freelander
Footballguy
I don't buy this argument in most situations. To me as a fan, even though there is no chance in hell my team is coming back to win, I want them to try their hardest. Taking the losing teams starters out and "giving-in" is more demoralizing to the losin team then a "disruption" to the winning team if they do the same IMO. I'd rather they get injured trying to win a game then get injured when the game is well in hand.the craziest thing about those situations when NE is deep in the other team's territory during 'run it up' time, is they almost approach 4th down as if it were 3rd down. They already understand theyll be going for it on 4th if they dont make it on 3rd. Its not a matter of will they or wont they. Its a matter of what play will it be. My point being, that if they approached the 4th down situation like alot of teams do, where theyd be kicking a FG or punting, theyd be more aggressive on 3rd down. In those late 'run it up' situations, theyll typically run on 2nd and 3rd down. Theyre putting in the work on the ground. But theyre just not going to run it all 3 or 4 downs. Its just not happening. Theyre keeping the chains moving and keeping their D off the field. And even funniner, and Madden pointed this out during the broadcast, is that as soon as the other team gets the ball back, its not as if theyre no longer trying to score. Buffalo still had its starters in passing the ball in a meaningless game, trying to score, risking injury to its own starters. As did Washington. As did Miami. And as has every other team NE has been running it up on. The opponent is taking the same risks with its own starters leaving them on the field during meaningless times in these games and still trying to score. The same times NE is getting hammered for risking injury to its own players. Washington was down 52-0 with its starting QB still in the game! Why? Because he's paid to play football.
You guys are running it up...so live with it...