worth asking still IMO
I would not want the Steelers to trade a 1st for Fields. The Steelers are bad at protecting the QB so Fields will fail in Pittsburgh as well. The Steelers need to build up their O line and defense before worrying about QB. They’re not going anywhere in 2024 anyways.
 
Current top 10:

Chi (Car)
Zona
Wash
NE
Tenn
LAC
NYG
Chi
NYJ
LV
Oooooh, bad drop by NE with that win.
Also, does NE's win clinch the 1st pick for Chicago? Strength of schedule is one of the tie breakers and Carolina is winning there because the south is so bad.
Carolina would need to win out and Arizona lose out for the Bears to not get the first pick.

Carolina plays Jacksonville and Tampa. Two playoff teams.

Arizona plays Philly and Seattle... so probably two losses.
 
Yeah the Bears are pretty much a lock for the 1st pick. Their own pick though has dropped all the way from 2 early in the season to 8 with their recent habit of winning games.
 
Yeah the Bears are pretty much a lock for the 1st pick. Their own pick though has dropped all the way from 2 early in the season to 8 with their recent habit of winning games.
At least the 1.1 pick gives them options. Trade down and get the best OT and Nabers. Assuming you keep Fields of course.
Keep the pick and draft Williams, than best OT at their own pick.
Trade down a few times. Say with Washington, than the Raiders if they want a qb like Maye or Daniels.
As a Chicago fan. I love the spot they're in now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top